
Web Release Date: August 12,
A Chloroquine-like Molecule Designed to Reverse Resistance in Plasmodium falciparum




and
Department of Chemistry, Portland State University, P.O. Box 751, Portland, Oregon 97207-0751, and Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon 97239
Received April 4, 2006
Abstract:
A class of hybrid molecules which we term 'reversed chloroquines' (RCQs) was designed, and a prototype molecule, N'-(7-chloroquinolin-4-yl)-N-[3-(10,11-dihydrodibenzo[b,f]azepin-5-yl)propyl]-N-methylpropane-1,3-diamine (1), was synthesized and tested against both chloroquine-sensitive and chloroquine-resistant strains of Plasmodium falciparum. An in vitro assay against the two strains indicated that 1 was effective at low-nM concentrations against both strains. A preliminary study in mice demonstrated oral efficacy against P. chabaudi and the absence of obvious toxicity. The RCQ approach therefore appears to be feasible.
In terms of human suffering, malaria is clearly the most
important parasitic disease. Furthermore, the worldwide burden
of malaria is increasing, in part due to the unfortunate spread
of resistance to most, if not all, of the drugs that were once
effective and safe.1,2
CQ resistance in P. falciparum malaria has been found to be
strongly associated with mutations in a parasite digestive vacuole
(DV) membrane protein, termed PfCRT.5-8
| Scheme 1 |
We synthesized 1 according to Scheme 2. The parent
imipramine is among the better-studied PfCRT reversal agents
known.13,16-18
-oxo dimer)
was assumed throughout, and this assumption gave good fits
to the data (e.g., the inset to Figure 1). At pH 5.7, near the DV
pH,6 the measured binding constant (3 × 105 M-1) was found
to be the same as measured for CQ (3 × 105 M-1). The
measured binding constant at pH 7 (also 3 × 105 M-1) was
also found to be comparable to that which we measured for
CQ (1 × 106 M-1) under identical conditions. Our methods
were validated in that the CQ-heme2 binding constants are
similar to literature values.19,20
| Scheme 2 |
The in vitro drug susceptibility assays of 1 against P. falciparum parasites are shown in Table 1, with the corresponding results for CQ as a reference. Compound 1 is at least as effective against either strain as is CQ against the CQS strain. The very low IC50 value for 1 against the CQS D6 strain means that attaching the RA moiety is not detrimental to its CQ-like activity, and its resistance-subverting activity against CQR Dd2 is a remarkable result for a first attempt at a lead compound. The observation that 1 has lower IC50 values than CQ for either strain may indicate that PfCRT in even the D6 strain is able to export CQ, but not as efficiently as does the Dd2 strain.
The prototype RCQ molecule 1 is probably too hydrophobic a molecule to be a strong drug candidate against malaria in humans; however, our pilot in vivo trial still demonstrated at least some oral bioavailability in mice. It was found that 64 mg/kg/day suppressed more than 99% of P. chabaudi growth after 4 days of dosing; lower dosing produced no observed suppression of the Plasmodium. Although CQ is effective at a lower dose in this animal model,21 the results serve as proof-of-concept and justification to pursue pharmacologic optimization. The reasons for the higher required dose of 1 are not known but may involve its lipophilic character, its metabolism in the liver, or other factors.
In conclusion, the RCQ approach seems to be viable. The
prototype molecule 1 has demonstrated growth inhibition of
P. falciparum CQR or CQS parasites in vitro and after oral dosing
in vivo. We are synthesizing other candidate molecules that will
address the practical concerns of oral availability and metabolism.
General and Spectroscopy. All reagents and solvents were purchased from Aldrich and used as supplied. NMR spectral characterizations were done on a Tecmag Libra-modified NM-500 NMR spectrometer, operating at 499.8 MHz using simple one-pulse observation and C2HCl3 solvent, or with a Bruker AMX-400 NMR spectrometer operating at 400.14 MHz for 1H observation, or 100.62 MHz for 13C observation. UV-vis spectra were recorded with an Ocean Optics USB-2000 diode array spectrophotometer equipped with a cuvette accessory. The procedures for performing the titrations and processing the data were the same as published,20 after the data were exported directly into an Excel (Microsoft) spreadsheet for analysis.
