
Web Release Date: January 19,
High-Resolution Structure of a
-Peptide Bundle


and

Departments of Chemistry and Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8107
Received December 4, 2006
Abstract:
We recently reported that
-peptides can form discrete hetero-oligomers in aqueous solution. Here we describe the structure of such an oligomer as determined by X-ray crystallography. The structure of Zwit-1F reveals a homo-octamer of two cupped "hands" composed of both parallel and antiparallel 314-helices. The core of the assembly is composed entirely of solvent-excluded
3-homoleucine residues. The Zwit-1F assembly shares many of the physical characteristics of natural proteins.
Non-natural polymers have the capacity to recapitulate both the
well-folded structures and resultant functionalities of biological
polymers. Peptides composed of
3-amino acids, which have one
additional backbone methylene unit compared to natural
-amino
acids, can adopt stable helices in water1-3
-peptide functionality, however, must await the incorporation of higher order
structure. Previous efforts toward this goal have generated constrained tertiary interactions using disulfide bonds,9 nucleobase
pairing,10 or metal chelation.11 Quaternary structures lacking a well-defined stoichiometry have also been reported.12,13
-dodecapeptide (Zwit-1F, Figure 1A) that self-assembles spontaneously in aqueous solution into a highly thermostable
-peptide
octamer and determine its structure by X-ray crystallography.
Peptides composed of
3-amino acids favor a 314 helical
secondary structure characterized by a 14-membered hydrogen-bond
ring between the amide at position i and the carbonyl of position
i + 2, a left-handed helical twist, and three distinct faces.14,15
-peptide pair (Acid-1F, Base-1F) that assembles
in an equimolar ratio into a
-peptide quaternary structure, a
cooperatively folded assembly of
-peptide subunits.16
Like Acid-1F and Base-1F, the design of Zwit-1F uses residues
on each of the three 314-helical faces to control higher order
structure. Residues along one helical face promote 314 helicity
through salt-bridge formation, while those on a second use
3-homoleucines to drive oligomerization, akin to leucine zipper
proteins (Figure 1A). While Acid-1F and Base-1F bear cross-complementary charges at positions 1 and 10 on the third face to
drive hetero-oligomerization, Zwit1-F employs self-complementary
charges to favor homo-oligomerization.
Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy indicates that Zwit-1F is
minimally structured in buffered aqueous solution at low
M
concentration but undergoes a concentration-dependent increase in
314-helical structure (Figure 1B), suggesting the formation of a well-structured oligomer. The thermally induced change in the CD
spectrum of Zwit-1F is sigmoidal, indicating cooperativity in the
unfolding process (Figure 1C). Moreover, the Zwit-1F oligomer is
exceptionally stable; even at 100
M the TM is 70
C, definitively
within the range observed for well-folded small proteins.17 Data
from sedimentation equilibrium experiments are consistent with an
oligomer of discrete stoichiometry, fitting well to both hexamer
and octamer models.18
To unambiguously define the oligomerization state of Zwit-1F
and detail the interactions of its assembly, we determined its
structure by X-ray crystallography. To aid phasing, we synthesized
an analogue of Zwit-1F bearing
3-4-iodohomophenylalanine at
position 4 (Zwit-1F*). Zwit-1F* exhibits concentration-dependent
secondary structure and sedimentation equilibria comparable to
Zwit-1F18 and crystallizes from similar conditions, allowing calculation of initial phases by single-wavelength anomalous scattering.
The final model of Zwit-1F thus derived is refined against data to
1.45 Å resolution and contains two pairs of parallel 314 helices per
asymmetric unit. Individually, these four crystallographically unique
monomers exhibit metrics that deviate only slightly from an ideal
314 helix. The root-mean-square deviation between all monomers
is 1.44 Å, and all possible i to i + 2 main-chain hydrogen bonds
are observed, with the exception of the N-terminal residue in one
monomer. The average backbone dihedral angles (
= -135.5
,
= -126.4
,
= 55.6
) correspond well to those expected for
the 314 helix.19 Crystallographic symmetry relates two copies of
the asymmetric unit, however, to bury 2421 Å2 of surface area and
reveal the octameric structure of Zwit-1F (Figure 2A).
The Zwit-1F octamer is best described as a pair of tetrameric
"hands", each composed of four 314 helices cupped at approximately
a 90
angle to each other. The two halves of each hand are
composed of symmetry-equivalent parallel dimers oriented in an
antiparallel fashion.
3-Homoleucine side chains decorate the
interior of each hand. Their sequestration buries a total surface area
of 2385 Å2 with less than 10 Å2 of average solvent accessible
surface per residue, creating a hydrophobic core highly reminiscent
of globular protein structures (Figure 2B).
