Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on February 27, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/4/889    most recent
deh173v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (28)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bigelow, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Colombo, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bigelow, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Colombo, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 19, No. 4, 889-892, April 2004
© 2004 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Mucus observations in the fertile window: a better predictor of conception than timing of intercourse

Jamie L. Bigelow1, David B. Dunson2,7, Joseph B. Stanford3, René Ecochard4, Christian Gnoth5 and Bernardo Colombo6

1 Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 2 Biostatistics Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, 3 Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah, USA, 4 Service de Biostatistiques, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire, Lyon, France, 5 Department of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Staedtische, Kliniken Duesseldorf gGmbH, Frauenklinik Benrath, Duesseldorf, Germany and 6 Department of Statistics, University of Padua, Padua, Italy

7 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: dunson1{at}niehs.nih.gov

BACKGROUND: Intercourse results in a pregnancy essentially only if it occurs during the 6-day fertile interval ending on the day of ovulation. The strong association between timing of intercourse within this interval and the probability of conception typically is attributed to limited sperm and egg life times. METHODS: A total of 782 women recruited from natural family planning centres in Europe contributed prospective data on 7288 menstrual cycles. Daily records of intercourse, basal body temperature and vaginal discharge of cervical mucus were collected. Probabilities of conception were estimated according to the timing of intercourse relative to ovulation and a 1–4 score of mucus quality. RESULTS: There was a strong increasing trend in the day-specific probabilities of pregnancy with increases in the mucus score. Adjusting for the mucus score, the day-specific probabilities had limited variability across the fertile interval. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in mucus quality across the fertile interval predict the observed pattern in the day-specific probabilities of conception. To maximize the likelihood of conception, intercourse should occur on days with optimal mucus quality, as observed in vaginal discharge, regardless of the exact timing relative to ovulation.

Key words: Bayesian analysis/cervical mucus/day-specific pregnancy probabilities/menstrual cycle/ovulation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.J. Keulers, C.J.C.M. Hamilton, A. Franx, J.L.H. Evers, and R.S.G.M. Bots
The length of the fertile window is associated with the chance of spontaneously conceiving an ongoing pregnancy in subfertile couples
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1652 - 1656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. B. Stanford and D. B. Dunson
Effects of Sexual Intercourse Patterns in Time to Pregnancy Studies
Am. J. Epidemiol., May 1, 2007; 165(9): 1088 - 1095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
Y. Andersch-Bjorkman, K. A. Thomsson, J. M. Holmen Larsson, E. Ekerhovd, and G. C. Hansson
Large Scale Identification of Proteins, Mucins, and Their O-Glycosylation in the Endocervical Mucus during the Menstrual Cycle
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, April 1, 2007; 6(4): 708 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. B. Stanford and D. D. Federman
The biology of human sex differences.
N. Engl. J. Med., July 6, 2006; 355(1): 98 - 98.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stat Methods Med ResHome page
R. Ecochard
Heterogeneity in fecundability studies: issues and modelling
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, April 1, 2006; 15(2): 141 - 160.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Stat Methods Med ResHome page
H. Zhou
Statistical models for human fecundability
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, April 1, 2006; 15(2): 181 - 194.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
S.S. Suarez and A. A. Pacey
Sperm transport in the female reproductive tract
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2006; 12(1): 23 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Gnoth, E. Godehardt, P. Frank-Herrmann, K. Friol, J. Tigges, and G. Freundl
Definition and prevalence of subfertility and infertility
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2005; 20(5): 1144 - 1147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
D. B. Dunson, J. L. Bigelow, and B. Colombo
Reduced Fertilization Rates in Older Men When Cervical Mucus Is Suboptimal
Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 2005; 105(4): 788 - 793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
I. Brosens, S. Gordts, M. Valkenburg, P. Puttemans, R. Campo, and S. Gordts
Investigation of the infertile couple: when is the appropriate time to explore female infertility?
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2004; 19(8): 1689 - 1692.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.