3-(7-Chloroquinolin-4-ylamino)propan-1-ol (2). A mixture of
4,7-dichloroquinoline (25.35 g, 0.128 mol) and 3-aminopropanol
(120 mL, 1.57 mol) were heated with stirring at 130-140
C for
24 h.22 After cooling, the reaction was poured into water (500 mL)
and filtered, and the solid residue was dried then boiled in ethyl
acetate (250 mL) to give 2 (27.3 g, 90%) as an off-white solid. 1H
NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3)
1.80 (bs, 1H, OH), 2.05 (m, J = 5.9,
5.6 Hz, 2H, CH2), 3.46 (td, J = 5.9, ~6 Hz, 2H, CH2), 3.98 (t, J
= 5.4 Hz, 2H, CH2), 5.95 (bs, 1H, NH), 6.36 (d, J = 5.4 Hz, 1H,
ClQ-C3-H), 7.31 (dd, J = 2.1, 8.9 Hz, 1H, ClQ-C6-H), 7.60 (d, J
= 8.9 Hz, 1H, ClQ-C5-H), 7.92 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H, ClQ-C8-H),
8.49 (d, J = 5.3 Hz, 1H, ClQ-C2-H).
3-(7-Chloroquinolin-4-ylamino)propyl Methanesulfonate (3).
To a suspension of 2 (0.5 g, 2.1 mmol) in anhydrous THF (10 mL)
under a nitrogen atmosphere was added triethylamine (0.66 mL,
4.2 mmol).23 The mixture was cooled to below 0
C. Methanesulfonyl chloride (0.17 mL, 2.2 mmol) was added slowly, keeping
the temperature below 5
C, and the reaction was stirred in an ice
bath for 45 min. After dilution with saturated NaHCO3 solution
(20 mL), the reaction was extracted with ether (20 mL then 2 ×
10 mL). The organic extracts were dried over MgSO4, filtered, and
evaporated to leave 3 (0.42 g, 63%) as a white solid. 1H NMR
(500 MHz, CDCl3)
2.18 (m, J = ~6.1 Hz, 2H, CH2), 3.04 (s,
3H, CH3), 3.59 (td, J = ~6.1 Hz, 2H, CH2), 4.43 (t, J = 5.7 Hz,
2H, CH2), 5.44 (bs, 1H, NH), 6.43 (d, J = 5.3 Hz, 1H, ClQ-C3-H),
7.40 (dd, J = 2.2, 8.9 Hz, 1H, ClQ-C6-H), 7.70 (d, J = 8.9 Hz,
1H, ClQ-C5-H), 7.97 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H, ClQ-C8-H), 8.55 (d, J =
5.4 Hz, 1H, ClQ-C2-H).
N'-(7-Chloroquinolin-4-yl)-N-[3-(10,11-dihydrodibenzo[b,f]azepin-5-yl)propyl]-N-methylpropane-1,3-diamine (1).
Desimipramine hydrochloride (0.65 g, 2.15 mmol) was dissolved
in water (8 mL), and solid NaHCO3 (0.4 g, 4.9 mmol) was added
with stirring.23 After addition of dichloromethane (10 mL), two clear
layers resulted. The aqueous layer was removed and extracted with
dichloromethane (2 × 10 mL). The combined organic layers were
evaporated to leave desimipramine free base (0.63 g, 100%) as a
yellow oil. To this oil were added anhydrous THF (15 mL) and 3
(0.42 g, 1.33 mmol) followed by triethylamine (0.4 mL, 2.9 mmol).
After being stirred at 50-60
C for 72 h, the reaction was allowed
to cool to room temperature and the solvent evaporated under
reduced pressure. The residue was partitioned between ethyl acetate
(20 mL) and saturated NaHCO3 solution (20 mL). The organic layer
was separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl
acetate (2 × 10 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over
MgSO4, filtered, and evaporated. The residue was chromatographed
on alumina (MCB type F20, 80-200 mesh), eluting with ethyl
acetate:hexanes (30:70) to give 1 (0.53 g, 84%) as a yellow oil.
Based on 1H NMR, 13C NMR, HR-MAS, and HPLC (Supporting
Information), 1 was at least 98% pure. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3)
1.80 (m, J = ~2 Hz, 2H, CH2), 1.84 (m, J = ~2 Hz, 2H, CH2),
2.28 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.49 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, CH2), 2.54 (t, J = 5.3
Hz, 2H, CH2), 3.10 (s, 4H, 2xCH2), 3.28 (td, J = ~3.9, 2H, CH2),
3.72 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H, CH2), 6.24 (d, J = 5.3 Hz, 1H, ClQ-C3-H), 6.83-7.10 (m, 8H, Ar), 7.13 (dd, J = 2.0, 8.9 Hz, 1H, ClQ-C6-H), 7.43 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H, ClQ-C5-H), 7.67 (bs, 1H, NH),
7.91 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H, ClQ-C8-H), 8.48 (d, J = 5.3 Hz, 1H,
ClQ-C2-H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3)
24.4, 26.0, 32.2, 42.3,
44.2, 48.7, 56.2, 57.9, 98.4, 117.6, 119.8, 121.6, 122.6, 124.9, 126.4,
128.6, 129.8, 134.1, 134.6, 148.0, 149.2, 150.5, 152.1. MS (ESI):
m/z 485.2461 M + H (Calculated 485.2472).
