|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
SPECIAL REPORT |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Chemical science is a rich, broad, and thriving area of research that encompasses the traditional fields of chemistry and chemical engineering. It has the potential in the next decade both to transform itself, through fundamental breakthroughs in understanding of molecular phenomena, and to make substantial contributions to improving human life and the environment. Thus, the chemical sciences today offer many grand challenges that make it an exciting field to be working in and one that deserves the country's financial support. So proclaims a new report, "Beyond the Molecular Frontier: Challenges for Chemistry and Chemical Engineering," prepared under the auspices of the National Research Council's Board on Chemical Sciences & Technology (BCST). The report is intended to provide a snapshot of where research in the chemical sciences stands today and to offer a vision of how advances that seem possible in the near term could contribute to a brighter future. More than two years in the making, the report was prepared by a committee of 17 distinguished chemists and chemical engineers headed by Ronald Breslow, professor of chemistry at Columbia University, and Matthew V. Tirrell, dean of the college of engineering and professor of chemical engineering and materials at the University of California, Santa Barbara. The committee sought input from the broader chemical sciences community as well, and the report acknowledges more than 170 other contributors. "Chemistry and chemical engineering have tremendous breadth and tremendous importance for humanity," Breslow says. "Our report doesn't focus on a few central goals--is it more important to cure cancer or to prevent terrorism, to understand the chemistry of life or to develop computer methods to predict the properties of an unknown substance? Instead, we have presented a summary of the achievements and remaining challenges for our field over a great range of pure and applied science." "This report tries to present a vision of what the world could be like if we can make major progress on some of the grand challenges we lay out," Tirrell says. "It's possible to imagine a world substantially different from what we have now, based on progress that we think can be achieved in the next decade or so." The report's challenges are indeed grand. One, for example,
envisions being able to synthesize and manufacture any new substance
with high-yield, low-energy consumption and only benign "Beyond the Molecular Frontier" follows in the footsteps of three earlier National Research Council reports: two in chemistry and one in chemical engineering. The first of these appeared in 1965. Formally titled "Chemistry: Opportunities and Needs," it is usually referred to as the Westheimer Report after the chairman of the committee that prepared it, Harvard University chemistry professor Frank H. Westheimer.
"I think the whole community values a reflective look at the research and educational landscape periodically, and these reports provide an opportunity to do that," says Alice P. Gast, cochair of BCST and its liaison to the committee that prepared the report. Gast is a professor of chemical engineering and vice president for research at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The new report covers both chemistry and chemical engineering, which reflects one of the significant changes that has taken place in these fields since the 1980s. Both fields have broadened their scope, moving into areas such as biology, nanotechnology, and materials science. Even more apparent is the growing middle ground between what were once seen as the separate territories of chemists on the one hand and chemical engineers on the other. The two fields now make a nearly seamless whole, Tirrell points out. He suggests that they overlap more than some chemists realize. "Chemical engineers identify very strongly with fundamental research in areas like catalysis, polymers, and nanotechnology," he notes, and chemists do, as well. "There are not any sharp walls between these two fields," he says, "so philosophically, it makes sense to talk about them in one report." "The report reflects the chemical sciences themselves," says Jacqueline K. Barton, professor of chemistry at California Institute of Technology and a member of the report committee. "Like them, it has a multidisciplinary flavor, and there are so many different tentacles to it. I get excited and to some extent overwhelmed at how enormous this field is and how wide the impact is of what we do, from medicine to the environment to manufacturing. You can go on and on. Yet there's a thread of a molecular perspective that is in all of it, and I think this report well reflects that." One of the problems the chemical sciences sometimes face both with funding agencies and in attracting students, Barton suggests, is this multidisciplinary character. "Too often people say, 'I didn't know that was chemistry!' " she says, "whether we are talking about biotechnology or polymer work or nanosciences. It's all chemistry, and that's what this report is all about." Tirrell adds, "We hope the report will be seen as sophisticated enough to be inspirational and that it will provide adequate ammunition for those who are creating the exciting research agenda for the chemical sciences."
