
Web Release Date: August 5,
Large-Scale Hierarchical Organization of Nanowire Arrays for Integrated Nanosystems


and

Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, and Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
Received July 11, 2003
Abstract:
The assembly of nanowires and nanotubes into arrays patterned on multiple length scales is critical to the realization of integrated electronic and photonic nanotechnologies. A general and efficient solution-based method for controlling organization and hierarchy of nanowire structures over large areas has been developed. Nanowires were aligned with controlled nanometer to micrometer scale pitch using the Langmuir-Blodgett technique and transferred to planar substrates in a layer-by-layer process to form parallel and crossed nanowire structures. The parallel and crossed nanowire structures were efficiently patterned into repeating arrays of controlled dimensions and pitch using photolithography to yield hierarchical structures with order defined from the nanometer through centimeter length scales. In addition, electrical transport studies show that reliable electrical contacts can be made to the hierarchical nanowire arrays prepared by this method. This solution-based process offers a flexible pathway for bottom-up assembly of virtually any nanowire material into highly integrated and hierarchically organized nanodevices needed for a broad range of functional nanosystems.
Semiconductor nanowires (NWs) and carbon nanotubes
represent promising building blocks for the bottom-up
assembly of integrated electronic and photonic systems
because these materials can exhibit diverse device behavior
and simultaneously function as the 'wires' that access and
interconnect devices.1-3
Here we report a solution-based approach for hierarchically organizing NW building blocks en masse into integrated arrays tiled over large areas. NWs were aligned with controlled nanometer to micrometer scale pitch using the Langmuir-Blodgett technique, transferred to planar substrates in a layer-by-layer process to form parallel and crossed NW structures over centimeter length scales, and then efficiently patterned into repeating arrays of controlled dimensions and pitch using photolithography. This solution-based method enables the specific NW building block, NW pitch, NW orientation, array size, array orientation, and array pitch to be controlled independently for sequential depositions, and thus offers a flexible pathway for bottom-up assembly of NW and nanotube materials into integrated and hierarchically organized structures.
Our approach for controlled assembly of NWs (Figure 1) exploits the Langmuir-Blodgett (LB) technique14 to uniaxially compress a NW-surfactant monolayer on an aqueous subphase, thereby producing aligned NWs with controlled spacing. The compressed layer is then transferred in a single step to a planar substrate to yield parallel NWs covering the entire substrate surface. In addition, this sequence of steps can be repeated one or more times with controlled orientation to produce crossed and more complex NW structures, where the NWs can be the same or different in sequential layers. The ability to assemble a wide range of different NW building blocks in a flexible manner is a unique attribute of this bottom-up approach and quite distinct from top-down fabrication methods. The Langmuir-Blodgett technique was used previously to organize single layers of low aspect ratio nanorods into close-packed structures suggestive of liquid crystalline phases,15 although this latter work did not demonstrate control of spacing and other properties critical to integrated and interconnected arrays. In addition, we have recently used this method to prepare large area NW masks for deposition and etching.16
We illustrate the flexibility of our approach using silicon NWs that were prepared with nearly monodisperse diameters by nanocluster catalyzed chemical vapor deposition.17 Stable NW suspensions in nonpolar solvents made using the surfactant 1-octadecylamine, which coordinates reversibly to NW surfaces, were spread on the surface of the aqueous phase in a Langmuir-Blodgett trough and compressed.18 During compression, NWs become aligned along their long axes with the average spacing (center-to-center distance) controlled by the compression process. Large area field-emission scanning electron microscopy images (Figure 2A) show that parallel NWs were transferred with good uniformity and alignment onto substrates with areas up to 20 cm2 in our experiments, although this approach can be applied to much larger area substrates.19
Significantly, we are also able to control the spacing of
the transferred NWs from the micrometer scale to well-ordered and close-packed structures by the compression
process. Representative images of transferred NWs with
spacings of ca. 0.8 and 0.4
m (Figures 2B, 2C) show that
the NWs are isolated and have good uniaxial alignment. In
general, we find that the transferred NW arrays have similar
quality for spacings from ca. 2
m (the largest studied) to
200 nm. Compression to spacings below ca. 200 nm leads
to increasing aggregation due to strong inter-NW attractive
forces, although aligned close-packed monolayer structures
can be transferred. This latter capability was used to make
ultrahigh-density arrays with the NW spacing controlled on
the nanometer scale, by compressing NWs coated with
controlled thickness sacrificial layers, and then removing this
layer once transferred.16 For example, core/shell Si/SiO2
NWs, in which the oxide shell thickness was precisely
controlled during NW growth,20 were compressed to close-packed structures and transferred to substrates. Images
recorded following HF etching of the oxide shells show well
aligned parallel NWs with center-to-center separations of 90
nm (Figure 2D) and ca. 45 nm (Figure 2E) that are in
agreement with the values predicted based on the dimensions
of the core/shell NWs; that is, the center-to-center separation
is equal to 2 × (NW radius + shell thickness). We have
also used selective dry (i.e., reactive ion) etching to remove
oxide from core/shell Si/SiO2 NWs to produce similar
structures.16 In addition, it should be possible to extend this
approach to even finer spacings that would be difficult to
achieve by top-down lithography.
