
Web Release Date: May 12,
A Hybrid Phosphorus Ligand for Highly Enantioselective Asymmetric Hydroformylation
Contribution from the Department of Chemistry, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
Received October 17, 2005
Abstract:
A new hybrid phosphorus ligand has been prepared starting from chiral NOBIN (2-amino-2'-hydroxy-1,1'-binaphthyl). Excellent enantioselectivities (up to 99% ee) have been achieved in the Rh-catalyzed asymmetric hydroformylations of styrene derivatives and vinyl acetate.
Hydroformylation is the reaction of alkenes with carbon monoxide and hydrogen to form aldehydes, which provides a versatile method for the functionalization of C-C double bonds [eq 1].
Today, hydroformylation is the largest industrially homogeneous catalytic process. Over 6 million tons of oxo products
are being produced worldwide per year. Because chiral aldehydes can be easily converted into a variety of enantiomerically
pure compounds, asymmetric hydroformylation1 is potentially
useful for the preparation of pharmaceutical products. Despite
its importance, asymmetric hydroformylation is underdeveloped.
Achieving high ee's (
98% ee) remains a challenging goal due
to the following reasons: First, hydroformylation reactions are
often carried out at elevated temperature to achieve an acceptable
reaction rate. However, high enantioselectivities are generally
observed at low temperature with relatively low reaction rate
and low conversion. This limits the utilities of this important
transformation. Second, the aldehyde products, especially for
those hydroformylated from styrene derivatives, can undergo
racemization under certain hydroformylation reaction conditions.1b
This racemization results in lower ee's at high conversion in
some catalytic systems. To the best of our knowledge, only a
few ligands2 are capable of affording over 90% ee's in
asymmetric hydroformylation. Recent reports have shown that
mixed phosphorus ligands bearing two different phosphorus
groups are effective in asymmetric hydroformylation.2ab,3
Binaphos,2ab,4 a hybrid phosphine-phosphite ligand developed
by Takaya and co-workers, has been proved to be one of the
benchmark ligands for the asymmetric hydroformylation of
vinylarenes. For example, up to 94% ee has been achieved for
the hydroformylation of styrene with Rh-Binaphos catalyst.
However, racemization remains a major problem for Binaphos,2b,4a
and the enantioselectivity can be further improved. The development of ligands for highly enantioselective hydroformylation
without the racemization of chiral products is highly desirable.
Herein, we would like to report the synthesis of a new hybrid
phosphine-phosphoramidite ligand 15
Takaya and co-workers have demonstrated that configuration matched (R,S and S,R) Binaphos led to better enantioselectivity than mismatched (R,R and S,S) Binaphos.2b As the phosphine-phosphoramidite analogue of Binaphos, we anticipated that (R,S)-1 and its enantiomer are the configuration matched isomers. We thus synthesized (R,S)-1 for the current study. Despite the similarity, there is a significant difference between Binaphos and ligand 1, both electronically (phosphoramidites are more electron-donating than phosphites because the electronegativity of nitrogen (3.04) is less than that of oxygen (3.44)) and sterically. Hence, replacing the phosphite group in Binaphos with the N-substituted phosphoramidite group in ligand 1 represents substantial change. Figure 1 shows the space-filling and stick models (based on CAChe MM2 calculation) for Rh[(R,S)-1]H(CO)2 and Rh[(R,S)-Binaphos]H(CO)2 complexes, which are presumed to be the active intermediates in hydroformylation reactions.2ab As shown in Figure 1, in the presence of the crowded N-substituent, Rh[(R,S)-1]H(CO)2 complex can provide a deeper and more closed chiral pocket than the corresponding Rh[(R,S)-Binaphos]H(CO)2 complex. Molecular dynamics simulation based on the CAChe program also indicates that the Rh complex of ligand 1 is more conformationally rigid than the analogous Binaphos complex due to the presence of N-substituent of the phosphoramidite part in ligand 1. We envision that a more closed rigid chiral pocket provided by Rh[(R,S)-1]H(CO)2 complex could lead to high asymmetric induction.
| Figure 1 Space-filling and stick models for Rh[(R,S)-1]H(CO)2 and Rh[(R,S)-Binaphos]H(CO)2 based on CAChe MM2 calculation. |
Ligand 1 was prepared from chiral 2-amino-2'-hydroxy-1,1'-binaphthyl (NOBIN) 2. Following the literature procedure,6 the
phosphine oxide amide 3 was easily obtained in high yield.
