
Web Release Date: May 28,
Silicon Oxide Nanoparticles Reveal the Origin of Silicate Grains in Circumstellar Environments



and
Department of Physics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23284, Departments of Chemistry and Physics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, and Solar System Exploration Division, Astrochemistry Laboratory, NASA, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771
Received March 10, 2006
Revised May 14, 2006
Abstract:
A synergistic effort combining experiments in beams and first principles theoretical investigations is used to propose mechanisms that could lead to the formation of silicates and nanoparticles with silicon-rich cores through agglomeration of SiO, an abundant oxygen-bearing species in space. The silicon oxygen species involved in the transformation have optical excitations that could contribute to extended red emissions and blue luminescence. Apart from resolving an outstanding astronomical problem, we demonstrate novel silicon architectures.
The processes leading to the widespread presence of crystalline silicates throughout the galaxy1 and the origin of the
observed extended red emission in diffuse galactic background,2 currently believed to be due to silicon nanoparticles,3
are still far from being understood. One of the most abundant
oxygen-bearing condensable species in molecular astronomical regions is SiO. It has been conjectured that silicate
formation probably proceeds via the agglomeration of these
molecular species.4-7
In this work, we use a synergistic approach combining
detailed experimental investigations on the clustering of SiO
units in molecular beams and first principles electronic
structure studies to elucidate the condensation processes at
the nanoscale that can lead to the formation of silicates9 on
one hand and silicon nanoparticles10 on the other. We
demonstrate that as SiO units assemble to form bigger
clusters,11-13
The current experimental studies were carried out in a
femtosecond laser based time-of-flight mass spectrometer
system equipped with a laser vaporization (LaVa) source.15-17
| Figure 1 Mass spectra of clusters formed by vaporizing solid SiO and ionizing the resultant clusters. |
In addition to pure (SiO)n+ clusters, the data presented in Figure 1, reveal the presence of single oxygen enriched species, namely, Si2O3+, Si3O4+, Si4O5+, Si5O6+, Si6O7+, and small amount of Si7O8+. Also interesting are formation of the oxygen-deficient clusters and in particular the pure silicon clusters, though their origin through SiO photochemistry cannot be discounted. There are variations in the intensity across each series. In the pure (SiO)n+ clusters, there is a precipitous drop in intensity from (SiO)5+ to (SiO)6+. A similar decline in intensity is noticeable from Si6O7+ to Si7O8+. In addition there is a large peak at Si+. The oxygen-rich species Si2O3+ and Si3O4+ were also observed in the beams where clusters were formed through vaporization of silicon under oxygen or formed through the vaporization of solid SiO2, indicating that they are particularly stable. The most surprising experimental finding is the conspicuous absence of SiO2+ in all the experiments except for very minor intensity of the cations extracted from the silicon vaporized under oxygen. This could be due to a low photoionization cross section at the wavelengths employed in these experiments. Our focus on the other hand is on the origin of the SinOm species and hence this possibility does not bear directly on the results published in this paper. We easily detect species of all other Si to O ratios in the beam.
The experimental observations raise four startling questions. (1) Why do pure (SiO)n clusters exhibit a marked drop in intensity at n = 6? (2) What processes lead to the formation of oxygen-enriched species? What is the relative stability of SinOn+1 species and does SiO2 form in this enrichment cycle? If yes, why is it not seen in the cation experiments and are there alternate ways to detect its presence? (3) Does the clustering of SiO units lead to the formation of silicon nanoparticles? Is the same mechanism responsible for the presence of Si+ and small Sin+ clusters? (4) What are the HOMO-LUMO gaps and optical excitation energies in SinOm clusters and do they lie in the regions covering from infrared to blue observed in experiments? Since one starts with SiO molecules, the most likely mechanism of growth is the addition of SiO units. The natural starting point is then investigating the clustering of SiO molecules.
