
Web Release Date: January 14,
Solid-State Modeling of the Terahertz Spectrum of the High Explosive HMX
1-014 Center for Science and Technology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244
Received: September 23, 2005
In Final Form: December 7, 2005
Abstract:
The experimental solid-state terahertz (THz) spectrum (3-120 cm-1) of the
-crystal form of the high explosive
octahydro-1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine (HMX) has been analyzed using solid-state density functional
theory calculations. Various density functionals (both generalized gradient approximation and local density
approximation) are compared in terms of their abilities to reproduce the experimentally observed solid-state
structure and low-frequency vibrational motions. Good-to-excellent agreement between solid-state theory and
experiment can be achieved in the THz region where isolated-molecule calculations fail to reproduce the
observed spectral features, demonstrating a clear limitation of using isolated-molecule calculations for the
assignment of THz frequency motions in molecular solids. The deficiency of isolated-molecule calculations
is traced to modification of the molecular structure in the solid state through crystal packing effects and the
formation of weak C-H···O hydrogen bonds.
Terahertz (THz) spectroscopy has been utilized in a diverse number of fields, ranging from security applications1 to the pharmaceutical industry.2 These experimental THz investigations have demonstrated that many compounds have distinct absorption spectra that can be used for their detection, identification, and characterization. While the origins of these absorption features are generally attributed to intermolecular vibrations, intramolecular torsions, or even crystal lattice vibrations, the actual assignment of particular observed spectral features to specific atomic motions is rare. The assignment of these spectral features is crucial to understanding these characteristic THz spectra.
The difficulty in assigning low-frequency THz spectra derives from the very nature of the vibrational motions. Broadly speaking, these motions can no longer be considered as localized atomic motions, like those encountered in the mid-infrared (e.g., O-H stretching modes). The THz frequency vibrational motions must be considered in a global sense where all of the atoms in the entire molecule are participating in the intramolecular or intermolecular motion. This global motion, particularly the intermolecular coordinates, leads to a complete failure of familiar single-molecule-based modeling approaches. A typical calculation treats the molecule of interest in isolation with no environmental interactions present. This is, of course, largely appropriate for gas-phase molecules and some weakly interacting solute-solvent solutions but generally inappropriate for molecular solids.
To address the limitations of isolated-molecule calculations,
we have applied periodic boundary condition (PBC) calculations
to interpret the THz spectrum of the
-crystal form (the most
stable of the
-,
-,
-, and
-HMX crystal forms)3 of the high
explosive octahydro-1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine (HMX).
This energetic material, among others, is a threat agent that can
be detected using THz spectroscopy in, for instance, the nondestructive and noninvasive screening of opaque containers.4
The experimental THz spectrum of
-HMX has been previously
reported,4-7
-HMX THz
spectrum in threat detection databases, a thorough understanding
of the spectrum is required.
The experimental room-temperature THz spectrum of crystalline
-HMX was obtained from TeraView Limited (Cambridge,
U.K.).5 Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were
performed using the programs Gaussian038 (isolated-molecule)
and DMol3 (version 3.2)9,10
= 90.0
,
= 124.3
,
=
90.0
.
3.1. Comparison of Experimental and Theoretical HMX Structural Data. Crystallographic and calculated (isolated-molecule and solid-state) HMX structural data are provided in Tables 1 (bond lengths) and 2 (bond angles). The calculated bond length differences from experiment are shown diagrammatically in Figure 1 for comparative purposes. Both the isolated-molecule and solid-state optimizations yield Ci symmetry HMX minima (with the exception of the PWC and VWN isolated-molecule calculations, which deviate only slightly to C1 symmetry), consistent with the crystal data and previous relative energy comparisons of HMX conformations.25 The best bond length agreements occur in the PWC, VWN, HCTH, and B3LYP optimizations by isolated-molecule root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) comparisons. This same trend continues in the solid-state calculations, where the LDA results are second only to the HCTH results in the accurate reproduction of crystal bond lengths. As expected from the inclusion of neighboring molecules, considerable improvement in bond angle agreement is found in the solid-state calculations relative to their isolated-molecule counterparts, with the solid-state angle agreement surpassing the accuracy of the isolated-molecule B3LYP results in all LDA and GGA cases. It is noteworthy that the functionals with the best experimental bond length agreement are also the ones with the worst bond angle RMSD agreement, although these differences occur over a narrow range.
The solid-state GGA and LDA
-HMX geometry optimizations, through their inclusion of crystal packing interactions and
weak intermolecular hydrogen-bonding interactions, improve the
agreement of the calculated HMX geometry with experiment.
All but three (BLYP, BOP, RPBE) functionals either match or
surpass the isolated-molecule B3LYP calculations in accuracy
by RMSD comparisons. The solid-state calculations still generally overestimate bond lengths as compared to observed crystal
distances. The GGA bond length overestimation is larger than
in the LDA results. The only cases where the LDA bond lengths
are shorter than observed are the C-N distances in the eight-membered ring.
Overlay of the isolated-molecule and solid-state HMX
structures reveals the directions and magnitudes of structural
changes in the molecule due to crystal cell interactions. The
overlay of the HCTH structures (those with the best crystal bond
length agreement) is shown in Figure 2. The local features (bond
lengths, angles) are found to change very little, while the pendant
NO2 groups are all shifted toward the isolated-molecule inversion center in the solid-state structure. The features of the crystal
cell not accounted for by this structural comparison are the
intermolecular hydrogen-bonding interactions that couple each
HMX molecule to its neighbors. Assigned hydrogen-bonding
interactions are provided in Table 3

. Intermolecular hydrogen
bonding in the
-HMX crystal occurs well within the range of
weak hydrogen bonds observed in other molecular crystals.26
Additionally, five symmetry-unique intramolecular hydrogen-bonding interactions are found in the isolated-molecule HMX
calculations in the range of 2.10-2.60 Å. Of note in the isolated-molecule calculations are the reductions in the O3-Hb and
O4-Hc distances in the LDA calculations relative to the other
methods. These result from the reduced N1-N2 and N3-N4 bond
lengths in these same LDA calculations (Table 1).
