
Web Release Date: September 30,
Light-to-Chemical Energy Conversion in Lamellar Solids and Thin Films
Department of Chemistry, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
Received May 14, 2005
Abstract:
Photocatalytic water splitting by visible light is one of the most difficult and persistent challenges in chemistry. This Forum Article reviews progress in this field, focusing on efforts made in our laboratory to control electron- and energy-transfer reactions, and catalytic hydrogen and oxygen evolution, in lamellar solids and thin films.
As the cost and environmental impact of fossil fuels continues to rise, the development of new strategies for converting sunlight to chemical energy has become an increasingly compelling problem for chemists. The photolysis of water could potentially produce stored chemical energy in the form of clean hydrogen from an abundant, renewable resource. Photoassisted water electrolysis using ultraviolet (UV) light was demonstrated over 30 years ago by Fujishima and Honda,1 and more recently oxide photocatalysts for efficient overall water splitting by UV light have been discovered.2 However, photochemical water splitting by visible light, which was described a decade ago as one of the "holy grails" of chemistry,3 remains a difficult challenge today.
A generic artificial photosynthetic system is sketched in Scheme 1. Rapid energy transfer between antenna molecules funnels excitation to a photoredox center, which pumps electrons from the donor to the acceptor side of a chain of redox molecules. The sensitizer box may consist of an individual molecule, a semiconductor particle, or a dye-sensitized semiconductor particle. At the ends of this chain, catalytic reactions occur so that the transiently stored energy of an electron-hole pair is permanently stored in energetic chemical products. Although very many molecular and supramolecular systems have been created to carry out parts of this overall reaction scheme, so far there are very few examples (outside of natural photosynthesis) of visible-light-driven chemical transformations that store useful amounts of free energy.
| Scheme 1. Artificial Photosynthesis |
This Forum Article discusses our efforts to design and construct hybrid organic-inorganic photosystems that attack this problem at several levels. We seek first to develop lamellar solids, redox assemblies in porous solids, and ordered thin films that position molecules in a vectorial fashion, with the precision needed to control energy- and electron-transfer rates. These molecules absorb visible light and transfer excitation energy and electrons, resulting in long-lived (microsecond to millisecond) charge separation. By coupling one end of the photoredox chain to nanoparticle catalysts, we have demonstrated photochemical hydrogen evolution from nonsacrificial electron donors, as well as efficient oxygen evolution in sacrificial systems. The remaining major challenge is to couple both ends of the photoredox chains to catalysts that can turn over faster than back electron transfer occurs. Possible routes to such systems are described at the conclusion of this Forum Article.
Thermodynamically, the water-splitting reaction (1) is
uphill by 1.23 V and should, in principle, be readily
accomplished by using visible light and an appropriate
photocatalyst. The thermodynamics of photocatalysis have
been considered in detail by Bolton et al., who concluded
that the overall water splitting at 10-15% energy conversion
efficiency (assuming a quantum efficiency of 100% and a
single-band-gap absorber)

Important questions to ask in the design of visible-light
water-splitting photocatalysts are, why is the quantum
efficiency of the current systems so poor and what is needed
to increase it to the level of semiconductor photoelectrochemical systems, which are typically 50-90%? The answer
may be found by examining the results of studies on
hydrogen- and oxygen-evolving half-cell photosystems, or
so-called sacrificial photosystems. In these cases, the sensitizer in Scheme 1 is coupled to an electron relay and
catalyst in only one direction, to produce hydrogen or
oxygen. The photogenerated electron or hole on the sensitizer
is removed irreversibly by a sacrificial acceptor or donor,
respectively, which rapidly decomposes to products that do
not interfere with the photocatalytic half-reaction. Typical
sacrifical donors are reducing agents such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid or triethanolamine, whereas sacrificial
acceptors are oxidizing agents such as persulfate. In cases
where the excited state of the sensitizer is quenched by
electron transfer to/from the sacrificial reagent, the quantum
yield for hydrogen or oxygen evolution can be quite high
(40-70%).7,8
It follows that successful photosystems must maintain sensitzers, electron relays, and catalysts in the proper spatial arrangement and chemical environment to prevent these recombination reactions. In natural photosystems, this is taken care of by the protein scaffolding that prevents contact between the wrong redox partners, by catalysts that are not good catalysts for reverse reactions (such as the reaction of oxygen with sugars), and by spatial compartmentalization of products. These natural assemblies are good examples of integrated chemical systems9 that function through an interlocking sequence of electron transfer and catalytic reactions. Our research efforts over the past 15 years, which are summarized below, have focused primarily on the development of material synthetic techniques to address the problem of spatial organization in artifical integrated chemical systems.
If one thinks of the problem of organizing photoredox molecules and catalysts into a linear chain, a lamellar arrangement (in which the components reside in an appropriate sequence of layers) provides the necessary spatial control, at least in the stacking direction. Early proof-of-concept experiments by Kuhn and Moebius10 illustrated this idea with Langmuir-Blodgett thin films. These studies also provided some of the first reliable measurements of the distance dependence of outer-sphere electron-transfer reactions. However, Langmuir-Blodgett films are metastable and are not sufficiently robust for photocatalysis. Lamellar coordination solids and intercalation compounds are more rugged candidate materials for such assemblies, provided they can be grown with the appropriate sequence of layers.
Metal Phosphonates. Metal phosphonates are coordination solids that often crystallize as lamellar materials, with a morphology resembling pillared clays.11 We recognized in 1988 the structural resemblance between the alternating organic-inorganic layers in these compounds and in Langmuir-Blodgett films and performed experiments to see if these materials could be grown one layer at a time on solid surfaces.12 This strategy was based on the earlier work of Netzer and Sagiv, who built up thin films of organosilanes by a sequence of alternating adsorption and activation reactions.13 In the case of metal phosphonates, thin film deposition was accomplished by alternately dipping a phosphonate-primed substrate in solutions of di-, tri-, or tetravalent metal salts and alkyl- or arylbis(phosphonic acid)s.14 The same kind of sequential adsorption procedure (illustrated schematically in Figure 1) was subsequently developed for LBL growth of intercalated metal phosphates,15 organic polyelectrolytes,16 and coordination compounds17 as ordered thin films.
Metal phosphonate films were subsequently characterized
by several research groups. Thompson and co-workers used
atomic force microscopy to study the dynamics of the
assembly process and determined that phosphonate layers
Photoinduced charge transfer in zirconium phosphonate LBL films was first studied by Katz et al., who made multilayer films consisting of 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-phosphonophenyl)porphyrin and N,N'-bis(3-phosphonopropyl)-4,4'-bipyridinium molecules interleaved by Zr4+ layers.22 In the absence of the bipyridinium electron acceptor, the free base porphyrin excited state decays with a fluorescence lifetime of 4 ns. Electron transfer from the porphyrin to the bipyridinium in adjacent layers was found to be competitive with singlet excited-state decay, as evidenced by a 60% loss in fluorescence intensity. Because of the ease with which layers of different sequences could be grown, Katz and co-workers were able to study different donor-acceptor sequences that also contained electroinactive alkanediyl bisphosphonate spacer layers. However, they were not able to observe the products of the electron-transfer reaction directly, so they could not comment on the effect of the lamellar structure in preventing back electron transfer.
