
Web Release Date: February 3,
Can Block Copolymers Be Synthesized by a Single-Step Chemoenzymatic Route in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide?



and

School of Chemistry, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, U.K. NG7 2RD, and Department of Polymer Chemistry, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Received November 24, 2004
Abstract:
We demonstrate the single-step one-pot synthesis of block copolymers by simultaneous enzymatic ring-opening polymerization and chemically catalyzed atom transfer radical polymerization in supercritical carbon dioxide. Both catalyst systems function simultaneously under these conditions, providing a simple route to the formation of block copolymers of dissimilar monomers.
We report for the first time a simple strategy for a single-step,
simultaneous, one-pot synthesis of block copolymers by combining
the enzymatic ring-opening polymerization (ROP) of
-caprolactone
(
-CL) with the atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) of
methyl methacrylate (MMA). The success of the process can be
attributed to the use of supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2). We
demonstrate that both enzyme- and metal-based ATRP catalysts
function concurrently in scCO2. Use of
-CL as a cosolvent allows
the ATRP-catalyzed growth of the PMMA block to proceed with
good control, despite the fact that the
-CL cosolvent is being
consumed by the enzymatic ROP.
The combination of two different living polymerization strategies in one pot (i.e., ATRP and conventional metal catalyzed ROP) has been reported using conventional solvents.1 Others have shown sequential two-step syntheses combining enzyme and ATRP catalysts.2 However, the results were not as successful when the polymerizations were attempted simultaneously in conventional solvents.3
Enzymes are used as catalysts in a wide variety of reactions
because they can be highly active and selective, while also being
more environmentally acceptable than some conventional catalysts.4
There has been a great deal of interest in the use of enzymes to
mediate polymerizations.5,6
Supercritical fluids are environmentally acceptable replacements
for organic solvents. scCO2 has been widely studied because it is
inexpensive, inert, nontoxic, and nonflammable, and because its
critical parameters are easily accessible (Tc = 31.0
C, pc = 7.38
MPa).8 While scCO2 has been demonstrated to be a suitable solvent
for some enzyme-catalyzed reactions9 and chemically catalyzed
polymerizations,10,11
C, 1500 psi (10.3 MPa) using MMA
(1.5 mL) and
-CL (5 mL). An immobilized enzyme catalyst
(Novozym-435) was used for the ROP. However, the key to success
is to ensure that the ATRP process remains homogeneous in scCO2.
This is not normally the case (vide infra), but here we find that
-CL acts as a very effective cosolvent, while also supplying the
monomer for consumption by the enzymatic polymerization. The
use of
-CL as the solvent for ATRP reactions has been reported
previously.15 Intriguingly, in our work, control over the ATRP
reaction was preserved, despite the consumption of the
-CL
cosolvent as it polymerized to form the second block (Table 1
). A
key advantage of the use of scCO2 is that the ATRP can occur in
the scCO2 plasticized PCL that is formed, as well as in the
-CL
monomer/scCO2 solution. The two catalysts do not appear to have
any adverse effect on each other; both PCL and PMMA peaks were
clearly observed in the 1H NMR spectrum of the product. From
the NMR analysis, the block copolymers were found to be
approximately 15 mol % PMMA. GPC analyses showed polydispersities very similar to those of the block copolymers produced
using the consecutive two-step methods (Scheme 1, routes 2 and
3, vide infra). To demonstrate block copolymer formation, the
product was hydrolyzed. GPC analysis of the product clearly shows
a shift to lower molecular weight, implying the removal of the PCL
from the block copolymer (Figure 1). Additionally, 1H NMR shows
definitively the disappearance of the PCL from the product, leaving
just the PMMA block of the copolymer. Further data from DSC,
MALDI-TOF, and electrospray mass spectrometry also suggest a
PCL-b-PMMA structure. In addition, analysis by GPC and DSC
confirmed that levels of homopolymer were less than 10 wt %.
Control of the molecular weights of the constituent blocks can also easily be achieved in situ. The molecular weights of the PMMA and PCL blocks both increase with time, demonstrating that the two polymerizations occur simultaneously. Reducing the amount of ATRP catalyst (Table 1, entry 4) reduced the length of the PMMA block. Similarly, reducing the level of enzyme catalyst (entry 5) reduced the size of the PCL block produced.
To investigate the simultaneous single-step polymerization, the
constituent polymerization steps have been studied in isolation
(Scheme 1, routes 2 and 3). Enzymatic ROP of
-CL, initiated from
the hydroxyl group of the initiator, was carried out in scCO2 (35
C, 1500 psi (10.3 MPa)) using identical reaction conditions but
without addition of the ATRP catalysts (20 h, Mw = 28 000, PDI
= 1.6). 1H NMR demonstrated that the initiator was indeed bound
to the PCL.
The ATRP step was also performed in scCO2 as an isolated
reaction, under identical conditions using the bromine group of the
same bifunctional initiator, but in the absence of enzyme. There is
only one previous report of ATRP in scCO2, the focus of which
was the use of fluorinated reagents to produce homogeneous,
controlled reactions.16 Here, we demonstrate that
-CL (the
comonomer) is a suitable cosolvent for the ATRP step in scCO2.
Our strategy takes advantage of the fact that both
-CL and MMA
are miscible with liquid and scCO2. View cell measurements
demonstrated the homogeneity of the reaction system throughout
the duration of the experiment, with no visible precipitation.
