ACS Publications
[Journal Home Page] [Search the Journals] [Table of Contents] [PDF version of this article] [Download to Citation Manager]

J. Am. Chem. Soc., 127 (8), 2384 -2385, 2005. 10.1021/ja042903o S0002-7863(04)02903-8
Web Release Date: February 3, 2005

Copyright © 2005 American Chemical Society

Can Block Copolymers Be Synthesized by a Single-Step Chemoenzymatic Route in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide?

Christopher J. Duxbury, Wenxin Wang, Matthijs de Geus, Andreas Heise, and Steven M. Howdle*

School of Chemistry, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, U.K. NG7 2RD, and Department of Polymer Chemistry, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands

steve.howdle@nottingham.ac.uk

Received November 24, 2004

Abstract:

We demonstrate the single-step one-pot synthesis of block copolymers by simultaneous enzymatic ring-opening polymerization and chemically catalyzed atom transfer radical polymerization in supercritical carbon dioxide. Both catalyst systems function simultaneously under these conditions, providing a simple route to the formation of block copolymers of dissimilar monomers.


We report for the first time a simple strategy for a single-step, simultaneous, one-pot synthesis of block copolymers by combining the enzymatic ring-opening polymerization (ROP) of -caprolactone (-CL) with the atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) of methyl methacrylate (MMA). The success of the process can be attributed to the use of supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2). We demonstrate that both enzyme- and metal-based ATRP catalysts function concurrently in scCO2. Use of -CL as a cosolvent allows the ATRP-catalyzed growth of the PMMA block to proceed with good control, despite the fact that the -CL cosolvent is being consumed by the enzymatic ROP.

The combination of two different living polymerization strategies in one pot (i.e., ATRP and conventional metal catalyzed ROP) has been reported using conventional solvents.1 Others have shown sequential two-step syntheses combining enzyme and ATRP catalysts.2 However, the results were not as successful when the polymerizations were attempted simultaneously in conventional solvents.3

Enzymes are used as catalysts in a wide variety of reactions because they can be highly active and selective, while also being more environmentally acceptable than some conventional catalysts.4 There has been a great deal of interest in the use of enzymes to mediate polymerizations.5,6 In particular, lipases have been found to be effective in ROPs.7 Recently, there have been concerted efforts to increase the versatility of enzymes to produce block copolymers. A combination of enzymatic polymerization with an alternative polymerization method can allow the stepwise formation of block copolymers of very different monomers by use of a central bifunctional initiator.2

Supercritical fluids are environmentally acceptable replacements for organic solvents. scCO2 has been widely studied because it is inexpensive, inert, nontoxic, and nonflammable, and because its critical parameters are easily accessible (Tc = 31.0 C, pc = 7.38 MPa).8 While scCO2 has been demonstrated to be a suitable solvent for some enzyme-catalyzed reactions9 and chemically catalyzed polymerizations,10,11 very little work has been carried out combining the environmentally friendly nature of enzymes and scCO2 for use in polymerizations.12-14 Our strategy toward the simultaneous one-pot synthesis is outlined in Scheme 1 (route 1). The reactions were carried out in scCO2 at 35 C, 1500 psi (10.3 MPa) using MMA (1.5 mL) and -CL (5 mL). An immobilized enzyme catalyst (Novozym-435) was used for the ROP. However, the key to success is to ensure that the ATRP process remains homogeneous in scCO2. This is not normally the case (vide infra), but here we find that -CL acts as a very effective cosolvent, while also supplying the monomer for consumption by the enzymatic polymerization. The use of -CL as the solvent for ATRP reactions has been reported previously.15 Intriguingly, in our work, control over the ATRP reaction was preserved, despite the consumption of the -CL cosolvent as it polymerized to form the second block (Table 1). A key advantage of the use of scCO2 is that the ATRP can occur in the scCO2 plasticized PCL that is formed, as well as in the -CL monomer/scCO2 solution. The two catalysts do not appear to have any adverse effect on each other; both PCL and PMMA peaks were clearly observed in the 1H NMR spectrum of the product. From the NMR analysis, the block copolymers were found to be approximately 15 mol % PMMA. GPC analyses showed polydispersities very similar to those of the block copolymers produced using the consecutive two-step methods (Scheme 1, routes 2 and 3, vide infra). To demonstrate block copolymer formation, the product was hydrolyzed. GPC analysis of the product clearly shows a shift to lower molecular weight, implying the removal of the PCL from the block copolymer (Figure 1). Additionally, 1H NMR shows definitively the disappearance of the PCL from the product, leaving just the PMMA block of the copolymer. Further data from DSC, MALDI-TOF, and electrospray mass spectrometry also suggest a PCL-b-PMMA structure. In addition, analysis by GPC and DSC confirmed that levels of homopolymer were less than 10 wt %.


