
Web Release Date: June 28,
Hydrogels Formed by Multiple Peptide Ligation Reactions To Fasten Corneal Transplants


and
Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Chemistry, Metcalf Center for Science and Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, and Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710
Received March 7, 2006
Revised May 31, 2006
Abstract:
A stable cross-linked hydrogel was formed under mild aqueous conditions using pseudoproline peptide ligation chemistry. A cysteine-terminated lysine dendron containing four cysteines and a PEG macromolecule modified with terminal ester aldehydes were prepared. Upon mixing, the two macromers gave a stable hydrogel. This hydrogel along with sutures was used to successfully secure a corneal transplant in vitro.
Mild chemoselective reactions with biomacromolecules are
of significant interest and of widespread use in chemistry,
biology, and more recently in nano-biotechnology. Such reactions can afford bioconjugates for characterization of native
functions (e.g., electron-transfer proteins) (1), attachment to solid
substrates (e.g., chemiluminescence biosensor applications) (2),
preparation of biohybrid structures (e.g., derivatized bacteriophage) (3), and introduction of new activity (e.g., photoresponsive membrane channels) (4). Of these reactions, chemical
ligation is a particularly attractive approach to prepare large
proteins that are otherwise unattainable using conventional solid-phase peptide synthesis (5-8)
Pseudoproline formation is one type of chemoselective and
orthogonal peptide ligation method that has been applied
successfully to the synthesis of a variety of proteins (5, 6, 10,
11)
| Figure 1 (top) Reaction scheme for pseudoproline ligation to form cross-linked hydrogel. (bottom) poly(ethylene glycol) diester-aldehyde and N-terminal cysteine lysine dendron macromers. |
Upon mixing an aqueous solution of the poly(ethylene glycol)
diester-aldehyde and dendron macromers, a hydrogel (18, 19)
300 nm (see Figure 4A).
The hydrogel formed between the dendron and poly(ethylene
glycol) diester-aldehyde is stable and retains its shape and size
over time. As shown in Figure 3, this pseudoproline-cross-linked
hydrogel remains intact for more than 6 months with less than
a 10% change in weight when placed in a humidity chamber.
At six months the value for compressive modulus is
90% of
the original value, indicating that an extensive network is still
present. This result is in contrast to a hydrogel formed between
the dendron and poly(ethylene glycol) dialdehyde (9). In this
later reaction, a hydrogel is formed via formation of multiple
thiazolidines. This reaction represents the first half of the
reaction sequence shown in Figure 1. Given that thiazolidine
formation is reversible, the hydrogel is intact for relatively short
periods. When placed in a humidity chamber, the thiazolidine-cross-linked hydrogel loses its original cylindrical shape and is
an unstructured gelatinous mass at approximately one week (see
Figure 3). Confirmation of the thiazolidine and the pseudoproline
ligations was obtained using a model small molecular weight
system in a manner analogous to that previously reported (see
SI) (20).
We are interested in the design requirements and properties
of hydrogels as sealants for the repair of ophthalmic wounds
created as a result of injury, infection, or surgical procedure
(21-25)
Corneal transplantation or penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) is
one of the most common and successful tissue transplants (27).
In a corneal transplantation the recipient cornea undergoes a
large circular full-thickness cutting, or trephination, to remove
the diseased or damaged tissue and then a previously trephinated
donor corneal button is manually sutured to the recipient corneal
rim. The major disadvantages related to this procedure include
delayed visual recovery, suprachoroidal hemorrhage, neovascularization, microbial keratitis, postoperative suture removal
(typically nine-months after transplantation), and surgically
induced astigmatism (28-31)
Toward this goal, we determined whether this in situ
polymerizing hydrogel would reduce the number of sutures
necessary to secure the incision between the host and graft
corneal tissue. In this in vitro model, an 8 mm central corneal
trephination was made in an enucleated eye and then this newly
formed button was autografted back to the original eye. The
host-graft tissue interface was secured using sutures, sutures
plus the hydrogel sealant, or the hydrogel sealant alone (Figure
4). The leaking pressure for the autografted eyes was measured
as we have done for corneal laceration studies to determine the
extent to which the wound was sealed (9). The leaking pressure
for autografts receiving 16 interrupted 10-0 nylon sutures was
13 ± 5 mmHg (n = 4). Today, this is a standard procedure for
a PKP. Normal intraocular pressure (IOP) is
15 mmHg. When
the hydrogel sealant was applied (33 wt %; 60
L) to the sutured
wound with 16 interrupted sutures, the leaking pressure
increased to 63 ± 7 mmHg (n = 4). Increasing the macromer
wt % to 50% (60
L) with 16 interrupted sutures afforded a
leaking pressure of 101 ± 5 mmHg (n = 4). Next, we evaluated
if the hydrogel sealant in concert with 8 interrupted 10-0 nylon
sutures would secure the wound. The autograft with 8 sutures
had a leaking pressure of 5 mmHg or less (n = 4). When the
hydrogel sealant at 33wt % % (60
L) and 8 sutures were used
to secure the autograft, the wound leaked at a pressure of 45 ±
6 mmHg (n = 4). This leaking pressure approaches the upper
bounds of the physiologically relevant limit, and thus we decided
to increase the wt % of the polymers to attain a stronger seal.