Figure 2 The packing arrangement of the -HMX crystal cell (left), an overlay of the HCTH/DNP isolated-molecule and solid-state geometries
(center), and the labeling scheme for the HMX molecule used in bond length and angle assignments (right). Vertical (V) and horizontal (H) NO2
groups are differentiated in the overlay and labeled figures. Crystal and overlay figures were rendered with VMD.31
|
In the crystal cell, intermolecular hydrogen-bonding interactions form that approach and, in some instances, occur within the range of the intramolecular distances (Table 3). Among the GGA solid-state calculations, all but the O3-Hb distances are found to increase upon geometry optimization relative to the isolated-molecule distances. Atoms O3 and Hb reside below the plane of the four methylene carbons and are brought into closer contact due to the bending of the N4-bound NO2 group toward the molecular center in the crystal environment. In the LDA calculations, both the O3-Hb and O2-Ha distances are found to be reduced slightly. In the crystal cell, intermolecular distances to the Ha and Hb atoms (from oxygen atoms in nearest-neighbor HMX molecules) occur at distances within the intramolecular regime, which is noteworthy both for the shorter distances and for the fact that the Hb atom is found to interact more closely with its intramolecular acceptor (O3) in the GGA cases (both Ha and Hb reside closer to their acceptors in the LDA cases) than the isolated-molecule geometry optimizations. The crystal environment also positions other HMX molecules near Hd, the only atom to which short (<2.60 Å) intramolecular hydrogen-bonding distances could not be assigned in the isolated-molecule calculations.
3.2. IR Intensity Calculations by Difference-Dipole Methods. The assignment of THz features in the
-HMX spectrum
is complicated by (1) the differences in the treatment of crystal
packing interactions among the various density functionals, (2)
the lack of lattice constant optimizations in DMol3, which also
affects the treatment of intermolecular interactions in the
calculations, and (3) the presence of both internal and external
modes in the THz region. For these reasons, both frequency
and intensity data are important for use in accurate assignments.
Currently, DMol3 cannot calculate solid-state IR intensities, nor
can static electric fields be applied in solid-state calculations
for calculating IR intensities by atomic polar tensor methods.
A means for indirectly calculating IR intensities is available in
the solid state through the calculation of unit cell dipole moment
differences between the ground and vibrational states based on
Mulliken27 and Hirshfeld28 atomic charges. The solid-state IR
intensities reported in this work are calculated from the change
in dipole moments for the unit cell that result from atomic
displacements along each normal-mode coordinate (d
/dQ). A
previous study reports the use of this difference-dipole method
for the assignment of
-sheet vibrations in oligopeptides based
on Mulliken charges.29 While this approach, in principle, is
expected to yield reasonable IR intensities due to the dependence
of the intensity on the square of the transition dipole moment,
it is important to first validate this approach external to the solid-state calculations. It is also known that Hirshfeld analyses are
more useful than Mulliken analyses for explaining molecular
properties,30 and so the differences between difference-dipole
calculations using both charge partitioning methods is of some
importance. To test this method, the difference-dipole technique
was first applied to the isolated HMX molecule, where IR
intensities and molecular dipoles are directly calculated in the
normal-mode analysis.
The scaling of difference dipoles (all between 0.0 and 0.1
D) to intensities (0.0-30.0 km/mol) was performed by applying
a constant multiplicative term to the square of the difference
dipoles and adjusting this term as to minimize their RMSDs
with respect to the calculated molecular intensities of the sub-200 cm-1 modes (in the PWC and VWN calculations, this range
was increased to 220 cm-1 to include two modes that occur in
the GGA functionals below 200 cm-1). The RMSDs of the
difference-dipole calculations are provided in Table 4
. The
histograms in Figure 3 show the IR intensity fits for the C1
symmetry PWC results (the PWC and VWN results are nearly
superimposable) and the Ci symmetry VWN-BP results, which
are representative of the eight GGA functionals. The two additional modes in the PWC/VWN cases are a result of the absence
of inversion symmetry in the optimized molecules and the reporting of only those modes with intensities larger than 0.00
km/mol.
RMSD minimization leads to reasonable agreements in both the absolute intensities and trends in intensities in the sub-200 cm-1 region. The Mulliken dipole RMSDs are smaller than the Hirshfeld values for all but the BLYP and BOP functionals. The Mulliken and Hirshfeld dipole differences for the lowest-frequency IR-active modes are calculated too small in all cases, but it is clear that trends in intensity are correct across all methods. The Mulliken and Hirshfeld difference dipoles are noteworthy for their good agreement with one another. This agreement can be attributed to the use of the dipole differences between two states and not the actual charges themselves in any one state. Over small displacements, the changes in atomic charge by either partitioning method would be expected to be similar, leading to the consistent difference-dipole results throughout.
The results obtained from the dipole treatment of molecular intensities indicate that similar treatments in the solid-state should yield results accurate enough to prove useful in mode assignments. The results of these calculations are provided in the next section.
3.3. Comparison of Experimental and Simulated THz
Spectra. The experimental THz spectrum of
-HMX (3-120
cm-1) is provided in Figure 4 with the calculated isolated-molecule and solid-state spectra. The intensities in the solid-state spectra result from the Mulliken difference-dipole analysis.
The experimental spectrum in this region contains three
prominent absorptions at 58.5, 82.2, and 95.4 cm-1. The
isolated-molecule normal-mode analyses with the GGA functionals yield five IR-active modes in the 0-120 cm-1 region,
with all eight functionals producing the same relative positions
and intensities of the lowest three and the highest fifth modes.
The frequency of the fourth mode varies between 74 (RPBE)
and 105 (HCTH) cm-1, with the other functionals generating a
tighter grouping between 82 and 89 cm-1. The LDA functionals
are in good agreement with one another in the isolated-molecule
calculations, with the fifth dominant IR-active mode (all modes
have some IR activity in the C1 structure) calculated at 140
cm-1 by both methods and, therefore, beyond the reported
experimental results. The calculated isolated-molecule normal
modes (both IR-active and inactive) in this region are provided
in Table 5
. All isolated-molecule normal-mode analyses display
little agreement with the THz spectrum of the crystalline
material, as apparent from the lack of frequency agreement with
the three experimental maxima and the calculated positions of
the two most intense IR-active modes below the first apparent
THz peak at 58.5 cm-1.
The results of the solid-state normal-mode analyses for all
GGA and LDA functionals are shown (with their calculated IR
intensities) overlaid with the measured THz spectrum and
isolated-molecule peaks in Figure 4 and are listed in Table 6
.