In Vitro Drug Susceptibility Assays. Both CQS (D6) and CQR
(Dd2) P. falciparum maintained continuously in culture were used.
Asynchronous cultures were diluted with uninfected erythrocytes
and complete medium (RPMI-1640 with 0.5% Albumax II) to
achieve 0.2% parasitemia and 2% hematocrit. In 96-well microplates, chloroquine (positive control) or 1 diluted in complete
medium from 10 mM stock in DMSO were added to the cell
mixture to yield triplicate wells with drug concentrations ranging
from 0 to 10-4 M in a final well volume of 100
L. After 72 h of
incubation under standard culture conditions, plates were harvested
and read by the SYBR Green I fluorescence-based method24 using
a 96-well fluorescence plate reader (Gemini-EM, Molecular Devices), with excitation and emission wavelengths at 497 and 520
nm, respectively. The fluorescence readings were plotted against
log[drug], and the IC50 values were obtained from curve fitting
performed by nonlinear regression using either Prism (GraphPad)
or Excel (Microsoft) software.
In Vivo 4-Day Suppressive Test.25 Female CF-1 mice, at 4-5
weeks of age, were injected intravenously with 106 erythrocytes
infected with CQR P. chabaudi.26,27
The authors thank the Medical Research Foundation of Oregon, the National Institutes of Health, and the U.S. Department of Defense for funding that enabled parts of this work.
Structural characterization of compound 1, as well as an evaluation of its purity. This information consists of 1H and 13C NMR spectra and 13C NMR peak assignments, as well as HR-MS plots and HPLC traces. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Phone: 503 725-3875. Fax 503 725-9525. E-mail: peytond@pdx.edu.
Portland State University.
Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
a. Abbreviations: CQ, chloroquine; CQR, chloroquine-resistant; CQS, chloroquine-sensitive; DV, digestive vacuole; PfCRT, P. falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter; RA, reversal agent; RCQ, reversed chloroquine.
1. Krogstad, D. J. Malaria as a reemerging disease. Epidemiol. Rev.
1996, 18 (1), 77-89.
2. Greenwood, B. M.; Bojang, K.; Whitty, C. J.; Targett, G. A. Malaria.
Lancet 2005, 365 (9469), 1487-98.
3. Ashley, E. A.; White, N. J. Artemisinin-based combinations. Curr.
Opin. Infect. Dis. 2005, 18 (6), 531-6.
4. Schellenberg, D.; Abdulla, S.; Roper, C. Current Issues for Anti-Malarial Drugs to Control P. falciparum Malaria. Curr. Mol. Med.
2006, 6 (2), 253-60.
5. Zhang, H.; Paguio, M.; Roepe, P. D. The antimalarial drug resistance
protein Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter
binds chloroquine. Biochemistry (Mosc). 2004, 43 (26), 8290-6.
6. Bennett, T. N.; Kosar, A. D.; Ursos, L. M.; Dzekunov, S.; Singh
Sidhu, A. B.; Fidock, D. A.; Roepe, P. D. Drug resistance-associated
pfCRT mutations confer decreased Plasmodium falciparum digestive
vacuolar pH. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2004, 133 (1), 99-114.
7. Martin, R. E.; Kirk, K. The malaria parasite's chloroquine resistance
transporter is a member of the drug/metabolite transporter superfamily. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2004, 21 (10), 1938-49.
8. Ginsburg, H. Should chloroquine be laid to rest? Acta Trop. 2005,
96 (1), 16-23.
9. Martin, S. K.; Oduola, A. M.; Milhous, W. K. Reversal of chloroquine
resistance in Plasmodium falciparum by verapamil. Science 1987,
235 (4791), 899-901.
10. Krogstad, D. J.; Gluzman, I. Y.; Kyle, D. E.; Oduola, A. M.; Martin,
S. K.; Milhous, W. K.; Schlesinger, P. H. Efflux of chloroquine from
Plasmodium falciparum: mechanism of chloroquine resistance.
Science 1987, 238 (4831), 1283-5.
11. van Schalkwyk, D. A.; Walden, J. C.; Smith, P. J. Reversal of
chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum using combinations
of chemosensitizers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001, 45 (11),
3171-4.
