
Web Release Date: December 16,
High-Density Silver Nanoparticle Film with Temperature-Controllable Interparticle Spacing for a Tunable Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering Substrate
Berkeley Sensor and Actuator Center, Department of Bioengineering, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720
Received July 4, 2004
Revised November 17, 2004
Abstract:
The formation of high-density silver nanoparticles and a novel method to precisely control the spacing between nanoparticles by temperature are demonstrated for a tunable surface enhanced Raman scattering substrates. The high-density nanoparticle thin film is accomplished by self-assembling through the Langmuir-Blodgett (LB) technique on a water surface and transferring the particle monolayer to a temperature-responsive polymer membrane. The temperature-responsive polymer membrane allows producing a dynamic surface enhanced Raman scattering substrate. The plasmon peak of the silver nanoparticle film red shifts up to 110 nm with increasing temperature. The high-density particle film serves as an excellent substrate for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), and the scattering signal enhancement factor can be dynamically tuned by the thermally activated SERS substrate. The SERS spectra of Rhodamine 6G on a high-density silver particle film at various temperatures is characterized to demonstrate the tunable plasmon coupling between high-density nanoparticles.
Metallic nanoparticles have been the subject of extensive
research in the past several years.1 In particular, noble metal
nanoparticles (e.g., Au and Ag) with their associated strong
plasmon resonance have generated great interest in fields
such as nanoscale photonics and biological sensing. The fact
that particle plasmon allows direct coupling of light to
resonant collective electron plasmon oscillation leads to
tremendous efforts to design and fabricate optical components that can focus and manipulate light at spatial dimension
far below the classical diffraction limit.2,3
Silver nanoparticles (20 nm) were prepared using oleylamine and oleic acid as the capping reagents, which can
help the dissolution of reactant salt and prevent particle
aggregation, oxidation and degradation, as well as render
particle surface hydrophobic.10,11
C. A 0.12 mL portion of oleic acid is then added in the hot
solution. The system is kept at 182
C for 5 min under
magnetic stirring. The AgNO3/oleylamine/DCB mixture is
rapidly injected into the hot solution. A light-yellow color
appears right after the injection and becomes dark brown
within 1 min. The product solution is extracted after heating
5 min at 182
C. All the synthesis is done in an argon
atmosphere. To wash the sample, 3 mL of product solution
is added with 5 mL of methanol, followed by 5 min
centrifugation at 4000 rpm. The precipitate is redispersed in
3 mL of chloroform.
Langmuir-Blodgett (LB) is a powerful technique that can
be used to assemble large-scale monolayers of hydrophobic
silver nanoparticles on a water surface.12,13
In a typical LB process, the film is usually pressurized to form a close-packed particle film in which particle spacing is determined by the particle diameter and the length of the surfactant molecules.14 A critical factor of producing an organized, high-density particle film is that the pressure applied on the monolayer should be precisely controlled to avoid the formation of not only microscopic holes (at low pressure) but also multilayer aggregations (at high pressure). However, a perfect particle film could also be broken when the film is transferred from water surface to solid substrates. Therefore, it is not trivial to obtain a large area close-packed particle film on solid substrate by directly transferring LB film. In our process, we introduced a thermal sensitive polymer layer as the shrinkable substrate to further densify the particle monolayer, allowing the formation of high-density film of nanoparticles. Figure 2A shows the discontinuous Ag particle film obtained by directly transferring the LB monolayer to a polymer substrate without applying any pressure.
Poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) exhibits a low
critical solution temperature (LCST) transition from 30 to
40
C.15 This response is based on the fact that in one state
the network polymer chains are fully solvated and polymer
has good compatibility with the solvent. As temperature goes
higher than LCST, the polymer-solvent interaction is
disrupted and the polymer-polymer interactions dominate,
resulting in the aggregation of polymer chains. The PNIPAM
thin film is prepared by photopolymerization of PNIPAM
monomers, with 2,2'-diethoxyacetophenone (DEAP) as photoinitiator and a small amount of N,N-methylenebisacrylamide (bis-AMD) as crosslinker. In a typical procedure, 1.6
mmol of N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAM) and 30
mol of
bis-AMD are mixed with 2 mL ultrapure water. Then 0.4
mol of 'DEAP is added into the solution as a photoinitiator.