Application of the 50 wt % formulation (60
L) and 8 sutures
afforded an autograft that leaked at a pressure of 77 ± 5 mmHg
(n = 4). Application of the hydrogel sealant reduced the number
of sutures required to secure the autograft. We were unable to
secure the autograft to a safe high pressure when the hydrogel
sealant was used alone, indicating that this hydrogel does not
possess sufficient adhesivity by itself to secure a PKP. However,
an additional benefit to this hydrogel sealant, beyond closing
the wound with a reduced number of sutures, is the potential
of the hydrogel barrier formed at the wound interface to protect
the wound from postoperative infections. As a first indicator
for the potential effectiveness of this hydrogel barrier, the
transport of India ink across the hydrogel can be monitored as
described by McDonnell (35). As shown in Figure 4D when
India ink is applied to the wound, the dye does not penetrate
into the anterior chamber, indicating that the wound interface
is secured.
In summary, an in situ polymerizing hydrogel is described
that forms in aqueous solution under mild conditions. This
chemical-ligation strategy is attractive for hydrogel preparation
since it allows synthetic flexibility in the use of a wide-range
of macromer compositions, including potentially those with
reactive groups, in a manner analogous to the reaction diversity
obtained with previous bioconjugated proteins and enzymes. The
hydrogel can be used in conjunction with a reduced number of
sutures to successfully fasten a corneal transplant and secure
the wound interface. The dendron macromer used in hydrogel
formation belongs to a family of dendritic macromolecules
composed of biocompatible building blocks (21, 22)
This work was supported by the NIH.
Experimental details. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mgrin@bu.edu.
Boston University.
Duke University Medical Center.
1. Gray, H. B., and Winkler, J. R. (2003) Electron tunnelling through
proteins. Q. Rev. Biophys. 36, 341-372.
2. Pande, R., et al. (1996) A biotinylated undecylthiophene copolymer
bioconjugate for surface immobilization: Creating an alkaline
phosphatase chemiluminescence-based biosensor. Bioconjugate Chem.
7, 159-164.
3. Hooker, J. M., Kovacs, E. W., and Francis, M. B. (2004) Interior
surface modification of bacteriophage ms2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126,
3718-3719.
4. Banghart, M., et al. (2004) Light activated ion channels for remote
control of neuron firing. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 1381-1386.
5. Liu, C. F., Rao, C., and Tam, J. A. (1996) Orthogonal ligation of
unprotected peptide segments through pseudoproline formation for
the synthesis of hiv-1 protease analogues. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118,
307-312.
6. Tam, J. P., Xu, J., and Eom, K. D. (2001) Methods and strategies
of peptide ligation. Biopolymers 60, 194-205.
7. Shao, J., and Tam, J. P. (1995) Unprotected peptides as building
blocks for the synthesis of peptide dendrimers with oxime, hydrazone, and thiozolidine linkages. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 3893-3899.
8. Dawson, P. E., et al. (1994) Synthesis of proteins by native chemical
ligation. Science 266, 766-778.
9. Wathier, M., et al. (2004) Dendritic macromers as in situ polymerizing biomaterials for securing cataract incisions. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
126, 12744-12745.