Insulating and Semiconducting Sheets. The metal phosphonate assembly process is somewhat limiting because it
requires that electron donors, acceptors, and sensitzers be
derivatized with phosphonate groups. Following the discovery of the polyelectrolyte sequential adsorption process by
Decher,26 LBL assemblies were constructed by sequentially
depositing two-dimensional inorganic, polyanionic sheets
interleaved with polycationic layers.23,24
-Zr(HPO4)2 (
-ZrP) sheets along
with a cationic oligomer (Keggin ions, [Al13O4(OH)24(H2O)12]7+, or the protein, cytochrome c) or cationic polymer
[poly(allylamine) hydrochloride, PAH].24 Inorganic sheets
were obtained by exfoliation of
-ZrP with tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (TBA+OH-) to create a suspension. In
this particular case, exfoliation involves a two-step mechanism: (1) intercalation of TBA+ cations between
-ZrP
layers upon deprotonation, forming the intermediate Zr(HPO4)1.5(TBA+ PO4-)0.5 and expanding the interlayer spacing from 7.6 to 16.8 Å, and (2) further deprotonation causing
delamination of the layers and subsequent formation of
colloidal anionic sheets. The sequence of layer deposition
steps utilized to grow films is shown schematically in Figure
2. The film thickness, as determined by ellipsometry,
increased linearly with the number of
-ZrP/cation layers,
or bilayers. From linear fits of the data, the thickness of each
-ZrP/cation bilayer was determined to be 13, 31, and 16 Å
for
-ZrP/PAH,
-ZrP/cyt c, and
-ZrP/Al137+, respectively.
The bilayer thicknesses were in good agreement with the
sum of the known
-ZrP layer spacing (7.6 Å)25 and either
the thickness of a single uncoiled PAH layer (5 Å)26-34
| Figure 2 LBL growth of polyanion/polycation films from lamellar colloids. |
Layered metal oxide semiconductors (LMOSs) such as K4Nb6O17 and CsTi2NbO7 can also be used in place of
-ZrP.
These quasi-2D semiconductors are of special interest for
constructing electron-transfer assemblies because they can
be sensitized with carboxylate- or phosphonate-derivatized
dye molecules. Anionic LMOS sheets can be obtained by
acid exchange followed by exfoliation with TBA+OH-.
Sheets of K4Nb6O17 contain two distinct interstitial sites for
potassium cations; hence, after sequential treatment with a
mild acid and TBA+OH-, the colloid exists as two niobate
sheets sandwiching a layer of K+. Ellipsometric measurements of LMOS/PAH films showed that the hexaniobate
layers were 26 Å thick, consistent with the deposition of
niobate-K+-niobate sandwiches. In contrast, CsTi2NbO7
layers were only 16 Å thick, consistent with single-layer
deposition for every LMOS cycle.
Because electrostatic interactions are the driving force for
LBL film growth, the cationic and anionic layers can be
easily substituted, creating the potential for a library of
different heterostructures that vary in complexity. As a proof
of this concept, Keller et al. alternated
-ZrP and K4Nb6O17
anionic sheets to build up
-ZrP/PAH/K4Nb6O17/PAH heterostructures (Figure 3); the figure inset accentuates the
dramatic thickness changes associated with the addition of
specific individual layers. Importantly, the LBL technique
is self-regulating because each immersion step deposits only
one layer of polyanion or polycation.
An important benefit of using lamellar colloids to build
up multilayer structures, instead of organic polyelectrolytes,
is that sequentially grown layers do not necessarily interpenetrate. This feature is important if one wishes to use the
ordered sequence of layers to avoid back electron transfer
in photochemical electron-transfer cascades. The LBL assembly of sheets gives a "lasagne" structure, although in
some cases (for example, with smectite clay sheets), there
appears to be some mixing of components in sequential
deposition steps.37 We were able to show using fluorescence
resonant energy-transfer techniques that
-ZrP layers do not
interpenetrate significantly in LBL assemblies.38
-ZrP
and the fluorophore polycations onto 4-(aminobutyl)dimethylmethoxysilane/glass or 2-mercaptoethylamine/Au gave
22-Å-thick bilayers. The efficiency of Förster energy transfer,
, can be used as a quantitative probe of intermolecular
distances, r, because of the following relationship:39
At the Förster distance, R0, the efficiency of the transfer is
0.5; for Fl and RhB, this distance has been determined to be
40 Å.40 Experimentally, the efficiencies for the LBL assemblies were calculated by using either donor emission
quenching or enhancement of the acceptor emission and
values of
from either method were typically within
2-5%.39 Monte Carlo simulations were also performed to
provide theoretical energy-transfer efficiencies using experimentally determined film thicknesses and densities of donors
and acceptors. The experimental and simulated data correlated very well for a range of different layer sequences,
providing compelling evidence that each adsorption step
produces a monolayer and that successive organic layers have
minimal interpenetration and are well-separated by the
anionic sheets.
LBL assemblies were also prepared that incorporated both
ionic and covalent interlayer connections.41 In this "mix and
match" strategy,
-ZrP sheets, deposited onto Au or Si
substrates that were primed with thiol- or trialkoxysilyl-terminated phosphonic acids, were first charge-compensated
by zirconium tetrameric hydroxycations, [Zr4(OH)8(H2O)16]8+
(abbreviated as Zr48+). A bis(phosphonic acid), CnBPA, was
then introduced, followed by sequential treatment with Zr48+
and
-ZrP sheets, giving the sequence
-ZrP/Zr48+/CnBPA/Zr48+/
-ZrP. Such assemblies were constructed for n = 4,
8, 10, 12, 14, and 16. The thickness of the repeat sequence
for n = 16 was determined to be 39 Å by ellipsometry and
41 Å by X-ray diffraction (Bragg peak at 2
= 2.1
).
Importantly, reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy showed that the intensity of both the asymmetric and
symmetric CH2 stretches were linear with the number of C16BPA layers, confirming the stepwise growth of the films. In
the "mix and match" strategy, one can also switch from a
covalent motif to an ionic one, as demonstrated by using
intermittent
-ZrP/PAH bilayers.
Intercalation and exfoliation of
-ZrP sheets has been
shown to compete with base hydrolysis/corrosion, as depicted
by the following reaction:42

-ZrP sheets should be
exfoliated at 0
C, where the rate of hydrolysis is slow. A
closer look at the base hydrolysis of
-ZrP sheets showed
that the process occurs from the edges inward.42 Atomic force
microscopy revealed the presence of 1-10-nm-high "bumps"
around the edges after heating of the sheets for 1 h in
TBA+OH- at 75
C. Further heating resulted in fewer sheets
with a concomitant increase in the number of smaller
particles. From transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
images, the edges of the sheets displayed increased contrast
following base hydrolysis, consistent with an increase in the
electron density owing to the formation of hydrous zirconium
oxide (relatively high electron density) and loss of phosphate
groups (relatively low electron density). Indeed, inductively
coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometric analysis of
solutions following restacking of the sheets by acidification
with HCl indicated the presence of orthophosphate and
negligible amounts of Zr, consistent with the loss of
phosphate by hydrolysis.
