
Web Release Date: July 13,
Nitro-Substituted Hoveyda-Grubbs Ruthenium Carbenes: Enhancement of Catalyst Activity through Electronic Activation



and
Contribution from the Institutes of Organic Chemistry and Physical Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, 01-224 Warsaw, Poland
Received March 2, 2004
Abstract:
The design, synthesis, stability, and catalytic activity of nitro-substituted Hoveyda-Grubbs metathesis catalysts are described. The highly active and stable meta- and para-substituted complexes are attractive from a practical point of view. These catalysts operate in very mild conditions and can be successfully applied in various types of metathesis [ring-closing metathesis, cross-metathesis (CM), and enyne metathesis]. Although the presence of a NO2 group leads to catalysts that are dramatically more active than both the second-generation Grubbs's catalyst and the phosphine-free Hoveyda's carbene, enhancement of reactivity is somewhat lower than that observed for a sterically activated Hoveyda-Grubbs catalyst. Attempts to combine two modes of activation, steric and electronic, result in severely decreasing a catalyst's stability. The present findings illustrate that different Ru catalysts turned out to be optimal for different applications. Whereas phosphine-free carbenes are catalysts of choice for CM of various electron-deficient substrates, they exhibit lower reactivity in the formation of tetrasubstituted double bonds. This demonstrates that no single catalyst outperforms all others in all possible applications.
Recent decades have seen a burgeoning of interest in olefin metathesis, as witnessed by a rapidly growing number of elegant applications.1 Using this tool, chemists can now efficiently synthesize an impressive range of molecules that only a decade ago required significantly longer and tedious routes. The development of efficient and selective catalysts 1a-c has been the key to the widespread application of olefin metathesis in organic synthesis.1
Although the second-generation Grubbs's ruthenium catalyst
1b possesses in general a very good application profile, combining high activity with an excellent tolerance of a variety of
functional groups, the phosphine-free catalyst 2b, recently
introduced by Hoveyda et al.,2,3
Despite the promising application profile observed in reactions
of 2b, this catalyst proved to initialize slower than 1b, probably
as a result of steric (large isopropoxy group) and electronic
factors (iPrO
Ru electron donation).8 Blechert and Wakamatsu have shown recently that replacement of the isopropoxybenzylidene "ligand" in 2 by BINOL- or biphenyl-based
benzylidene results in a large improvement in catalyst activity,
as-for example-complex 4b is drastically more reactive not
only than 2b but also than the "second-generation" Grubbs's
catalyst 1b.9,10 Recently, we reported on the preparation of two
Hoveyda-type complexes substituted at the benzylidene fragment. Catalyst 5, which is very stable and easy to prepare from
inexpensive
-asarone, shows activity comparable to that of the
parent Hoveyda's carbene 2b,11
Ru chelation and facilitate initiation
of the catalytic cycle.12-14
| Scheme 1. Family of Ruthenium Catalysts for Alkene Metathesisa a Cy = cyclohexyl; Mes = 2,4,6-trimethylphenyl. | |
| Scheme 2 |
Design of Catalysts. The discovery of highly active catalysts 4b and 6b prompted us to further investigate the structure-reactivity relationship, in order to fine-tune the catalysts' properties. First, we decided to examine the "pure" electronic effects in the isopropoxybenzylidene sphere of complexes 6 and 7. The design of catalysts 8-10 was based on the idea that decreasing the electron density in the styrene part of 2 and simultaneously applying a steric bulk9b close to the chelating isopropoxy fragment could result in an even higher increase of catalytic activity (Scheme 2).
Preparation. As illustrated in Scheme 3, we used commercially available nitrosalicylaldehydes 11-13 as starting materials for preparation of the corresponding 2-isopropoxy-5-nitrostyrenes 14-16 via a straightforward alkylation-olefination sequence. Bromination/nitration of phenols 17 and 21, followed by the alkylation and Stille reactions, gave access to the nitrostyrenes 20 and 23, respectively.15 Having in hand 2-isopropoxystyrenes, we attempted to synthesize the catalysts 6-10. An exchange reaction of the styrene 14 with Grubbs's carbene 1a in the presence of CuCl, used as a phosphine scavenger, followed by routine flash chromatography leads to the formation of the "first-generation" 5-nitro-substituted carbene 6a as an air-stable brown microcrystalline solid (83% yield).