Reduction of both phosphine oxide and amide groups with
excess BH3, followed by treatment with diethylamine, gave 4
in 49% yield. After deprotonation with n-BuLi and quenching
with phosphorochloridite 5, the desired ligand (R,S)-1 was
obtained in 37% yield as an air-stable solid (Scheme 1).
| Scheme 1. Synthesis of (R,S)-1 |
Using the chiral ligand (R,S)-1, rhodium-catalyzed asymmetric
hydroformylation has been explored. Styrene was selected as
the standard substrate for the optimization of reaction conditions.
The catalyst was prepared in situ by mixing Rh(acac)(CO)2 with
4 equiv of ligand 1. Hydroformylation reactions were performed
using 1:1 CO/H2 gas with 0.1 mol % of the catalyst. The
chemoselectivities of the hydroformylation reactions were
excellent, and no hydrogenation product was detected via 1H
NMR. The regioselectivities were moderate with a branch/linear
ratio generally over 85:15, which were comparable to the results
obtained with Binaphos.2ab The enantioselectivities strongly
depended on reaction conditions. Significant solvent effect was
observed (Table 1
, entries 1-4). High enantioselectivities were
obtained when the reactions were run in nonpolar solvents such
as methylene chloride and benzene, while low ee values were
observed in THF and EtOAc. The competition for coordination
sites between polar solvents and substrates may account for this
solvent effect.1b Increasing reaction temperature led to faster
reaction rate and lower ee (Table 1, entries 1, 5, and 6).
Enantiomeric excess of 99% was achieved when the reaction
was run at 40
C with 25% conversion. Up to 98% ee was
achieved in asymmetric hydroformylation with 100% conversion
at 60
C, while the enantioselectivity dropped to 81% ee at 80
C. No significant influence of the CO/H2 pressure on regio-
and enantioselectivity was observed. The total pressure dramatically affected the reaction rate (Table 1, entries 1, 7, and 8).
Under low CO/H2 pressure, the reaction was fast and complete
conversion was achieved in 24 h under 20 atm of CO/H2. The
pressure effect on the reaction rate can be explained by the lower
dissociation rate of CO from the Rh center at high pressure. It
is worth noting that the racemization of the hydroformylation
product was significantly lower with ligand 1 than with
Binaphos.2b For example, elongation of the reaction time after
the reaction was complete only slightly lowered the enantiomeric
excess of the chiral product with ligand 1 (Table 1, entries 1,
9, and 10). With Binaphos as the ligand, a dramatic decrease
of enantiomeric excess after full conversion has been observed.2b
It has also been reported that significant racemization may occur
even before full conversion was reached in the hydroformylation
of styrene with Binaphos.4a After reaction conditions were
screened, hydroformylation of styrene with the Rh-(R,S)-1
catalyst was performed under 20 atm of 1:1 CO/H2 at 60
C in
benzene. Optimized conversion, regioselectivity, and enantioselectivity were achieved under this condition.
A series of styrene derivatives were hydroformylated using
the Rh-(R,S)-1 catalyst under the optimized reaction condition
(Table 2
). Under the same reaction condition, 98% ee (Table
2, entry 1) in the hydroformylation of styrene was achieved
with ligand 1, while only 84% ee (Table 2, entry 2) was obtained
with Binaphos. The result with Binaphos under current reaction
condition is much lower than the literature reported result (Table
2, entry 3, 94% ee).2ab Because optimized reaction conditions
for Binaphos and ligand 1 are very different due to different
steric and electronic properties of two ligands, direct comparison
of ligand 1 with Binaphos under the same reaction condition is
not appropriate. To demonstrate the utilities of this new ligand,
we have selected the best reported results with Binaphos for a
side-by-side comparison. With ligand 1, up to 99% ee was
obtained for the hydroformylation of para-methyl styrene (Table
2, entry 4). Halogen-substituted styrene derivatives were also
hydroformylated with excellent enantioselectivities with ligand
1 (Table 2, entries 6, 8, and 10). It is worth noting that high
enantioselectivities at high conversions were achieved for
fluorinated styrene derivatives (Table 2, entries 6 and 8). For
comparison, the reactions with Binaphos needed to be terminated
at moderate conversions to obtain high enantioselectivities due
to the racemization of the chiral products (Table 2, entries 7
and 9).2b With ligand 1, para-methoxy styrene was hydroformylated with high enantioselectivity (98% ee) (Table 2, entry 12),
which is significantly higher than the result (88% ee) reported
with Binaphos.2ab Up to 98% ee for the hydroformylation of
para-isobutyl styrene was achieved with ligand 1 (Table 2, entry
14). Oxidation of the aldehyde product affords the corresponding
acid, ibuprofen, one of the most widely used nonsteroidal
antiinflammatory agents. (S)-Ibuprofen is the biological active
form of two enantiomers. With Binaphos, only 92% ee was
obtained (Table 2, entry 15), and the turnover frequency was
very low (300 turnover after 66 h).2a,b Hydroformylation of vinyl
acetate was also tested with ligand 1. The hydroformylation
product 2-acetoxypropanal is a precursor for the Strecker
synthesis of the amino acid threonine.7 The hydroformylation
was performed under the identical reaction condition for styrene.