12. Millet, J.; Torrentino-Madamet, M.; Alibert, S.; Rogier, C.; Santelli-Rouvier, C.; Mosnier, J.; Baret, E.; Barbe, J.; Parzy, D.; Pradines,
B. Dihydroethanoanthracene derivatives as in vitro malarial chloroquine resistance reversal agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004,
48 (7), 2753-6.
13. Bhattacharjee, A. K.; Kyle, D. E.; Vennerstrom, J. L.; Milhous, W.
K. A 3D QSAR pharmacophore model and quantum chemical
structure-activity analysis of chloroquine(CQ)-resistance reversal.
J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42 (5), 1212-20.
14. Morphy, R.; Rankovic, Z. Designed multiple ligands. An emerging
drug discovery paradigm. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48 (21), 6523-43.
15. Egan, T. J.; Mavuso, W. W.; Ross, D. C.; Marques, H. M.
Thermodynamic factors controlling the interaction of quinoline
antimalarial drugs with ferriprotoporphyrin IX. J. Inorg. Biochem.
1997, 68 (2), 137-45.
16. Bhattacharjee, A. K.; Kyle, D. E.; Vennerstrom, J. L. Structural
analysis of chloroquine resistance reversal by imipramine analogs.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001, 45 (9), 2655-7.
17. Menezes, C. M.; Kirchgatter, K.; Di Santi, S. M.; Savalli, C.;
Monteiro, F. G.; Paula, G. A.; Ferreira, E. I. Antimalarial effect in
vitro and lack of modulating effect of desipramine and imipramine.
Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1997, 91 (6), 697-700.
18. Miki, A.; Tanabe, K.; Nakayama, T.; Kiryon, C.; Ohsawa, K.
Plasmodium chabaudi: association of reversal of chloroquine
resistance with increased accumulation of chloroquine in resistant
parasites. Exp. Parasitol. 1992, 74, (2), 134-42.
19. Dorn, A.; Vippagunta, S. R.; Matile, H.; Jaquet, C.; Vennerstrom, J.
L.; Ridley, R. G. An assessment of drug-haematin binding as a
mechanism for inhibition of haematin polymerisation by quinoline
antimalarials. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1998, 55, (6), 727-36.
20. Xu Kelly, J.; Winter, R.; Riscoe, M.; Peyton, D. H. A spectroscopic
investigation of the binding interactions between 4,5- dihydroxyxanthone and heme. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2001, 86, (2-3), 617-25.
21. Hunt, P.; Cravo, P. V.; Donleavy, P.; Carlton, J. M.; Walliker, D.
Chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium chabaudi: are chloroquine-resistance transporter (crt) and multi-drug resistance (mdr1) orthologues involved? Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2004, 133, (1),
27-35.
22. Bolte, J.; Demuynck, C.; Lhomme, J. Synthetic models of DNA
complexes with antimalarial compounds. 2. The problem of guanine
specificity in chloroquine binding. J. Med. Chem. 1977, 20, 0, (1),
106-13.
23. Fujita, M.; Seki, T. Syntheses and bioactivities of novel carbamates
combining platelet activating factor (PAF) receptor antagonist with
thromboxane synthase inhibitor (TxSI). Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2002, 12, (10), 1383-6.
24. Smilkstein, M.; Sriwilaijaroen, N.; Kelly, J. X.; Wilairat, P.; Riscoe,
M. Simple and inexpensive fluorescence-based technique for high-throughput antimalarial drug screening. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, (5), 1803-6.
25. Peters, W. The chemotherapy of rodent malaria, XXII. The value of
drug-resistant strains of P. berghei in screening for blood schizontocidal activity. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 1975, 69, (2), 155-71.
26. Mackinnon, M. J.; Read, A. F. Virulence in malaria: an evolutionary
viewpoint. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 2004, 359,
(1446), 965-86.
27. Mackinnon, M. J.; Walker, P. R.; Rowe, J. A. Plasmodium
chabaudi: rosetting in a rodent malaria model. Exp. Parasitol. 2002,
101, (2-3), 121-8.
28. Hommel, M. Diagnostic methods in malaria, 4th ed.; Arnold: London, New York, 2002; pp 35-58.
|
Drug |
Cell line |
CQR/CQS |
IC50 (nM) |
|
CQ |
D6 |
CQS |
6.5 |
|
CQ |
Dd2 |
CQR |
102 |
|
1 |
D6 |
CQS |
2.9 |
|
1 |
Dd2 |
CQR |
5.3 |
a The uncertainties are estimated to be ±15%, based on weighing uncertainties for 1 (which is an oil), as well as on variability between determinations that were performed on different weeks.