The green microcrystalline complex 6b can be easily obtained in a similarly good yield (76-83%) by the reaction of 1b with 14. In the both cases, the reaction can be conveniently monitored by TLC, using cyclohexane/ethyl acetate (4:1) as the eluent.
As synthesis of 6b from the relatively expensive 1b would be somewhat impractical on a larger scale, we adopted a two-step, one-pot process11 using the cheaper "first-generation" carbene 1a as a Ru source. In this procedure, solid 1a was stirred with commercial 4,5-dihydroimidazolium salt 24 in the presence of potassium tert-pentanolate in n-hexane. The in-situ-generated 1b was then treated in the same flask with a solution of styrene 14 and CuCl, providing, after flash chromatography, complex 6b in good yield (67-72%).
The reactions of the styrene 23 with Grubbs's carbenes 1a,b proceeded in a similar manner to give the 4-nitro isomers 7a,b in good yields (70% and 76%, respectively).
The preparation of the next member of this family, complex
8, was more problematic, however. During the reaction between
3-nitro-2-isopropoxystyrene 15 and the Grubbs's complex, we
observed by TLC the formation of a new green spot, presumably
of the complex 8, that however disappears completely before
all the 1b was consumed (1 h, 40
C). All the attempts to capture
this unstable product, either by ceasing the reaction at lower
conversion or by lowering the temperature, were unsuccessful.16
A similar behavior was noted in the case of styrene 20, which
formed a green complex, presumably 9, that decomposed
completely during the isolation/purification step.
We surmised that decreasing the steric bulk near the ortho-chelating iPrO group would lead to a more stable catalyst. The preparation of 10 following the same straightforward route (Scheme 3) leads to the expected complex as a green solid in 46% yield. In a solid form, this compound can be stored in a refrigerator for several days, but it decomposes quickly in solution (see below).
The observed significant instability of 3-substituted 5-nitro complexes 8-10 indicates that combining two modes of activation, steric and electronic, results in great changes in catalyst properties and involves the risk of "over-bursting". This rather disappointing result forced us to abandon the preparation of other members of this series, e.g., a 3,5-dinitro Hoveyda analogue.17
Relative Reactivity of Various Ruthenium Catalysts. Having a panel of NHC-containing ruthenium complexes (1b-7b, 10) in hand, we decided to study in detail their catalytic activity. For such comparative investigation of relative activity, we chose a model RCM reaction of diene 25, leading to the formation of cyclic product 26 bearing a trisubstituted double bond.11,12 The results, illustrated in Figure 1, reveal that both catalysts 6b and 7b are significantly more reactive than 2b. The doubly modified complex 10 initializes the reaction; however, it dies after 15 min (Figure 1).
| Figure 1 Relative rates of RCM of diene 25 using catalysts 1b, 2b, 6b, 7b, and 10. a1 mol % catalyst, CH2Cl2, room temperature. |
As the above reaction proceeds too fast to allow a more
accurate comparison of the activity of such potent catalysts, we
focused on the more challenging cyclization of 27 at 0
C.
According to Blechert and Wakamatsu, 1b gave only ca.
20-30% of cyclized 28 under these conditions.9b Therefore,
this transformation could serve as a calibration point for
estimating activity of the highly active catalysts. Figure 2 shows
the reaction profile at 0
C for catalysts 2b, 4b, 6b, and 7b.
We have found that although the enhancement of reactivity is
somewhat lower than that observed for sterically activated 4b,
the presence of a NO2 group leads to catalysts that are
dramatically more active than 2b.