Interestingly, it was found that the hydrolysis reaction was prevented by exfoliating the sheets in the presence of excess phosphate, suggesting that a dynamic equilibrium exists at the edges between phosphate and hydroxide anions.42 The reversibility of the hydrolysis reaction was exploited by selectively functionalizing the edges of the sheets with organophosphonates. Specifically, the sheets were exfoliated with TBA+OH- in the presence of vinylphosphonic acid to displace phosphate groups at the edge.42 The olefinic groups of vinylphosphonic acid were then reacted with OsO4, gradually resulting in the formation of 2-20-nm colloids of, presumably, OsO2. TEM images showed that the sheet edges were almost entirely decorated with OsO2 nanoparticles.Control experiments in which phosphate edge groups were displaced by ethylphosphonic acid showed that the OsO2 nanoparticles43 were randomly associated with the sheets and that hydrolysis of the edges was significantly diminished.
Other materials for preparing inorganic sheets by exfoliation for use in LBL assemblies have been identified. These
include Dion-Jacobsen layered perovskites (A[An-1'BnO3n+1],
where A = alkali, A' = alkaline earth or rare earth, and B
= transition metal),44,45
Electron/Energy-Transfer Assemblies. As noted above, there is considerable interest in creating artificial photosynthetic devices that can efficiently harness solar energy, vectorially separate electrons and holes, and produce useful fuels with these redox equivalents.50 Vectorial movement of holes and electrons is a key first step because it minimizes undesirable charge recombination and promotes successful conversion of the stored potential energy into chemical energy.
Artificial photosynthesis is often studied using molecular-based synthetic systems containing several redox-active
components with the ultimate goal of developing efficient
photoconversion systems or devices.l In triad systems, for
example, charge separation is typically afforded by excited-state electron transfer from a visible-light-absorbing spacer
(S) to a covalently attached acceptor component (A),
followed by thermal electron transfer from a donor component (D) to the oxidized spacer:51,52

Quantum yields for charge separation critically depend on
the branching ratio between forward and back-electron-transfer rates at each successive step within the multicomponent system and can only approach unity if the forward
While these multicomponent systems are quite useful for modeling aspects of natural photosynthesis, their synthesis becomes increasingly demanding as more chromophoric or redox-active units are added.56 In addition, these systems are typically studied in fluid solution or frozen glasses where the charge-separated state ultimately decays back to the ground state. To utilize the redox equivalents of the charge-separated state, the molecules should be organized in space at a level of complexity and control required for high conversion efficiencies.56 Ideally, organization of the photoredox/redox-active molecules would be achieved through an assembly process, avoiding the need for covalent linkages between all of the components.
LBL assembly of photosystems using inorganic sheets was
demonstrated by Keller et al., who grew concentric "onion"
structures on high surface area silica (average diameter =
50 nm).56-58
-ZrP sheets (~15 ×
15 × 0.8 nm). Following centrifugation and washing,
methylviologen-functionalized polystyrene (p-MV2+) was
deposited from aqueous solution, followed sequentially by
another layer of
-ZrP sheets and a polystyrene layer
functionalized with a ruthenium(II) poly(pyridyl) photosensitizer (p-[RuIII(p-bpy)(bpy)2)]2+, abbreviated as p-Ru2+,
where bpy is 2,2'-bipyridine and p-bpy is the 2,2'-bipyridine
ligand directly attached to the polymeric backbone; Figures
4 and 5). On planar Si surfaces, deposition of the polycationic
redox layers reproducibly gave thicknesses of ~9 Å by
ellipsometry, while the
-ZrP layers had thicknesses consistent with previous results.
| Figure 4 Schematic procedure for the preparation of the composite multilayers on high-surface-area silica. |
Visible-light absorption by p-Ru2+ produces a metal-to-ligand charge-transfer (MLCT) excited state (formally p-[RuIII(p-bpy)(bpy)(bpy
-)]2+) that is a potent reductant [E(Ru3+/2+*)
~ -0.62 V vs NHE] capable of transferring an electron to
p-MV2+ [E(MV2+/+) = -0.45 V vs NHE]. Surprisingly,
when p-MV2+ was deposited prior to p-Ru2+ (i.e., p-Ru2+/
-ZrP/p-MV2+/
-ZrP/SiO2), photoexcitation with 532-nm
pulsed-laser light did not produce MV
+. In addition, the
excited-state lifetime (600 ns) was similar to that observed
for p-Ru2+/
-ZrP/SiO2, suggesting minimal quenching of
p-Ru2+* by p-MV2+. In contrast, when the reversible electron
donor, methoxy-N,N-bis(ethylsulfonate) (MDESA2-), was
added to the solution containing p-Ru2+/
-ZrP/p-MV2+/
-ZrP/SiO2, a p-MV
+/MDESA- charge-separated state was
observed with a quantum yield of ~30%. MDESA2- reduces
the metal center of p-Ru2+*, forming a Ru+ species in which
one of the bipyridine ligands remains reduced:


- escaping the p-Ru2+ layer
(escape yield ~ 60%). Hence, charge recombination requires
diffusion of MDESA
- through both p-Ru2+ and anionic
-ZrP layers. Interestingly, when the order of polymer
deposition was reversed, i.e., p-MV2+/
-ZrP/p-Ru2+/
-ZrP/SiO2, p-Ru2+* was no longer quenched by MDESA2- and
charge separation was no longer observed with or without
the electron donor. Apparently, diffusion of MDESA2- to
the buried p-Ru2+ layer is severely impeded in this composite
such that MDESA2-/Ru2+ ground-state adducts no longer
form and diffusional quenching between MDESA2- and
p-Ru2+* no longer occurs. In addition, when the
-ZrP sheets
were replaced with organic poly(styrenesulfonate) (PSS),
reaction (5) was no longer observed presumably because
p-Ru2+ is intertwined with anionic PSS, preventing the
approach of MDESA2-. In the absence of the silica support,
i.e., when p-Ru2+, p-MV2+, and MDESA2- were dissolved
together in solution, reaction (5) was observed while reaction
(6) was not, presumably because of repulsion between the
polycationic redox polymers.