UNLIKE EARLIER reports, "Beyond the Molecular Frontier" doesn't make specific recommendations to federal agencies to increase their support of research in the chemical sciences. That was a deliberate decision on the committee's part, its cochairs say. They see the report as a resource to use in working with agencies that support this research. "The funding agencies draw on the same sources that we do to describe the research opportunities for the future," Tirrell says. "We don't think that the people in the Chemistry Division at the National Science Foundation, for example, need to be told most of the things that we say in this report. But we hope this document will put some powerful arguments in their hands to enable them to acquire and provide the support for the chemical sciences that we think they deserve." Breslow says, "I believe the report makes a convincing case that chemistry and chemical engineering have made huge contributions to civilization, and that the problems we will solve in the future--which we have listed as challenges--will deal with humanity's greatest needs." By making that case, he hopes the report will serve two purposes: to attract young people to the field and to lead the public and the government to support chemical research. The report is one part of a three-pronged effort by BCST to offer a new assessment of the chemical landscape. Another part is an eight-page "Challenges Brief," which Gast says is intended to make the highlights of the report more approachable for policymakers and the general public. The board also sponsored six three-day workshops that each focused on a particular area in which chemical research contributes to society. Reports from each workshop are the third part of the project. The first of these workshop reports, on national security and homeland defense, was published late last year. Over the next several months, reports will appear on materials and manufacturing, energy and transportation, health and medicine, information and communications, and the environment. The workshop reports have direct input from a broader segment of the chemical community than the larger report does, and they provide a more in-depth discussion of their particular areas. They are also specifically intended to provide federal agencies with information that can guide their R&D investment. Breslow, Tirrell, and perhaps other members of the committee will be visiting federal agencies that support chemical sciences research to bring the reports to their attention. "We think we can use the report as ammunition to support specific suggestions and requests," Breslow says. They hope that some of the organizations that sponsored the report--which include the American Chemical Society and the American Institute of Chemical Engineers--will find the report useful in their efforts, as well. The report's other sponsors are NRC, Department of Energy, NSF, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Environmental Protection Agency, National Institute of Standards & Technology, National Cancer Institute, Camille & Henry Dreyfus Foundation, and several chemical companies.
Breslow adds, "We hope our colleagues will look at the report and say that it makes the case for chemistry and chemical engineering very well and that it justifies all the effort that went into it." There are other potential audiences, as well. For Barton, "the most important audience is the young people we can get excited to join us. We wanted to produce something that high school teachers can turn to when they are thinking about what areas students should be excited about going into." Yet another important audience is the general public. "These are the people who put money in the hands of the agencies through the government," Tirrell points out. The grand challenges, in particular, are intended to both inspire and capture the imagination of the public. As Breslow explains, "We tried to write the challenges in such a way that the public, without reading the rest of the report, could look at them and say, 'This sounds pretty interesting. I didn't know that chemists were worrying about things like that.' " Although the report is being formally released on March 3, only "prepublication" copies are currently available, and those only online. The National Academies hopes to have some printed copies of the report in time for the spring national meetings of ACS and AIChE that take place later this month. The report is coming out at a time when its potential audience may be especially open to its message. "I believe we currently have a very important 'teachable moment,' as they call it," Gast says. "Both the public and policymakers are giving heightened attention to science and technology." That attention comes, in part, because of the many technological advances in areas like health care, microelectronics, energy, and transportation, she explains. In addition, national security and concerns about new forms of terrorism and weapons that involve chemical and biological agents are focusing attention on science and technology. "I think it's very important that our community find a voice to get the message out to policymakers and to the broader society on issues related to chemical sciences and chemical engineering," Gast says. "If we don't do it, nobody is going to do it for us." Copies of "Beyond the Molecular Frontier" will be available from the National Academies Press, 500--5th St., N.W., Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242; or online at http://www.nap.edu. BY THE BOOK Some Grand Challenges For Chemists And Chemical Engineers "Beyond the Molecular Frontier" presents its overriding themes in the form of grand challenges or broad opportunities for chemical professionals to make contributions of huge potential benefit to society. Those opportunities are presented here just as they appear in the report:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Chemical & Engineering News |
|||||||||||||||||||||