
Web Release Date: January 4,
Alcohol-Assisted Phosphine Catalysis: One-Step Syntheses of Dihydropyrones from Aldehydes and Allenoates
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, 607 Charles E. Young Drive East, Los Angeles, California 90095-1569
Received October 9, 2007
| Abstract: |
![]() |
5,6-Dihydro-2-pyrone moieties are present in many biological
metabolites, some of which exhibit desirable medicinal
properties,1 such as antitumor,1q antifungal,1l anti-HIV,1p anti-hepatitis C,1q,s and antibiotic1c activity. As a result of their
prevalence in medicinally useful compounds, there are many
reported syntheses of dihydropyrones, several of which have
been used successfully to prepare natural products. One such
approach involves standard acid-catalyzed lactonization,
following construction of the carbon framework.2 For
example, the nucleophilic opening of epoxides by propiolic
acid dianions and subsequent alkyne-to-alkene transformation
provides substrates suitable for lactonization.3 An alternative
approach toward dihydropyrones is the preparation of related
six-membered oxygen-containing heterocycles and subsequent functional group manipulation to install the carbonyl
group.4 These two methods are, however, quite inefficient
because they require the use of several sequential reactions;
a single-step, multicomponent coupling protocol would be
desirable.5 A more attractive methodology lies in the hetero-Diels-Alder reaction between Brassard's diene and an
aldehyde.6 Although this approach leads to the dihydropyrone
core in a single step, reasonable yields have been achieved
only when using the
In addition to exhibiting biologically important functions, 4-alkoxy-5,6-dihydro-2-pyrones are also synthetically useful: they can be efficiently transformed into hydroxypyrazoles,9a reduction of the carbonyl group provides a hydroxylated anomeric carbon for further functionalization,9c,d and they are converted to disubstituted 2,3-dihydro-4-pyrones upon addition of a nucleophile followed by acid hydrolysis.9e The synthetic utility of 5,6-dihydro-2-pyrones has also been demonstrated in several syntheses of polyether ionophore antibiotics.9b
Considering the many versatile and efficient methodologies that have emerged featuring phosphine-catalyzed annulations of electron-deficient allenes,10 we suspected that it might be possible to synthesize disubstituted dihydropyrones from allenoates. Previously, we reported the preparation of dioxanes and pyrones through nucleophilic phosphine-catalyzed additions of allenoates to aldehydes as effective electrophiles (Figure 1).11
| Figure 1 Divergent pathways for phosphine-catalyzed annulations of aldehydes with 2,3-butadienoates. |
Upon the addition of a phosphine to 2,3-butadienoate 1, a
phosphonium dienolate having s-trans stereochemistry, 2',
is formed favorably as a result of the stabilizing Coulombic
interaction between the partially anionic carbonyl group and
the phosphonium center (Scheme 1).12 Dioxanes result when
an aldehyde adds to this s-trans-dienolate, followed by the
addition of a second molecule of aldehyde and subsequent
6-exo-trig cyclization.11a Use of a more sterically bulky
phosphine destabilizes the s-trans-phosphonium dienolate
and shifts the equilibrium in favor of the s-cis isomer 2.11b
Upon addition of an aldehyde, the intermediate
-phosphonium enoate having an E-alkene geometry, 3, is formed,
allowing intramolecular lactonization. The alkoxide released
from the allenoate abstracts a proton to form an alcohol and
initiate a series of proton transfers that form the pyrone
product with regeneration of the phosphine catalyst.11b In a
different scenario, if the alkoxide generated upon lactonization adds conjugatively to the
-phosphonium enoate 4,
4-alkoxy-5,6-dihydro-2-pyrones can be formed after
-elimination of the phosphine catalyst. The presence of sterically
bulky phosphines, which are necessary for the generation
of s-cis-phosphonium dienolates, is believed, however, to
impede such Michael addition of the alkoxide. Therefore,
we needed an alternative means of influencing the equilibrium and inducing the formation of the s-cis-phosphonium
dienolate 2 (vs 2'); we hypothesized that adding an external
alcohol-to act as an electron donor toward the phosphonium
ion-would overcome the Coulombic attraction in the s-trans-isomer. This process would allow a smaller phosphine to
act as the catalyst and increase the concentration of the
Michael donor.