The resulting solution is dropped on a glass substrate and
spread through the whole surface as it is covered with a thin
glass slide to prevent oxidation. The samples were polymerized over 30 min at room temperature using attenuated UV
light. After the polymer was cured, the top glass slide was
removed and the polymer film in the thickness of ~100
m
could be used as the substrates to "pick up" silver nanoparticle film.
This polymer film is an ideal substrate to control nanoparticle spacing due to its ability to swell and shrink in
response to temperature. As the polymer shrinks at temperatures higher than the transition temperature, most particles
far away from each other can be brought together since the
polymer film has about 10% or higher shrinkage. The
interparticle distance became smaller and exhibits "spread
out" effect in the dark-field image. Originally, there are some
small aggregations of silver particles that could also be
brought closer by the film and thus larger particle aggregation
may be present on the film at high temperature. Figure 2B
shows the optical microscope image of high-density silver
nanoparticle film as the result of shrinkage of the polymer
substrate at 40
C. As compared with Figure 2A, the voids
and spacing are greatly reduced. Below 34
C, water is a
relatively good solvent for PNIPAM polymer and polymer
chains are mostly extended, therefore, the polymer film looks
transparent. In the transition regime, water becomes a poor
solvent as polymer-polymer interaction becomes stronger
and PNIPAM undergoes conformation changes, including
both intrachain "coil-to-globule" transitions and interchain
self-association. The transition leads to the volume shrinkage
of the whole polymer film. As a part of reduction, the
polymer surface will shrink in all directions and carry the
silver particles on its surface to a closer contact. Due to the
hydrophobic nature of the nanoparticle surface, the interaction between nanoparticles and the polymer substrate is so
strong that the nanoparticles can reorganize to get rid of the
empty spaces among broken monolayers. Though the link
between particles and the film is not a chemical bond, the
mobility is caused by the interaction force between polymer
molecules, and it is strong enough to bring the silver particle
to move with them. The polymer film contains some water,
and it takes 4 to 5 h for the film to be dry. After the film is
dry in air, it cannot switch between hydrophilic and
hydrophobic states.
The dependence of the absorption spectra as a function
of the temperature was recorded with a UV-vis spectrometer. Figure 3A shows a typical series of UV-vis spectra at
different temperatures. Figures 3B and 3C highlight the
absorption spectra of the same particle film from 400 to 900
nm at 24 and 38
C. As temperature increases from 20 to
40
C, the plasmon peak of silver nanoparticles in the visible
light region shifted from 480 to 590 nm at a temperature
around 35
C. This is mainly due to the near-field coupling
between adjacent Ag particles when the Ag particles are
brought together by the substrate film16, and the refractive
index change of the polymer at transition temperature cannot
induce such a drastic peak shift. Furthermore, an absorption
peak around 800 nm appear in Figure 3C, and such near-infrared plasmon mode is also reported by others recently.17
By comparing Figure 3B with 3C, the intensity of the
plasmon peak in the visible light region increases more than
20 times, which can be partly attributed to the increase of
the particle density in addition to the particle couplings. The
phase transition of the polymer film also plays a role in the
increase of absorption. The phase transition turns the polymer
chain from hydrophilic to hydrophobic and breaks the
interaction between the polymer chain and water molecules.
The polymer film is no longer a homogeneous system,
instead, it becomes a heterogeneous system composed of a
hydrophobic polymer bone and small water drops. The
polymer film appears semi-transparent white after phase
change, thus also increases the absorption of the system,
though the induced change has no spectral preference.