Exhaustive studies demonstrated that the ATRP reaction could
proceed effectively at 35
C in a CO2/
-CL mixture (30 vol %
-CL)
using nonfluorinated catalysts and MMA monomer (20 h, Mw =
7200, PDI = 1.04). GPC data show molecular weight control with
time, although the molecular weight of the PMMA product was
found to be greater than the theoretical value. The polydispersity
(PDI) was very narrow (typically 1.05-1.10), even before precipitating the polymer from solution. As expected, in the absence of
initiator, there was a negligible yield of PMMA. In the absence of
-CL cosolvent, PMMA rapidly precipitated from the scCO2
solution, leading to a complete loss of control. GPC analysis showed
a very broad, asymmetric molecular weight distribution. Detailed
results from these experiments will be discussed in a future
publication.
After carrying out the second steps (Scheme 1, routes 2 and 3), both PMMA and PCL were found to be present (1H NMR analysis). GPC analysis showed that the molecular weights of the macroinitiators had increased. As with the simultaneous samples (route 1) the block copolymer structure was further confirmed by hydrolysis. In addition, no evidence for initiator transesterification was seen, which would lead to significant levels of homopolymer.
We have demonstrated that a simultaneous one-pot combination of enzymatic and chemical polymerization systems in scCO2 leads to controlled synthesis of block copolymers. Moreover, the data clearly show that the two catalyst systems are robust under these conditions and can tolerate each other. We believe that this methodology can be extended to provide a very simple route to a wide range of block copolymers incorporating monomers with very different physical and chemical properties.
We are grateful to the EPSRC National Mass Spectrometry Service Centre, Swansea, and Mark Wyatt for MALDI-TOF MS analysis. We thank the EPSRC (C.J.D.) and the Dutch Polymer Institute (A.H. and M.d.G.) for financial support. S.M.H. is a Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award Holder.
* In papers with more than one author, the asterisk indicates the name of the author to whom inquiries about the paper should be addressed.
University of Nottingham.
Eindhoven University of Technology.
1. Mecerreyes, D.; Moineau, G.; Dubois, P.; Jerome, R.; Hedrick, J. L.;
Hawker, C. J.; Malmstrom, E. E.; Trollsas, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
1998, 37, 1274-1276.
2. Meyer, U.; Palmans, A. R. A.; Loontjens, T.; Heise, A. Macromolecules
2002, 35, 2873-2875.
3. Heise, A.; Palmans, A. R. A.; Koning, C. Abstr. Pap.-Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 226, 435.
4. Schmid, A.; Dordick, J. S.; Hauer, B.; Kiener, A.; Wubbolts, M.; Witholt,
B. Nature 2001, 409, 258-268.
5. Kobayashi, S.; Uyama, H.; Kimura, S. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 3793-3818.
6. Gross, R. A.; Kumar, A.; Kalra, B. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 2097-2124.
7. Uyama, H.; Suda, S.; Kikuchi, H.; Kobayashi, S. Chem. Lett. 1997, 1109-1110.
8. Woods, H. M.; Silva, M. M. C. G.; Nouvel, C.; Shakesheff, K. M.; Howdle,
S. M. J. Mater. Chem. 2004, 14, 1663-1678.
9. Mesiano, A. J.; Beckman, E. J.; Russell, A. J. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 623-633.
10. Cooper, A. I. J. Mater. Chem. 2000, 10, 207-234.
11. Kendall, J. L.; Canelas, D. A.; Young, J. L.; DeSimone, J. M. Chem.
Rev. 1999, 99, 543-563.
12. Loeker, F. C.; Duxbury, C. J.; Kumar, R.; Gao, W.; Gross, R. A.; Howdle,
S. M. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 2450-2453.
13. Ryu, K.; Kim, S. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 1996, 13, 415-418.
14. Takamoto, T.; Uyama, H.; Kobayashi, S. e-Polymers 2001, art. no.-004.
15. Wang, W. X.; Yin, Z. H.; Detrembleur, C.; Lecomte, P.; Lou, X. D.;
Jerome, R. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2002, 203, 968-974.
16. Xia, J. H.; Johnson, T.; Gaynor, S. G.; Matyjaszewski, K.; DeSimone, J.
Macromolecules 1999, 32, 4802-4805.
|
block copolymerc |
hydrolyzedc |
|||||
|
entry |
time (h) |
% yieldb |
Mw |
PDI |
Mw |
PDI |
|
1 |
4 |
39 |
9400 |
1.28 |
3900 |
1.14 |
|
2 |
12 |
46 |
23000 |
1.26 |
5400 |
1.08 |
|
3 |
20 |
60 |
41000 |
2.11 |
10000 |
1.07 |
|
4d |
20 |
58 |
24000 |
1.47 |
4100 |
1.13 |
|
5e |
20 |
30 |
23000 |
1.20 |
8400 |
1.12 |
a Reactions performed with 0.4 g of Novozym-435, 0.22 mmol CuBr, and 0.45 mmol 2,2'-bipyridine unless otherwise stated.b Polymerization yield determined gravimetrically.c Molecular weight determined by GPC, against polystyrene standards.d Reaction carried out using half the amount of CuBr (0.11 mmol) and 2,2'-bipyridine (0.23 mmol).e Reaction carried out using half the amount of enzyme (0.2 g).