ACS Publications
[Journal Home Page] [Search the Journals] [Table of Contents] [PDF version of this article] [Download to Citation Manager]

J. Am. Chem. Soc., 130 (10), 2902 -2903, 2008. 10.1021/ja077795v S0002-7863(07)07795-5
Web Release Date: February 19, 2008

Copyright © 2008 American Chemical Society

Designing Adsorbents for CO2 Capture from Flue Gas-Hyperbranched Aminosilicas Capable of Capturing CO2 Reversibly

Jason C. Hicks, Jeffrey H. Drese, Daniel J. Fauth, McMahan L. Gray, Genggeng Qi, and Christopher W. Jones*

School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 311 Ferst Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, and U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, 626 Cochrans Mill Road, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15236

cjones@chbe.gatech.edu

Received October 10, 2007

Abstract:

Carbon dioxide adsorption from a simulated flue gas stream was successfully performed with a hyperbranched aminosilica (HAS) material. The HAS was synthesized by a one-step reaction, spontaneous aziridine ring-opening polymerization off of surface silanols, to form a 32 wt % organic/inorganic hybrid material. The adsorption measurements were performed in a fixed-bed flow reactor using humidified CO2. The advantage of this adsorbent over previously reported adsorbents is the stability of the organic groups covalently bound to the silica support compared to those made by physisorbed methods. Furthermore, a large CO2 capacity (~3 mmol CO2/g adsorbent) associated with the high loading of amines was observed.


Due to the increasing CO2 concentration in the atmosphere, contemporary research has focused on ways to slow or stop this trend. CO2 capture has attracted attention due to the potential to trap and sequester large amounts of CO2 from concentrated sources such as power plants. Traditional technologies in capturing CO2 include absorption by aqueous amines.1 However, utilization of this process is energy intensive and expensive when used for large volumes of dilute gas, such as flue gas.2 This is primarily due to the high heat capacity of water and use of temperature swings to induce CO2 desorption. Many types of amine-modified silica materials have been reported (e.g., amine-tethered silica materials,3 amines impregnated into porous silicas,4,5 etc.) as possible solid adsorbents for CO2 capture from flue gas streams. However, these materials generally suffer from low CO2 capacities or lack stability over many cycles, especially when amines are physisorbed onto the support. Therefore, it is advantageous to synthesize an organic/inorganic hybrid amine-tethered silica material with high amine loadings (>6 mmol/g) capable of reversibly binding CO2 rather than employing physisorbed, impregnated adsorbents that may be unstable after several cycles. Here we describe the synthesis of a covalently tethered hyperbranched aminosilica (HAS) material6-8 capable of binding CO2 reversibly from simulated flue gas, and we compare its CO2 capacity with those of other reported solid amine adsorbents (Scheme 1). We conceived of these HAS materials as practical CO2 adsorbents due to their simple synthesis, covalent inorganic-organic linkage, and low cost. The HAS material has the highest fully regenerable CO2 capacity for a covalently supported adsorbent under simulated flue gas conditions.


Scheme 1. Solid CO2 Adsorbents

The synthesis of HAS was performed via a one-step reaction between aziridine and the silica surface.6 As previously reported on silica wafers, the surface silanols initiated aziridine polymerization off the surface.6 Due to low surface areas, hybrid aminosilica materials constructed on silica wafers are impractical adsorbents. However, the formation of hybrid aminosilicas on high surface area mesoporous silica materials7,8 can lead to materials capable of reversibly binding CO2 with substantial capacities (>2 mmol CO2/g). The aziridine monomer was added to SBA-15 dispersed in a toluene solution with catalytic amounts of acetic acid and stirred at room temperature in a glass pressure reaction vessel. The resulting HAS material (SBA-HA) was washed extensively to remove physisorbed aziridine or unbound oligomer from the surface. The organic loading of the grafted hybrid aminosilica used here was determined via elemental analysis as 7.0 mmol N/g material.

For these studies, the hybrid aminosilica was uniformly dispersed in sand and tested in a fixed bed flow system. The adsorbent/sand mixture allowed for decreased heat effects and reproducible flow through the bed. The SBA-HA material was analyzed for CO2 capture at 25 C and 75 C with 10% CO2/Ar saturated with water flowing at a rate of 20 mL/min. The adsorption of CO2 on the aminosilica was determined by monitoring the effluent gas with a mass spectrometer. After the adsorption experiment, the gas was switched to pure argon, and the CO2 was desorbed from the surface at 130 C for at least 3 h. As shown in Figure 1, the SBA-HA material captured CO2 reversibly in all 11 experiments performed with an average capacity of 1.98 mmol CO2/g adsorbent (6.6 mmol CO2/g aziridine monomer or 0.28 mmol CO2/mmol N).9 The CO2 adsorption capacities were found to be relatively constant, ranging between 1.9 and 2.1 mmol CO2/g. Hence, under simulated flue gas conditions, the SBA-HA material demonstrated promising CO2 adsorption properties.


