
Web Release Date: November 30,
Preparation and Liquid Crystalline Properties of Spherical Cellulose Nanocrystals

and

College of Material Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China, and Key Laboratory of Mesoscopic Materials Science, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
Received March 11, 2007
In Final Form: November 13, 2007
Abstract:
A novel kind of spherical cellulose nanocrystal (SCNC) suspension was prepared by hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose with a mixture of sulfuric acid and hydrochloric acid under ultrasonic treatment. The mechanism of SCNC formation and the liquid crystalline properties of their suspensions were investigated. A suspension of spherical particles was usually inclined to form crystallization colloids rather than liquid crystals at high concentration. However, a SCNC suspension with high polydispersity (49%) was observed to form the liquid crystalline phase, and the liquid crystalline textures changed with increasing concentration. This observation offers an approach to the liquid crystal formation of highly polydisperse spherical nanoparticles.
Stable suspensions of rodlike cellulose nanocrystals can be
prepared by acid hydrolysis of native cellulose with sulfuric
acid.1-5
In this letter, a novel kind of spherical cellulose nanocrystal (SCNC) suspension was prepared by using a mixture of sulfuric and hydrochloric acids to hydrolyze the microcrystalline cellulose under ultrasonic treatment. The polydispersity of the SCNC particles was up to 49%, and their suspension was observed to form the liquid crystalline phase when the solid content was above 3.9% (w/w). Our observations offered an approach to the liquid crystalline formation of spherical nanoparticles, and will advance the understanding of the mechanism of liquid crystal formation.
Sulfuric acid (98% w/w), hydrochloric acid (37% w/w), and
distilled water were mixed at a ratio of 3:1:6 (v/v) to obtain the
mixed acid. Commercial microcrystalline cellulose (average particle
size: 20
m) was hydrolyzed by this mixed acid under ultrasonic
treatment at 50 Hz (NP-B-33-400, New Power, China) for 10 h to
prepare the SCNCs. After hydrolysis, the product was allowed to
stand at room temperature to cool and was followed by thorough
removal of the acid by repeated washing, centrifugation, and dialysis
with distilled water. When the system pH reached 3-5, the
supernatant became turbid and was collected to obtain the final
SCNC suspension.
The final suspension was transferred into a liquid crystalline cell with a spacer (0.3 mm thick) and then was observed by using an optical polarizing microscope (ORTHOPLAN-POL, Leitz, Germany). The shape and size of the cellulose nanocrystals were investigated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, FEI-Tecnai 12, FEI) at 100 kV and by atomic force microscopy (AFM, SPI3800N, Seiko Instruments Inc.,) in noncontact mode. The crystal structures of the SCNCs and microcrystalline cellulose were characterized by using an X-ray diffractometer (D/MAX-1200, Rigaku, Japan).
In previous works, sulfuric acid (64 wt %) was usually used to hydrolyze the native cellulose materials for preparation of the rodlike cellulose nanocrystals. These nanocrystals usually had a higher degree of crystallinity than that of native cellulose. The explanation was that the hydrolysis reaction occurred mostly at the amorphous regions of native cellulose, and subsequently only the domain with a perfect crystalline structure remained after hydrolysis. In previous works, only the rodlike cellulose nanocrystals were reported as the hydrolysis product which is probably attributed to the hydrolysis reaction that was undertaken under the strong acidic conditions. However, our research found that if a mixture of sulfuric and hydrochloric acid with an appropriate composition was used to hydrolyze the native cellulose materials under ultrasonic treatment, a novel kind of cellulose particles, that is, the spherical cellulose nanocrystals (SCNCs), will be obtained.
In the present paper, SCNCs were prepared by hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose with a mixed acid composed of sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid, and distilled water at a ratio of 3:1:6. After a given time, small amounts of the hydrolysis products were taken out and immediately diluted with distilled water for examination. The shape and size of the hydrolysis products were characterized by TEM. Their images are shown in Figure 1.
The formation process of SCNCs is clearly shown in Figure
1. The microcrystalline cellulose particles as the starting native
cellulose materials were in irregular shapes, and their average
size was about 20
m. After being hydrolyzed for 2 h, the
microcrystalline cellulose was damaged to sub-micrometer
cellulose fragments with various shapes (Figure 1b). Subsequently, it was clearly observed that some SCNC particles began
to form at the edges of the sub-micrometer fragments (Figure
1c). As the reaction time increased, the SCNC particles
continuously formed, accompanied by a decrease in the microfragments. When the hydrolysis time was more than 10 h, the
regular SCNC particles were basically obtained while the
microfragments completely vanished (Figure 1d). In contrast
with that for the hydrolysis of native cellulose in the presence
of sulfuric acid for preparing rodlike cellulose nanocrystals, the
reaction time was usually less than 1 h. The formation of SCNCs
was ascribed to the combination of the ultrasonic treatment and
mild acid concentration.
