
Web Release Date: October 4,
Advanced Fine-Tuning of Grubbs/Hoveyda Olefin Metathesis Catalysts: A Further Step toward an Optimum Balance between Antinomic Properties
Bieniek,





and

Institute of Organic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kasprzaka 44/52, 01-224 Warsaw, Poland, Faculty of Chemistry, Warsaw University of Technology, Koszykowa 75, 00-662 Warsaw, Poland, Laboratoire de Chimie de Coordination du CNRS, 205 route de Narbonne, 31077 Toulouse Cedex 4, France, and Ligand Chemie GmbH Papenhauser Strausse 10, Lemgo D-32657, Germany
Received May 6, 2006
Abstract:
A 95% yield in the cross metathesis of acrylonitrile with a model olefin is achieved at 25
C with only 3 mol % of the new air-stable ruthenium catalyst 1f shown in the enclosed structural diagram. Even more remarkable are the performances of its boosted version 1g incorporating an electron-withdrawing group. Both these new enhanced versions of Hoveyda catalyst are readily available from Grubbs second generation precatalyst upon reaction with a styrenyl ether the end group of which has been functionalized by an ester function. The latter acts as a weakly coordinating ligand allowing to reach a desirable balance between antinomic properties such as the catalyst's stability, a high activity for challenging substrates, and a high initiation rate.
With the recognition of a major impact of olefin metathesis in
modern organic synthesis,1 recent years have witnessed a surge of
productive research efforts in Ru catalyst design,2-10
Also quite spectacular was the report by Piers9 of an elegant direct access to a 14 electron catalyst based on a phosphonium alkylidene, obtained without liberation of any auxiliary ligand susceptible to be recaptured by the active species.
As recently mentioned by Fogg,10 however, higher activity may come at the price of catalyst lifetime. So, in the context of green chemistry, there is still an obvious need to find the best compromise between desirable (but antinomic) properties such as the stability of the precatalyst, a high initiation rate, a high selectivity for challenging substrates, and the possibility of catalyst recycling.
In the present attempt to enhance the leaving group properties of the styrenyl ether, we were led to functionalize its aliphatic end group by attachment of an ester function, originally selected in account of its electron withdrawing properties.
The required ligand 3f was prepared according to Scheme 1 and reacted with 1a in the presence of CuCl,5,13 to produce the air stable green complex 1f. The molecular structure of 1f, established by X-ray diffraction (Figure 1), revealed the occurrence of an additional coordination of the carbonyl oxygen of the ester function to the metal (2.54 Å).
| Figure 1 Molecular structure of the catalyst 1f (see ESI for details). | |
| Scheme 1. Two-Step Preparation of Catalysts 1f and 1g |
The new complex 1f was subject to a series of comparative
catalytic ring-closing metathesis (RCM) reactions (at 0
C) and
cross-metathesis (CM) with methyl acrylate (at 25-26
C) with a
set of benchmark catalysts 1c-e (Table 1
). Interestingly, in the
more challenging CM reaction, the 1f catalyst's performance was
matching that recorded with Blechert's catalyst (Table 1, entry 2).
The ester catalyst 1f appeared to be particularly insensitive to
impurities, as established by a selected CM reaction deliberately
carried out in an opened tube and in commercial grade dichloromethane (entry 2). Significantly, 1f catalyses the cross metathesis
of a model olefin, 4c,6a,b with acrylonitrile (95% yield after 5 h at
25
C with 3 mol % of catalyst loading), or methacrylonitrile (56%
yield after 16 h at 40
C with 5 mol % of catalyst loading).14
In a logical extension of this approach, we also prepared the
closely related complex 1g, incorporating both the electron-withdrawing NO2 group6,13 and the ester. An interesting point is
that the combined independent effects of the coordinating ester and
the electron-withdrawing groups are additive. This is particularly
obvious in the RCM of 4a at 0
C, where 99% is achieved within
1 h with only 1 mol % of catalyst 1g (Table 1, entry 1), and in the
RCM of diethyldiallylmalonate 4b (Figure 2).
Figure 2 Relative conversion rates for RCM of 4b, by 1a (Grubbs), 1c
(Hoveyda), 1d (Blechert), 1f, and 1g (this work) using 1 mol % catalyst in
CH2Cl2 at 0 C. See ref 15 and ESI for more details.
|
Particularly appealing are the high turnover numbers recorded with 1g in the RCM of dienes 4f (TON = 1367), 4g (TON = 3200), and in enyne 4h cycloisomerization (TON = 560). Selectivity, a further advantage of the catalyst, can be appraised in the synthesis of 5i, a pheromone of the Leopard moth (Zeuzera pyrina), obtained in good yield without homo-dimerization product, and requiring only a very low catalyst loading (0.3 mol % of 1g), just ten times less than required with already very active6 1e to obtain the same result. This highlights the fact that apparently "minor" changes in the structure of Hoveyda-Grubbs type catalysts can dramatically improve their performances and also broaden the scope of their applications, which can be taken as a rewarding justification of relevant research efforts in this direction.
Research supported by the Polish Academy of Sciences (President of Polish Academy of Sciences Fellowship to M.B.), by the CNRS, and through a European Community Marie Curie Action (contract no. HPMT-CT-2001-00398). A gift of chemicals from Chemetall GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) is gratefully acknowledged.
Experimental details for the preparation of the reported compounds and crystallographic data for 1f. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
* In papers with more than one author, the asterisk indicates the name of the author to whom inquiries about the paper should be addressed.