To estimate the relation between the average interparticle distance and temperature by analyzing the temperature-dependent absorption spectra, we simulated the absorption spectra of a monolayer cluster of 1000 (20 nm) Ag nanoparticles given various interparticle distances. We made a discrete dipole approximation to the Ag nanoparticles and numerically solved Markel's couple dipole equations.18 We used the tabulated dielectric constants of Ag at different wavelengths.19 The simulation results are shown in Figure 4A. When the interparticle distance is larger than 24 nm, the absorption peak is around or below 400 nm, which is similar to the absorption peak of single Ag nanoparticle with a thin layer of coating. With the decrease of the interparticle distance, the absorption peak begins to red-shift due to the interparticle plasmon coupling. When the interparticle distance decreases to less than 12 nm, the absorption peak in the visible light region moves to the red light region, and the peaks in the near-infrared region appear. If the nanoparticles get too close to each other (<4 nm), the cluster can be considered as a bulk Ag film and the coupled dipole approximation does not apply for this case. Next we extract the absorption peak wavelengths of the Ag film at different temperatures from the measured visible light absorption spectra (Figure 3A) and plot them in Figure 4B as a function of temperature. The interparticle distances at different temperature regions are estimated according to our simulation results and denoted in Figure 4B.
The high-density particle film is expected to have high
local electromagnetic (EM) field enhancement and can be
served as SERS substrates for molecular sensing with high
sensitivity and specificity. The Ag nanoparticles are "floating" on the surface of the temperature-sensitive polymer
layer, not embedded in the layer, so most of the Raman signal
should come from the molecules adsorbed on the surface of
Ag nanoparticles. Figure 5 shows a set of SERS spectra of
10-5 M Rhodamine 6G (R6G) molecules adsorbed on a high-density Ag particle film (785 nm, 40 mV) at various
temperatures. The observed Raman bands that are assigned
to R6G include
(C-H) out-of-plane bend mode at 774
cm-1,
(C-H) in-plane bend mode at 1129 cm-1,
(C-C)
stretching mode at 1363 cm-1, 1509 cm-1, 1650 cm-1.20 The
coated oleic acid and oleylamine layer is only 1~2 nm thick,
and their Raman scattering cross-sections are smaller than
R6G molecules, so their Raman peaks are not as prominent
as those of adsorbed R6G molecules that are still within the
range of scattering near-field of Ag nanoparticles. The peaks
such as 1020 and 1181 cm-1 are assigned to the coated
molecules. A minor background signal from the polymer and
glass substrate has been subtracted in the presented figures.
The intensity of the R6G Raman signal dramatically increased when the temperature goes higher than the LCST.
This is due to coherent capacity coupling between adjacent
particles in the high-density particle film. Calculation of
particle aggregation shows that the coupling between particles is quite short-ranged.21 The electromagnetic field in
the particle junctions is not a simple coherent sum of the
fields from each individual particle. Instead, as the particles
approach each other, there is a dramatic enhancement factor
increase of more than 10 times and even 100 times for certain
bands (i.e., 1650 cm-1). The maximal SERS enhancement
is achieved around 37
C, at which temperature the interparticle distance makes the plasmon resonance peak of the
nanoparticle cluster closer to the laser excitation wavelength.
This result has good correlation with our estimation on the
interparticle distance at different temperatures. Additionally,
the area of active SERS substrate is increased by bringing
the nanoparticle closer and minimizing the voids on the Ag
film since the SERS effect is sensitive to the defect on the
Ag film. When the temperature is lower than the transition
temperature, the interparticle distance is larger than 12 nm
and the plasmon peaks are in the blue and green light region;
conversely when the temperature rises and becomes higher
than the transition temperature, the interparticle distance is
shorter than 12 nm which, makes the plasmon peak red shift
to the far red and near-infrared light region. The observed
temperature-dependent SERS spectra can be well correlated
to the factors described above since a 785 nm laser excitation
is used.