Figure 1 Multicycle CO2 testing of SBA-HA at 75 C.

Additionally, the SBA-HA material reported in the literature was compared to a number of the best materials (Scheme 1). For instance, traditionally functionalized (SBA-NH2)10 and diamine-functionalized (SBA-diamine) aminosilicas were synthesized with amine loadings of 1.9 mmol N/g and 2.5 mmol N/g, respectively. When analyzed in the fixed bed flow system, these materials captured CO2 with capacities of approximately 10% (SBA-NH2) and 20% (SBA-diamine) that of the SBA-HA material at 25 C (Table 1). The high loading of amines on the hybrid aminosilica (SBA-HA) allowed for a CO2 capacity of 3.1 mmol CO2/g at 25 C, which is the basis for the data in Table 1.

Three additional materials were synthesized via impregnation of (i) a high molecular weight PEI4 into calcined SBA-15 (SBA/PEI(750 000 MW)), (ii) a low molecular weight PEI into calcined SBA-15 (SBA/PEI(800 MW)),4 or (iii) tetraethylenepentamine (TEPA) into uncalcined SBA-155 (SBA-UCTEPA). The SBA/PEI(750 000 MW) material captured approximately 70% as much CO2 per gram adsorbent as the SBA-HA material. Similar to previous reports,4 the capacities of the SBA/PEI materials increased at a higher temperature, possibly due to swelling of the amine polymer within the porous support. However, when SBA/PEI(800 MW) was studied, the capacities were not reproducible due to the texture of the material. When the PEI was impregnated in the SBA-15, the resulting material was very "sticky" due to the addition of the PEI polymer to the internal and external surface of the SBA-15. Furthermore, these materials typically clogged the adsorption column, creating a significant decrease in the volumetric flow rate and a large pressure drop. Thus, CO2 adsorption capacities with these materials could not be determined in our system. The sample prepared by impregnation of TEPA into uncalcined SBA-15 (SBA-UCTEPA) captured CO2 with high capacities at 75 C. However, a decrease in CO2 capacity was observed after subsequent runs (see the Supporting Information), likely due to leaching of the physisorbed TEPA from the support. Furthermore, at lower temperatures, the capacity decreased substantially (Table 1). Although high amine loadings can be obtained by physically adsorbing low molecular weight amines onto the support material, the longevity of such a material appears limited due to leaching of the organics from the support.

The easy to synthesize, robust HAS material is capable of adsorbing CO2 reversibly with very high capacities of 3.1 mmol CO2/g material at 25 C. The advantage of this adsorbent over previously reported adsorbents rests in its large CO2 capacity and demonstrated multicycle stability. The material was recycled by thermally desorbing the CO2 from the surface with essentially no changes in capacity. Furthermore, the organic groups on the surface were stable in the temperature range between 25 and 130 C due to the covalent attachment between the support and the organic groups. We report the first use of hybrid aminosilicas of this type for CO2 capture. Based on the high amine loading, the ability to recycle the materials, and the high CO2 affinity, these materials are very promising new materials for acid gas capture from flue gas streams.

Acknowledgment

This work was fully supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory under contract no. 41817M3226.

Supporting Information Available

Control material adsorption testing, experimental methods, XRD, FT-Raman spectra, CPMAS 13C NMR spectra, porosity data, and polymer characterization. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

* In papers with more than one author, the asterisk indicates the name of the author to whom inquiries about the paper should be addressed.

Georgia Institute of Technology.

U.S. Department of Energy.

1. Astarita, G. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1961, 16, 202. [ChemPort] [CrossRef]

2. Huang, H. Y.; Chinn, D.; Munson, C. L.; Yang, R. T. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2003, 42, 2427.[Full text - ACS] [ChemPort]

