
Web Release Date: November 16,
Neutron Powder Diffraction Study of D2 Sorption in Cu3(1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylate)2




and
School of Chemistry, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia, NIST Center for Neutron Research, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-8562, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742-2115, and Indiana University Cyclotron Facility, Bloomington, Indiana 47408
Received August 25, 2006
Abstract:
Rietveld analyses of neutron powder diffraction data of D2 in Cu3(BTC)2, where BTC = 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylate, reveals the location and progressive filling of six distinct D2 sites within the nanopore structure. Location of the primary site at the coordinatively unsaturated Cu atoms provides direct structural evidence of the potential importance of such metal sites to hydrogen storage. Competitive loading of the other D2 sites proceeds with the pores filling from smallest to largest.
The recent focus on hydrogen as an alternative energy carrier has led to the question of how to store hydrogen gas safely and efficiently. This question has arisen in parallel with the development of an important new class of nanomaterials that show outstanding promise in this area, porous metal organic frameworks. The exploration of the location of H2 within these materials and their structural behavior during H2 sorption is allowing the delineation of the structural features that maximize hydrogen loading, in turn providing fundamental insight into the structural behavior and porous nature of these materials.
Cu3(BTC)2, where BTC = 1,3,5 benzenetricarboxylate, is a three-dimensional cubic (Fm-3m) neutral coordination framework composed of dinuclear cupric tetracarboxylate units bridged by three-connecting BTC units to form a Pt3O4-type network.1 The framework
shows structural stability to complete desolvation and is stable to
250
C. The Cu atoms in the fully dehydrated phase are coordinatively unsaturated; such sites are of interest in that they have
been proposed to favor high dihydrogen binding enthalpies.2-4
Cu3(BTC)2 has a complex three-dimensional channel system. The largest pores are 9 Å in diameter and are formed from 12 dinuclear Cu2(OOC)4 subunits forming a cuboctahedron. A second pore system is accessible from these larger pores, in which four benzene rings constitute the inner surface with the centers of the rings forming a tetrahedron of diameter 5 Å. The triangular windows leading to these secondary pores are 3.5 Å in diameter.
Cu3(BTC)2 was prepared using a hydrothermal method (Supporting Information). Neutron powder diffraction data were collected on Cu3(BTC)2 in a vanadium can using the high-resolution
neutron powder diffractometer (BT-1) at the National Institute for
Standards and Technology Center for Neutron Research. Data were
collected using neutrons with a wavelength of 2.0787 Å, from 2
= 4
to 145
. D2 was substituted for H2 due to the large incoherent
scattering of H. Gas quantities corresponding to D2:Cu ratios of 0,
0.5, 1, 2, and 4 were loaded into the sample via a capillary line.
Temperature control was achieved using a top-loading closed-cycle
helium refrigerator. D2 was loaded at 77 K and the sample cooled
to 5 K before data were collected. Gas sorption was observed by
monitoring the pressure in the control volume; total gas sorption
was always achieved above 30 K.
Structural analyses were performed using Rietveld refinements
using GSAS as implemented in EXPGUI.7,8
The powder diffraction pattern was observed to change significantly during the D2 loading (Figure 1). The crystalline lattice
expands as D2 is adsorbed, then contracts slightly at higher D2:Cu
loadings (Table 1
). This contraction is associated with a subtle
buckling of the BTC units and a concomitant decrease in the BTC-bridged Cu···Cu distance from 8.07(1) Å to 8.03(1) Å.
| Figure 1 Neutron powder diffraction data for Cu3(BTC)2 with ad-sorbed D2. |
Rietveld analyses of the 4D2:Cu loaded sample revealed the
location of six D2 adsorption sites, each site representing the centroid
of the D2 molecule (Tables 2
and 3
, Figure 2). The most favorable
site, D2(1), shown on the left in Figure 3, occupies the coordinatively
unsaturated axial sites of the dinuclear Cu center. This site is located
2.39(1) Å from the Cu atom (cf. Cu-OH2 coordination bond
distance of 2.17(1) Å in the hydrated material1), indicating there is
significant interaction with the d9 Cu(II) center. Notably, the binding
distance is considerably greater than that of
-bonded
2-dihydrogen
complexes, e.g., of group 6 metal ions (M-H ca. 1.7-2.0 Å).9
This comparatively long interaction appears consistent with the
reported observation of a high-energy
(H-H) sideband in the IR
spectra of H2-loaded Cu3(BTC)2.10
The order of filling of subsequent sites is sequential from D2(2) to D2(6) (see Table 3 and Figure 3). Following binding at the metal sites, there is a progressive occupation of the D2(2) site, which lies within the 5 Å pores at a distance 3.29(1) Å from a benzene ring of the BTC unit. The 3.5 Å windows accessing these pores are next to fill, with the D2(3) site residing in the center of these windows 3.88(1) Å from six BTC oxygen atoms and 3.90(1) Å from three BTC carbon atoms. Analysis of the 4 D2:Cu phase shows partial occupation of three further sites at higher loading: D2(4) lies 3.31(1) Å from two BTC carboxylate carbon atoms within the 9 Å pores; D2(5) lies 3.63(1) Å from three BTC benzene carbon atoms within the 5 Å pores; and D2(6) lies 3.23(1) Å from two BTC carboxylate oxygen atoms within the 9 Å pores. The filling of smaller, then larger, pores is consistent with the theory of micropore filling.11 These results complement previous grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations performed in conjunction with high-resolution low-pressure Ar sorption experiments, which indicated a graduated pore-filling sequence beginning with the smaller pores, followed by a stepwise adsorption and condensation in the main pores.12 High-resolution N2 isotherms for this material also correspond to the filling of the narrower, then larger, pores.13
Analysis of the D2 site-to-site distances within the 5 Å pores indicates that at most two of the six octahedrally arranged D2(2) sites may be occupied (corresponding to a D2 SOF of 0.67), these lying 3.27(1) Å from each other (cf. an unphysical 2.31 Å for neighboring sites). It seems likely that progressive filling of this pore from two to three D2 molecules would then involve depopulation of one of these D2(2) sites and occupation of two of the four tetrahedrally arranged D2(5) sites such that D2(2)···D2(5) = 3.26(1) Å and D2(5)···D2(5) = 3.30(1) Å. The refined site occupancies (Table 3) for the 4D2:Cu loaded sample are consistent with ca. 80% of the pores containing three D2 and ca. 20% containing only two. Further data collection is planned to explore competitive D2 site filling at high D2:Cu loadings.