While variety in peak positions and calculated intensities is
greater among the solid-state calculations, it is evident that
inclusion of the crystal cell interactions results in significantly
improved agreement with the observed THz spectrum in all
cases. Both LDA functionals predict IR-active modes within
close proximity of THz peaks. A range of agreement can be
found from among the GGA functionals, with the VWN-BP,
BP, and PW91 calculations yielding excellent THz peak position
agreement. The eighth IR-active crystal mode occurs above the
120 cm-1 THz cutoff in the BLYP, BOP, PBE, RPBE, and
HCTH calculations and is grouped within a narrow range in
the GGA series (116-126 cm-1) where the experimental THz
spectrum rises to what may be a nearby absorption maximum.
The LDA functionals place this eighth mode at 99 cm-1. The
ninth IR-active mode is predicted to lie above the 120 cm-1
THz cutoff in all the GGA calculations, while the LDA
calculations place the ninth mode approximately 3 cm-1 above
the eighth crystal mode.
3.4. THz Mode Assignments From the VWN-BP/DNP Simulated Spectrum. From among the density functional comparisons, the VWN-BP simulated solid-state THz spectrum agrees best in terms of both peak positions and relative calculated IR intensities by the difference-dipole method. It is with these results that the assignment of the THz spectrum to specific molecular motions is performed. The nine lowest-frequency molecular vibrational modes are shown in Figure 5. These low-frequency modes include NO2 pendulum motions and ring-twisting motions (modes 1 and 2), large-amplitude ring stretches and twisting modes (modes 3, 4, and 5), and in- and out-of-phase NO2 rotor modes for both the vertically (modes 6 and 7) and horizontally (modes 8 and 9) oriented NO2 fragments (for orientation, see Figure 5). The distinct lack of agreement between the THz peaks and isolated-molecule modes in Figure 6 indicates, as expected, that these large-amplitude motions are altered in the crystal environment.
A crystal unit cell containing M molecules with N atoms
contains 3N-6M internal modes (those modes associated with
intramolecular motions), 6M-3 external modes (those modes
associated with relative motions between the M molecules, such
as rotations and translations), and 3 acoustic modes. In the
-HMX crystal (Z = 2), the nine external modes correspond to
three optical translational (IR-active) modes (the two molecules
moving in opposite directions along the [x,y,z] axes) and six
optical rotational (IR-inactive) modes, which occur as in-phase
and out-of-phase motions of the two molecules in the crystal
unit cell. Because the energies and relative motions of large-amplitude (low-frequency) internal modes and external modes
are dependent on crystal packing and intermolecular interactions
(such as ionic and hydrogen-bonding interactions), these two
different types of modes can be intermixed in the low-frequency
region. This intermixing, coupled with the changes to molecular
mode frequencies due to crystallographic forces, is the primary
reason why isolated-molecule calculations are of limited use in
low-frequency vibrational assignments.
In the absence of strong electrostatic interactions to couple neighboring molecules (and, subsequently, their vibrational modes), the low-frequency vibrations of a molecular crystal (those not due to external modes) can be assigned based on the relative motions of isolated molecules with respect to their internal modes. In this absence of strong interactions, a single molecular mode occurs as in-phase and out-of-phase combinations of the same normal mode displacements in crystal cells containing two identical molecules (such as HMX). The degree to which the crystal packing interactions alter one or both of these combinations is reflected in both the frequency shift relative to the isolated molecular mode positions and the relative splitting of these in- and out-of-phase solid-state combinations.
The solid-state vibrational modes in
-HMX can be readily
assigned to either internal (molecular) mode combinations or
external modes (Table 7
). The THz spectrum and VWN-BP
spectra are shown and labeled in Figure 6 using both the
Hirshfeld (middle) and Mulliken (bottom) difference-dipole
intensities. The normal-mode assignments reveal considerable
shifting of internal modes in the crystal cell and the prominence
of the three optical translational modes in the THz region. It is
these three modes that isolated-molecule calculations are
incapable of reproducing. The six rotational modes are all
predicted to be IR-inactive and occur in the 40-90 cm-1 range
(Table 7). The IR-active modes below 120 cm-1 are found to
include the in- and out-of-phase combinations of the vertical
NO2 pendulum motions (mode 1 in Figure 5) split by 25.5 cm-1,
the out-of- and in-phase combinations of the Au symmetry ring-twisting modes (mode 5 in Figure 5) split by 1.0 cm-1, and, at
the very edge of this range, the out-of-phase combination of
the horizontal NO2 pendulum motions (mode 2 in Figure 5)
that lies 7.4 cm-1 below its in-phase combination. The remaining
combinations of the low-frequency molecular modes occur
beyond the 120 cm-1 THz limit. From among the molecular
modes available for assignment to this THz region, the isolated-molecule calculation includes six modes (including IR-active
modes 7 and 9) that do not contribute to features in the THz
spectrum according to the VWN-BP calculations.
4.1. Density Functional Selection and Molecular Geometry. Inclusion of the crystal environment is found to significantly improve the HMX molecular geometry agreement between theory and experiment. In RMSD comparisons, solid-state DFT calculations are always found to improve over their molecular counterparts, with the HCTH calculations yielding the best overall bond length agreement and RPBE calculations yielding the best overall bond angle agreement with experiment. The only two bond lengths that are not corrected for in the solid-state calculations are the N1-O1 and N1-O2 distances of the vertical NO2 groups (for orientation, see Figure 2). One of the useful insights to come from the functional comparisons is the realization that the degree of agreement between theory and experiment depends on the experimental feature being considered. While the HCTH results yield the best bond length agreement, it is clear from the vibrational analyses that this functional is less accurate than others in the GGA series at reproducing major spectral features. The sensitivity of the normal modes to the choice of functional is, from these results, more significant than the range in RMSDs in the LDA/GGA series.
The observed agreement in the solid-state DMol3 results with
the crystal distances surpasses the results of the more computationally demanding isolated-molecule calculations with the
B3LYP hybrid density functional. From a methodological
perspective, it is not the better agreements of the GGA and LDA
functionals over the isolated-molecule B3LYP results that are
noteworthy here, but the improvement in structural agreement
to experiment that comes from including intermolecular interactions in the GGA and LDA computational analyses. While
crystal packing alone is an important factor in determining
molecular geometry for flexible molecules, the
-HMX crystal
is found to contain numerous intermolecular weak hydrogen-bonding interactions between molecules that, with crystal
packing, alter the intramolecular interactions calculated for the
isolated molecule. These interactions are chemically weak but
lead to significant changes in the low-frequency internal modes
from their isolated-molecule origins.