Figure 2 Relative rates of RCM of diene 27 using catalysts 1b, 2b, 4b,
6b, and 7b. a1 mol % catalyst, CH2Cl2, 0 C.
|
Encouraged by these results, we decided to test a broader set of reactions [cross-metathesis (CM), ring-closing metathesis (RCM), and enyne metathesis] in order to obtain a more detailed picture of the application profile of catalysts 6 and 7.
Utility in Catalytic Cross-Metathesis Reactions.18 We have
recently published a novel CM reaction of
,
-unsaturated
sulfones.19 Scheme 4 shows a comparative study of the
performance of catalysts 1b, 1c, 6b, and 7b in CM of phenyl
vinyl sulfone and the highly substituted indole 29. Although
CM of this challenging substrate, a "dead-end intermediate" 20
in total synthesis of 1,3,4,5-tetrahydrobenz[c,d]indol-4-amine
alkaloids,21 is possible with Grubbs's "second-generation"
carbene 1b, the highest conversions and lowest catalyst loadings
can be achieved in the case of 6b and 7b (Scheme 4). The
catalytic CM of selected
,
-unsaturated substrates was then
examined. The results compiled in Table 1
illustrate the
remarkably wide scope of these catalysts. Thus, (i) the CM
reactions of methyl acrylate (entries 1 and 12) and methyl vinyl
ketone (entry 7) can be efficiently performed at room temperature; (ii) in the case of reactive alkenes, even CM of phenyl
vinyl sulfone and acrylonitrile was possible at ambient temperature (entries 2-4, 9) [however, in the case of vinylphosphine
oxides22 (entries 5, 11, and 14) and more demanding olefinic
partners (e.g., entries 6, 10, and 13), reflux temperature (40
C)
was required to achieve good conversions]; (iii) the indole
nitrogen and other functionalities do not require protection. Most
remarkably, the new catalyst 6b can be used for CM of
methacrylonitrile, a transformation which is beyond the scope
of the "second-generation" Grubbs's carbene 1b (entry 8).
Recently, we described a novel "homo-metathesis" 24
Utility in the Formation of Tri- and Tetrasubstituted
C-C Double Bonds. As illustrated in Table 2
, the nitro-substituted complexes 6b and 7b serve as effective catalysts
for formation of di- and trisubstituted double bonds. The RCM
and enyne metathesis reactions can be performed efficiently even
at 0
C (Table 2, entries 1-4). Furthermore, the potential of a
nitro catalyst for more challenging metathesis reactions has been
proved (entries 5-12). Various degrees of substitution of the
double bond are tolerated, and even trisubstituted cyclic olefins
can be synthesized in usually good yields (entries 5-7). The
CM of terminal alkenes with internal olefins (entry 10) and
2-methyl-2-butene27 (entries 8, 9) proceeds very efficiently. In
all reported cases, complex 6b exhibits similar levels of activity
as compared with Grubbs's carbene 1b. The catalytic cross-metathesis reactions of 1,1-disubstituted olefins represent, however, a more difficult case for 6b (entries 11-13).
Having established the application profile of the nitro-substituted Hoveyda-type catalysts in the formation of di- and trisubstituted C-C double bonds, we focused our efforts on the most demanding case-the formation of the tetrasubstituted C-C double bonds.29
As can be seen from Table 3
, the NO2-containing complex
6b effected the cyclization of substrates 58, albeit in lower yield
(entry 1). The analogous malonate derivative 60 was even more
reluctant toward cyclization (Table 3, entry 2).28 Entries 1-3
show that, in general, the Hoveyda-type catalysts are inferior
Stability and Recyclability of Nitro-Substitited Ru Complexes. The ruthenium carbenes 6a,b and 7a,b possess very good
air, moisture, and thermal stability and can be handled in air
and stored for extended periods of time (more than six months
at +4
C) without decomposition or diminishing of their
activity.30 One of the unique properties of the Hoveyda-Grubbs
carbene 2b is that up to 95% of the catalyst can be recovered
after the reaction.2b However, no data were provided until now
regarding the recyclability of the more active catalysts: 4b and
6b.9,12 To answer this question, we attempted to isolate the NO2
C,
99% conversion, Table 2, entry 4), 40% of the catalyst was
isolated after chromatography. However, in the case of CM
reaction with acrylate (Table 1, entry 1), no catalyst was
recovered. Similarly, prolonged reaction times at higher temperature (Table 3) led to decomposition of the catalyst.31
Synthetic Utility of the First-Generation Complexes 6a
and 7a. In a second set of experiments, the utility of the first-generation complexes 6a and 7a in the formation of various
heterocycles via RCM and enyne reactions was revealed (Table
4
). Catalyst loadings lower than 5 mol % were sufficient.
