Environ. Sci. Technol., 40 (24), 7717 -7724, 2006. 10.1021/es061139y S0013-936X(06)01139-4
Web Release Date: November 1, 2006

Copyright © 2006 American Chemical Society

Quantum Chemical Calculations of Sulfate Adsorption at the Al- and Fe-(Hydr)oxide-H2O Interface-Estimation of Gibbs Free Energies

Kristian W. Paul,* James D. Kubicki, and Donald L. Sparks

Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, 152 Townsend Hall, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, and Department of Geosciences and Earth and Environmental Systems Institute, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802

Received for review May 12, 2006

Revised manuscript received August 4, 2006

Accepted August 15, 2006

Abstract:

Quantum chemical calculations were performed to estimate relative Gibbs free energies of sulfate adsorption on variably charged Al- and Fe-(hydr)oxide clusters. Inner-sphere bidentate bridging and monodentate adsorption were predicted to be exergonic on positively charged Al- and Fe-(hydr)oxides (ranging from -19 to -124 kJ mol-1). However, inner-sphere and H-bonded adsorption on neutral Al- and Fe-(hydr)oxides was predicted to be endergonic (ranging from +5 to +61 kJ mol-1). At the highest positive surface charge, bidentate bridging adsorption was most thermodynamically favorable. At intermediate positive surface charge, bidentate bridging and monodentate adsorption energies were equivalent on Al-(hydr)oxides; monodentate adsorption was more thermodynamically favorable on Fe-(hydr)oxides as compared with bidentate bridging adsorption. The predicted thermodynamic favorability of sulfate adsorption on Al- and Fe-(hydr)oxides was directly related to positive surface charge and indirectly related to the HO-/SO42- exchange stoichiometry, . Predicted Gibbs free energies of bidentate bridging and monodentate sulfate adsorption on an Fe-(hydr)oxide cluster (charge = +1, = 1) agreed reasonably well with published experimental estimates of sulfate adsorption on geothite (predicted values -34 and -52 kJ mol-1, respectively, and experimental range -36 to -30 kJ mol-1).


Download the full text: PDF | HTML