4.2. Normal-Mode Analyses and Solid-State Assignments.
The assignment of low-frequency vibrational modes in molecular solids from isolated-molecule calculations is certainly
demonstrated to be incorrect for HMX. The majority of the sub-120 cm-1 isolated-molecule modes for HMX do not occur in
the available THz range for
-HMX according to the VWN-BP calculations. Despite variability among the available density
functionals, the crystal cell normal-mode calculations are always
found to be improvements over their isolated-molecule counterparts. This is certainly because the solid-state calculations
include crystal packing, intermolecular hydrogen-bonding interactions, and restriction of motion in the normal modes due
to these structural interactions. This restriction of motion is the
time-dependent feature of normal-mode analyses and vibrational
spectroscopy that combines with the time-independent quality
of geometry optimizations and diffraction data to provide the
more complete picture of the crystal environment. A detailed
analysis of the VWN-BP solid-state calculations reveals the
degree to which the crystal environment changes the isolated-molecule vibrations. Several absorption features in the THz
spectrum are assigned to optical translational (IR-active) modes
that cannot be accounted for in isolated-molecule calculations
since these motions are solely the result of the relative motions
of the two HMX molecules in the crystal cell. The isolated-molecule modes undergo both shifting to higher frequency and,
due to the presence of in- and out-of-phase combinations of
these individual modes in the Z = 2 crystal cell, significant
mode splitting when the relative motions of one combination
are less restricted than the oppositely phased motions in the
other. Within the 120-cm-1 range of the THz experiment, the
in-phase combination of the lowest-frequency isolated-molecule
pendulum motions (mode 1 in Figure 5) is shifted 40 cm-1 to
higher frequency, while the out-of-phase combination is 25.5
cm-1 higher still in energy. In contrast, the asymmetric twisting
mode at 62.6 cm-1 (mode 5) is shifted by only 27 cm-1 and
split between its in- and out-of-phase components by 1 cm-1.
4.3. Mulliken and Hirshfeld Difference-Dipole Solid-State
Intensities. The calculation of crystal cell dipole differences
along each normal coordinate yields IR intensity trends that can,
provided the frequencies themselves accurately reproduce the
positions of major peaks in the THz spectrum, aid greatly in
solid-state mode assignments. Both the Mulliken and Hirshfeld
difference-dipole intensities in the VWN-BP solid-state calculations reproduce the positions of major peaks up to 120 cm-1 in
-HMX and, when plotted with a Lorentzian line shape, accurately account for major shoulder features where the prominence
of minor absorptions are diminished by local nearby maxima.
The only notable difference between the Mulliken and Hirshfeld
intensity spectra (Figure 6) is the relative calculated intensities
of the THz peak at 82 cm-1, which find the Hirshfeld results
predicting this mode too high relative to both the Mulliken
spectrum and experiment. These two peaks are found to contain
two closely spaced crystal cell modes each, making the relative
intensities of these two modes sensitive to the accuracy of the
charge analyses in four modes. Here, the Mulliken intensities
are found to reproduce the experiment through both a larger
difference in the two most intense modes in this region ("OT3"
and "5-5" in Figure 6) and the prediction of negligible intensity
in the two other contributing modes ("1 - 1" and "5 + 5" in
Figure 6). This difference-dipole approach has proven useful
in the
-HMX analysis and is being further considered in other
solid-state studies of molecular crystals.
The THz spectrum of
-HMX has been analyzed with
isolated-molecule and solid-state DFT calculations. Isolated-molecule calculations are incapable of reproducing the observed
spectral features. The inclusion of the crystal environment in
the DFT calculations greatly improves both the crystallographic
structural agreement relative to the isolated-molecule calculations and the theoretical agreement with the measured THz
spectrum. The available THz spectrum of
-HMX (3-120
cm-1) is assigned based on the results of solid-state normal-mode analyses at the VWN-BP/DNP level of theory. Analysis
of the individual modes reveals that major features in the THz
spectrum are due to optical translational motions of molecules
in the crystal cell and that the majority of isolated-molecule
normal modes predicted to lie below 120 cm-1 are, in fact,
shifted to much higher frequency. This is due to crystal packing
and intermolecular interactions, further indicating the limitation
of employing isolated-molecule calculations for assignment
purposes. Reasonable IR intensity predictions can be made in
the solid-state by using difference-dipole calculations from
Mulliken and Hirshfeld charge analyses in DMol3, with Mulliken
charge analyses generally providing better agreement in the
-HMX studies. Further investigations of the application of
solid-state DFT methods to the analysis of the THz spectra of
energetic materials are ongoing.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the
support of the National Science Foundation (PHY-0442188) and
the ACS Petroleum Research Fund (40610-G6). The authors
thank TeraView Limited (Cambridge, UK) for providing the
experimental THz spectrum of
-HMX and the reviewers for
their insightful comments.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Phone: 315-443-0269. Fax: 315-443-4070. E-mail: tmkorter@syr.edu.
1. Kemp, M. C.; Taday, P. F.; Cole, B. E.; Cluff, J. A.; Fitzgerald, A.
J.; Tribe, W. R. Proc. SPIE 2003, 5070, 44.
2. Taday, P. F. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 2004, 362, 351.
3. Choi, C. S.; Boutin, H. P. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B 1970, 26, 1235.
4. Cook, D. J.; Decker, B. K.; Maislin, G.; Allen, M. G. Proc. SPIE
2004, 5354, 55.
5. Lo, T.; Gregory, I. S.; Baker, C.; Taday, P. F.; Tribe, W. R.; Kemp, M. C. Vibration. Spectrosc. Submitted.
6. Barber, J.; Hooks, D. E.; Funk, D. J.; Averitt, R. D.; Taylor, A. J.;
Babikov, D. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 3501.
7. Huang, F.; Schulkin, B.; Altan, H.; Federici, J. F.; Gary, D.; Barat,
R.; Zimdars, D.; Chen, M.; Tanner, D. B. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 85, 5535.
8. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb,
M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Montgomery, J., J. A.; Vreven, T.; Kudin, K. N.;
Burant, J. C.; Millam, J. M.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.;
Mennucci, B.; Cossi, M.; Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.; Petersson, G. A.;
Nakatsuji, H.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.;
Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Klene, M.; Li,
X.; Knox, J. E.; Hratchian, H. P.; Cross, J. B.; Bakken, V.; Adamo, C.;
Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.;
Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Ayala, P. Y.; Morokuma, K.;
Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Dapprich,
S.; Daniels, A. D.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A.
D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cui, Q.; Baboul, A.
