Web Release Date: February 23,
Morphology of Layered Silicate- (NanoClay-) Polymer Nanocomposites by Electron Tomography and Small-Angle X-ray Scattering





#
and

Materials and Manufacturing Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, AFRL/RXBP, 2941 Hobson Way, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433, UES Inc., Dayton, Ohio 45432, FEI Company, Hillsboro, Oregon 97124, Triune Software, Beavercreek, Ohio 45431, Innovative Management and Technology Services, Fairmount, West Virginia 26554, and Universal Technology Corporation, Dayton, Ohio 45432
Received October 5, 2007
Revised Manuscript Received December 19, 2007

Abstract:
A basis for quantitative analysis of layered silicate- (nanoclay-) polymer nanocomposite
morphology using two characterization methods, electron tomography and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS),
is provided. For tilt greater than 15
, the contrast of a single montmorillonite layer experimentally decreases
below the detectable limit of high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM). Calculations based on Z-contrast imaging of a 1 nm thick aluminosilicate layer predict this tilt angle
(15
) should produce 17% contrast, consistent with a reasonable limit of HAADF-STEM detection for this
system. This result implies that segmentation or thresholding of 2-dimensional Z-contrast projection images of
randomly oriented, highly anisotropic nanoparticles, such as layered silicates in polymer nanocomposites, will be
extremely inaccurate. For example, nearly 75% of the volume of montmorillonite layers in an epoxy matrix will
not be identified in the segmentation, owing to their orientation alone. Using electron tomography, this number
is reduced to below 15% and tomographic reconstruction reveals three-dimensional information. The corresponding
3D fast Fourier transformation (FFT) indicates that the image volume (10-1
m3) does not contain sufficient
distribution of local environments (interlayer correlation length ~ 16.1 nm) to directly correspond to the global
average as revealed by SAXS (scattering volume, 107
m3; interlayer correlation length ~ 12.3 nm). Nevertheless,
in contrast to SAXS, the tomographic reconstruction provides precise details of the distribution of morphological
features, in addition to statistical averages over the sample volume.
Download the full text: PDF | HTML