| Scheme 1. Possible Reaction Pathways |
Our initial experiments with alcohol additives were successful, displaying a modest induction of 4-alkoxy-5,6-dihydro-2-pyrone (Table 1).13 The added alcohol presumably
provided the necessary
disruption of the phosphonium-alkoxide electrostatic interaction in addition to possibly
hydrogen bonding to the dienolate alkoxide. Varying the
nature of the alcohol allowed us to fine-tune the nucleophilicity of the requisite Michael donor. The addition of
2-propanol and ethanol resulted primarily in dioxane products, presumably because the equilibrium favored the s-trans-phosphonium dienolate diastereoisomer (entries 1 and 2). We
also observed the noncyclized product 6 when using ethanol
as the additive. The addition of methanol provided the highest
total mass recovery and a significant reduction in the yield
of the dioxane product, albeit with a corresponding increase
in the amount of undesired noncyclized product 6 (entry 3).
Suspecting that the enhanced nucleophilicity of methanol
might have been responsible for the formation of the
noncyclized product, we hoped to encourage cyclization by
employing commercially available halogenated ethanol derivatives exhibiting increased acidity and diminished nucleophilicity (entries 4-9). Encouragingly, the relatively
poorer nucleophilicities of 2-fluoroethanol and 2-chloroethanol provided the desired dihydropyrone product 5 with
significantly reduced formation of the noncyclized product
6 (entries 4 and 5). Although it was gratifying that these
alcohols provided no dioxane product 7, the mismatch
between the ester and the added alcohols led to a mixture of
either MeO or XCH2CH2O groups incorporated in the
dihydropyrone product 5. The addition of 2,2-dichloroethanol
or 2,2,2-trichloroethanol led to no apparent consumption of
the starting material, presumably because of each alcohol's
excessive acidity (entries 6 and 7).14 The use of matched
2-chloroethyl and 2-fluoroethyl alcohols and allenoates
provided single dihydropyrones 5 and noncyclized products
6, but still with significantly lower mass recoveries compared
with that obtained using methanol (entries 8 and 9).
Therefore, for subsequent experiments we chose to use
methanol as the additive to induce dihydropyrone formation,
but we needed to find a way to suppress the formation of
the noncyclized product.
We suspected that the noncyclized product 6 resulted from
protonation of the benzylic alkoxide 3 and regeneration of
the catalyst through Michael addition of the alkoxide without
lactonization (Scheme 2).15 Considering that the intermediate
alkoxide 3 was necessary for lactonization, we reasoned that
protonation of the benzylic alkoxide by methanol might be
inhibiting the desired lactonization. We hypothesized that
addition of a base, allowing generation of methoxide in situ,
would encourage progress along the desired pathwa
| Scheme 2. Formation of the Dihydropyrones 5 and the Noncyclized Coupling Products 6 |
With this concept in mind, we added n-butyllithium to
generate lithium methoxide in situ (Table 2
). Although we
observed no noncyclized
Having determined optimized concentrations of methanol
and n-butyllithium, we proceeded to probe the scope of the
substrate for the formation of dihydropyrones (Table 3
).
Benzaldehydes possessing a variety of electron-withdrawing
substituents provided the desired dihydropyrones in good
yields (entries 1-7). Aromatic substitution in the meta
position was optimal, as exemplified by the reactions of
3-cyano-, 3-nitro-, and 3-trifluoromethylbenzaldehyde (entries 2, 4, and 6). Substitution at the ortho position, the most
sterically hindered site, was also tolerated, as exemplified
by the similar yields for the reactions of 4- and 2-trifluoromethylbenzaldehyde (entries 5 and 7). Consistent with the
results of previous allene/aldehyde annulations,11 the use of
more electron-rich aromatic aldehydes provided lower yields
(entries 8-10). 3-Pyridine carboxaldehyde had similar
reactivity, providing the corresponding substituted pyridine
in 44% yield.