In the course of this investigation, we observed that the use
of the catalyst 6b for metathesis of 66 led to the generation of
an undesired product 68 (Table 5
, entry 1). The same byproduct
was formed in reactions promoted by other second-generation
Hoveyda-type carbenes (entries 2, 3). A similar lack of
selectivity has been reported by Mori for enyne reactions of 1c
with enynes having a 1,1-disubstituted alkene and an internal
alkyne motif.32 The byproduct formed in reaction of 66
decomposes easily, leading to undefined material, but could be
isolated by a quick flash chromatography on silica gel and
characterized by 1H NMR and HRMS. The proposed structure
68 agrees well with a possible reaction mechanism proposed
by Mori.32 Interestingly, both of the first-generation complexes
6a and 7a show in this transformation a high level of selectivity,
leading only to the formation of 67.
Considerations Regarding the Structure-Activity Relationship of Substituted Hoveyda Catalysts. It has been reported by Hoveyda that the variation from an isopropoxy to a methoxy chelating group has a negative impact on the catalyst performance, since the 2-methoxy analogue 69 (Scheme 5) was significantly less stable and less reactive than 2a.2a In light of this observation, it is worthwhile to note that the electron-donating group (EDG) substituted carbene 5 with a MeO-chelating group shows not only good catalytic activity but also perfect stability.11 An electron-withdrawing group (EWG) analogue, 70 has been therefore prepared from commercially available 2-methoxy-5-nitrobenzaldehyde via olefination and exchange reaction of the resulting styrene with 1b.15 However, this complex was difficult to synthesize and purify in good yield (39% of an exchange reaction with 1b), while the catalyst 5, bearing electron-donating substituents, was almost quantitatively prepared.11 Moreover, 70 proved to be a less effective catalyst than its iPr analogue (only 75% conversion after 2 h in a model reaction shown in Figure 1). The difference in properties of 6b and 70 indicates that the nature of the ether chelate is more critical to the stability, as well as the activity, of complexes bearing EWGs than of those containing EDG substituents.
| Scheme 6 |
In the course of our project aimed at the preparation of the immobilized metathesis catalyst, we prepared the bromo analogue 71 of the Hoveyda catalyst 2b.6b Although the reactivity patterns of complexes 2b and 71 were in general similar, the latter system was visibly less reactive in some model reactions.19b These results once again show that even a small variation in the benzylidene sphere can result in a change in the activity of the catalyst.
The effect of substitution of the benzylidene fragment on a
catalyst's activity has been studied in detail and interpreted by
means of
+ values by Blechert et al.13 In our current investigation, we decided to perform a preliminary ab initio calculation of an electron density distribution, viewed as electrostatic potential (ESP) or Mulliken charges in selected 2-isopropoxystyrenes.33
This approach should provide more information regarding
the relative importance of electron density at either the vinyl
fragment (precursor of a benzylidene) or the chelating isopropoxy group. The calculated values of ESP charges in 2-isopropoxy-5-nitrostyrene (14) and 2-isopropoxy-4-nitrostyrene (16)
indicate that, in comparison with the unsubstituted 2-isopropoxystyrene 72, the electron density at the iPrO oxygen atom
is lowered in both regioisomers, while C-7 carbons show
evidently increased ESP charge (Scheme 6).35 The comparison
of Mulliken charges34 (ESP not available) in 2-isopropoxy-4-bromostyrene revealed increased electron density at both the
iPrO oxygen and the C-7 carbon. Although this approach is an
oversimplification of a real situation and provides no information
The data reported in this paper witness that the Hoveyda-type catalysts can be significantly improved by changing not only the steric but also the electronic situation in the Ru-chelating isopropoxy fragment. This notion has strong implications for catalyst design and application, which will be studied in more detail during our research program. Attempts to combine the two modes of activation of 2, steric and electronic, resulted in severely decreasing the catalyst's stability. This indicates that the effect of structural modifications of complex 2 does not always correspond to those of the related chiral complexes.17 Although the presence of a NO2 group leads to catalysts that are dramatically more active than both 1b and 2b, enhancement of reactivity is somewhat lower than that observed for sterically activated 4b. However, taking in account simple preparation, partial recyclability, excellent stability, and high activity, the nitro-substituted Hoveyda catalysts 6 and 7 are very attractive from a practical point of view,12b,c even if they do not surpass the hindered catalyst 4b in terms of initiation speed.