The successful demonstration of photoinduced charge
separation in this D-S-A "onion" system suggested the
possibility of making a more complex artificial photosynthetic system by LBL techniques. In this multilayer thin film
system, light absorption was coupled to electron transfer/charge separation by a series of energy transfers through an
antenna system containing three dye molecules (Figure 6).56
The dyes that were chosen, coumarin, Fl, and a tetrasubstituted palladium(II) tetraphenylporphyrin (PdTPP), have large
molar extinction coefficients and absorb visible light at
progressively longer wavelengths. In order for Förster (i.e.,
singlet-singlet) energy transfer to be efficient, good spectral
overlap must exist between the donor emission spectra and
the acceptor absorbance spectra.39 Accordingly, the coumarin
dye absorbs light in the blue region of the visible spectrum
(
abs,max = 412 nm;
em = 485 nm) and can donate its excited-state energy to the Fl dye (
abs,max = 500 nm;
em = 530),
which, in turn, can transfer its excited-state energy to PdTPP
(
abs,max = 520 nm;
em = 720 nm). It is also possible for
the coumarin dye to transfer energy directly to the porphyrin
dye because the coumarin emission and porphyrin Q-band
absorbance slightly overlap. Importantly, porphyrin excited
states are formed either by direct excitation or indirectly by
excitation of the coumarin or Fl dyes. Furthermore, the
presence of a Pd atom in the porphyrin fluorophore ensures
nearly quantitative intersystem crossing to a long-lived triplet
excited state, allowing ample time for interlayer electron
transfer to occur.56
Two kinds of multilayer thin film assemblies were
prepared through alternate anion/cation adsorption steps. For
interlayer energy transfer, coumarin-functionalized PAH
(Coum-PAH), Fl-functionalized PAH (Fl-PAH), and palladium(II) tetrakis(4-N,N,N-trimethylanilinium)porphyrin (i.e.,
PdTPP4+) were deposited sequentially using anionic
-ZrP
layers as spacers.56 For intralayer energy transfer, all three
polycationic dyes were adsorbed simultaneously onto anionic
-ZrP. Absorption and emission spectra of both multilayer
assemblies were obtained and compared with that for
individual dye layers. The emission spectra (excitation with
450 nm) showed almost complete quenching for the coumarin dye, significant quenching of the Fl dye, and enhanced
emission from the porphyrin. On the basis of the emission
data, the energy-transfer efficiency of the interlayer assembly
was calculated to be 0.65 while that for the intralayer
assembly was 0.82. The lower efficiency of the interlayer
assembly was attributed to the Förster distances of the various
donor-acceptor combinations being close to the
-ZrP/dye-PAH bilayer thickness (~22 Å). In contrast, the average
donor-acceptor distances in the intralayer assembly were
significantly smaller, allowing for relatively facile energy
transfer.56
Because the intralayer assembly gave superior results, it
was coupled to an electron-acceptor layer, methylviologen-functionalized poly(vinyltoluene) (PVT-MV2+; Figure 7). To
provide a larger driving force for electron transfer from the
porphyrin excited state to MV2+, PdTPP4+ was replaced with
a tetraanionic porphyrin (PdTPP4-), which is a more powerful
triplet excited-state reductant by ~0.3 V.56 Efficient quenching of the porphyrin phosphorescence was observed upon
the addition of PVT-MV2+ to the system, the degree of which
depended on the anionic "glue" used for its fastening. Using
HTiNbO5 sheets, the phosphorescence was quenched by 76%
while that for
-ZrP was 58%. This corresponds to combined
energy/electron-transfer quantum yields of 0.61 and 0.47,
respectively. Importantly, spectra from diffuse-reflectance
flash photolysis experiments for similar systems constructed
on high surface area silica showed that MV
+ is present on
the microsecond time scale and that it is produced in greater
yield when the HTiNbO5 spacer is used. These results
suggested that semiconducting HTiNbO5 sheets mediate the
electron transfer between 3PdTPP4-* and MV2+, while
-ZrP, an insulator, does not. Indeed, when HTiNbO5 is
layered on the top of the intralayer assembly in the absence
of PVT-MV2+, significant quenching of 3PdTPP4-* phosphorescence is observed, suggesting that electron transfer
between 3PdTPP4-* and HTiNbO5 is occurring.56
Nonsacrificial Hydrogen-Evolving Photosystems. As noted above, many artificial photosynthetic systems have been constructed with the purpose of transiently separating charge, or generating products from sacrificial reagents. Structural control is really most needed when nonsacrificial reagents are used because of the possibility of recombination reactions. Catalysts for generating chemical products should be spatially compartmentalized and connected by an electron relay system that disfavors charge recombination. The recombination reaction is necessarily thermodynamically downhill and favorable because free energy is stored in the charge-separated state. Compartmentalization of redox reactions is conveniently achieved in photoelectrochemical cells by carrying out oxidation and reduction reactions at spatially well-separated electrodes. However, in photochemical systems, oxidation and reduction products are typically made at the same particle. Therefore, preventing their recombination requires sieving at the molecular level.
In the first example of such a nonsacrificial artificial
photosynthetic system, LMOS sheets of K4-xHxNb6O17·nH2O
(x ~ 2.5) were sensitized with [Ru(dcb)3]2+ (where dcb is
4,4'-dicarboxylic acid-2,2'-bipyridine).59,60
s and
follows biphasic kinetics. In the presence of the electron
donor, KI, [Ru(dcb)3]3+ is no longer observed by flash
photolysis; instead, a positive transient at 380 nm is observed
and attributed to the formation of I2
- according to the
following reaction sequence:



Hence, the charge-separated state on the microsecond time
scale consists of I2
-/e-(CB,LMOS), formed with a quantum
yield of ~10-15%. On a seconds-to-minutes time scale, only
triiodide is observed, showing that I2
- has disappeared either
by disproportionation (eq 7d) or by recombination with
injected CB electrons.63
To utilize the reducing equivalents of the charge-separated
state for hydrogen evolution, the LMOS sheets were internally platinized. This process, which was first reported by
Domen and co-workers, involves ion exchange of Pt(NH3)42+
ions into the interlayer galleries, followed by hydrogen
reduction at 200-600
C.64 Aqua regia treatment is then used
to remove Pt from external sites. Because the solid is a cation
exchanger, the resulting interlayer Pt clusters are inaccessible
to anions. For example, [Fe(CN)6]3- is not reduced by
molecular hydrogen in the presence of platinized sheets
prepared by this method. This suggests that anionic species,
such as I3-, are incapable of intralayer diffusion and
recombination with molecular hydrogen.
Hydrogen evolution was tested by photolyzing the above
system using a Hg-Xe lamp. Upon light excitation, hydrogen and triiodide are formed in equimolar amounts. Importantly, hydrogen is formed in trace amounts in the absence
of iodide and is not formed in the absence of [Ru(dcb)3]2+.
The initial quantum yield was determined to be ~0.3%;
because this is a factor of 40 lower than that determined by
flash photolysis, the major recombination pathway involves
the reduction of I3- or I2
- by injected electrons in the
semiconductor. Over time, the hydrogen evolution plateaus
as the concentration of triiodide increases. When a fresh
iodide solution is introduced and the photolysis reaction is
resumed, the initial hydrogen evolution rate is restored,
supporting the claim that CB electrons also recombine with
triiodide. Importantly, when photolysis is stopped, the
triiodide and hydrogen levels of the system do not change,
indicating that back reaction between photoproducts does not
occur appreciably, presumably a result of their physical
separation.
