|
|
|
Back Issues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACS Members can sign up to receive C&EN e-mail newsletter.

|
|
|

Join ACS
|
|
|
|

March 22, 2004
Volume 82, Number 12
CENEAR 82 12 p. 9
ISSN 0009-2347
|
|
|
|
SECURITY RESEARCH
DHS REVISES RESEARCH PLAN
Political pressure leads to a reversal on national labs eligibility
LOIS EMBER
Leadership in the Department of Homeland Securitys (DHS) Science & Technology Directorate has bowed to political pressure and jettisoned a plan forged late last year to divvy up security research among the Department of Energys eight national laboratories.
Initially, the directorate assigned the five DOE weapons labsLawrence Livermore, Los Alamos, Oak Ridge, Pacific Northwest, and Sandiato its $120 million intramural program, making them eligible to compete for and carry out homeland-security-related classified research. Three other national labsArgonne, Brookhaven, and Idaho National Environmental & Engineeringwere assigned to the directorates $213 million extramural program and would have had to compete with the private sector for DHS contracts.
|
 |
|
McQueary
DHS PHOTO |
This two-tier plan was perceived as treating the intramural labs as special and placing theextramural labs at a funding disadvantage. Pressure from congressional delegations representing the three extramural labs spurred DHSs decision to allow all of the labs to compete equally for all homeland security research. House Science Committee Chairman Sherwood L. Boehlert (R-N.Y.), who represents Brookhavens district, called the reversal a big win ... for common sense.
But the reversal also glosses over a detriment. As Nancy B. Jackson, a Sandia manager, points out, This political infighting is what makes DHS so slow in getting programs started.
Much of DHSs R&D efforts are heavily weighted to near-term development and deployment of counterterrorism technologies. At a congressional hearing, Charles E. McQueary, DHS undersecretary for science and technology, admitted that basic research funding wasat least initiallybeing shortchanged. He noted that basic research funding would drop to $80 million in fiscal 2005 from its current level of $117 million. But, he said, the directorates research emphasis over time would evolve into more fundamental research and the funding would go back up.
|
|
Chemical & Engineering News
Copyright © 2004 American Chemical Society |
|
|
|
|
|