Equally noteworthy is the fact that different NHC catalysts turned out to be optimal for different applications. Whereas the phosphine-free carbenes are proven to be catalysts of choice for CM of various electron-deficient alkenes, they exhibit lower reactivity toward tetrasubstituted double bonds. This shows that no single catalyst outperforms all others in all possible applications.37
Financial support was provided by the
State Committee of Scientific Research (Grant No. 4 T09A 136
22). We thank Micha
Barbasiewicz for helpful discussions and
for critical reading of this manuscript. A.M. thanks the IOC
PAS for a pre-doctoral fellowship. We are grateful to Mr. C.
Samoj
owicz for technical assistance. This article is dedicated
to Professor Mieczys
aw M
kosza on the occasion of his 70th
birthday.
Full experimental details, compilation of the instrumentation used, electron density maps and visualizations, and copies of the NMR spectra. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
* In papers with more than one author, the asterisk indicates the name of the author to whom inquiries about the paper should be addressed.
Institute of Organic Chemistry
Institute of Physical Chemistry
1. Pertinent reviews: (a) Schrock, R. R.; Hoveyda, A. H. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2003, 42, 4592-4633.
(b) Trnka, T. M.; Grubbs, R. H. Acc. Chem.
Res. 2001, 34, 18-29.
(c) Fürstner, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39,
3012-3043.
(e) Schuster, M.; Blechert, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997,
36, 2037-2056.
(f) Dragutan, V.; Dragutan, I.; Balaban, A. T. Platinum
Metals Rev. 2001, 45, 155-163.![]()
2. (a) Kingsbury, J. S.; Harrity, J. P. A.; Bonitatebus, P. J.; Hoveyda, A. H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 791-799.
(b) Garber, S. B.; Kingsbury, J.
S.; Gray, B. L.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8168-8179.![]()
3. For a short review on these catalysts, see: Hoveyda, A. H.; Gillingham,
D. G.; Van Veldhuizen, J. J.; Kataoka, O.; Garber, S. B.; Kingsbury, J. S.;
Harrity, J. P. A. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 1-16.![]()
4. (a) Randl, S.; Gessler, S.; Wakamatsu, H.; Blechert, S. Synlett 2001, 430-432.
For activation of Grubbs's carbene 2b toward acrylonitrile, via either
structural modifications or addition of CuCl, see: (b) Love, J. A.; Morgan,
J. P.; Trnka, T. M.; Grubbs, R. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 4035-4037.
5. Imhof, S.; Randl, S.; Blechert, S. Chem. Commun. 2001, 1692-1693.![]()
6. For syntheses of supported variants of 2, see inter alia ref 2b and (a)
Kingsbury, J. S.; Garber, S. B.; Giftos, J. M.; Gray, B. L.; Okamoto, M.
M.; Farrer, R. A.; Fourkas, J. T.; Hoveyda, A. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2001, 40, 4251-4255.
(b) Grela, K.; Tryznowski, M.; Bieniek, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 9055-9059.
(c) Connon, S. J.; Dunne, A. M.;
Blechert, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3835-3838.