G.; Clifford, S.; Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.;
Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham,
M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.;
Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian
03, Revision C.02;
9. Delley, B. J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 92, 508.
10. Delley, B. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 7756.
11. Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648.
12. Stephens, P. J.; Devlin, F. J.; Chabalowski, C. F.; Frisch, M. J. J.
Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 11623.
13. Hehre, W. J.; Ditchfield, R.; Pople, J. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1972, 56,
2257
![]()
14. Perdew, J. P.; Wang, Y. Phys. Rev. B 1992, 45, 13244.
15. Vosko, S. H.; Wilk, L.; Nusair, M. Can. J. Phys. 1980, 58, 1200.
16. Becke, A. D. Phys. Rev. A 1988, 38, 3098.
17. Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785.
18. Tsuneda, T.; Suzumura, T.; Hirao, K. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110,
10664.
19. Perdew, J. P.; Chevary, J. A.; Vosko, S. H.; Jackson, K. A.;
Pederson, M. R.; Singh, D. J.; Fiolhais, C. Phys. Rev. B 1992, 46, 6671.
20. Boese, A. D.; Handy, N. C. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 114, 5497.
21. Perdew, J. P.; Wang, Y. Phys. Rev. B 1986, 33, 8800.
22. Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77,
3865.
23. Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 78,
1396.
24. Hammer, B.; Hansen, L. B.; Norskov, J. K. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59,
7413.
25. Brand, H. V.; Rabie, R. L.; Funk, D. J.; Diaz-Acosta, I.; Pulay, P.;
Lippert, T. K. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 10594.
26. Desiraju, G. R.; Steiner, T. The Weak Hydrogen Bond In Structural Chemistry and Biology; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1999.
27. Mulliken, R. S. J. Chem. Phys. 1955, 23, 1833.
28. Hirshfeld, F. L. Theor. Chim. Acta B 1977, 44, 129.
29. Franzen, S. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 9898.
30. For in-depth discussions, see: Roy, R. K. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003,
107, 10428
and Guerra, C. F.; Handgraaf, J.-W.; Baerends, E. J.;
Bickelhaupt, F. M. J. Comput. Chem. 2003, 25 (2), 189.
31. Humphrey, W.; Dalke, A.; Schulten, K. J. Mol. Graph. 1996, 14,
33.
|
functional |
N1-N2 |
N3-N4 |
N1-O1 |
N1-O2 |
N3-O3 |
N3-O4 |
N2-C1 |
C1-N4 |
N4-C2 |
C2-N2' |
CHavg |
RMSD |
|
[Functional]/DNP Isolated-Molecule Bond Lengths |
||||||||||||
|
PWCa |
1.3851 |
1.3785 |
1.2188 |
1.2187 |
1.2232 |
1.2160 |
1.4205 |
1.4540 |
1.4251 |
1.4408 |
1.1024 |
0.016 |
|
|
1.3855 |
1.3790 |
1.2187 |
1.2187 |
1.2230 |
1.2160 |
1.4205 |
1.4540 |
1.4253 |
1.4409 |
|
|
|
VWNa |
1.3848 |
1.3782 |
1.2186 |
1.2185 |
1.2230 |
1.2158 |
1.4203 |
1.4536 |
1.4248 |
1.4405 |
1.1022 |
0.016 |
|
|
1.3852 |
1.3786 |
1.2185 |
1.2184 |
1.2229 |
1.2158 |
1.4202 |
1.4537 |
1.4250 |
1.4406 |
|
|
|
BLYP |
1.4385 |
1.4233 |
1.2364 |
1.2362 |
1.2432 |
1.2366 |
1.4517 |
1.4937 |
1.4659 |
1.4725 |
1.0934 |
0.036 |
|
BOP |
1.4449 |
1.4256 |
1.2364 |
1.2364 |
1.2437 |
1.2378 |
1.4549 |
1.4958 |
1.4701 |
1.4742 |
1.0930 |
0.038 |
|
PBE |
1.4182 |
1.4068 |
1.2284 |
1.2281 |
1.2343 |
1.2276 |
1.4407 |
1.4779 |
1.4509 |
1.4599 |
1.0963 |
0.025 |
|
RPBE |
1.4351 |
1.4200 |
1.2317 |
1.2314 |
1.2382 |
1.2320 |
1.4499 |
1.4879 |
1.4629 |
1.4686 |
1.0958 |
0.032 |
|
PW91 |
1.4174 |
1.4057 |
1.2281 |
1.2277 |
1.2340 |
1.2273 |
1.4397 |
1.4776 |
1.4505 |
1.4592 |
1.0950 |
0.024 |
|
HCTH |
1.4097 |
1.3916 |
1.2124 |
1.2124 |
1.2187 |
1.2136 |
1.4306 |
1.4677 |
1.4430 |
1.4494 |
1.0857 |
0.018 |
|
BP |
1.4243 |
1.4074 |
1.2290 |
1.2289 |
1.2357 |
1.2297 |
1.4434 |
1.4798 |
1.4549 |
1.4612 |
1.0946 |
0.026 |
|
VWN-BP |
1.4239 |
1.4070 |
1.2288 |
1.2287 |
1.2355 |
1.2295 |
1.4431 |
1.4795 |
1.4546 |
1.4609 |
1.0944 |
0.026 |
|
[Functional]/DNP Solid-State Bond Lengths |
||||||||||||
|
PWC |
1.3745 |
1.3557 |
1.2260 |
1.2210 |
1.2348 |
1.2242 |
1.4224 |
1.4650 |
1.4369 |
1.4440 |
1.1042 |
0.012 |
|
VWN |
1.3736 |
1.3554 |
1.2261 |
1.2209 |
1.2348 |
1.2239 |
1.4227 |
1.4654 |
1.4359 |
1.4436 |
1.1043 |
0.012 |
|
BLYP |
1.3989 |
1.3851 |
1.2446 |
1.2388 |
1.2524 |
1.2429 |
1.4469 |
1.4967 |
1.4661 |
1.4702 |
1.0894 |
0.025 |
|
BOP |
1.3989 |
1.3846 |
1.2437 |
1.2379 |
1.2516 |
1.2424 |
1.4473 |
1.4955 |
1.4660 |
1.4698 |
1.0878 |
0.025 |
|
PBE |
1.3893 |
1.3731 |
1.2357 |
