
Web Release Date: March 22,
Activation of High-TC Ferromagnetism in Mn2+-Doped ZnO using Amines
Department of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-1700
Received February 3, 2005
Abstract:
We report the discovery that high-TC ferromagnetism in manganese-doped ZnO (Mn2+:ZnO) can be activated by amine binding and calcination. The activation of ferromagnetism is attributed to the incorporation of uncompensated p-type dopants into the ZnO lattice upon amine calcination, a process that has substantial precedence in the literature surrounding p-type ZnO. The experimental observations are consistent with a microscopic mechanism involving formation of bound magnetic polarons upon introduction of p-type dopants into Mn2+:ZnO. These results clearly demonstrate that Mn2+:ZnO ferromagnetism is critically sensitive to defects other than the magnetic dopants themselves, offering some insight into the diversity of experimental observations reported previously for this material.
Since its discovery in Co2+-doped TiO2 in 2001,1 high-Curie
temperature (TC) ferromagnetism has been observed in a number
of diluted magnetic oxides (DMOs),2 and elucidation of its origins
has been cited as among the most important problems in magnetism
to have emerged in several years.3,4
0.16
B/Mn2+),12
high-TC ferromagnetism has been observed in Mn2+:ZnO/GaAs
films that appeared to correlate with p-type conductivity,13 but near-room-temperature ferromagnetism was also claimed for n-type
Mn2+:ZnO.14 Recently, ferromagnetism described earlier as intrinsic
was suggested to instead arise from manganese oxide impurity
phases, such as Zn-doped Mn2O3 or Mn3O4.15,16
We recently reported high-TC ferromagnetism in Mn2+:ZnO
prepared by direct chemical synthesis.17 To explain the large MS
of 1.35 
/Mn2+, we speculated that calcination of amines may
introduce p-type nitrogen defects into the ZnO lattice. To test this
hypothesis, we have performed the split-batch experiment described
by Figure 1.18 A single batch of high-quality 0.20% Mn2+:ZnO
nanocrystals17 was split into two equal parts. Half were capped with
trioctylphosphine oxide (TOPO, O-capped), and the other half were
capped with trioctylamine (N-capped) under identical conditions.
Clear colloidal suspensions of the nanocrystals in toluene were spin
coated onto fused-silica substrates and calcined aerobically at 500
C for 2 min per coat (~20 coats total, 1
m thickness). Figure 1
shows 300 K magnetization loops collected for the two films.
Whereas the sample prepared from O-capped nanocrystals showed
little magnetization at 300 K, that prepared from N-capped colloids
showed a strong magnetic hysteresis with MS = 1.22 
/Mn2+ and
a coercivity of 65 Oe. This experiment was repeated several times
with various N (dodecylamine or trioctylamine) or O (TOPO or
acetate) ligands. Without exception, N-capped colloids yielded
ferromagnetic films (13 films, mean MS(300 K) = 0.76 ± 0.42

/Mn2+), whereas O-capped colloids yielded paramagnetic films
(10 films, mean MS(300 K) = 0 ± 0 
/Mn2+). Calcined powders
gave similar results.