Scheme 1. Synthetic Routes To Form PCL-b-PMMA from a Bifunctional Initiatora a Route 1, simultaneous, single-step polymerization combining ATRP of MMA and ROP of -CL. Two-step routes: Route 2, the ROP of -CL followed by the ATRP of MMA. Route 3, the ATRP of MMA followed by the ROP of -CL.
Figure 1 GPC traces for the block copolymer (entry 2) before (blue) and after (red) hydrolysis of the PCL block. Concentration of the hydrolyzed sample is approximately 10 mol % relative to that of the block copolymer.

Control of the molecular weights of the constituent blocks can also easily be achieved in situ. The molecular weights of the PMMA and PCL blocks both increase with time, demonstrating that the two polymerizations occur simultaneously. Reducing the amount of ATRP catalyst (Table 1, entry 4) reduced the length of the PMMA block. Similarly, reducing the level of enzyme catalyst (entry 5) reduced the size of the PCL block produced.

To investigate the simultaneous single-step polymerization, the constituent polymerization steps have been studied in isolation (Scheme 1, routes 2 and 3). Enzymatic ROP of -CL, initiated from the hydroxyl group of the initiator, was carried out in scCO2 (35 C, 1500 psi (10.3 MPa)) using identical reaction conditions but without addition of the ATRP catalysts (20 h, Mw = 28 000, PDI = 1.6). 1H NMR demonstrated that the initiator was indeed bound to the PCL.

The ATRP step was also performed in scCO2 as an isolated reaction, under identical conditions using the bromine group of the same bifunctional initiator, but in the absence of enzyme. There is only one previous report of ATRP in scCO2, the focus of which was the use of fluorinated reagents to produce homogeneous, controlled reactions.16 Here, we demonstrate that -CL (the comonomer) is a suitable cosolvent for the ATRP step in scCO2. Our strategy takes advantage of the fact that both -CL and MMA are miscible with liquid and scCO2. View cell measurements demonstrated the homogeneity of the reaction system throughout the duration of the experiment, with no visible precipitation. Exhaustive studies demonstrated that the ATRP reaction could proceed effectively at 35 C in a CO2/-CL mixture (30 vol % -CL) using nonfluorinated catalysts and MMA monomer (20 h, Mw = 7200, PDI = 1.04). GPC data show molecular weight control with time, although the molecular weight of the PMMA product was found to be greater than the theoretical value. The polydispersity (PDI) was very narrow (typically 1.05-1.10), even before precipitating the polymer from solution. As expected, in the absence of initiator, there was a negligible yield of PMMA. In the absence of -CL cosolvent, PMMA rapidly precipitated from the scCO2 solution, leading to a complete loss of control. GPC analysis showed a very broad, asymmetric molecular weight distribution. Detailed results from these experiments will be discussed in a future publication.

After carrying out the second steps (Scheme 1, routes 2 and 3), both PMMA and PCL were found to be present (1H NMR analysis). GPC analysis showed that the molecular weights of the macroinitiators had increased. As with the simultaneous samples (route 1) the block copolymer structure was further confirmed by hydrolysis. In addition, no evidence for initiator transesterification was seen, which would lead to significant levels of homopolymer.

We have demonstrated that a simultaneous one-pot combination of enzymatic and chemical polymerization systems in scCO2 leads to controlled synthesis of block copolymers. Moreover, the data clearly show that the two catalyst systems are robust under these conditions and can tolerate each other. We believe that this methodology can be extended to provide a very simple route to a wide range of block copolymers incorporating monomers with very different physical and chemical properties.