3. (a) Tsuda, T.; Tsuyoshi, F. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1992, 1659. [ChemPort] [CrossRef] (b) Leal, O.; Bolivar, C.; Ovalles, C.; Garcia, J. J.; Espidel, Y. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1995, 240, 183. [ChemPort] [CrossRef] (c) Gray, M. L.; Soong, Y.; Champagne, K. J.; Pennline, H. W.; Baltrus, J.; Stevens, R. W., Jr.; Khatri, R.; Chuang, S. S. C. Int. J. Environ. Technol. Manage. 2004, 4, 82. [ChemPort] (d) Gray, M. L.; Soong, Y.; Champagne, K. J.; Pennline, H. W.; Baltrus, J.; Stevens, R. W., Jr.; Khatri, R.; Chuang, S. S. C.; Filburn, T. Fuel Proc. Technol. 2005, 86, 1449. [ChemPort] [CrossRef] (e) Khatri, R. A.; Chuang, S. S. C.; Soong, Y.; Gray, M. Energy Fuels 2006, 20, 1514.[Full text - ACS] [ChemPort] (f) Kim, S.; Ida, J.; Guliants, V. V.; Lin, J. Y. S. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 6287.[Full text - ACS] [ChemPort] [Medline] (g) Knowles, G. P.; Graham, J. V.; Delaney, S. W.; Chaffee, A. L. Fuel Proc. Technol. 2005, 86, 1435. [ChemPort] [CrossRef] (h) Chang, A. C. C.; Chuang, S. S. C.; Gray, M.; Soong, Y. Energy Fuels 2003, 17, 468.[Full text - ACS] [ChemPort] (i) Zheng, F.; Tran, D. N.; Busche, B. J.; Fryxell, G. E.; Addlemann, R. S.; Zemanian, T. S.; Aardahl, C. L. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 3099.[Full text - ACS] [ChemPort] (j) Khatri, R. A.; Chuang, S. S. C.; Soong, Y.; Gray, M. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 3702.[Full text - ACS] [ChemPort] (k) Harlick, P. J. E.; Sayari, A. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 46, 446.[Full text - ACS] [ChemPort] (l) Harlick, P. J. E.; Sayari, A. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45, 3248.[Full text - ACS] [ChemPort] (m) Knowles, G. P.; Delaney, S. W.; Chaffee, A. L. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45, 2626.[Full text - ACS] [ChemPort]

4. (a) Xu, X.; Song, C.; Andresen, J. M.; Miller, B. G.; Scaroni, A. W. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2003, 62, 29. [ChemPort] [CrossRef] (b) Xu, X.; Song, C.; Andresen, J. M.; Miller, B. G.; Scaroni, A. W. Energy Fuels 2002, 16, 1463.[Full text - ACS] [ChemPort] (c) Xu, X.; Song, C.; Miller, B. G.; Scaroni, A. W. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 8113.[Full text - ACS] [ChemPort] (d) Xu, X.; Song, C.; Miller, B. G.; Scaroni, A. W. Fuel Proc. Technol. 2005, 86, 1457. [ChemPort] [CrossRef]

5. Yue, M. B.; Chun, Y.; Cao, Y.; Dong, X.; Zhu, J. H. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2006, 16, 1717. [ChemPort] [CrossRef]

6. Kim, H. J.; Moon, J. H.; Park, J. W. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2000, 227, 247. [ChemPort] [Medline] [CrossRef]

7. (a) We are building on the work of Kim et al.6 who used flat silica materials for surface-initiated hyperbranching polymerization of aziridine to form aminosilica hybrid materials. Hicks, J. C.; Fauth, D.; Gray, M.; Jones, C. W. U.S. Patent Application 2006. (b) In parallel, Linden and coworkers8 reported similar materials but did not report an application.

8. Rosenholm, J. M.; Penninkangas, A.; Linden, M. Chem. Commun. 2006, 3909. [ChemPort] [CrossRef]

9. These experiments were systematically stopped after 200 min. If the experiments were allowed 250 min, capacities of 2.4 mmol CO2/g or 8.0 mmol CO2/g aziridine would be calculated.

10. (a) Hicks, J. C.; Dabestani, R.; Buchanan, A. C., III; Jones, C. W. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 5022.[Full text - ACS] [ChemPort] (b) Hicks, J. C.; Jones, C. W. Langmuir 2006, 22, 2676.[Full text - ACS] [ChemPort] [Medline]


Table 1. Comparison of Amine Adorbents as Solid CO2 Traps

material

analysis temp (C)

mmol N /ga

capacity/ capacity HA

mmol CO2/ mmol N

SBA-HA

25

7.0

1.00

0.44

SBA-HA

75

7.0

0.68

0.30

SBA/PEI(750 000 MW)

25

7.4

0.64

0.27

SBA/PEI(750 000 MW)

75

7.4

0.69

0.29

SBA/PEI(800 MW)

25

10.9

ndb

ndb

SBA/PEI(800 MW)

75

10.9

ndb

ndb

SBA-UNTEPA

25

10.5

0.88

0.26

SBA-UNTEPA

75

10.5

1.09

0.32

SBA-diamine

25

2.5

0.23

0.28

SBA-NH2

25

1.9

0.13

0.21

a Values were determined from elemental analysis.b Capacities were not determined or reproducable due to the tacky nature of the material from the addition of PEI. The materials could not be dispersed in the packed-bed uniformly. All capacities are normalized to the capacity of SBA-HA at 25 C (3.11 mmol CO2/g sorbent).