(d) Dowden,
J.; Savovic, J. Chem. Commun. 2001, 37-38.
(e) Yao, Q. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3896-3898.
(f) Yao Q.; Zhang, Y. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2003, 42, 3395-3398.
(g) Connon, S. J.; Blechert, S. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2002, 12, 1873-1876.
(h) Yao, Q.; Zhang, Y. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2004, 12, 74-75.![]()
7. Catalysts 2 are commercially available from Aldrich Chemical Co.
8. For a comparison of relative initiation rates of 1b and 2b, see refs 9a,b, 11, and 12.
9. (a) Wakamatsu, H.; Blechert, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 794-796.
(b) Wakamatsu, H.; Blechert, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41,
2403-2405.
(c) For an improved synthesis of 4b and reactivity studies,
see: Dunne, A. M.; Mix, S.; Blechert, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 2733-2736.![]()
10. Extensive studies described in ref 9b,c suggest that a steric bulk adjacent to the chelating isopropoxy moiety of 3b and 4b is the crucial factor securing the unusually high activity of these complexes.
11. (a) Grela, K.; Kim, M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 963-966.
(b) For a unique
activity of a catalyst derived from 5 in living polymerization of diynes,
see: Krause, J. O.; Zarka, M. T.; Anders, U.; Weberskirch, R.; Nuyken,
O.; Buchmeiser, M. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5965-5969.![]()
12. (a) Grela, K.; Harutyunyan, S.; Michrowska, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2002, 41, 4038-4040.
For applications of 6b in target-oriented synthesis,
see the following. (b) (-)-Securinine: Honda, T.; Namiki, H.; Kaneda,
K.; Mizutani, H. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 87-89.
(c) An artificial photosynthesis
model: Ostrowski, S.; Mikus, A. Mol. Divers. 2003, 6, 315-321.
(d)
Harutyunyan, S.; Michrowska, A.; Grela, K. In Catalysts for Fine Chemical
Synthesis; Roberts, S., Ed; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 2004; Vol. 3,
in press.
13. (a) After our report on 6b, another study on the effects of EWG and EDG
substituents in the benzylidene part of 2 on the rate of metathesis was
published: Zaja, M.; Connon, S. J.; Dunne, A. M.; Rivard, M.; Buschmann,
N.; Jiricek, J.; Blechert, S.Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 6545-6558.
(b) For an
application of a CN-substituted Hoveyda-Grubbs catalyst, see: Connon,
S. J.; Rivard, M.; Zaja, M.; Blechert, S. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2003, 345, 572-575.![]()
14. (a) In the case of Hoveyda-Grubbs complexes, initiation requires dissociation of the aryl ether ligand as well as a metathesis step. The slower
rate of initiation of 2a,b is likely due to the less facile dissociation of the
bidentate ligand from the metal center (ref 2). The suppression of oxygen
reassociation to the Ru center caused by a para-NO2 group and the increased
electron deficiency at the initiating carbene species should make 6b more
active in olefin metathesis. (b) For other types of Ru metathesis catalysts
bearing a NO2 group, see: De Clercq, B.; Verpoort, F. Adv. Synth. Catal.
2002, 344, 639-648.
(c) Schwab, P.; Grubbs, R. H.; Ziller, J. W. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 100-110.![]()
15. See the Supporting Information for experimental details.
16. The instability of 8 can be explained in view of the increased steric demand
of the nitro group, which tends to be in the same plane as the benzene
ring. According to ab initio calculation of the minimum-energy conformation of styrene 15, the NO2 group is twisted 22.1
off-plane. See the
Supporting Information and ref 33 for computational details.