In later studies, several LMOSs were studied as components in the above system: acid-exchanged titanates (Na3Ti3O7 and K2Ti4O9), niobates (KNb3O8 and K4Nb6O17), and
titanoniobates (KTiNbO5 and CsTi2NbO7).60 Following selective internal platinization, the LMOSs were fully acid-exchanged; suspensions prior to acid exchange gave pH =
9-10, while those afterward gave pH = 3-4. Photochemical
(>400 nm) hydrogen evolution was measured by gas
chromatography for sensitized, internally platinized LMOSs
in the presence of iodide. Only the niobates and titanoniobates were found to produce stoichiometric amounts of
hydrogen and triiodide, with K4Nb6O17 giving the highest
initial quantum yield. In contrast, only trace amounts of
hydrogen were detected for the two titanates under similar
conditions. These results were attributed to the titanates
having relatively positive CB-edge energies compared to the
niobates and titanoniobates. Theoretical predictions of the
LMOS's band-edge energies were made using concepts of
electronegativity. The CB-edge energy at the point of zero
charge of a semiconductor, Ecs0, can be expressed by65

Interestingly, when the acid-exchanged niobates and titanoniobates were suspended in alkali iodide solutions, the pH of the suspension dropped from 3-4 to 1-2 because of the exchange of protons for alkali cations. This behavior was not observed for the titanates. X-ray diffraction studies corroborated this, showing the presence of an additional interlayer spacing for the niobates and titanoniobates that have undergone alkali iodide treatment. In contrast, the titanates showed no changes in their diffraction patterns. Hence, the niobates and titanoniobates were partially proton-exchanged under the photolysis conditions used while the titanates remained fully acidified. As a result, the CB-edge energies of the niobates and titanoniobates should be more negative than those of the titanates. Furthermore, the slightly more acidic conditions used for the titanoniobates and niobates pushes the water/hydrogen reduction potential more positive, favoring hydrogen evolution. It was concluded that the titanates did not evolve hydrogen effectively because injected electrons cannot reduce protons and thus fall victim to recombination. Similar explanations were used in followup studies to explain the superior photochemical hydrogen evolution observed for zeolite L impregnated with Nb2O5 and Pt in the presence of the nonsacrificial electron donor, MDESA2-, as compared to that impregnated with TiO2 and Pt.68
The hydrogen evolution rate was also shown to critically depend on the LMOS interlayer spacing.60 The spacing was varied by changing the iodide's countercation, decreasing in the order Na > Li > Cs > K > H.69 The evolution rate increased in the same order, suggesting that a competition exists between charge recombination and electron tunneling between layers. In a layered LMOS system, the photosensitizer is adsorbed only on the external surface; thus, injected electrons reach Pt deposits faster when the interlayer spacing is small.
On strategy for potentially reducing the rate of charge
recombination involves blocking the access of I2
- and/or
I3- to the LMOS surface. This was initially attempted by
adsorbing alkyl phosphonates to [Ru(dcb)3]2+-sensitized
LMOS surfaces. Unfortunately, this resulted in significant
sensitizer desorption under aqueous conditions. To circumvent this problem, a subsequent study employed a sensitizer
that attaches itself to the LMOS surface through an aryl
phosphonate linkage.63 Two polyanionic surface modifiers
were examined, [TiNbO5]nn- and PSS. Because the sensitizer
imparts a positive charge to the unmodified LMOS surface,
it is possible to deposit an anionic layer on top. Treatment
of a sensitized surface (1.43
mol/g of LMOS) with excess
aqueous PSS resulted in a surface coverage of 5.25
mol of
PSS/g of LMOS, indicating that the PSS layer overcompensates the charge of the sensitizer and provides a net negative
charge to the surface. Both [TiNbO5]nn- and PSS were shown
to increase the initial hydrogen evolution rate by a factor of
3 and 5, respectively (Figure 8). In the case of PSS, the initial
rate corresponds to a quantum yield of 3%. The polyanionic
layer presumably assists in excluding redox-active species
such as I2
- and I3- from the surface, thus decreasing the
rate of charge recombination between these species and the
injected electrons within the LMOS structure. This idea is
supported by transient diffuse-reflectance spectra obtained
with and without PSS (Figure 8). The decays for charge
recombination are well-described by a second-order kinetic
model with rate constants of 3.17 (±0.03) × 107 and 3.01
(±0.03) × 106 M-1 s-1 for the unmodified and PSS-modified
samples, respectively. While the actual values of these rate
constants depend on an assumption about the path length of
the analyzing light, the ratio of the rate constants (approximately 10) does not and is in semiquantitative agreement with the enhanced hydrogen evolution rate found in
the presence of PSS.
The time scale of charge recombination is several milliseconds in the PSS-modified system. It follows that, in order to replace iodide by water as the electron donor, one would need to couple this system to an oxygen-evolving catalyst that could turn over quite rapidly. Alternatively, it may be possible to modify the solid to increase the rate of electron transfer from the outer surface, which is where electrons are injected, to interlayer Pt clusters. The low quantum yield for hydrogen evolution indicates that the time scale of this process is long (tens to hundreds of milliseconds) in LMOS systems, where electronic coupling between sheets is relatively weak.
Water Oxidation Catalysis. One of the biggest obstacles
to achieving efficient photochemical water splitting has been
the inability to identify an effective, selective O2-evolving
system. Because the evolution of O2 from H2O requires four
oxidizing equivalents [reaction (9)], this process is

It has long been known that colloidal and bulk RuO2 and
IrO2 are capable of heterogeneously catalyzing water oxidation in the presence of a [Ru(bpy)3]2+ photosensitizer and
the sacrificial electron acceptor, S2O82-, via photocatalytic
cycle (10).78-82 The mechanism involves the following
elementary steps:





Colloidal IrO2 is a particularly interesting colloidal catalyst because of its stability and the ease of analysis of the photocatalytic cycle (10) with simple UV-vis spectrophotometry.84 Colloidal catalysts also typically have a surface charge that can be used to incorporate them into photosynthetic assemblies constructed from inorganic sheets and organic polyelectrolytes.82 As a result, the photocatalytic potential of IrO2 colloids has been further investigated in this laboratory beyond the previous studies by Harriman and co-workers.