In conclusion, hydrophobic nanoparticles-Ag particles capped with oleic acid and oleylamine have been fabricated and used as the building components for LB technique. The as-obtained Ag nanoparticles on water surface are transferred onto a thermoresponse polymer surface. As temperature increases, the polymer undergoes a phase transition and the polymer film shrinks in all direction. The Ag particles are pushed closer by the polymer film and the particle spacing can be tuned by adjusting temperature. Highly ordered high-density particle film can be obtained by heating the film to temperature above the polymer's LCST. We have studied the optical response of the Ag nanoparticles on thermoresponse polymer film as a function of temperature dependence. The Raman spectra of R6G molecules on the Ag nanoparticles are also investigated. Raman enhancement of this tunable SERS substrate shows temperature dependence and optimal temperature and interparticle distance exist for given laser excitation line. Although comparable sensitivity has been reported, the use of our particle film as SERS substrates has the advantage of tunability. First, high-density particle film can be easily obtained. Our method can use discontinuous or broken particle film as the starting materials, and change them into dense particle film. Second, the spacing between nanoparticles can be controlled by adjusting temperature for tunable SERS substrates for optimal signal amplifications. The particle distance can be optimized to approach strongest coupling between adjacent particles and match the plasmon resonance wavelength to the laser excitation wavelength. Hence, our high-density particle film and an ability to control precisely the spacing between nanoparticles by temperature can have significant applications in label-free biomolecular detections, environmental monitoring, and biological warfare agents sensing.
This research was supported by grants to Y.L. from Samsung Research Fund and Nanophotonic Bioscience Fund, G.L. from Intel Research Fund, and L.P.L. from NSF Career Award.
* Corresponding author. E-mail: lplee@socrates.berkeley.edu.
1. Goia, D. V.; Matijevic, E. New J. Chem. 1998, 1203.
2. Bohren, C. F.; Huffman, D. R. Adsorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles; Wiley: New York, 1983.
3. Charney, C.; Lee, A.; Man, S.-Q.; Moran, C. E.; Radloff, C.; Bradley,
K.; Halas, N. J. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 7327.
4. Xia, Y.; Sun, Y. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 5297.
5. Kim, F.; Kwan, S.; Arkana, J.; Yang, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
123, 4386.
6. Messer, B.; Song, J. H.; Yang, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 10232.
7. Huang, Y.; Duan, X. F.; Wei, Q.; Lieber, C. M. Science 2001, 291,
630.
8. Melosh, N. A.; Boukai, A.; Diana, F.; Gerardot, B.; Badolato, A.;
Petroff, P. M.; Heath, J. R. Science 2003, 300, 112.
9. Tao, A.; Kim, F.; Hess, C.; Goldberger, J.; He, R.; Sun, Y.; Xia, Y.;
Yang, P. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 1229.
10. Quaroni, L.; Chumanov, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10642.
11. Nagasawa, H.; Maruyama, M.; Komatsu, T.; Isoda, S.; Kobayashi,
T. Phys. Status Solidi A 2002, 191, 67.
12. Kwan, S.; Kim, F.; Arkana, J.; Yang, P. Chem. Commun. 2001, 5,
447.
13. Chung, S. W.; Markovich, G.; Heath, J. R. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998,
102, 6685.
14. Heath, J. R.; Knobler, C. M.; Leff, D. V. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997,
101, 189.
15. Serpe, M. J.; Jones, C. D.; Lyon, L. A. Langmuir 2003, 19, 8759.
16. Krenn, J. R.; Dereux, A.; Weeber, J. C.; Bourillot, E.; Lacroute, Y.;
Goudonnet, J. P.; Schider, G.; Gotschy, W.; Leitner, A.; Aussenegg,
F. R.; Giarad, C. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 82, 2590.
17. Mertens, H.; Verhoeven, J.; Polman, A.; Tichelaar, F. D. Appl. Phys.
Lett. 2004, 85, 1317.
18. Markel, V. A. J. Mod. Opt. 1993, 40, 2281.
19. Johnson, P. B.; Christy, R. W. Phys. Rev. B 1972, 6, 4370.
20. Hildebrandt, P.; Stockburger, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 5935.
21. Jiang, J.; Bosnick, K.; Maillard, M.; Brus, L. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003,
107, 9964.