After 24 h, 75% of the starting material was converted to
aldehyde with 96% ee and with a 13:1 branch/linear ratio (Table
2, entry 16). The enantioselectivity with ligand 1 was higher as
compared to Binaphos ligand (Table 2, entry 17, 92% ee) 2ab
and matched the previous best result using chiral diazaphospholane ligand (96% ee).2c To demonstrate the catalytic efficiency of Rh-(R,S)-1 catalyst, hydroformylation of styrene was
carried out with substrate/catalyst molar ratio of 10 000:1 (Table
2, entry 18). With this low catalyst loading, Rh-(R,S)-1 catalyst
still showed high reactivity (89% conversion after 24 h) and
maintained high enantioselectivity (98% ee) for the hydroformylation reaction.
In conclusion, a new hybrid phosphine-phosphoramidite ligand 1 has been developed. Unprecedented high enantioselectivities have been achieved for Rh-catalyzed asymmetric hydroformylations. The high reactivity and excellent enantioselectivity of this new ligand make the catalyst system potentially useful for industrial applications. Further structural variation of N-substituted phosphoramidite ligands will be developed in the future for asymmetric hydroformylation and other metal-catalyzed transformations.
General Methods. All reactions and manipulations were performed in a nitrogen-filled glovebox or using standard Schlenk techniques, unless otherwise noted. Solvents were dried with standard procedures and degassed with N2. Column chromatography was performed using 200-400 mesh silica gel supplied by Natland International Corp. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on EM reagents 0.25 mm silica 60-F plates. 1H, 13C NMR, and 31P spectra were recorded on Bruker AM-300 and AMX-360 spectrometers. Optical rotation was obtained on a Perkin-Elmer 241 polarimeter. MS spectra were recorded on a KRATOS mass spectrometer MS 9/50. GC analysis was carried out on Hewlett-Packard 6890 gas chromatography using chiral capillary columns. Compound 3 was synthesized according to known literature procedure.6
Synthesis of Compound 4. To a solution of 3 (3.70 g, 7.24 mmol)
in THF (200 mL) was added dropwise a 10 M borane-dimethyl sulfide
complex in THF (7.24 mL, 72.4 mmol) at 0
C. The mixture was
refluxed for 18 h. After being cooled to room temperature, the mixture
was diluted with EtOAc (200 mL) and poured into ice water. The
mixture was stirred for 30 min, and the organic layer was separated
and washed with brine. The organic phase was dried over Na2SO4 and
concentrated under reduced pressure. To the residue was added 270
mL of diethylamine, and the reaction mixture was stirred at room
temperature for 30 min. After removal of diethylamine, the residue
was chromatographed on silica gel (eluted with hexane/EtOAc, 16:1)
to give 4 (1.71 g) in 49% yield. 1H NMR (360 MHz, CDCl2)
: 7.91
(t, J = 8.92 Hz, 3H), 7.77 (d, J = 8.01 Hz, 1H), 7.54-7.7.44 (m, 2H),
7.33-7.16 (m, 11H), 7.12 (t, J = 7.40 Hz, 1H), 7.07-7.01 (m, 3H),
6.65 (d, J = 8.47 Hz, 1H), 3.21 (m, 1H), 3.07-3.00 (m, 1H), 2.81-2.72 (m, 1H), 0.76 (t, J = 7.11 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (91 MHz, CD2Cl2)
: 144.81, 144.78, 142.62, 142.24, 138.65, 138.50, 138.10, 137.65,
134.79, 134.18, 133.96, 133.63, 133.42, 133.35, 131.34, 129.91, 128.97,
128.91, 128.90, 128.81, 128.66, 128.59, 128.56, 128.47, 128.31, 127.60,
127.34, 127.19, 126.77, 126.74, 126.57, 124.31, 121.79, 116.24, 116.14,
113.92, 38.68, 15.17. 31P NMR (146 MHz, CH2Cl2)
: -14.235 (s).