In photoredox cycle (10), protons are released when O2 is evolved, and this causes a decrease in the pH of the system. Harriman and co-workers have shown that the reduction potential of IrO2 colloids shifts positively as the pH of the external solution is lowered.85 At lower pH, the driving force for reaction (10d) decreases, leading to slower electron transfer between the photosensitizer and IrO2(red). At higher pH, nucleophilic attack on the oxidized Ru(III) complex becomes more rapid. Hence, it is advantageous to control the pH of the photocatalytic system. Indeed, Harriman and co-workers found that the rate of O2 evolution is optimal at pH ~ 5 and decreases below and above this value.8
Hara et al. investigated several buffer candidates and found that both the photosensitizer decomposition rate and the turnover number depended sensitively on the composition of the buffer.82 For a KH2PO4/Na2B4O7 buffer, the turnover number depended significantly on the buffer concentration, reaching a maximum at 0.011 M. Further experiments in which [Ru(bpy)3]2+ was irradiated in the presence of S2O82- and absence of IrO2 showed that [Ru(bpy)3]3+ is rapidly decomposed at higher buffer concentrations. Similar experiments using either KH2PO4 or Na2B4O7 showed that the culprit was the KH2PO4 component of the buffer. Subsequent studies focused on buffers that contain only weakly coordinating inorganic anions, such as Na2SiF6/Na2B4O7 and Na2SiF6/NaHCO3. The latter showed a sensitizer turnover number of 290 as compared with 100 for the former, as well as a higher average rate of oxygen evolution. After ~30 min, the O2 evolution plateaus because of complete consumption of the S2O82- sacrificial acceptor. By the addition of more S2O82- and more HCO3- to bring the pH from 5.0 to 5.4, O2 evolution resumes upon photolysis, albeit with a lower yield and lower initial rate. The lower rate of the second photolysis was ascribed to ~50% decomposition of the sensitizer during the initial photolysis.
Several attempts were made to determine why bicarbonate gave a superior performance relative to borate. Both buffers were effective at maintaining the pH above 5 during the entirety of the photolysis, and both gave similar [Ru(bpy)3]2+ observed rate constants for decomposition in the absence of IrO2.82 In addition, the rates during the initial 20 min of the photolysis were similar for both buffers. The latter finding argues that the enhancement is not a result of bicarbonate-induced acceleration of reactions (10d) and (10e). Because the IrO2 colloid is negatively charged at pH > 2,78,80 the buffers may be influencing favorable adsorption of [Ru(bpy)3]2+. However, surface coverages of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ on IrO2/(4-aminobutyl)dimethylmethoxysilane/SiO2 were similar in the presence of both buffers, suggesting that the buffers do not significantly influence sensitizer adsorption.
From the above studies, it was concluded that decomposition of [Ru(bpy)3]3+ prevents achievement of turnover numbers > 290. Under photochemical conditions, a significant portion of [Ru(bpy)3]3+ is present in free solution because excited-state oxidation by S2O82- is rapid.82 [Ru(bpy)3]3+ molecules that are adsorbed to the IrO2 are less susceptible to decomposition because they are more rapidly reduced by the colloid. In light of this finding, Hara et al. synthesized IrO2 colloidal particles in the presence of Nafion, a perfluorinated anionic polyelectrolyte that contains sulfonate pendants.86 Photolysis reactions comparing the [Ru(bpy)3]2+/IrO2 colloid system (i.e., free colloid) with the Nafion-stabilized IrO2 system were performed under identical conditions. In both systems, the initial O2 evolution rates plateau at high [Ru(bpy)3]2+ concentration, resembling Langmuir adsorption isotherm behavior. For the Nafion system, this plateau begins at ~2 × 10-4 M [Ru(bpy)3]2+, at which point the initial rate is ~1.6 times that for the free colloid system. The highest quantum yields for the Nafion and free colloid systems were 73% and 45%, respectively. Meanwhile, the turnover number for both systems reaches a maximum and then falls off at higher [Ru(bpy)3]2+ concentrations, consistent with competition between O2 evolution and sensitizer decomposition at higher [Ru(bpy)3]2+ concentrations. The O2 evolution rates were also examined as a function of the incident light intensity at fixed [Ru(bpy)3]2+ concentration. For the free colloid system, the rate plateaus at high light intensities, suggesting limitations by [IrO2]. No plateau was observed for the Nafion system, indicating that oxygen evolution is light-limited. The superior performance of the Nafion-stabilized system was tentatively attributed to Nafion-induced enhancement of [Ru(bpy)3]2+/IrO2 adsorption, which aids in the prevention of unwanted sensitizer decomposition.
Photochemical water oxidation was further investigated
using IrO2 colloid supported on silica particles (average
diameter = 70 nm).87 By using the cationic ruthenium(II)
poly(pyridyl) polymer, [Ru2+]9, sensitized IrO2 containing
composites (Figure 9) was made by the LBL technique. Two
different multilayer sequences were studied. In the first case,
anionic SiO2 was first treated with [Al13O4(OH)24(H2O)12]7+
(Keggin) ions, followed sequentially by the IrO2 colloid and
[Ru2+]9. This system showed low photocatalytic activity,
which was attributed to poor physical contact between
[Ru2+]9 and the IrO2 particles. In the second case, a solution
containing [Ru2+]9 and IrO2 colloid was first added to a Na2SiF6/NaHCO3 buffer solution, which, in turn, was immobilized on the silica support. This system showed photocatalytic activity similar to those of [Ru2+]9/IrO2 colloidal
solutions. Although both systems showed lower O2 evolution
rates (0.3
mol/min) and lower turnover numbers (~90)
compared to those of the optimized [Ru(bpy)3]2+/IrO2 colloid
system, silica-supported [Ru2+]9/IrO2 does represent an
integrated chemical system for photochemical oxygen evolution, which could, in principle, be coupled to a microheterogeneous hydrogen-evolving photosystem.
| Figure 9 Top: TEM images of IrO2/Keggin/SiO2 and [Ru2+]9/IrO2/Keggin/SiO2. Bottom: Time course of O2 evolution from [Ru2+]9-IrO2/SiO2 samples: (A) [Ru2+]9-IrO2/SiO2; (B) [Ru2+]9-colloidal IrO2. |
The problem of coupling hydrogen- and oxygen-evolving
photocatalytic systems for an overall water splitting requires
them to function under the same conditions (pH, buffer
composition, etc.). Efficient water splitting would also require
catalysts that turn over fast enough to compete kinetically
with back-electron-transfer reactions. To optimize the turnover rate of colloidal IrO2 catalysts and rapidly explore their
behavior under different conditions, we developed a simple
high-throughput screening method. The method is based on
the retention of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ absorbance or emission under
continuous photolysis in IrO2/persulfate solutions.88 Because
the destruction of the sensitizer by nucleophilic attack on
the Ru(III) complex competes kinetically with catalytic
oxygen evolution in cycle (10), better catalysts or better
catalytic conditions correspond to longer retention of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ spectral properties. Figure 10 illustrates the screening method, which utilizes standard 96-well plates and a
conventional plate reader. Interestingly, in a Na2SiF6/NaHCO3 buffer, we found higher turnover numbers at higher
pH (pH
7.0). At this pH, the SiF62- ion is slowly
hydrolyzed to colloidal silica and the system begins to
resemble the microheterogeneous sensitizer/colloidal catalyst/silica system shown in Figure 9. Direct measurements of
the Ru(III) lifetime in this medium show that the decomposition rate of the oxidized sensitizer is actually lower at higher
pH, probably because of the interaction of the [Ru(bpy)3]3+/2+
complex with the anionic silica surface.