1.2304 |
1.2437 |
1.2342 |
1.4376 |
1.4816 |
1.4537 |
1.4580 |
1.0940 |
0.016 |
|
RPBE |
1.3940 |
1.3820 |
1.2386 |
1.2335 |
1.2455 |
1.2371 |
1.4427 |
1.4893 |
1.4599 |
1.4646 |
1.0908 |
0.020 |
|
PW91 |
1.3890 |
1.3749 |
1.2348 |
1.2297 |
1.2429 |
1.2334 |
1.4379 |
1.4821 |
1.4534 |
1.4569 |
1.0922 |
0.016 |
|
HCTH |
1.3735 |
1.3564 |
1.2178 |
1.2139 |
1.2249 |
1.2186 |
1.4270 |
1.4701 |
1.4434 |
1.4469 |
1.0844 |
0.008 |
|
BP |
1.3893 |
1.3742 |
1.2361 |
1.2310 |
1.2441 |
1.2347 |
1.4380 |
1.4822 |
1.4551 |
1.4586 |
1.0916 |
0.017 |
|
VWN-BP |
1.3893 |
1.3738 |
1.2357 |
1.2306 |
1.2439 |
1.2345 |
1.4378 |
1.4817 |
1.4548 |
1.4581 |
1.0914 |
0.017 |
|
B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) Isolated-Molecule Bond Lengths |
||||||||||||
|
B3LYP |
1.3977 |
1.3918 |
1.2256 |
1.2253 |
1.2303 |
1.2237 |
1.4415 |
1.4777 |
1.4510 |
1.4607 |
1.0907 |
0.017 |
|
crystalb |
1.373(5) |
1.353(8) |
1.204(6) |
1.209(5) |
1.220(9) |
1.233(1) |
1.436(8) |
1.472(5) |
1.447(5) |
1.454(9) |
1.100(5) |
|
a The PWC/DNP and VWN/DNP isolated-molecule calculations yield C1 symmetry (nearly Ci) structures where all bond lengths are unique. Reported values are for the Ci-unique (first row) and primed atom (second row) labels, respectively, in Figure 2.b Crystal values taken from ref 3.
|
functional |
O1N1O2 |
O3N3O4 |
C2'N2C1 |
N2C1N4 |
C1N4C2 |
N4C2N2' |
O1N1N2 |
O2N1N2 |
O3N3N4 |
O4N3N4 |
RMSD |
|
[Functional]/DNP Isolated-Molecule Bond Angles |
|||||||||||
|
PWCa |
128.13 |
127.61 |
124.41 |
110.97 |
123.45 |
113.78 |
115.48 |
116.37 |
114.46 |
117.90 |
1.205 |
|
|
128.14 |
127.61 |
124.42 |
110.97 |
123.38 |
113.78 |
115.47 |
116.36 |
114.48 |
117.88 |
|
|
VWNa |
128.13 |
127.61 |
124.41 |
110.97 |
123.46 |
113.78 |
115.48 |
116.37 |
114.46 |
117.90 |
1.206 |
|
|
128.14 |
127.61 |
124.42 |
110.97 |
123.39 |
113.77 |
115.47 |
116.36 |
114.48 |
117.88 |
|
|
BLYP |
127.84 |
127.10 |
122.66 |
111.23 |
123.15 |
114.49 |
115.58 |
116.56 |
115.20 |
117.63 |
1.090 |
|
BOP |
127.79 |
127.01 |
122.35 |
111.40 |
123.23 |
114.53 |
115.67 |
116.51 |
115.37 |
117.56 |
1.109 |
|
PBE |
128.02 |
127.34 |
122.93 |
111.26 |
122.92 |
114.44 |
115.51 |
116.44 |
114.93 |
117.68 |
1.132 |
|
RPBE |
127.96 |
127.21 |
122.35 |
111.38 |
122.75 |
114.60 |
115.59 |
116.43 |
115.21 |
117.51 |
1.151 |
|
PW91 |
128.00 |
127.32 |
123.02 |
111.23 |
123.03 |
114.41 |
115.51 |
116.47 |
114.95 |
117.68 |
1.120 |
|
HCTH |
127.69 |
126.98 |
122.50 |
112.30 |
123.40 |
114.56 |
115.78 |
116.51 |
115.34 |
117.63 |
1.213 |
|
BP |
127.95 |
127.22 |
122.63 |
111.22 |
123.14 |
114.32 |
115.57 |
116.46 |
115.11 |
117.61 |
1.109 |
|
VWN-BP |
127.95 |
127.22 |
122.64 |
111.22 |
123.15 |
114.32 |
115.57 |
116.46 |
115.11 |
117.61 |
1.109 |
|
[Functional]/DNP Solid-State Bond Angles |
|||||||||||
|
PWC |
126.80 |
125.97 |
123.21 |
110.50 |
122.84 |
111.79 |
116.28 |
116.89 |
115.50 |
118.51 |
0.833 |
|
VWN |
126.82 |
125.99 |
123.10 |
110.38 |
122.81 |
111.79 |
116.26 |
116.89 |
115.48 |
118.51 |
0.841 |
|
BLYP |
126.53 |
125.58 |
122.89 |
110.40 |
122.76 |
112.20 |
116.81 |
116.62 |
115.97 |
118.40 |
0.644 |
|
BOP |
126.57 |
125.64 |
122.84 |
110.40 |
122.72 |
112.27 |
116.82 |
116.58 |
115.94 |
118.37 |
0.625 |
|
PBE |
126.80 |
125.89 |
122.74 |
110.37 |
122.74 |
112.18 |
116.55 |
116.61 |
115.72 |
118.36 |
0.700 |
|
RPBE |
126.81 |
125.81 |
122.70 |
110.44 |
122.40 |
112.44 |
116.69 |
116.46 |
115.84 |
118.31 |
0.609 |
|
PW91 |
126.80 |
125.85 |
122.73 |
110.33 |
122.55 |
112.28 |
116.61 |
116.56 |
115.77 |
118.34 |
0.657 |
|
HCTH |
126.66 |
125.64 |
122.28 |
110.96 |
122.73 |
112.38 |
116.69 |
116.62 |
115.99 |
118.34 |
0.764 |
|
BP |
126.77 |
125.83 |
122.86 |
110.42 |
122.62 |
112.20 |
116.60 |
116.59 |
115.77 |
118.35 |
0.662 |
|
VWN-BP |
126.77 |
125.85 |
122.86 |
110.40 |
122.64 |
112.19 |
116.60 |
116.60 |
115.76 |
118.35 |
0.666 |
|
B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) Isolated-Molecule Bond Angles |
|||||||||||
|
B3LYP |
127.37 |
126.76 |
123.59 |
111.25 |
123.28 |
114.22 |
115.86 |
116.75 |
115.12 |
118.06 |
0.910 |
|
crystalb |
126.65 |
125.91 |
123.80 |
110.13 |
122.39 |
113.52 |
117.45 |
115.90 |
116.21 |
117.89 |
|
a The PWC/DNP and VWN/DNP isolated-molecule calculations yield C1 symmetry (nearly Ci) structures where all bond angles are unique. Reported values are for the Ci unique (first row) and primed atom (second row) labels, respectively, in Figure 2.b Crystal values taken from ref 3.