Packing between pairs of helices in each hand involves interactions between residues on two helical faces. Both parallel and
antiparallel helical pairs exhibit packing of
3-homoleucine side
chains, in accord with our design (Figure 2C). The antiparallel
interaction in the center of each hand positions the salt-bridge faces
of each helix to make complementary electrostatic interactions
across the interface (Figure 2D). Parallel helical pairs associate the
aromatic face of an internal helix with the salt-bridge face of a
terminal helix, with
3-E1 and
3-O10 forming electrostatic contacts
with
3-O3 and
3-D12, respectively. In addition, the
3-F side chains
exhibit a degree of hydrophobic packing from the side chain carbon
atoms of opposing
3-D6 and
3-O9. Despite the differences in
specific interactions, both helical arrangements are tightly packed,
with parallel and antiparallel interfaces burying 796 and 784 Å2 of
surface area, respectively, approximately 50% of a monomer. This
percentage, as well as the mass-adjusted buried surface area (480
Å2/kDa), are nearly identical to those of coiled-coil proteins (450
Å2/kDa, 51.5%).20
Inspiration for the design of a
3-homoleucine face to promote
interhelix interaction came from the leucine zipper motif of coiled-coil proteins.20 While the 314-helical interfaces display association
of leucine faces, there are significant differences in packing when
compared to the knobs-into-holes pattern that allowed Crick to
predict the supercoiling of leucine zippers (Figure 3).21 The
periodicity of knobs and holes displayed in
-helical turns is a result
of a repeat of 3.5-3.6 residues per turn. The nearly integral 3.1
residues/turn of 314 helices does not allow a similar complementary
periodicity, however. Zwit-1F helices are instead offset along the
helical axis, staggering the display of residues between the
interacting faces. This interface allows a closer approach of the
helices (~8.5 Å between helical axes) than in coiled-coil proteins
(~9.5 Å) and greater main-chain contact, with direct backbone
methylene contacts generating 23-33% of dimer interface. We
anticipate that the participation of this additional methylene in
packing interactions will be a general feature of higher order
-peptide structure.
In summary, here we describe the first high-resolution
-peptide
quaternary structure. Despite significant differences between the
secondary structures of discrete 314 helices and
-helices and the
interactions between them, the Zwit-1F structure is remarkably
protein-like. Composed of a discrete number of helices and possessing a solvent-excluded hydrophobic core, the assembly is driven
only by noncovalent inter-residue interactions and is highly thermostable. Structures such as this "
-protein" promise the opportunity
for more sophisticated functionality from future
-peptides.
This work was supported by the NIH and the National Foundation for Cancer Research and is based in part upon research conducted at the Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source (CHESS), which is supported by the NSF, using the macromolecular diffraction at CHESS (MacCHESS) facility, which is supported by the NIH. This research was also supported by the Yale Center for Structural Biology, whose faculty and staff we gratefully acknowledge for use of their data collection facilities.
Table containing data collection and refinement statistics, experimental details for crystallography, and sedimentation equilibrium. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org. CCDC 633286 contains atomic coordinates and supplementary crystallographic data for Zwit-1F. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
* In papers with more than one author, the asterisk indicates the name of the author to whom inquiries about the paper should be addressed.
Department of Chemistry.
Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology.
1. Cheng, R. P.; DeGrado, W. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5162-5163.
2. Arvidsson, P. I.; Rueping, M.; Seebach, D. Chem. Commun. 2001, 649-650.
3. Hart, S. A.; Bahadoor, A. B. F.; Matthews, E. E.; Qiu, X. Y. J.; Schepartz,
A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 4022-4023.
4. Kritzer, J. A.; Lear, J. D.; Hodsdon, M. E.; Schepartz, A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2004, 126, 9468-9469.
5. Karlsson, A. J.; Pomerantz, W. C.; Weisblum, B.; Gellman, S. H.; Palecek,
S. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12630-12631.
6. Raguse, T. L.; Porter, E. A.; Weisblum, B.; Gellman, S. H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 12774-12785.
7. Stephens, O. M.; Kim, S.; Welch, B. D.; Hodsdon, M. E.; Kay, M. S.;
Schepartz, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 13126-13127.
8. Werder, M.; Hauser, H.; Abele, S.; Seebach, D. Helv. Chim. Acta 1999,
82, 1774-1783.
9. Cheng, R. P.; DeGrado, W. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 11564-11565.
10. Bruckner, A. M.; Chakraborty, P.; Gellman, S. H.; Diederichsen, U. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4395-4399.
11. Lelais, G.; Seebach, D.; Jaun, B.; Mathad, R. I.; Flogel, O.; Rossi, F.;
Campo, M.; Wortman, A. Helv. Chim. Acta 2006, 89, 361-403.
12. Raguse, T. L.; Lai, J. R.; LePlae, P. R.; Gellman, S. H. Org. Lett. 2001,
3, 3963-3966.
13. Clark, T. D.; Buehler, L. K.; Ghadiri, M. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 651-656.
14. Cheng, R. P.; Gellman, S. H.; DeGrado, W. F. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101,
3219-3232.
15. Seebach, D.; Beck, A. K.; Bierbaum, D. J. Chem. Biodivers. 2004, 1,
1111-1239.
16. Qiu, J. X.; Petersson, E. J.; Matthews, E. E.; Schepartz, A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 11338-11339.
17. Privalov, P. L.; Tiktopulo, E. I.; Venyaminov, S.; Griko Yu, V.;
Makhatadze, G. I.; Khechinashvili, N. N. J. Mol. Biol. 1989, 205, 737-750.
18. Please see Supporting Information for details.
19. Beke, T.; Somlai, C.; Perczel, A. J. Comput. Chem. 2006, 27, 20-38.
20. O'Shea, E. K.; Klemm, J. D.; Kim, P. S.; Alber, T. Science 1991, 254,
539-544.
21. Crick, F. H. C. Acta Crystallogr. 1953, 6, 689-697.