Determining the rate-limiting step in the photocatalytic
cycle (10) is an essential step toward answering the question
of whether colloidal IrO2 catalysts could be useful for overall
photocatalytic water splitting. For instance, if the slow step
is electron transfer between [Ru(bpy)3]3+ and IrO2 colloid,
then the strategy for enhancing O2 evolution rates would be
to improve the electronic coupling or to increase the driving
force of the reaction by changing the ligands of the sensitizer.
However, if the rate-determining step is O-O bond formation or M-O bond dissociation, then it would be beneficial
to redesign the catalyst itself. With this goal is mind, we
performed time-resolved UV-vis spectrophotometry experiments, in which [Ru(bpy)3]3+ is reduced by IrO2 colloid, and
photochemical steady-state O2 evolution studies in both H2O
and D2O.89 In both sets of experiments, we observed a kinetic
isotope effect (KIE) of 1.0, which contrasts with the KIEs
of 1.4 and 1.6 reported for the molecular O2-evolving
complexes, cis,cis-[[(bpy)2Ru(OH2)]2O]4+ and [(terpy)(H2O)MnIII(O)2(OH2)(terpy)]3+, respectively. This suggests that the
Time-resolved studies confirmed that the oxygen evolution reaction follows second-order kinetics and that increasing the concentration of either reagent increases the reaction rate. This finding is consistent with an earlier observation by Harriman and co-workers that the rate of water oxidation by radiolytically oxidized IrO2 clusters is quite fast.90 Under the conditions normally used for photocatalytic cycle (10), the steady-state concentration of photogenerated [Ru(bpy)3]3+ is low and therefore the oxygen evolution rate is low. By using relatively high concentrations of the [Ru(bpy)3]2+ sensitizer, oxidizing it photochemically to [Ru(bpy)3]3+, and then injecting the IrO2 colloid, we were able to reach site turnover rates of about 160 s-1, which corresponds to O2 evolution at a rate of about 40 molecules per second per surface Ir atom. This result is very encouraging for the possible use of IrO2 colloids in water-splitting systems. It also helps to explain why supports for IrO2 such as Nafion, which is a good cation exchanger, lead to higher [Ru(bpy)3]3+ turnover rates. Such supports serve to concentrate the oxidized sensitizer at the surface of the colloid, leading to a higher rate of electron transfer.
Photocatalysis lags behind other solar energy conversion methods, in particular photovoltaic and photoelectrochemical electrolysis, as a means of generating hydrogen from water. However, there is no fundamental reason that photocatalytic systems cannot be efficient. We now understand the principles of electron transfer well enough to design reasonably good systems for both the water oxidation or water reduction half-cell reactions. The problem of joining these half-cell systems together in ways that prevent electron-hole and chemical product recombination reactions remains the most important challenge in achieving an efficient overall water splitting with visible light.
This work was supported by the Division of Chemical Sciences, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy, under Contract DE-FG02-93ER14374.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tom@ chem.psu.edu.
1. Fujishima, A.; Honda, K. Nature 1972, 238, 37-38.![]()
2. (a) Kato, H.; Kudo, A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 4285-4292.
(b)
Kato, H.; Asakura, K.; Kudo, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3082-3089.![]()
3. Bard, A. J.; Fox, M. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 1995, 28, 141-145.![]()
4. Zou, Z.; Ye, J.; Sayama, K.; Arakawa, H. Nature 2001, 414, 625.![]()
5. Sayama, K.; Musaka, K.; Abe, R.; Abe, Y.; Arakawa, H. Chem.
Commun. 2001, 2416-2417.![]()
6. Khaselev, O.; Turner, J. A. Science 1998, 280, 425.![]()
7. Goldsmith, J. I.; Hudson, W. R.; Lowry, M. S.; Anderson, T. H.; Bernhard, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, ASAP article.
8. Harriman, A.; Richoux, M.; Christensen, P. A.; Moseri, S.; Neta, P.
J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1 1987, 83, 3001.![]()
9. Bard, A. J. Integrated Chemical Systems; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1994; pp 227-288.
10. (a) Buecher, H.; Kuhn, H.; Mann, B.; Moebius, D.; Von Szentpaly,
L.; Tillmann, P. Photo. Sci. Eng. 1967, 11, 233.
(b) Kuhn, H.; Moebius,
D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1971, 10, 620-37.
(d)
Kuhn, H. Pure Appl. Chem. 1981, 53, 2105.![]()
11. (a) Dines, M. B.; Griffith, P. C. Inorg. Chem. 1982, 86, 571.
(b)
Clearfield, A. J. Mol. Catal. 1984, 27, 251.
(c) Alberti, G.; Costantino,
U.; Kornyei, J.; Giovagnotti, M. L.; Luciani, React. Polym., Ion Exch.,
Sorbents 1985, 4, 1-10.![]()
12. Lee, H.; Kepley, L. J.; Hong, H.-G.; Mallouk, T. E. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1988, 110, 618-620.![]()
13. Netzer, L.; Sagiv, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 674-676.![]()
14. Cao, G.; Hong, H.-G.; Mallouk, T. E. Acc. Chem. Res. 1992, 25, 420-427.![]()
15. (a) Rong, D.; Kim, Y. I.; Hong, H. G.; Krueger, J. S.; Mayer, J. E.;
Mallouk, T. E. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1990, 97, 237-248.![]()
16. Decher, G.; Hong, J.-D. Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 1430.
17. (a) Evans, S. D.; Ulman, A.; Goppert-Berarducci, K. E.; Gerenser, L.
J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 5866-5968.
(b) Bell, C. M.; Arendt,
M. F.; Gomez, L.; Schmehl, R. H.; Mallouk, T. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1994, 116, 8374-8375.![]()
18. Byrd, H.; Snover, J. L.; Thompson, M. E. Langmuir 1995, 11, 4449.
19. Yang, H. C.; Aoki, K.; Hong, H. G.; Sackett, D. D.; Arendt, M. F.;
Yau, S. L.; Bell, C. M.; Mallouk, T. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115,
11855-11862.![]()
20. Zeppenfeld, A. C.; Fiddler, S. L.; Ham, W. K.; Klopfenstein, B. J.;
Page, C. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 9158-9165.![]()
21. (a) Byrd, H.; Whipps, S.; Pike, J. K.; Nagler, S. E.; Talham, D. R. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 295-301.
(b) Byrd, H.; Pike, J. K.; Talham,
D. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 7903-7904.![]()
22. Ungashe, S. B.; Wilson, W. L.; Katz, H. E.; Scheller, G. R.; Putvinski,
T. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 8717.![]()
23. Kleinfeld, E. R.; Ferguson, G. S. Science 1994, 265, 370.![]()
24. (a) Keller, S. W.; Kim, H. N.; Mallouk, T. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994,
116, 8817.