Figure 2a shows magnetization data measured as a function of
temperature for representative ferromagnetic and paramagnetic
samples. The data from the paramagnetic sample are reproduced
well by a S = 5/2 Brillouin function17 using the analytical Mn2+
concentration determined by atomic emission spectrometry and no
variable parameters. This agreement demonstrates that manganese
oxides are not formed during calcination since, in that case, the S
= 5/2 paramagnetism would be reduced. Indeed, the concentration
of Mn2+ (0.20%) is ca. 102 times lower than its solid solubility
under these conditions (~20%).19 In addition to paramagnetism,
the ferromagnetic sample shows a large temperature-independent
moment that persists up to the instrument limit of 350 K. This signal
is the ferromagnetism shown in Figure 1, and its temperature
independence demonstrates TC
350 K.
Figure 2b shows the dependence of the 300 K ferromagnetism on Mn2+ concentration for a series of samples prepared under identical conditions. These data show that Mn2+ is required, but that increasing its concentration above 0.20% actually reduces both MS/Mn2+ and MS/g, inconsistent with scenarios involving ferromagnetism from segregated manganese oxides. A similar concentration dependence in n-type DMOs has been rationalized by invoking formation of antiferromagnetically coupled TM2+ dimers.4 From 0.20 to 1.0%, the statistical probability that a Mn2+ ion is isolated without any nearest neighbor Mn2+ ions decreases by only 16% (from 98 to 82%),20 however, a difference far too small to account for the 97% reduction in ferromagnetism over the same concentration range, arguing against this explanation in the present case. This concentration dependence likely reflects the relative availability of nitrogen8 (vide infra) and is the subject of ongoing investigation.
We attribute the activation of ferromagnetism in Mn2+:ZnO to the incorporation of uncompensated p-type defects into the ZnO lattice upon amine calcination, a process that has substantial precedence in the literature surrounding p-type ZnO. Successful methods for preparing p-type ZnO have largely relied on introduction of NO, NH3, N2, or N2O during21 or after22 vacuum deposition to incorporate nitrogen, believed from single-crystal EPR data to substitute for lattice oxygen as the reduced shallow acceptor, NO3-.21 Three factors likely contribute to the successful incorporation of uncompensated p-type defects in our Mn2+:ZnO samples. (1) Amine capping forms Zn2+-Namine bonds, providing activated nitrogen already bound to lattice cations. (2) Aerobic synthesis and calcination aid suppression of native donor defects, such as OV, Zni, or H.21 (3) Amine capping passivates surface defects that could otherwise be trapped during sintering (evident from the diminished green defect emission and enhanced UV excitonic emission in N-capped ZnO nanocrystals17). We note that addition and calcination of amines after spin coating also enhances the ferromagnetism of the Mn2+:ZnO films.
The experimental observations are consistent with a microscopic
mechanism involving formation of bound magnetic polarons
(BMPs)23 upon introduction of p-type dopants, analogous to that
proposed recently for n-type DMOs.4 Magnetic exchange interactions between defect-bound VB holes and Mn2+ ions occupying
the same space are proposed to align Mn2+ spins with respect to
one another, forming a BMP. As the defect density is increased,
overlapping BMPs coalesce into an extended ferromagnetic domain,
as illustrated in Scheme 1.4 The hole-Mn2+ exchange energy (N0
)
arises from oxo(p)-Mn2+(d) covalency and can be parametrized
using the configuration interaction expression in eq 1,24 in which
the resonance integral is proportional to the spatial overlap (Scheme
1), S is the dopant spin, and E- represents the energy associated
with transfer of the VB hole to Mn2+ (E+ for transfer of a VB
electron to Mn2+).

| Scheme 1 |
By MCD spectroscopy, the Mn2+
Mn3+ photoionization
transition in Mn2+:ZnO has been identified at 24 000 cm-1,17 just
4000 cm-1 below the VB
CB excitation, implying that E- is
very small (~4000 cm-1). The strong hole-Mn2+ hybridization
that results promotes long-range Mn2+-Mn2+ exchange coupling
(Scheme 1). This analysis is supported by density functional
calculations of Mn2+:ZnO band structure.6-8 When p-doped, delocalization of VB holes onto Mn2+ ions is extensive and the wave
function at the Fermi level possesses substantial manganese
character. Hybridization at the Fermi level is the source of all
potential spintronics applications of this material.
In summary, we report the discovery that calcination of amines activates high-TC ferromagnetism in Mn2+:ZnO. Perhaps the most important aspect of this result is the clear demonstration that the magnetism of Mn2+:ZnO (and by inference, other DMOs) is critically dependent upon factors other than the transition metal dopants themselves. Such factors are likely responsible for the broad range of magnetic properties previously reported.
This work was funded by the NSF (DMR-0239325 and ECS-0224138). D.R.G. is a Cottrell Scholar of the Research Corporation. Paul Archer (U.W.) is thanked for preliminary magnetic measurements.