Acknowledgment

We are grateful to the EPSRC National Mass Spectrometry Service Centre, Swansea, and Mark Wyatt for MALDI-TOF MS analysis. We thank the EPSRC (C.J.D.) and the Dutch Polymer Institute (A.H. and M.d.G.) for financial support. S.M.H. is a Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award Holder.

* In papers with more than one author, the asterisk indicates the name of the author to whom inquiries about the paper should be addressed.

University of Nottingham.

Eindhoven University of Technology.

1. Mecerreyes, D.; Moineau, G.; Dubois, P.; Jerome, R.; Hedrick, J. L.; Hawker, C. J.; Malmstrom, E. E.; Trollsas, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1274-1276. [ChemPort]

2. Meyer, U.; Palmans, A. R. A.; Loontjens, T.; Heise, A. Macromolecules 2002, 35, 2873-2875.[Full text - ACS] [ChemPort]

3. Heise, A.; Palmans, A. R. A.; Koning, C. Abstr. Pap.-Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 226, 435.

4. Schmid, A.; Dordick, J. S.; Hauer, B.; Kiener, A.; Wubbolts, M.; Witholt, B. Nature 2001, 409, 258-268. [ChemPort] [Medline] [CrossRef]

5. Kobayashi, S.; Uyama, H.; Kimura, S. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 3793-3818.[Full text - ACS] [ChemPort] [Medline]

6. Gross, R. A.; Kumar, A.; Kalra, B. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 2097-2124.[Full text - ACS] [ChemPort] [Medline]

7. Uyama, H.; Suda, S.; Kikuchi, H.; Kobayashi, S. Chem. Lett. 1997, 1109-1110. [ChemPort]

8. Woods, H. M.; Silva, M. M. C. G.; Nouvel, C.; Shakesheff, K. M.; Howdle, S. M. J. Mater. Chem. 2004, 14, 1663-1678. [ChemPort] [CrossRef]

9. Mesiano, A. J.; Beckman, E. J.; Russell, A. J. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 623-633.[Full text - ACS] [ChemPort] [Medline]

10. Cooper, A. I. J. Mater. Chem. 2000, 10, 207-234. [ChemPort] [CrossRef]

11. Kendall, J. L.; Canelas, D. A.; Young, J. L.; DeSimone, J. M. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 543-563.[Full text - ACS] [ChemPort] [Medline]

12. Loeker, F. C.; Duxbury, C. J.; Kumar, R.; Gao, W.; Gross, R. A.; Howdle, S. M. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 2450-2453.[Full text - ACS] [ChemPort]

13. Ryu, K.; Kim, S. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 1996, 13, 415-418. [ChemPort]

14. Takamoto, T.; Uyama, H.; Kobayashi, S. e-Polymers 2001, art. no.-004.

15. Wang, W. X.; Yin, Z. H.; Detrembleur, C.; Lecomte, P.; Lou, X. D.; Jerome, R. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2002, 203, 968-974. [ChemPort] [CrossRef]

16. Xia, J. H.; Johnson, T.; Gaynor, S. G.; Matyjaszewski, K.; DeSimone, J. Macromolecules 1999, 32, 4802-4805.[Full text - ACS] [ChemPort]


Table 1. Simultaneous One-Pot Block Copolymerizations of MMA and -CLa

     

block copolymerc

hydrolyzedc

entry

time (h)

% yieldb

Mw

PDI

Mw

PDI

1

4

39

9400

1.28

3900

1.14

2

12

46

23000

1.26

5400

1.08

3

20

60

41000

2.11

10000

1.07

4d

20

58

24000

1.47

4100

1.13

5e

20

30

23000

1.20

8400

1.12

a Reactions performed with 0.4 g of Novozym-435, 0.22 mmol CuBr, and 0.45 mmol 2,2'-bipyridine unless otherwise stated.b Polymerization yield determined gravimetrically.c Molecular weight determined by GPC, against polystyrene standards.d Reaction carried out using half the amount of CuBr (0.11 mmol) and 2,2'-bipyridine (0.23 mmol).e Reaction carried out using half the amount of enzyme (0.2 g).