Polish Academy of Sciences.
Warsaw University of Technology.
Laboratoire de Chimie de Coordination du CNRS.
Ligand Chemie GmbH.
1. (a) Nicolaou, K. C.; Bulger, P. C.; Sarlah, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2005, 44, 4490.
(b) Handbook of Metathesis; Grubbs, R. H., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2003.
2. (a) Hoveyda, A. H.; Gillingham, D. G.; Van Veldhuizen, J. J.; Kataoka,
O.; Garber, S. B.; Kingsbury, J. S.; Harrity, J. P. A. Org. Biomol. Chem.
2004, 2, 1.
(b) Schrock, R. R.; Hoveyda, A. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2003, 42, 4592.
(c) Connon, S. J.; Blechert, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2003, 42, 1900.
(d) Trnka, T. M.; Grubbs, R. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001,
34, 18.
(e) Fürstner, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3012.
3. (a) Sanford, M. S.; Love, J. A.; Grubbs, R. H. Organometallics 2001, 20,
5314.
(b) Love, J. A.; Morgan, J. P.; Trnka, T. M.; Grubbs, R. H. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 4035.
4. Garber, S. B.; Kingsbury, J. S.; Gray, B. L.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2000, 122, 8168.
5. (a) Wakamatsu, H.; Blechert, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2403.
(b) Dunne, A. M.; Mix, S.; Blechert, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 2733.
6. (a) Grela, K.; Harutyunyan, S.; Michrowska, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2002, 41, 4038.
(b) Michrowska, A.; Bujok, R.; Harutyunyan, S.; Sashuk,
V.; Dolgonos, G.; Grela, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 9318.
(c)
Harutyunyan, S.; Michrowska, A.; Grela, K. In Catalysts for Fine
Chemical Synthesis; Roberts, S. M., Whittall, J., Mather, P., McCormack,
P., Eds.; Wiley-Interscience: New York 2004; Vol. 3, 169. (c) For an
overwiew, see: Grela, K.; Michrowska, A.; Bieniek, M. Chem. Rec. 2006,
6, 144.
7. Yang, L.; Mayr, M.; Wurst, K.; Buchmeister, M. R. Chem. Eur. 2004,
10, 5761.
8. (a) Fürstner, A.; Thiel, O. R.; Lehmann, C. W. Organometallics 2002,
21, 331.
(b) Slugovc, C.; Perner, B.; Stelzer, F.; Mereiter, K. Organometallics 2004, 23, 3622.
9. Romero, P. E.; Piers, W. E.; McDonald, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004,
43, 6161.
10. (a) Conrad, J. C.; Parnas, H. H.; Snelgrove, J. L.; Fogg, D. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 11882.
(b) Conrad, J. C.; Fogg, D. E. Curr. Org. Chem.
2006, 10, 185.
11. For applications of catalyst 1e, see (a) Ostrowski, S.; Mikus, A. Mol.
Divers 2003, 6, 315.
(b) Honda, T.; Namiki, H.; Kaneda, K.; Mizutani,
H. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 87.
(c) Honda, T.; Namiki, H.; Watanabe, M.;
Mizutani, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 5211.
(d) Stellfeld, T.; Bhatt,
U.; Kalesse, M. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3889.
(e) Albert, B. J.; Sivaramakrishnan, A.; Naka, T.; Koide, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2792.
(h) Goldup,
S. M.; Pilkington, C. J.; White, A. J. P.; Burton, A.; Barrett, A. G. M. J.
Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 6185.
12. (a) Adlhart, C.; Chen, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 3496.
(b) Cavallo,
L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 8965.
13. Bujok, R.; Bieniek, M.; Masnyk, M.; Michrowska, A.; Sarosiek, A.;
St
powska, H.; Arlt, D.; Grela, K. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 6894.
14. (a) This is much better than 1a, which gives 30% conversion for
methacrylonitrile under the same conditions (for a similar reaction in
toluene, see ref 6a). Interestingly, 1b and analogues were reported to give
very good results with acrylonitrile, see: ref 3b and (b) Bai, C.-X.; Zhang,
W.-Z.; He, R.; Lua, X.-B.; Zhang, Z.-Q. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 7225.
(c) Bai, C.-X.; Lu, X.-B.; He, R.; Zhang, W.-Z.; Feng, X.-J. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2005, 3, 4139.
15. The same benchmark reaction of 4b has recently been used by Piers et
al. (ref 9) for comparison of selected active catalysts, leading in general
to similar conclusions. According to this experiment the Grubbs 2nd
generation catalyst 1a is poor initiator at 0
C and only reaches 25% of
conversion after 4 h. The 3rd generation ruthenium 1b and Schrock's
molybdenum alkylidene Mo(N-2,6-Me2-C6H3)(CHCMe2Ph) (OCMe(CF3)2)2 are much more active than 1a, providing 60 and 90% of
conversion respectively, after 6 h (ref 9).
|
|
a Conditions: 0.03-3.00 mol % catalyst, 0-28
C, dry CH2Cl2, argon.b Isolated yields after silica gel chromatography. In parentheses are yields
determined by GC.c Reaction with 2 equiv of methyl acrylate.d Reference
5a.e Reaction in commercially grade CH2Cl2, in air.f Reaction with 2 equiv
of acrylonitrile.g Reaction with 4 equiv of methacrylonitrile.h Reaction with
2 equiv of (Z)-4-(acetoxy)-2-butenyl acetate.