10. Liu, C. F., and Tam, J. P. (1994) Chemical ligation approach to
from a peptide bond between unprotected peptide segments: Concepts and model study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116, 4149-4153.
11. Tam, J. P., and Miao, Z. (1999) Stereospecific pseudoproline
ligation of n-terminal serine and thereonine, or cysteine-containing
unprotected peptides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 9013-9022.
12. Fréchet, J. M. J. (2002) Dendrimers and supramolecular chemistry.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 4782-4787.
13. Newkome, G. R., Moorefield, C. N., and Vögtle, F. (1996) Dendritic molecules: Concepts, syntheses, perspectives, VCH, New York.
14. Bosman, A. W., Janssen, H. M., and Meijer, E. W. (1999) About
dendrimers: Structure, physical properties, and applications. Chem.
Rev. 99, 1665-1688.
15. Mathews, O. A., Shipway, A. N., and Stoddart, J. F. (1998)
Dendrimers-branching out from curiosities into new technologies.
Prog. Polym. Sci. 23, 1-56.
16. Zeng, F., and Zimmerman, S. C. (1997) Dendrimers in supramolecular chemistry: From molecular recognition to self-assembly.
Chem. Rev. 97, 1681-1712.
17. Tomalia, D. A., and Fréchet, J. M. J. (2001) Dendrimers and other dendritic polymers, Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester.
18. Park, K., Shalaby, S. W. S., and Park, H. (1993) Biodegradable hydrogels for drug delivery, p 252, Technomic Publishing, Lancaster, PA.
19. Hubbell, J. A. (1996) In situ material transformation in tissue
engineering. Mater. Res. Soc. Bull. 21, 33-35.
20. Liu, C. F., and Tam, J. P. (1994) Peptide segment ligation strategy
without the use of protecting groups. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
91, 6584-6588.
21. Grinstaff, M. W. (2002) Biodendrimers: New polymeric materials
for tissue engineering. Chem. Eur. J. 8, 2838-2846.
22. Luman, N. R., Kim, T., and Grinstaff, M. W. (2004) Dendritic
polymers composed of glycerol and succinic acid: Synthetic
methodologies and medical applications. Pure Appl. Chem. 76,
1375-1385.
23. Carnahan, M. A., et al. (2002) Hybrid dendritic-linear polyester-ethers for in situ photopolymerization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 5291-5293.
24. Velazquez, A. J., et al. (2004) New dendritic adhesives for
sutureless ophthalmic surgeries: In vitro studies of corneal laceration
repair. Arch Ophthalmol. 122, 867-870.
25. Kang, C., et al. (2005) Novel tissue adhesives to secure laser in
situ keratomileusis flaps. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 31, 1208-1212.
26. Records, R. E. (1979) Physiology of the human eye and visual system, p 691, Harper & Row, Cambridge.
27. NIH (2004) NIH Eye Institute. www.NIE.NIH.gov.
28. Volker-Dieben, H. J. M., et al. (1982) Different influences on
corneal graft survival in 539 transplants. Acta Ophthalmol. 60, 190-202.
29. Paque, J., and Poirier, R. H. (1977) Corneal allograft reaction
and its relationship to suture site neovascularization. Ophthalmic
Surg. 8, 71-74.
30. Wilson, S. E., and Kaufman, H. E. (1990) Graft failure after
penetrating keratoplasty. Surv. Ophthalmol. 34, 325-356.
31. Khodadoust, A. A. (1973) The allgraft rejection reaction: The leading cause of late failure of clinical corneal grafts. Corneal graft failure, pp 151-164, Elsevier Scientific, New York.
32. Gradle, H. S. (1921) The present status of keratoplasty. Am. J.
Ophthalmol. 4, 895-899.
33. Katzin, H. M. (1945) Aqueous fibrin fixation of corneal tranplants
in the rabbit. Arch. Ophthalmol. 35, 415-420.
34. Goins, K. M., Khadem, J., and Majmudar, P. A. (1998) Relative
strength of photodynamic biological tissue glue in penetrating
keratoplasty in cadaver eyes. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 24, 1566-1570.
35. McDonnell, P. J., et al. (2003) Dynamic morphology of clear
corneal cataract incisions. Ophthalmology 110, 2342-2348.![]()