|
[Functional]/ DNP Isolated-Molecule Intramolecular Hydrogen-Bonding Distances |
|||||||||||
|
HBond |
PWCa |
VWNa |
BLYP |
BOP |
PBE |
RPBE |
PW91 |
HCTH |
BP |
VWN-BP |
B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) |
|
O2-Ha |
2.3168 |
2.3163 |
2.3416 |
2.3442 |
2.3334 |
2.3420 |
2.3307 |
2.3290 |
2.3211 |
2.3207 |
2.3372 |
|
O3-Ha |
2.4887 |
2.4882 |
2.4891 |
2.4737 |
2.4740 |
2.4698 |
2.4742 |
2.4233 |
2.4558 |
2.4550 |
2.4881 |
|
O3-Hb |
2.4506 |
2.4502 |
2.5871 |
2.6263 |
2.5525 |
2.6021 |
2.5489 |
2.6085 |
2.5907 |
2.5907 |
2.5052 |
|
O4-Hc |
2.0879 |
2.0873 |
2.1824 |
2.1933 |
2.1554 |
2.1814 |
2.1508 |
2.1598 |
2.1587 |
2.1582 |
2.1475 |
|
O1'-Hc |
2.4800 |
2.4796 |
2.4541 |
2.4500 |
2.4594 |
2.4490 |
2.4552 |
2.4427 |
2.4313 |
2.4310 |
2.4665 |
|
[Functional]/DNP Solid-State Intramolecular Hydrogen-Bonding Distances |
|||||||||||
|
H bond |
PWC |
VWN |
BLYP |
BOP |
PBE |
RPBE |
PW91 |
HCTH |
BP |
VWN-BP |
crystal intramolecular |
|
O2-Ha |
2.3108 |
2.3144 |
2.3507 |
2.3531 |
2.3529 |
2.3587 |
2.3442 |
2.3324 |
2.3406 |
2.3391 |
2.3366 |
|
O3-Ha |
2.5766 |
2.5741 |
2.5963 |
2.5881 |
2.5519 |
2.5699 |
2.5691 |
2.5102 |
2.5697 |
2.5689 |
2.5516 |
|
O3-Hb |
2.4367 |
2.4425 |
2.5129 |
2.5223 |
2.5158 |
2.5177 |
2.5023 |
2.5470 |
2.4954 |
2.4956 |
2.4754 |
|
O4-Hc |
2.1585 |
2.1620 |
2.2013 |
2.1998 |
2.1829 |
2.1910 |
2.1847 |
2.1611 |
2.1793 |
2.1786 |
2.1915 |
|
O1'-Hc |
2.4882 |
2.4955 |
2.5410 |
2.5428 |
2.5241 |
2.5367 |
2.5249 |
2.4953 |
2.5149 |
2.5141 |
2.5234 |
|
[Functional]/DNP Solid-State Intermolecular (Two Closest ) Hydrogen-Bonding Distances |
|||||||||||
|
distances to |
PWC |
VWN |
BLYP |
BOP |
PBE |
RPBE |
PW91 |
HCTH |
BP |
VWN-BP |
crystal intermolecular |
|
Ha |
2.4676 |
2.4684 |
2.4876 |
2.4971 |
2.5017 |
2.4971 |
2.5043 |
2.5693 |
2.4996 |
2.5015 |
2.4788 |
|
|
2.5080 |
2.5090 |
2.5348 |
2.5526 |
2.5641 |
2.5620 |
2.5555 |
2.6313 |
2.5534 |
2.5543 |
2.5660 |
|
Hb |
2.2697 |
2.2693 |
2.3378 |
2.3416 |
2.2969 |
2.3569 |
2.3259 |
2.3740 |
2.3337 |
2.3326 |
2.6840 |
|
|
2.6639 |
2.6619 |
2.6168 |
2.6186 |
2.6485 |
2.6394 |
2.6402 |
2.6223 |
2.6462 |
2.6455 |
2.3601 |
|
Hc |
2.6552 |
2.6517 |
2.5649 |
2.5596 |
2.5662 |
2.5744 |
2.5893 |
2.5800 |
2.5954 |
2.5953 |
2.5940 |
|
|
2.6800 |
2.6771 |
2.6860 |
2.6967 |
2.7083 |
2.6986 |
2.6991 |
2.7628 |
2.6996 |
2.7007 |
2.6743 |
|
Hd |
2.5146 |
2.5145 |
2.5309 |
2.5391 |
2.5303 |
2.5514 |
2.5447 |
2.6324 |
2.5488 |
2.5495 |
2.5885 |
|
|
2.8321 |
2.8391 |
2.7543 |
2.7591 |
2.7978 |
2.7767 |
2.7842 |
2.8067 |
2.7759 |
2.7757 |
2.8302 |
a The reported PWC/DNP and VWN/DNP intramolecular hydrogen-bonding distances are average values resulting from the C1 symmetry structure optimizations.