The aligned, controlled spacing NW structures exhibit features similar to a nematic liquid crystal phase, including fluctuations in the average alignment direction and poor end-to-end registry (Figure 2C). These nonuniform features are distinct from the precise structures familiar to conventional top down fabrication; however, we do not believe these features represent serious impediments to making integrated and interconnected devices. Specifically, interconnected finite-size arrays of nanoscale devices are more desirable than monolithic structures for integrated nanosystems, because hierarchical organization reduces the probability that small numbers of defects will cause catastrophic failure in the whole system.21 Hence, by adjusting this array size to be less than the average NW length it is possible to minimize the number of NWs that fail to span the width of an array due to poor end-to-end registry.
We have implemented this desired hierarchical patterning
of the transferred NW structures in a flexible and scalable
manner using photolithography (Figure 3). Following uniform transfer of NWs of a specified spacing onto a substrate,
photolithography is used to define a pattern over the entire
substrate surface, which sets the array dimensions and array
pitch, and then the NWs outside the patterned array are
removed by gentle sonication.16,22 An image of a 10
m ×
10
m square array with a 25
m array pitch (Figure 3B)
shows that this method provides ready and scalable access
to ordered arrays over large areas. This array exhibits order
on multiple length scales - 40 nm diameter NWs, 0.5
m
NW spacing, 10
m array size, 25
m array pitch repeated
over centimeters - that is representative of the substantial
control enabled by our approach. In addition, this approach
can be used to define array geometries and tiling patterns
more complex than the above square structures.
We have also investigated whether our new approach for
assembling and patterning hierarchical NW arrays is compatible with fabrication of nanoelectronic devices. To test this
important point, electron beam lithography was used to define
a series of parallel finger electrodes contacting NWs in
hierarchically patterned parallel arrays (Figure 3C). Electrical
transport measurements carried out on three of the silicon
NW devices exhibit linear current versus voltage behavior.
This linear response and the typical two-terminal resistance
values, 260-1780 k
, are indicative of good electrical
contacts. We believe these preliminary results are important
because they demonstrate that our solution-based hierarchical
assembly methodology produces electrically active NWs, and
therefore should be compatible with the goal of creating
large-scale integrated, functional nanosystems. Significantly,
recent studies using a scalable photolithography approach
provide clear demonstration of this milestone.23
Last, our method can be used to make crossed NW arrays
by transferring sequential layers of aligned NWs in an
orthogonal orientation and then patterning the layers as
described above (Figure 4A).22 Crossed arrays are particularly
attractive targets because previous small scale studies of
crossed NW junctions have demonstrated interesting electronic7 and photonic6 function. Large area images of two
silicon NW layers transferred sequentially with orthogonal
alignment (Figure 4B) show that this approach yields
relatively uniform coverage over centimeter length scales.
Images of crossed NW arrays (Figure 4C), which were made
by defining an array pattern with photolithography and then
removing NWs outside of the patterned areas, show that
regular 10
m × 10
m square arrays with a 25
m array
pitch can be achieved over large areas and that each of the
square arrays consists of a large number of crossed NW
junctions. In addition, we have made ultrahigh-density
crossed NW arrays using the method described above. Close-packed Si/SiO2 core/shell NWs were transferred in two
orthogonal layers and then etched with HF to yield crossed
NW arrays with pitches of less than 50 nm (Figure 4D).
Because good electrical contacts to NW arrays assembled
and patterned by our approach have been realized (Figure
3C), we believe it will be possible to create integrated
nanosystems with diverse functions using these hierarchical
crossed NW arrays in the future.
In summary, our studies have outlined a general and rational strategy for hierarchical organization of NWs and represent substantial progress toward the bottom-up assembly of integrated architectures over large areas in a highly parallel and scalable manner. The facile substitution of different NWs and changes in structural hierarchy enabled by this approach will be attractive for creating integrated, functional nanosystems. For example, crossed NW arrays could be used as addressable nanoscale light-emitting diode sources. More generally, efforts focused on increasing the structural complexity, for example by tiling functionally distinct arrays using additional transfer steps, could enable combinations of logic and memory arrays that are needed for nanocomputing21 or even integrated sensing and processing function.