In conclusion, we demonstrate the progressive filling of six distinct D2 sites within the nanopore structure of Cu3(BTC)2. Location of the primary site at the coordinatively unsaturated Cu atoms provides direct structural evidence of the potential importance of such metal sites to hydrogen storage. Competitive loading of the other D2 sites proceeds with the pores filling from smallest to largest. It is likely that at saturation more D2 can be incorporated, most likely leading to more complete filling of both the 5 and 9 Å pores.
This work was supported by the Australian Research Council Grant with additional funding provided by the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy within the Center of Excellence on Carbon-based Hydrogen Storage Materials. We thank Dr. Peter Southon for help with H2 sorption measurements.
Synthesis; crystallographic data including structural results for Rietveld analysis using diffraction data for Cu3(BTC)2 loaded with D2; H2 and N2 sorption data. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
* In papers with more than one author, the asterisk indicates the name of the author to whom inquiries about the paper should be addressed.
The University of Sydney.
NIST Center for Neutron Research.
University of Maryland.
Indiana University Cyclotron Facility.
1. Chui, S. S.-Y.; Lo, S. M.-F.; Charmant, J. P. H.; Orpen, A. G.; Williams,
I. D. Science 1999, 283, 1148-1150.
2. Chen, B.; Ockwig, N. W.; Millward, A. R.; Contreras, D. S.; Yaghi, O.
M. Angew. Chem.. Int. Ed. 2005, 117, 4823-4827.
3. Chapman, K. W.; Southon, P. D.; Weeks, C. L.; Kepert, C. J. Chem.
Commun. 2005, 3322-3324.
4. Kaye, S. S.; Long, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6506-6507.
5. Wong-Foy, A. G.; Matzger, A. J.; Yaghi, O. M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
128, 3494-3495.
6. Rowsell, J. L. C.; Yaghi, O. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1304-1315.
7. Larson, A. C.; Dreele, R. B. V. General Structure Analysis System (GSAS); Los Alamos National Laboratory Report; LAUR, 2000; pp 86-748.
8. Toby, B. H. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2001, 34, 210-213.
9. Kubas, G. J. J. Organomet. Chem. 2001, 635, 37-38.
10. Prestipino, C.; Regli, L.; Vitillo, J. G.; Bonino, F.; Damin, A.; Lamberti,
C.; Zecchina, A.; Solari, P. L.; Kongshaug, K. O.; Bordiga, S. Chem.
Mater. 2006, 18, 1337-1346.
11. Rouquerol, F.; Rouquerol, J.; Sing, K. Adsorption by Powders & Porous Solids; Academic Press: San Diego, 1998.
12. Vishnyakov, A.; Ravikovitch, P. I.; Neimark, A. V.; Bulow, M.; Wang,
Q. M. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 713-718.
13. Krawiec, P.; Kramer, M.; Sabo, M.; Kunschke, R.; Fröde, H.; Kaskel, S.
Adv. Eng. Mater. 2006, 8, 293-296.
|
D2/Cu |
lattice parameter (Å) |
Rwp (%) |
dWD |
|
0 |
26.3046(2) |
2.82 |
0.963 |
|
0.5 |
26.3159(3) |
3.17 |
1.118 |
|
1 |
26.3256(3) |
3.51 |
0.945 |
|
2 |
26.3214(3) |
3.58 |
0.898 |
|
4 |
26.3136(4) |
3.77 |
0.959 |
|
site |
x |
y |
z |
|
D2(1) |
0.1515(2) |
0.1515(2) |
0 |
|
D2(2) |
0.25 |
0.25 |
0.312(2) |
|
D2(3) |
0.1556(4) |
0.1556(4) |
0.1556(4) |
|
D2(4) |
0.3714(4) |
0.1286(4) |
0 |
|
D2(5) |
0.2056(7) |
0.2056(7) |
0.2056(7) |
|
D2(6) |
0.2821(6) |
0.0756(6) |
0 |
|
D2:Cu |
D2(1) SOF |
D2(2) SOF |
D2(3) SOF |
D2(4) SOF |
D2(5) SOF |
D2(6) SOF |
calc D2:Cu |
calc wt % H2 |
|
0.5 |
0.94(2) |
0.05(1) |
|
|
|
|
0.50(1) |
0.50(1) |
|
1 |
1.80(2) |
0.16(1) |
|
|
|
|
0.98(3) |
0.98(3) |
|
2 |
2.02(2) |
0.37(1) |
2.11(3) |
|
|
|
1.90(2) |
1.90(2) |
|
4 |
1.99(2) |
0.38(3) |
2.12(4) |
1.69(3) |
0.78(5) |
1.39(2) |
4.39(5) |
4.40(4) |