In summary, 4-methoxy-6-aryl-5,6-dihydro-2-pyrones can
be assembled rapidly in one step from simple, bench-stable
starting materials in moderate to good yields. The generation
of dihydropyrones through these phosphine-catalyzed annulations of allenoates and aldehydes was facilitated by the
addition of alcohols and alkoxides. The presence of an added
alcohol allowed preferable formation of the s-cis-phosphonium dienolate and subsequent lactonization after its addition
to the aldehyde; the added alkoxide suppressed the formation
of a noncyclized three-component coupling product from the
allenoate, aldehyde, and alcohol. We are investigating several
applications of this protocol, including intramolecular variants using substrates incorporating aldehyde or alcohol
participants, enantioselective processes using chiral phosphines or alcohols, and increasing the product complexity
further through the use of
- and/or
-substituted allenoates.
This study was supported by the NIH (R01GM071779). We thank Dr. Xue-Feng Zhu for performing some initial experiments related to this work.
Representative experimental procedures and spectral data for all new compounds. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
* In papers with more than one author, the asterisk indicates the name of the author to whom inquiries about the paper should be addressed.
1. (a) Page, C. B.; Pinder, A. R. J. Chem. Soc. 1964, 4811.
(b) McInnes,
A. G.; Yoshida, S.; Towers, G. H. N. Tetrahedron 1965, 21, 2939.
(c)
Argoudelis, A. D.; Zieserl, J. F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1966, 7, 1969.
(d) Cavill,
G. W. K.; Clark, D. V.; Whitfield, F. B. Aust. J. Chem. 1968, 21, 2819.
(e)
Moss, M. O.; Robinson, F. V.; Wood, A. B.; Paisley, H. M.; Feeney, J.
Nature 1968, 220, 767.
(f) Evans, R. H., Jr.; Ellestad, G. A.; Kunstmann,
M. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1969, 10, 1791.
(g) Kirson, I.; Glotter, E.; Abraham,
A.; Lavie, D. Tetrahedron 1970, 26, 2209.
(h) Kimura, Y.; Katagiri, K.;
Tamura, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1971, 12, 3137.
(i) Govindachari, T. R.;
Parthasarathy, P. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1971, 12, 3401.
(j) Ellestad, G. A.;
McGahren, W. J.; Kunstmann, M. P. J. Org. Chem. 1972, 37, 2045.
(k)
Jewers, K.; Davis, J. B.; Dougan, J.; Manchanda, A. H.; Blunden, G.; Kyi,
A.; Wetchapiana, A. H. Phytochemistry 1972, 11, 2025.
(l) Yasui, K.;
Tamura, Y.; Nakatani, T.; Kawada, K.; Ohtani, M. J. Org. Chem. 1995,
60, 7567.
(m) Murakami, N.; Wang, W.; Aoki, M.; Tsutsui, Y.; Sugimoto,
M.; Kobayashi, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 2349.
(n) Boyer, F. E.;
Vara Prasad, J. V. N.; Domagala, J. M.; Ellsworth, E. L.; Gajda, C.; Hagen,
S. E.; Markoski, L. J.; Tait, B. D.; Lunney, E. A.; Palovsky, A.; Ferguson,
D.; Graham, N.; Holler, T.; Hupe, D.; Nouhan, C.; Tummino, P. J.; Urumov,
A.; Zeikus, E.; Zeikus, G.; Gracheck, S. J.; Sanders, J. M.; VanderRoest,
S.; Brodfuehrer, J.; Iyer, K.; Sinz, M.; Gulnik, S. V.; Erickson, J. W. J.
Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 843.
(o) F
tima, Â.; Kohn, L. K.; Antônio, M. A.;
Carvalho, J. E.; Pilli, R. A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005, 13, 2927.
(p) Li, H.;
Tatlock, J.; Linton, A.; Gonzalez, J.; Borchardt, A.; Dragovich, P.; Jewell,
T.; Prins, T.; Zhou, R.; Blazel, J.; Parge, H.; Love, R.; Hickey, M.; Doan,
C.; Shi, S.; Duggal, R.; Lewis, C.; Fuhrman, S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2006, 16, 4834.![]()
2. (a) Spino, C.; Mayes, N.; Desfossés, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37,
6503.
(b) Lokot', I. P.; Pashkovskii, F. S.; Lakhvich, F. A. Chem. Heterocycl.