We acknowledge A. DeHon, Y. Cui, D. Wang, Z. Zhong, S. I. Yang, and K. Hata for useful discussion, and thank G. Zheng and L. Lauhon for supplying Si/SiO2 core/shell NWs. D.W. thanks the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF) for postdoctoral fellowship support, and C.M.L. acknowledges support from the Defense Advanced Projects Research Agency.
Note Added after ASAP. Reference citations in the text have been corrected. This paper was originally posted ASAP on 8/5/03. The corrected version was posted on 8/14/03.
* In papers with more than one author, the asterisk indicates the name of the author to whom inquiries about the paper should be addressed.
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology.
Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences.
1. McEuen, P. L. Phys. World 2000, 13, 31.
2. Lieber, C. M. Sci. Am. 2001, September, p 58.
3. Avouris, Ph. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 1026.
4. Tans, S. J.; Verschueren, R. M.; Dekker, C. Nature 1998, 393, 49.
5. Martel, R.; Schmidet, T.; Shea, H. R.; Hertel, T.; Avouris, Ph. Appl.
Phys. Lett. 1998, 73, 2447.
6. Duan, X.; Huang, Y.; Cui, Y.; Wang, J.; Lieber, C. M. Nature 2001,
409, 66.
7. Cui, Y.; Lieber, C. M. Science 2001, 291, 851.
8. Björk, M. T.; Ohlsson, B. J.; Thelander, C.; Persson, A. I.; Deppert,
K.; Wallenberg, L. R.; Samuelson, L. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 81,
4458.
9. Gudiksen, M. S.; Lauhon, L. J.; Wang, J.; Smith, D. C.; Lieber, C.
M. Nature 2002, 415, 617.
10. Hiruma, K.; Yazawa, M.; Katsuyama, T.; Ogawa, K.; Haraguchi,
K.; Koguchi, M.; Kakibayashi, H. J. Appl. Phys. 1995, 77, 447.
11. Duan, X.; Huang, Y.; Agarwal, R.; Lieber, C. M. Nature 2003, 421,
241.
12. Huang, Y.; Duan, X.; Wei, Q.; Lieber, C. M. Science 2001, 291,
630.
13. Smith, P. A.; Nordquist, C. D.; Jackson, T. N.; Mayer, T. S. Appl.
Phys. Lett. 2000, 77, 1399.
14. Ulman, A. An introduction to ultrathin organic films: from Langmuir-Blodgett to self-assembly; Academic Press: New York, 1991.
15. Kim, F.; Kwan, S.; Akana, J.; Yang, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
123, 4360.
16. Whang, D.; Jin, S.; Lieber, C. M. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 951.
17. Cui, Y.; Lauhon, L. J.; Gudiksen, M. S.; Wang, J.; Lieber, C. M.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 78, 2214.
18. Single-crystal silicon NWs were synthesized by gold nanocluster catalyzed chemical vapor deposition with silane reactant.17 Assembly was carried out using 20, 40, and 80 nm diameter NW samples. Stable solutions of the NWs were made from a 3:1 (v/v) mixture of isooctane and 2-propanol containing 1-octadecylamine (0.25 mM), which coordinates reversibly to the silicon NW surfaces. The solubility of the surfactant and resulting rate of the compression was controlled by the subphase pH. While the surface pressure was kept at constant value (55-60 mN/m), the area of the Langmuir monolayer was continuously reduced by the dissolution of the surfactant into the water subphase.
19. Albrecht, O.; Matsuda, H.; Eguchi, K.; Nakagiri, T. Thin Solid Films
1996, 284, 152.
20. Lauhon, L. J.; Gudiksen, M. S.; Wang, D.; Lieber, C. M. Nature
2002, 420, 57.
21. DeHon, A. IEEE Trans. Nanotech. 2003, 2, 23.
22. Shipley S1813 photoresist was deposited by spin coating (4000 rpm
for 40 s) onto aligned NW covered substrates, baked at 110
C for
4 min, and then exposed for ca. 2 s on an ABM photoaligner. After
developing for 1 min, substrates were sonicated for 30 s in DI water
to remove exposed NWs, and then the remaining photoresist covering
the NW arrays was dissolved in acetone.
23. Jin, S.; Whang, D.; Wu, Y.; McAlpine, M. C.; Friedman, R. S.; Lieber, C. M., submitted for publication.
24. Silicon NWs used were grown17 with diborane as the dopant source in a Si/B ratio of 2000:1. Electrode patterns were defined by electron beam lithography. Substrates were cleaned in an O2 plasma (25 W for 60 s at 0.5 Torr O2), etched in buffered HF (Transenes, Inc.) for 8 s, and then Ti/Au (50/30 nm) electrodes were deposited by electron beam evaporation.