HRMS (ES+) (m/z): calcd for C34H29NP, 482.2038; found, 482.2029.
Synthesis of Ligand 1. To a solution of 4 (0.24 g, 0.5 mmol) in
THF (5 mL) at 0
C was added dropwise n-BuLi (0.65 mmol, 0.26
mL of 2.5 M hexane solution). The reaction mixture was allowed to
warm to room temperature and stirred for 30 min to give a deep red
solution. The reaction mixture was then recooled to 0
C, and 5 (262
mg, 0.75 mmol) in THF (5 mL) was added dropwise. After addition,
the cooling bath was removed and the mixture was stirred at room
temperature overnight. The volatiles were evaporated under reduced
pressure. To the residue was added CH2Cl2 (10 mL), and the mixture
was filtered to remove the salt. The filtration was concentrated and
subjected to chromatography on silica gel (eluted with hexane/EtOAc
9:1) to afford pure ligand 1 (145 mg) in 37% yield. 1H NMR (300
MHz, CD2Cl2)
: 8.10-8.01 (m, 3H), 7.93 (t, J = 7.28 Hz, 2H), 7.81(d, J = 8.20 Hz, 2H), 7.67-7.55 (m, 4H), 7.41-7.05 (m, 16H), 6.99
(t, J = 6.75 Hz, 2H), 6.87 (t, J = 7.08 Hz, 2H), 6.57 (t, J = 7.68 Hz,
1H), 6.41-6.32 (m, 2H), 2.74 (m, 1H), 2.35 (m, 1H), 0.66 (t, J = 7.01
Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CD2Cl2)
: 150.30, 150.21, 149.92,
142.36, 141.94, 138.59, 138.39, 138.27, 138.20, 135.44, 135.14, 134.10,
133.57, 133.36, 131.68, 130.51, 129.88, 129.11, 128.66, 128.58, 128.55,
128.49, 128.46, 128.42, 128.30, 128.12, 127.56, 127.19, 127.12, 127.03,
126.66, 126.29, 126.18, 125.71, 125.54, 125.06, 124.75, 122.49, 122.23,
122.19, 41.03, 14.98. 31P NMR (146 MHz, CD2Cl2)
: 141.63 (d, J =
53.3 Hz), -13.57 (d, J = 53.3 Hz). HRMS (ES+) (m/z): calcd for
C54H40NO2P2, 796.2534; found, 796.2552.
General Procedure for Asymmetric Hydroformylation. In a
glovebox filled with nitrogen, to a 2 mL vial equipped with a magnetic
bar were added ligand 1 (0.004 mmol),8 Rh(acac)(CO)2 (0.001 mmol
in 0.10 mL of benzene), and substrate (1.0 mmol), and additional
benzene was charged to bring the total volume of the reaction mixture
to 1.0 mL. After the mixture was stirred for 10 min, the vial was
transferred into an autoclave and taken out of the glovebox. Carbon
monoxide (10 atm) and dihydrogen (10 atm) were charged in sequence.
The reaction mixture was stirred (60 rpm)9 at 60
C (oil bath) for 24
h. The reaction was cooled, and the pressure was carefully released in
a well-ventilated hood. The conversion and regioselectivity were
determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy from the crude reaction mixture.
For styrene derivatives, the enantiomeric excesses of the hydroformylation products were determined by reduction with NaBH4 or oxidation
with Jones reagent to the corresponding alcohols or carboxylic acids,
and then analyzed by GC. For the hydroformylation product of vinyl
acetate, the enantiomeric excess was determined directly by GC analysis
of the crude reaction mixture.