Compd. 2001, 37, 707.![]()
3. (a) Carlson, R. M.; Oyler, A. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1974, 25, 2615.![]()
4. (a) Dujardin, G.; Rossignol, S.; Brown, E. Synthesis 1998, 763.
(b)
Harris, J. M.; O'Doherty, G. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 183.
(c)
Yamashita, Y.; Saito, S.; Ishitani, H.; Kobayashi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 3793.![]()
5. (a) Midland, M. M.; Graham, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106,
4294.
(b) Togni, A. Organometallics 1990, 9, 3106.
(d) Du, H.; Zhao, D.; Ding,
K. Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 5964.
(e) Fan, Q.; Lin, L.; Liu, J.; Huang, Y.;
Feng, X.; Zhang, G. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2185.![]()
6. (a) Midland, M. M.; Graham, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106,
4294.
(b) Togni, A. Organometallics 1990, 9, 3106.
(d) Du, H.; Zhao, D.; Ding,
K. Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 5964.
(e) Fan, Q.; Lin, L.; Liu, J.; Huang, Y.;
Feng, X.; Zhang, G. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2185.![]()
7. Pierres, C.; George, P.; van Hijfte, L.; Ducep, J.-B.; Hibert, M.; Mann,
A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 3645.![]()
8. (a) Reid, E. B.; Ruby, W. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951, 73, 1054.
(b)
Dugger, R. W.; Heathcock, C. H. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 1181.
(c) Fan,
R.; Hudlicky, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 5533.
(d) Schlessinger, R. H.;
Gillman, K. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 1257.
(e) Audrain, H.;
J
rgensen, K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 11543.
(f) Reddy, M. V.
R.; Brown, H. C.; Ramachandran, P. V. J. Organomet. Chem. 2001, 624,
239.![]()
9. (a) Ayoub, M. T.; Shandala, M. Y.; Gussba Bashi, G. M. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1981, 697.
(b) Faul, M. M.; Huff, B. E. Chem. Rev.
2000, 100, 2407.
(c) Ghosh, A. K.; Wang, Y.; Kim, J. T. J. Org. Chem.
2001, 66, 8973.
(d) Mulzer, J.; Öhler, E. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 3753.![]()
10. (a) Zhang, C.; Lu, X. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 2906.
(b) Zhu, G.;
Chen, Z.; Jiang, Q.; Xiao, D.; Cao, P.; Zhang, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
119, 3836.
(d) Xu, Z.;
Lu, X. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 5031.
(e) Xu, Z.; Lu, X. Tetrahedron Lett.
1999, 40, 549.
(f) Kumar, K.; Kapur, A.; Ishar, M. P. S. Org. Lett. 2000,
2, 787.
(g) Kumar, K.; Kapoor, R.; Kapur, A.; Ishar, M. P. S. Org. Lett.
2000, 2, 2023.
(h) Ung, A. T.; Schafer, K.; Lindsay, K. B.; Pyne, S. G.;
Amornraksa, K.; Wouters, R.; Van der Linden, I.; Biesmans, I.; Lesage, A.
S. J.; Skelton, B. W.; White, A. H. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 227.
(i) Liu,
B.; Davis, R.; Joshi, B.; Reynolds, D. W. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 4595.
(j)
Du, Y.; Lu, X.; Yu, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 8901.
(k) Lu, C.; Lu, X.
Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4677.
(l) Wang, J.-C.; Krische, M. J. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5855.
(m) Zhu, X.-F.; Lan, J.; Kwon, O. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 4716.
(n) Du, Y.; Lu, X. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 6463.
(p) Jung, C.-K.;
Wang, J.-C.; Krische, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 4118.
(q) Wurz,
R. P.; Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 12234.
(r) Zhao, G.-L.; Shi,
M. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 3686.
(s) Zhu, X.-F.; Henry, C. E.; Kwon,
O. Tetrahedron. 2005, 61, 6276.
(t) Tran, Y. S.; Kwon, O. Org. Lett. 2005,
7, 4289.
(u) Wilson, J. E.; Fu, G. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45,
1426.
(v) Nair, V.; Biju, A. T.; Mohanan, K.; Suresh, E. Org. Lett. 2006,
8, 2213.