On the basis of a series of experiments, it was recognized that, in the absence of ultrasonic treatment and the mixed acid in an appropriate ratio, SCNCs could not be obtained. During preparation of the rodlike cellulose, the hydrolysis reaction occurred from the surface to the inner amorphous region. In contrast, the acid molecules quickly penetrated into the inner amorphous region of the cellulose fibrils due to the ultrasonic treatment during SCNC preparation. Therefore, the hydrolysis reaction simultaneously occurred at the surface and in the inner amorphous regions of microcrystalline cellulose. This caused the microcrystalline cellulose to first hydrolyze to the sub-micrometer fragments, instead of directly obtaining the nanocrystalline cellulose. Moreover, because the mixed acid concentration was mild, the dissolving capability of the cellulose fragments was very limited. So, the sub-micrometer fragments were further hydrolyzed by the mixed acid to form the SCNC particles gradually. From the size distribution diagram of the SCNCs, the dimension of the SCNCs was distributed in the range of 10-180 nm, mostly in the range of 20-90 nm. The average diameter was 62.4 nm, and the polydispersity18 (standard deviation of the particle size distribution by the average size) reached up to 49%.
AFM topography images of SCNCs are shown in Figure 2. SCNC particles showed some aggregations in the whole AFM images (Figure 2a and b) which are probably due to the water evaporation. However, some isolated individual particles were clearly observed, especially in the AFM phase image (Figure 2b). From the magnified image of the SCNCs and the corresponding three-dimensional image, it was clearly recognized that the SCNC particles indeed were the regular spherical particles. The particle size of the SCNCs mostly distributed in the range of 20-90 nm, which is similar to the results from the TEM images.
The X-ray diffraction patterns of SCNCs and commercial microcrystalline cellulose are shown in Figure 3. Surprisingly, their diffraction patterns were almost identical. The original crystalline structure of the cellulose fibril was essentially maintained in the SCNC particles. In contrast to the rodlike cellulose nanocrystals with higher crystallinity after hydrolysis, the crystallinity of the SCNCs was slightly lower than that of microcrystalline cellulose. This observation meant that during SCNC formation the hydrolysis reaction not only occurred at the amorphous region of cellulose fibrils but also occurred at their crystalline region, or else the SCNCs should have a higher crystallinity than that of cellulose fibrils.
| Figure 3 X-ray diffraction diagram of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) and spherical cellulose nanocrystals (SCNC). |
Suspensions of SCNCs with different concentrations were
prepared by exact dilution with deionized water from a stock
suspension. The stock was prepared by evaporating the final
suspension of SCNCs at room temperature by desiccation in an
oven. The solid content of the stock suspension was determined
by drying it to a constant weight at 80
C.
The birefringent patterns of SCNC suspensions at various concentrations are shown in Figure 4. From the birefringent patterns, it was observed that the phase behaviors of spherical particle suspensions also possessed some particularities as those of rod-like particles. At lower solid content (<wt 3.0%), the SCNC suspension was isotropic and showed the flow birefringence pattern just after injection and then the pattern vanished after standing at rest (Figure 4a). As the concentration exceeded 4.5%, the suspension showed the remarkable chromatic birefringence at rest (Figure 4b and c).
Photos of the liquid crystalline textures of SCNC suspensions obtained by using a polarizing optical microscope are shown in Figure 5. When the solid content was above wt 3.9%, the suspension began to show the liquid crystalline phase (Figure 5a). At 3.9% concentration, the SCNC suspension showed some birefringent domains. When the polarizer and the analyzer were rotated, some of the birefringent domains turned from bright to dark or dark to bright. As shown in Figure 5b, the suspension at wt 4.5% showed the chromatic color and was observed to have a banded texture. At high solid content (wt 7.1%), a crosshatch pattern was observed (Figure 5c). This pattern closely resembled the "frozen in shear structure" in the "birefringent glassy phase",9,19 and it was remarkably different from the fingerprint pattern of the rodlike cellulose suspension.4,20 The crosshatch pattern was stable for at least 2 months, that is, it was not a transient state. In addition, the high content SCNC suspension (7.1%) still could flow even after standing for more than 1 month; that is, the suspension did not form a gel or crystallization colloid and was a true "glassy phase".
| Figure 5 Polarization of the micrographs of spherical cellulose nanocrystals. Cellulose solid content was at (a) 3.9%, (b) 4.5%, and (c) 7.1%. The liquid crystalline cell is 0.2 mm thick. |
According to Onsager's theory,21 the liquid crystalline phase formation of the rodlike particles is attributed to the repulsive force of interparticles and their corresponding liquid crystal textures strongly depend on the anisotropy of the particles. The liquid crystalline phases of the rodlike suspensions are thermodynamically stable, arising from gaining translation entropy that overrides the loss of orientation entropy associated with the particle alignment.22 In light of this theory, it is difficult for a suspension of spherical particles to form the liquid crystalline phase due to their symmetrical shape and thermodynamically instability. However, in this experiment, we observed liquid crystalline phase formation in the highly polydisperse (49%) SCNC suspension. This is the first instance, to our knowledge, of the formation of the liquid crystalline phase in a suspension of spherical nanoparticles.