|
RMSD |
||||
|
|
no. IR modes |
molecular dipole2 |
Mulliken dipole2 |
Hirshfeld dipole2 |
|
PWC/DNP (C1) |
9 |
0.974 |
1.936 |
1.986 |
|
VWN/DNP (C1) |
9 |
0.980 |
2.060 |
1.984 |
|
BLYP/DNP (Ci) |
7 |
0.542 |
2.508 |
2.140 |
|
BOP/DNP (Ci) |
7 |
0.442 |
2.316 |
2.205 |
|
PBE/DNP (Ci) |
7 |
0.556 |
1.888 |
2.232 |
|
RPBE/DNP (Ci) |
7 |
0.474 |
1.417 |
1.923 |
|
PW91/DNP (Ci) |
7 |
0.578 |
1.920 |
2.363 |
|
BP/DNP (Ci) |
7 |
0.561 |
1.575 |
2.123 |
|
VWN-BP/DNP (Ci) |
7 |
0.557 |
1.578 |
2.127 |
|
HCTH/DNP (C1) |
7 |
0.416 |
1.469 |
2.774 |
|
B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) |
PWC |
VWN |
BLYP |
BOP |
PBE |
RPBE |
PW91 |
HCTH |
BP |
VWN-BP |
|
14.4 |
10.8 |
11.4 |
23.2 |
24.8 |
28.5 |
27.3 |
26.7 |
(21.4) |
21.1 |
21.2 |
|
52.6 |
50.2 |
50.1 |
45.4 |
45.7 |
48.5 |
49.0 |
47.9 |
22.0 |
44.4 |
44.3 |
|
(61.6) |
(61.1) |
(61.2) |
(56.0) |
(53.2) |
(57.5) |
(58.0) |
(59.7) |
45.3 |
(56.3) |
(56.3) |
|
67.7 |
69.5 |
69.5 |
(59.3) |
62.0 |
60.7 |
61.4 |
61.0 |
56.6 |
(60.7) |
(60.6) |
|
(69.8) |
(76.6) |
(76.6) |
62.5 |
(63.4) |
(65.2) |
(62.6) |
(63.3) |
(70.8) |
62.7 |
62.6 |
|
(90.8) |
(95.6) |
(95.7) |
(84.2) |
(79.6) |
(84.3) |
(70.3) |
(86.3) |
(98.9) |
(79.8) |
(79.9) |
|
95.6 |
101.5 |
101.5 |
87.5 |
83.1 |
87.2 |
73.8 |
89.3 |
104.5 |
82.4 |
82.4 |
|
(118.9) |
(131.5) |
(131.6) |
(107.4) |
(108.1) |
(106.6) |
(111.5) |
(109.7) |
(106.8) |
(113.8) |
(113.8) |
|
128.7 |
139.8 |
139.9 |
116.0 |
114.8 |
119.1 |
115.1 |
119.9 |
116.3 |
119.3 |
119.3 |
a IR-inactive modes are shown in parentheses. The eight GGA functionals predict nine normal modes in the sub-120 cm-1 region (the maximum in the reported THZ spectrum). For consistency, the first nine molecular modes by all methods are provided.
|
PWC |
VWN |
BLYP |
BOP |
PBE |
RPBE |
PW91 |
HCTH |
BP |
VWN-BP |
|
28.0b |
27.6b |
51.0b |
54.4b |
47.2b |
52.7b |
48.1b |
58.2b |
45.1b |
41.5b |
|
53.3 |
52.1 |
66.0 |
70.2* |
60.8* |
70.3 |
60.2 |
79.7* |
61.8* |
60.7 |
|
54.8 |
56.6 |
83.1 |
86.1 |
77.8 |
86.1 |
76.2 |
82.9 |
78.8 |
78.0 |
|
72.8 |
71.7 |
90.0 |
95.1 |
83.4 |
93.6 |
84.3 |
101.9 |
86.6 |
85.5 |
|
82.8 |
76.2 |
90.9 |
95.4 |
85.0* |
95.7 |
85.6* |
103.4 |
86.7 |
86.2 |
|
87.0 |
86.6 |
95.6 |
98.7 |
94.2 |
101.2 |
94.1 |
109.6 |
96.4 |
95.4 |
|
88.4 |
89.7 |
97.1 |
100.1 |
95.9 |
105.2 |
94.8 |
113.0 |
97.0 |
96.4 |
|
99.1 |
98.6 |
121.1 |
125.7 |
120.6 |
125.5 |
116.3 |
126.0 |
117.7 |
117.6 |
|
103.6 |
101.6 |
130.2 |
135.4 |
128.4 |
136.7 |
124.7 |
136.6 |
125.8 |
125.4 |
a The two LDA functionals predict nine normal modes in the sub-120 cm-1 region (the maximum in the reported THZ spectrum). For consistency, the first nine normal modes by all methods are provided.b Identified modes that have negligible calculated intensity and are difficult to identify in the plots in Figure 4.
|
solid state |
associated isolated-molecule or external modeb |
combinationc |
IR activity |
|
39.2 |
OR1 |
|
|
|
41.5 |
OT1 |
|
Active |
|
58.7 |
OR2 |
|
|
|
60.7 |
21.2 cm-1 |
1 + 1 |
Active |
|
68.2 |
OR3 |
|
|
|
72.4 |
OR4 |
|
|
|
78.0 |
OT2 |
|
Active |
|
83.5 |
OR5 |
|
|
|
85.5 |
OT3 |
|
Active |
|
86.2 |
21.2 cm-1 |
1 - 1 |
Active |
|
88.8 |
OR6 |
|
|
|
93.7 |
56.3 cm-1 |
3 - 3 |
|
|
95.4 |
62.6 cm-1 |
5 - 5 |
Active |
|
96.4 |
62.6 cm-1 |
5 + 5 |
Active |
|
100.8 |
56.3 cm-1 |
3 + 3 |
|
|
117.6 |
44.3 cm-1 |
2 - 2 |
Active |
|
119.6 |
60.6 cm-1 |
4 + 4 |
|
|
125.0 |
44.3 cm-1 |
2 + 2 |
Active |
|
126.0 |
60.6 cm-1 |
4 - 4 |
|
|
135.0 |
82.4 cm-1 |
7 + 7 |
Active |
|
137.2 |
82.4 cm-1 |
7 - 7 |
Active |
|
139.2 |
79.9 cm-1 |
6 + 6 |
|
|
148.7 |
79.9 cm-1 |
6 - 6 |
|
|
157.9 |
113.8 cm-1 |
8 - 8 |
|
|
158.0 |
113.8 cm-1 |
8 + 8 |
|
|
163.0 |
119.3 cm-1 |
9 + 9 |
Active |
|
167.0 |
119.3 cm-1 |
9 - 9 |
Active |
a The solid-state modes are reported to 167.0 cm-1, the last normal mode to which a combination from among the isolated-molecule normal modes in Table 4 (0-120 cm-1) can be assigned.b OR = optical rotational (six modes), OT = optical translational (three modes).c + = in-phase relative motions. Among rotational modes (or those modes which include a molecular twisting component), the two molecules in the crystal cell spin clockwise about their respective rotation axes. - = out-of-phase motions and motions where one molecule in the crystal cell spins clockwise while the other spins counterclockwise about their respective rotation axes.