(x)
Jean, L.; Marinetti, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 2141.
(y) Virieux, D.;
Guillouzic, A.-F.; Cristau, H.-J. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 3710.
(z) Scherer,
A.; Gladysz, J. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 6335.
(aa) Xia, Y.; Liang,
Y.; Chen, Y.; Wang, M.; Jiao, L.; Huang, F.; Liu, S.; Li, Y.; Yu, Z.-X. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 3470.
(bb) Mercier, E.; Fonovic, B.; Henry, C.
E.; Kwon, O.; Dudding, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 3617.
(dd) Wallace, D. J.;
Sidda, R. L.; Reamer, R. A. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 1051.
(ee) Henry, C.
E.; Kwon, O. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3069.
(ff) Cowen, B. J.; Miller, S. J. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 10988.
(gg) Tran, Y. S.; Kwon, O. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2007, 129, 12632.
(hh) Sriramurthy, V.; Barcan, G. A.; Kwon, O. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 12928.![]()
11. (a) Zhu, X.-F.; Henry, C. E.; Wang, J.; Dudding, T.; Kwon, O. Org.
Lett. 2005, 7, 1387.
(b) Zhu, X.-F.; Schaffner, A.-P.; Li, R. C.; Kwon, O.
Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2977.
(c) Dudding, T.; Kwon, O.; Mercier, E. Org. Lett.
2006, 8, 3643.![]()
12. Zhu, X.-F.; Henry, C. E.; Kwon, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129,
6722
and references cited therein.
13. The immediate
-elimination of the phosphine, following the
conjugate addition of the alkoxide, was a faster reaction relative to the
synthesis of the 2-pyrone. The former reactions were complete within 30
min at room temperature (cf. 48 h at 60
C for the pyrone). No reaction
occurred in the absence of a phosphine catalyst.
14. The zwitterions formed after the addition of trimethylphosphine to
enones can be protonated and isolated as a phosphonium salts following
the addition of hydrochloric acid. See: Stewart, I. C.; Bergman, R. G.;
Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 8696.![]()
15. (a) Table of pKa values compiled by D. H. Ripin and D. A. Evans,
for Chem 206, accessed online at http://daecr1.harvard.edu/pdf/evans_pKa_table.pdf. (b) Table of pKa values compiled by R. Williams, W. P.
Jencks, and F. H. Westheimer, accessed online at www.webqc.org/pkaconstants.php. (c) Dalby, K. N.; Kirby, A. J.; Hollfelder, F. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1993, 1269.
a See the Supporting Information for a detailed experimental procedure.b Data from ref 15.c Isolated yields.d The alkene stereochemistry was
exclusively E (NOESY NMR spectroscopy).e Both methoxide and the
2-haloethoxide were incorporated as
-substituents (OR2) in 5 and 6.
yieldb (%)
entry
solvent
MeOH (equiv)
n-BuLi (equiv)
5a
6ac
1
CHCl3
2.0
1.0
37
2
CH2Cl2
2.0
0.0
51
18
3
CH2Cl2
2.0
1.0
71
4
CH2Cl2
1.5
1.0
61
5
CH2Cl2
1.0
1.0
49
6
CH2Cl2
3.0
1.0
62
11
7
CH2Cl2
1.25
0.25
58
4
8
CH2Cl2
3.0
2.0
64
9
CH2Cl2
4.0
3.0
52
10
CH2Cl2
4.0
2.0
66
11
CH2Cl2
6.0
3.0
59
a See the Supporting Information for a detailed experimental procedure.b Isolated yields.c Stereochemistry of the alkene was exclusively E (NOESY NMR spectroscopy).
entry
Ar
product
yielda (%)
1
4-NCC6H4
5b
68
2
3-NCC6H4
5c
83
3
4-O2NC6H4
5d
40
4
3-O2NC6H4
5e
74
5
4-CF3C6H4
5f
63
6
3-CF3C6H4
5g
74
7
2-CF3C6H4
5h
58
8
C6H5
5i
37
9
3-MeC6H4
5j
36
10
3-MeOC6H4
5k
36
11
3-pyridyl
5l
44
a Isolated yields.