C&EN Classifieds
Home | This Week's Contents  |  C&EN ClassifiedsSearch C&EN Online

 
Millennium Special Report
C&EN 75th Anniversary Issue
 
Related Stories
EPA Nominees Snarled In Senate
[C&EN, June 4, 2001]

BRIEF HALF-LIFE FOR WASTE BILL
[C&EN, Apr. 17, 2000]

DOE scientist give cautions nod to Yucca nuclear dumpsite
[C&EN, Jan. 11, 1999]

Related Sites
EPA
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
E-mail this article to a friend
Print this article
E-mail the editor
 
 
 
 Table of Contents
 C&EN Classifieds
 News of the Week
 Cover Story
 Editor's Page
 Business
 Government & Policy
 Science/Technology
 Concentrates
  Business
  Government & Policy
  Science/Technology
 Education
 ACS News
 Calendars
 Books
 Digital Briefs
 ACS Comments
 Career & Employment
 Special Reports
 Letters
 Awards
 New Products
 Newscripts
 Nanotechnology
 What's That Stuff?
 Pharmaceutical Century

 Hot Articles
 Safety  Letters
 Chemcyclopedia

 Back Issues

 How to Subscribe
 Subscription Changes
 About C&EN
 Copyright Permission
 E-mail webmaster
NEWS OF THE WEEK
REGULATION
June 11, 2001
Volume 79, Number 24
CENEAR 79 24 pp. 6
ISSN 0009-2347
[Previous Story] [Next Story]

EPA Sets Yucca Mountain Radiation Limit

JEFF JOHNSON

EPA last week issued its final radiation exposure standard for Nevada's Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository. The standard is nearly identical to an August 1999 proposal criticized by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), the nuclear power industry, and pronuclear members of Congress as too rigorous. Environmental activists and others, however, said the standard was too lax (C&EN, April 17, 2000, page 27).

The standard sets a dose limit for exposure of no more than 15 millirem per year from all pathways and a groundwater standard of 4 millirem per year, the same level used for the Safe Drinking Water Act. EPA notes that an aquifer beneath the planned repository will likely serve nearby Las Vegas in the 10,000-plus years that the repository's spent nuclear fuel remains dangerous.

The groundwater standard's stringency has generated most of the opposition from industry groups as well as NRC and the National Academy of Sciences.

Although the standard is applauded by Congress members from Nevada, the Nuclear Energy Institute says it may sue. Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham calls the standards "tough and challenging" but says the Department of Energy can meet them. Later this year, Abraham will make his recommendation to the President as to whether DOE should continue work on the repository.

[Previous Story] [Next Story]



Top


Chemical & Engineering News
Copyright © 2001 American Chemical Society


C&EN Classifieds
Home | Table of Contents | News of the Week | Cover Story
Business | Government & Policy | Science/Technology
Chemical & Engineering News
Copyright © 2001 American Chemical Society - All Right Reserved
1155 16th Street NW • Washington DC 20036 • (202) 872-4600 • (800) 227-5558


CASChemPortChemCenterPubs Page