Experimental details and additional materials characterization (2 figures). This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
* In papers with more than one author, the asterisk indicates the name of the author to whom inquiries about the paper should be addressed.
1. Matsumoto, Y.; Murakami, M.; Shono, T.; Hasegawa, T.; Fukumura, T.;
Kawasaki, M.; Ahmet, P.; Chikyow, T.; Koshihara, S.; Koinuma, H.
Science 2001, 291, 854.
2. For a recent review of DMOs, see: Pearton, S. J.; Heo, W. H.; Ivill, M.;
Norton, D. P.; Steiner, T. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2004, 19, R59.
3. Dietl, T. Nat. Mater. 2003, 2, 646.
4. Coey, J. M. D.; Venkatesan, M.; Fitzgerald, C. B. Nat. Mater. 2005, 4,
173
and references therein.
5. Dietl, T.; Ohno, H.; Matsukura, F.; Cibert, J.; Ferrand, D. Science 2000,
287, 1019.
6. Sato, K.; Katayama-Yoshida, H. Physica E 2001, 10, 251.
7. Wang, Q.; Sun, Q.; Jena, P.; Kawazoe, Y. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 70, 052408.
8. Petit, L.; Schulthess, T. C.; Svane, A.; Temmerman, W. M.; Szotek, Z.
Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 2004, 825E, G2.
9. Gratens, X.; Bindilatti, V.; Oliveira, N. F., Jr.; Shapira, Y.; Foner, S.;
Golacki, Z.; Haas, T. E. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 69, 125209.
10. Han, S.-J.; Jang, T.-H.; Kim, Y. B.; Park, B.-G.; Park, J.-H.; Jeong, Y.
H. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 83, 920.
11. Yoon, S. W.; Cho, S.-B.; We, S. C.; Yoon, S.; Suh, B. J.; Song, H. K.;
Shin, Y. J. J. Appl. Phys. 2003, 93, 7879.
12. Sharma, P.; Gupta, A.; Rao, K. V.; Owens, F. J.; Sharma, R.; Ahuja, R.;
Osorio Guillen, J. M.; Johansson, B.; Gehring, G. A. Nat. Mater. 2003,
2, 673.
13. Lim, S.-W.; Jeong, M.-C.; Ham, M.-H.; Myoung, J.-M. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.
2004, 43, L280.
14. Heo, Y. W.; Ivill, M. P.; Ip, K.; Norton, D. P.; Pearton, S. J.; Kelly, J.
G.; Rairigh, R.; Hebard, A. F.; Steiner, T. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 84,
2292.
15. Kundaliya, D. C.; Ogale, S. B.; Lofland, S. E.; Dhar, S.; Metting, C. J.;
Shinde, S. R.; Ma, Z.; Varughese, B.; Ramanujachary, K. V.; Salamanca-Riba, L.; Venkatesan, T. Nat. Mater. 2004, 3, 709.
16. Zheng, R. K.; Liu, H.; Zhang, X. X.; Roy, V. A. L.; Djurisic, A. B. Appl.
Phys. Lett. 2004, 85, 2589.
17. Norberg, N. S.; Kittilstved, K. R.; Amonette, J. E.; Kukkadapu, R. K.;
Schwartz, D. A.; Gamelin, D. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 9387.
18. See Supporting Information for experimental details.
19. White, W. B.; McIlvried, K. E. Trans. Brit. Ceram. Soc. 1965, 64, 521.
20. Bryan, J. D.; Gamelin, D. R. Prog. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 54, 47.
21. Look, D. C.; Claflin, B. Phys. Status Solidi B 2004, 241, 624.
22. Rommeluère, J. F.; Svob, L.; Jomard, F.; Mimila-Arroyo, J.; Lusson, A.;
Sallet, V.; Marfaing, Y. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 83, 287.
23. Furdyna, J. K.; Kossut, J. Diluted Magnetic Semiconductors. In Semiconductors and Semimetals; Academic Press: New York, 1988; Vol. 25.
24. Bhattacharjee, A. K. Phys. Rev. B 1992, 46, 5266.