Since the polydispersity of the SCNCs studied in this
experiment was up to 49%, which was remarkably higher than
the terminal polydispersity,23-25
A novel kind of spherical cellulose nanocrystal (SCNC) suspension was prepared by hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose with mixed acid under ultrasonic treatment. The formation of SCNCs was attributed to the combined action of the mixed acid and the ultrasonic treatment. The polydispersity of the SCNC suspension was high up to 49% according to the distribution obtained by TEM. When the solid content was above wt 3.9%, the formation of a liquid crystalline phase was observed in the SCNC suspension. To our knowledge, this is the first report of such behavior in a spherical nanoparticle suspension. This observation offered an access to the liquid crystal formation of highly polydisperse nanoparticles and will be in favor of further understanding of the mechanism of liquid crystalline formation. With the various concentrations, the suspension showed the different colors and the liquid crystalline structure. These characters might give rise to potential applications as functional materials.
We gratefully acknowledge the help of Dr Z. Y. Chen for making the AFM pictures and Dr J. Ma for performing the polarizing optical microscope experiments.
Complete preparation method of spherical cellulose nanocrystals. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Telephone: 086-25-83597355. Fax: 086-25-83317761. E-mail: rscheng@nju.edu.cn.
South China University of Technology.
Nanjing University.
1. Beck-Candanedo, S.; Roman, M.; Gray, D. G. Biomacromolecules 2005,
6, 1048-1054.![]()
2. Dong, X. M.; Revol, J.-F.; Gray, D. G. Cellulose 1998, 5, 19-32.![]()
3. Dong, X. M.; Kimura, T.; Revol, J.-F.; Gray, D. G. Langmuir 1996, 12,
2076-2082.![]()
4. Revol, J.-F.; Bradford, H.; Giasson, J.; Marchessault, R. H.; Gray, D. G.
Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 1992, 14, 170-172.![]()
5. Marchessault, R. H.; Morehead, F. F.; Walter, N. M. Nature 1959, 184,
632-633.![]()
6. Revol, J.-F.; Godbout, L.; Dong, X. M.; Gray, D. G.; Chanzy, H.; Maret,
G. Liq. Cryst. 1994, 16, 127-134.![]()
7. Revol, J.-F.; Marchessault, R. H. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 1993, 15, 329-335.![]()
8. Strzelecka, T. E.; Davidson, M. W.; Rill, R. L. Nature 1988, 331, 457-460.![]()
9. Buining, P. A.; Philipse, A. P.; Lekkerkerker, H. N. W. Langmuir 1994,
10, 2106-2114.![]()
10. Folda, T.; Hoffmann, H.; Chanzy, H.; Smith, P. Nature 1988, 333, 55-56.![]()
11. Gabriel, J.-C. P.; Davidson, P. Adv. Mater. 2000, 12, 9-20.![]()
12. Gabriel, J.-C. P.; Davidson, P. Top. Curr. Chem. 2003, 226, 119-172.
13. Li, L.-S.; Walda, J.; Manna, L.; Alivisatos, A. P. Nano Lett. 2002, 2,
557-560.![]()
14. Pursey, P. N.; van Megen, W. Nature 1986, 320, 340-342.![]()
15. van der Kooij, F. M.; Kassapidou, K.; Lekkerkerker, H. N. W. Nature
2000, 406, 868-871.![]()
16. van der Kooij, F. M.; van der Beek, D.; Lekkerkerker, H. N. W. J. Phys.
Chem. B 2001, 105, 1696-1700.![]()
17. Vroege, G. J.; Thies-Weesie, D. M. E.; Petukhov, A. V.; Lemaire, B. J.;
Davidson, P. Adv. Mater. 2006, 18, 2565-2568.![]()
18. Fasolo, M.; Sollich, P. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 91, 068301.![]()
19. Araki, J.; Wada, M.; Kuga, S.; Okano, T. Langmuir 2000, 16, 2413-2415.![]()
20. Revol, J.-F.; Godbout, L.; Dong, X. M.; Gray, D. G.; Chanzy, H.; Maret,
G. Liq. Cryst. 1994, 16, 127-134.![]()
21. Onsager, L. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1949, 51, 627-659.![]()
22. Jana, N. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1536-1540.![]()
23. Bolhuis, P. G.; Kofke, D. A. Phys. Rev. E 1996, 54, 634-643.![]()
24. Chaudhuri, P.; Karmakar, S.; Dasgupta, C.; Krishnamurthy, H. R.; Sood,
A. K. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 95, 248301.![]()
25. Kofke, D. A.; Bolhuis, P. G. Phys. Rev. E 1999, 59, 618-622.![]()
26. Dong, X. M.; Gray, D. G. Langmuir 1997, 13, 2404-2409.![]()
27. Araki, J.; Wada, M.; Kuga, S.; Okano, T. Colloids Surf., A 1998, 142,
75-82.![]()
28. Orts, W. J.; Godbout, L.; Marchessault, R. H.; Revol, J.-F. Macromolecules
1998, 31, 5717-5725.![]()