This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (5R01GM058832-07).
Determination of the enantiomeric excess of hydroformylation products and ligand NMR spectra. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
* In papers with more than one author, the asterisk indicates the name of the author to whom inquiries about the paper should be addressed.
1. For recent reviews, see: (a) Claver, C.; van Leeuwen, P. W. N. M. In
Rhodium Catalyzed Hydroformylation; Claver, C., van Leeuwen, P. W. N.
M., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2000.
(b) Agbossou, F.; Carpentier, J.; Mortreux, A. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 2485-2506.
(c) Gladiali, S.; Bayön, J. C.; Claver, C. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1995, 6, 1453-1474.
(e)
Diéguez, M.; Pàmies, O.; Claver, C. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2004, 15,
2113-2122.![]()
2. (a) Sakai, N.; Mano, S.; Nozaki, K.; Takaya, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993,
115, 7033-7034.
(b) Nozaki, K.; Sakai, N.; Nanno, T.; Higashijima, T.;
Mano, S.; Horiuchi, T.; Takaya, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 4413-4423.
(c) Clark, T. P.; Landis, C. R.; Freed, S. L.; Klosin, J.; Abboud, K.
A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 5040-5042.
(d) Breeden, S.; Cole-Hamilton, D. J.; Foster, D. F.; Schwarz, G. J.; Wills, M. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 4106-4108.
(e) Babin, J. E.; Whiteker, G. T. Patent
WO 9303839, 1992. (f) Dieguez, M.; Pamies, O.; Ruiz, A.; Castillon, S.;
Claver, C. Chem.-Eur. J. 2001, 7, 3086-3094.
(g) Axtell, A. T.; Cobley,
C. J.; Klosin, J.; Whiteker, G. T.; Zanotti-Gerosa, A.; Abboud, K. A. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5834-5838.
(h) Huang, J.; Bunel, E.; Allgeier,
A.; Tedrow, J.; Storz, T.; Preston, J.; Correll, T.; Manley, D.; Soukup, T.;
Jensen, R.; Syed, R.; Moniz, G.; Larsen, R.; Martinelli, M.; Reider, P.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 7831-7834.![]()
3. (a) Ewalds, R.; Eggeling, E. B.; Hewat, A. C.; Kamer, P. C. J.; van Leeuwen,
P. W. N. M.; Vogt, D. Chem.-Eur. J. 2000, 6, 1496-1504.
(b) Lot, O.;
Suisse1, I.; Mortreux, A.; Agbossou, F. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2000,
164, 125-130.
(c) Deerenberg, S.; Kamer, P. C. J.; van Leeuwen, P. W.
N. M. Organometallics 2000, 19, 2065-2072.
(d) Franci
, G.; Faraone,
F.; Leitner, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 1428-1430.
(e) Kless,
A.; Holz, J.; Heller, D.; Kadyrov, R.; Selke, R.; Fischer, C.; Bömer, A.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1996, 7, 33-36.![]()
4. (a) Solinas, M.; Gladiali, S.; Marchetti, M. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2005,
226, 141-147.
(b) Nozaki, K.; Matsuo, T.; Shibahara, F.; Hiyama, T. Adv.
Synth. Catal. 2001, 343, 61-63.
(c) Horiuchi, T.; Ohta, T.; Shirakawa, E.;
Nozaki, K.; Takaya, H. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 4285-4292.
(d) Nozaki,
K.; Hidemasa, T.; Tamejiro, H. Top. Catal. 1998, 4, 175-185.
(e) Horiuchi,
T.; Shirakawa, E.; Nozaki, K.; Takaya, H. Organometallics 1997, 16, 2981-2986.
(f) Nozaki, K.; Nanno, T.; Takaya, H. J. Organomet. Chem. 1997,
527, 103-108.
(g) Nozaki, K.; Li, W.-G.; Horiuchi, T.; Takaya, H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 4611-4614.
(h) Horiuchi, T.; Ohta, T.;
Shirakawa, E.; Nozaki, K.; Takaya, H. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 7795-7804.
(i) Nozaki, K.; Li, W.-G.; Horiuchi, T.; Takaya, H.; Saito, T.; Yoshida,
A.; Matsumura, K.; Kato, Y.; Imai, T.; Miura, T.; Kumobayashi, H. J.
Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 7658-7659.
(j) Horiuchi, T.; Ohta, T.; Nozaki, K.;
Takaya, H. Chem. Commun. 1996, 155-156.
(k) Nanno, T.; Sakai, N.;
Nozaki, K.; Takaya, H. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1995, 6, 2583-2591.![]()
5. We named this new hybrid phosphine-phosphoamidite ligand as YanPhos.
6. Vyskocil, S.; Smrcina, M.; Hanus, V.; Polasek, M.; Kocovsky, P. J. Org.
Chem. 1998, 63, 7738-7748.![]()
7. Chibata, I. In Synthetic Production and Utilization of Amino Acids; Kaneoko, T., Izumi, Y., Chibata, I., Itoh, T., Eds.; Wiley: New York, 1974.
8. Hydroformylation at lower ligand/metal ratio resulted in decreased enantioselectivity. For example, when the ligand/metal = 2, enantiomeric excess dropped to 54% (branch/linear ratio = 85/15).
9. This is sufficient for good stirring due to the small volume of the reaction mixture. Stirring at 160 rpm gave the same results. However, further increasing the stirring rate (260 rpm) caused the reaction mixture to spill out of the reaction vessel.
a All reactions were carried out with L:Rh = 4:1, substrate:Rh = 1000.b Conversions were determined on the basis of lH NMR.c (b/l) branched-linear ratio. Determined on the basis of lH NMR.d Determined by converting the aldehyde to the corresponding alcohol with NaBH4 followed by GC analysis (Supelco's Beta Dex 225). The absolute configuration (R) was assigned by comparing the sign of the optical rotation of the resulting alcohol with (R)-2-phenylpropan-1-ol.
entry
R
ligand
S/Cb
T (
C)
H2/CO (atm)
time (h)
conv. (%)c
b/ld
ee (%)e
1
Ph 6a
(R,S)-1
1000
60
10/10
24
>99
88/12
98(R)
2
Ph 6a
(S,R)-Binaphos
1000
60
10/10
24
>99
83/17
84(S)
3f
Ph 6a
(S,R)-Binaphos
2000
60
50/50
43
>99
88/12
94(S)
4
p-Me-Ph 6b
(R,S)-1
1000
60
10/10
24
98
87/13
99(R)
5f
p-Me-Ph 6b
(S,R)-Binaphos
1000
60
50/50
20
97
86/14
95(S)
6
p-F-Ph 6c
(R,S)-1
1000
60
10/10
24
>99
88/12
98(R)
7g
p-F-Ph 6c
(R,S)-Binaphos
2000
40
50/50
39
43
89/11
92(R)
8
o-F-Ph 6d
(R,S)-1
1000
60
10/10
24
99
91/9
98(R)
9g
o-F-Ph 6d
(R,S)-Binaphos
2000
40
50/50
30
52
91/9
95(R)
10
p-Cl-Ph 6e
(R,S)-1
1000
60
10/10
24
>99
87/13
98(R)
11f
p-Cl-Ph 6e
(S,R)-Binaphos
1000
60
50/50
34
>99
87/13
93(S)
12
p-Meo-Ph 6f
(R,S)-1
1000
60
10/10
24
97
86/14
98(R)
13f
p-Meo-Ph 6f
(S,R)-Binaphos
1000
60
50/50
34
>99
87/13
88(S)
14
p-iBu-Ph 6g
(R,S)-1
1000
60
10/10
24
98
89/11
98(R)
15f
p-iBu-Ph 6g
(S,R)-Binaphos
300
60
50/50
66
>99
88/12
92(S)
16
OAc 6h
(R,S)-1
1000
60
10/10
24
75
93/7
96(S)
17f
OAc 6h
(R,S)-Binaphos
400
60
50/50
36
>99
86/14
92(S)
18
Ph 6a
(R,S)-1
10 000
60
10/10
24
89
88/12
98(R)
a All reactions were carried out with L:Rh = 4:1 in benzene.b Substrate-catalyst ratio.c Conversions were determined on the basis of 1H NMR.d (b/l) branched-linear ratio. Determined on the basis of 1H NMR.e See Supporting Information for details.f Data taken from ref 2a for comparison.g Data taken from ref 2b for comparison.