17. Recently, the concept of steric and electronic activation has been utilized
by Hoveyda et al. in a preparation of chiral ruthenium complexes for
asymmetric metathesis. The results show that the steric hindrance exhibits
a more pronounced effect on a catalyst's activity. For example, while the
introduction of a NO2 group led to a complex that is 3 times more potent
than an unmodified catalyst, a sterically hindered one acts more than 100
times faster in the same model reaction. However, both modes of activation
can be successfully combined in this case, as the doubly (sterically and
electronically) modified chiral complex possessed the highest level of
potency among those studied. Van Veldhuizen, J. J.; Gillingham, D. G.;
Garber, S. B.; Kataoka, O.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
12502-12508.![]()
18. For reviews on catalytic cross-metathesis, see: (a) Vernall, A. J.; Abell,
A. D. Aldrichimica Acta 2003, 36, 93-105.
(b) Blechert, S.; Connon, S. J.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1900-1923.
(c) Blackwell, H. E.;
O'Leary, D. J.; Chatterjee, A. K.; Washenfelder, R. A.; Bussmann, D. A.;
Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 58-71.
(d) For a short review
on applications to commercial products, see: Pederson, R. L.; Fellows, I.
M.; Ung, T. A.; Ishihara, H.; Hajela, S. P. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2002, 344,
728-735.
(e) For a general model for selectivity in olefin CM, see:
Chatterjee, A. K.; Choi, T.-L.; Sanders, D. P.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 11360-11370.![]()
19. (a) Grela, K.; Bieniek, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 6425-6428.
(b)
Grela, K.; Michrowska, A.; Bieniek, M.; Kim, M.; Klajn, R. Tetrahedron
2003, 59, 4525-4531.
(c) For an application of this transformation in the
enantioselective synthesis of furanone natural products, see: Evans, P.;
Leffray, M. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 7973-7981.![]()
20. Sierra, M. A.; de la Torre, M. C.Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 1538-1559.![]()
21. M
kosza, M.; Stalewski, J.; Wojciechowski, K.; Danikiewicz, W. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 193-214.![]()
22. Demchuk, O. M.; Pietrusiewicz, K. M.; Michrowska, A.; Grela, K. Org.
Lett. 2003, 5, 3217-3220.![]()
23. Optical purity was calculated from the 31P and 1H NMR spectra registered
in the presence of (S)-N-[1-(1-naphthyl)ethyl]-3,5-dinitrobenzamide (Kagan
shift reagent). Cf. ref. 22 and (a) Pakulski, Z.; Demchuk, O. M.; Kwiatosz,
R.; Osiñski, P. W.; Wierczyñska, W.; Pietrusiewicz, K. M. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2003, 14, 1459-1462.
(b) Deshmukh, M.; Dunach, E.; Juge,
S.; Kagan, H. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 3467-3470.![]()
24. The examples of metathesis between two electron-deficient olefins are rare,
and good yields have been reported only for homodimerization of acrylates
and for cross-metathesis of
,
-unsaturated substrates with styrenes. See:
(a) Choi, T.-L.; Lee, C. W.; Chatterjee, A. K.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 10417-10418.
(b) Chatterjee, A. K.; Toste, F. D.; Choi,
T.-L.; Grubbs, R. H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2002, 344, 634-637.![]()
25. Michrowska, A.; Szmigielska, A.; Demchuk, O. M.; Butenschön, H.; Pietrusiewicz, K. M.; Grela, K. Unpublished.
26. The similar lack of activity of 1b in homocoupling of vinylphosphine oxides
has been reported independently: Bisaro, F.; Gouverneur, V. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2003, 44, 7133-7135.![]()
27. CM of terminal olefins and 2-methyl-2-butene, reported by Grubbs et al.,
constitutes a very elegant method of an allyl-to-prenyl conversion:
Chatterjee, A. K.; Sanders, D. P.; Grubbs, R. H. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1939-1942.![]()
28. Significantly higher yields in the cyclisation of dienes shown in Table 3
have been reported in the literature. (a) 61, 31% (5 mol % of 1b; 24 h in
refluxing DCM; NMR yield): Scholl, M.; Ding, S.; Lee, C. W.; Grubbs,
R. H. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 953-956.
(b) 59, 95% (5 mol % of 1c; toluene,
80
C, 24 h; isolated yield); 61, 47% (5 mol % of 1c; toluene, 80
C, 24
h; GC yield); 62, 75% (5 mol % of 1c; toluene, 80
C, 18 h; isolated yield);
cf.: Fürstner, A.; Ackermann, L.; Gabor, B.; Goddard, R.; Lehmann, C.