(b) Kim, H. N.; Keller, S. W.; Mallouk, T. E.; Schmitt, J.;
Decher, G. Chem. Mater. 1997, 9, 1414.![]()
25. Troup, J. M.; Clearfield, A. Inorg. Chem. 1977, 16, 3311.![]()
26. Decher, G.; Hong, J.-D. Makromol. Chem., Macromol. Symp. 1991,
46, 321.![]()
27. Decher, G.; Hong, J.-D.; Schmitt, J. Thin Solid Films 1992, 210/211,
504.
28. Decher, G.; Schmitt, J. Prog. Colloid Polym. Sci. 1992, 89, 160.![]()
29. Decher, G. Nachr. Chem., Tech. Lab. 1993, 41, 793.![]()
30. Lvov, Y.; Decher, G.; Mohwald, H. Langmuir 1993, 9, 481.![]()
31. Lvov, Y.; Decher, G.; Sukhorukov, G. Macromolecules 1993, 26, 5396.
32. Lvov, Y.; Hass, H.; Decher, G.; Mohwald, H.; Kalachev, A. J. Phys.
Chem. 1993, 97, 12835.![]()
33. Lvov, Y.; Essler, F.; Decher, G. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 13773.![]()
34. Schmitt, J.; Grunewald, T.; Kjaer, K.; Pershan, P.; Decher, G.; Losche,
M. Macromolecules 1993, 26, 7058.![]()
35. Johannson, G.; Lundgren, G.; Sillen, L. G.; Soderquist, R. Acta Chem.
Scand. 1960, 769.
36. Takano, T.; Kallai, O. B.; Swanson, R.; Dickerson, R. E. J. Biol. Chem.
1973, 248, 5244.
37. (a) Kleinfeld, E. R.; Ferguson, G. S. Chem. Mater. 1995, 7, 2329.![]()
38. Kaschak, D. M.; Mallouk, T. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 4222.
39. Lakowicz, J. R. Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, 2nd ed.; Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers: New York, 1999.
40. Wieb Van der Meer, B.; Coker, G.; Simon Chen, S.-Y. Resonance Energy Transfer Theory and Data; VCH: New York, 1994.
41. Fang, M. M.; Kaschak, D. M.; Sutorik, A. C.; Mallouk, T. E. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 12184.![]()
42. Kaschak, D. M.; Johnson, S. A.; Hooks, D. E.; Kim, H. N.; Ward, M.
D.; Mallouk, T. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 10887.![]()
43. Hayat, M. A. Fixation for Electron Microscopy; Academic Press: New York, 1981.
44. Fang, M. M.; Kim, C. H.; Saupe, G. B.; Kim, H. N.; Waraksa, C. C.;
Miwa, T.; Fujishima, A.; Mallouk, T. E. Chem. Mater. 1999, 11, 1526.
45. Schaak, R. E.; Mallouk, T. E. Chem. Mater. 2000, 12, 2513.![]()
46. Schaak, R. E.; Mallouk, T. E. Chem. Mater. 2000, 12, 3427.![]()
47. Schaak, R. E.; Mallouk, T. E. Chem. Commun. 2002, 706.![]()
48. Saupe, G. B.; Waraksa, C. C.; Kim, H. N.; Han, Y. J.; Kaschak, D.
M.; Skinner, D. M.; Mallouk, T. E. Chem. Mater. 2000, 12, 1556.![]()
49. Ma, R.; Bando, Y.; Sasaki, T. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 2115-2119.![]()
50. Wasielewski, M. R. Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 435.![]()
51. Kodis, G.; Liddell, P. A.; de la Garza, L.; Clausen, C.; Lindsey, J. S.;
Moore, A. L.; Moore, T. A.; Gust, D. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106,
2036.![]()
52. Miller, S. E.; Lukas, A. S.; Marsh, E.; Bushard, P.; Wasielewski, M.
R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7802.![]()
53. Gust, D.; Moore, T. A.; Moore, A. L. Acc. Chem. Res. 1993, 26, 198.
54. Gust, D.; Moore, T. A.; Moore, A. L.; Lee, S.-J.; Bittersman, E.;
Juttrull, D. K.; Rehms, A. A.; DeGraziano, J. M.; Ma, X. C.; Gao, F.;
Belford, R. E.; Trier, T. T. Science 1990, 248, 199.![]()
55. Gust, D.; Moore, T. A.; Moore, A. L.; Macpherson, A. N.; Lopez,
A.; DeGraziano, J. M.; Gouni, I.; Bittersman, E.; Seely, G. R.; Gao,
F.; Nieman, R. A.; Ma, X. C.; Demanche, L.; Hung, S.-C.; Luttrell,
D. K.; Lee, S.-J.; Kerrigan, P. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 11141.
56. Kaschak, D. M.; Lean, J. T.; Waraksa, C. C.; Saupe, G. B.; Usami,
H.; Mallouk, T. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 3435.![]()
57. Keller, S. W.; Johnson, S. A.; Brigham, E. S.; Yonemoto, E. H.;
Mallouk, T. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 12879.![]()
58. Kaschak, D. M.; Johnson, S. A.; Waraksa, C. C.; Pogue, J.; Mallouk,
T. E. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1999, 186, 403.
59. Kim, Y. I.; Salim, S.; Huq, M. J.; Mallouk, T. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1991, 113, 9561.![]()
60. Kim, Y. I.; Atherton, S. J.; Brigham, E. S.; Mallouk, T. E. J. Phys.
Chem. 1993, 97, 11802.![]()
61. Grätzel, M. Nature 2001, 414, 338.![]()
62. Kamat, P. V. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 267.![]()
63. Saupe, G. B.; Mallouk, T. E.; Kim, W.; Schmehl, R. H. J. Phys. Chem.
B 1997, 101, 2508.![]()
64. Domen, K.; Yoshimura, J.; Sekine, T.; Tanaka, A.; Onishi, T. Catal.
Lett. 1990, 4, 339.![]()
65. Morrison, S. R. Electrochemistry at Semiconductor and Oxidized Metal Electrodes; Plenum Press: New York, 1980.
66. Sanderson, R. T. Chemical Periodicity; Reinhold: New York, 1960.
67. Butler, M. A.; Ginley, D. S. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1978, 125, 228.![]()
68. Kim, Y. I.; Keller, S. W.; Krueger, J. S.; Yonemoto, E. H.; Saupe, G.
B.; Mallouk, T. E. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 2491.![]()
69. Kinomura, N.; Kumada, N.; Muto, F. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.
1985, 2349.![]()
70. Naruta, Y.; Sasayama, M.; Sasaki, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1994,
33, 1839.![]()
71. (a) Hammarstrom, L.; Sun, L.; Akermark, B.; Styring, S. Catal. Today
2000, 58, 57-69.
(b) Sun, L.; Hammarstrom, L.; Akermark, B.;
Styring, S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2001, 30, 36-49.