W.; Mynott, R.; Stelzer, F.; Thiel, O. R. Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 3236-3253.
29. (a) There are no separate reports devoted to applications of the Hoveyda-Grubbs catalysts for the preparation of tetrasubstituted C-C double bonds. However, Hoveyda et al. have noted that tetrasubstituted olefins were obtained less efficiently through catalytic RCM promoted by 2b (ref 2). For a possible explanation of the lower level of efficiency observed with 2b, see ref 3. (b) For some examples of the formation of tetrasubstituted olefins with Hoveyda-type catalysts, see also ref 6b,h,i.
30. The complex 6b is stable up to 110
C and efficiently promotes metathesis
at 80
C in toluene. Grela, K.; Bieniek, M. Unpublished. For the stability
of 2b and 4b, see refs 2 and 9, respectively.
31. In general, the recyclability of 6b is handicapped as compared with that of 2b, and typically 6b can be recovered after metathesis reaction only with moderate efficiency. See the Supporting Information for the recovery experiments.
32. (a) Kitamura, T.; Sato, Y.; Mori, M. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2002, 344, 678-693.![]()
33. All the calculations were performed using Gaussian 98 (Gaussian 98, Revision A.11.4; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 2002) on an IRIX64/Linux workstation. The structures of 2-isopropoxystyrenes were optimized using B3LYP with the 6-31G** basis set. Only real values of the analytical harmonic vibrational frequencies confirmed that the geometries under study correspond to the minimum-energy structures.
34. Mulliken, R. S. J. Chem. Phys. 1955, 23, 1833.![]()
35. For a full set of ESP/Mulliken charges, see the Supporting Information.
36. Similar changes in chemical shifts have been observed for another member of this series, compound 73: Ru=CH, 16.34 and 289.8; iPrO methine proton, 5.01 ppm, and carbon, 78.9 ppm. Arlt, D.; Bieniek, M.; Michrowska, A.; Bujok, R.; Grela K. Unpublished results.
37. For screening of the catalytic performance of catalysts 1b, 2b, 4b, and 6b
in the synthesis of cyclooctenes, see: Sibi, M. P.; Aasmul, M.; Hasegawa,
H.; Subramanian, T. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2883-2886.![]()
|
|
a Conditions: 1-5 mol % catalyst, 25-40
C, CH2Cl2 or 80
C, toluene.b Isolated yields after silica gel chromatography unless stated otherwise.c Reaction
with 2 equiv of methyl acrylate.d Yield determined by GC.e Reaction with 2 equiv of acrylonitrile.f (E):(Z) = 1:3, ref 4.g Reaction with 2 equiv of phenyl
vinyl sulfone.h Reaction with 2 equiv of diphenyl vinyl phosphine oxide.i Reaction with 2 equiv of methyl vinyl ketone.j Reaction with 4 equiv of
methacrylonitrile.k References 22 and 23.
|
|
a Conditions: 1-5 mol % catalyst, 0-40
C, CH2Cl2 or 80
C, toluene.b Isolated yields after silica gel chromatography unless stated otherwise.c Reference
28b.d Reference 9b e Yield determined by GC.f Reaction with neat 2-methyl-2-butene. Reference 27.g Reaction with 2 equiv of (Z)-4-(acetyloxy)-2-butenyl acetate.h Yield based on recovered starting material.i Reaction with 2 equiv of allyl(trimethyl)silane.
|
|
a Conditions: 5 mol % catalyst, 40
C, CH2Cl2.b Yields determined by
GC.
|
|
a Conditions: 1-2.5 mol % catalyst, 25
C, CH2Cl2.b Isolated yields
after silica gel chromatography.c Determined by GC.
|
|
a Conditions: 1-2.5 mol % catalyst, CH2Cl2, 24 h, 25
C.b Isolated
yields after silica gel chromatography. In parentheses are the GC yields.