Motivated by the above observations, we undertook
theoretical investigations on the clustering of SiO units. The
theoretical studies are based on first principles calculations
using density functional theory18 and generalized gradient
approximation19 for exchange and correlation. The total
energies, equilibrium geometries of clusters of SinOn (1
n
12), SinOn+1 (1
n
12), and SinOn-1 (1
n
12)
clusters and their cations were calculated using a linear
combination of atomic orbitals-molecular orbital (LCAO-MO) approach. The atomic orbitals were represented by the
double-zeta valence polarization basis set.20 The calculations
were carried out using the deMon code21 developed by
Koester and co-workers. An auxiliary basis set was used for
the variational fitting of the Coulomb potential22 and the
numerical integration of the exchange-correlation energy and
potential were performed on an adaptive grid.23 The minimum structures were fully optimized in delocalized internal
coordinates without constraints using the rational function
optimization method and the Broyden, Fletcher, Goldfarb,
and Shanno update.24 Several initial configurations were used
in order to prevent getting trapped in local minima of the
potential energy surface.
Figure 2 shows the ground-state geometries of SinOn
clusters. Note that the ground states for SinOn containing 2-4
are all open ring structures. The structure of Si5O5 is a double
ring sharing a common Si atom. This cluster marks the
beginning of the silicon core and the geometries of higher
SinOn clusters are all marked by silicon-rich cores of
increasing size. In fact, the structure of Si8O8 can be looked
upon as an interior Si4 square with edges decorated with SiO2
molecules. By the time one reaches Si12O12, the Si core has
grown to a cube of eight Si atoms. This indicates a natural
tendency for SinOn clusters to segregate into Si-rich cores
with oxygen-rich and particularly SiO2 outer shells. It is then
feasible that the extended red emission3,10,25 discovered in
1980 originates in the silicon cores of the SinOn aggregates.
Apart from its astrochemical interest, the above findings may
enable SiO aggregation on surfaces as a possible approach
to forming extended pure silicon nanostructures.13,26 We
would like to add that Zhang et al.13 have also reported
studies on (SiO)n clusters where they assumed a tetrahedral-like Si core. Our structures on small sizes (n
6) agree
with their findings; however, we find more stable structures
at larger sizes.
| Figure 2 Calculated ground-state geometries for SinOn. The total atomization energy and selected bond lengths in angstroms are listed. Si atoms are in gray, O atoms are in red. |
While the above calculations indicate segregation, they do raise a puzzle. SiO is a very stable molecule with an atomization energy of 8.21 eV while SiO2 only has an atomization energy of 12.78 eV or an atomization energy of 6.39 eV per SiO bond. Si2 has binding energy of only 2.45 eV and hence the formation of Si-Si bonds and SiO2 bonds would both seem to be energetically unfavorable. What then leads to the Si-rich cores and oxygen-rich outer shells? The answer to this riddle lies in the chemistry of atoms. Si atoms are marked by tetrahedral bonding in the bulk while higher coordinations are observed in Sin clusters. On the other hand, oxygen is divalent. As Figure 2 shows, in all the clusters, the oxygen atoms are generally bonded to two other atoms. As the cluster size grows, a compact structure demands higher coordination in the interior. It then provides a natural selection process for oxygen to be transferred to the outer layers. It is this special chemistry that leads to the observed evolution of the structures. How does the segregation affect the overall stability of the SinOn species? Are there processes that can take advantage of this segregation to isolate the exterior SiO2?
To understand the evolutions in geometries and to identify
any particularly stable species, let us first consider the
stability of pure (SiO)n clusters. To this end we calculated
the atomization energy (AE) representing the energy required
to break a (SiO)n cluster into n Si and n O atoms


| Figure 3 (A) Mininum fragmentation energy (FE) (eq 1) of SinOn clusters. (B) Ionization potentials of SinOm clusters. (C) HOMO-LUMO gap for SinOm clusters. |
The FEs shown in Figure 3 show a dramatic increase from
n = 6 to 7. This would make (SiO)6 as a relatively unstable
species. Could this decreased stability lead to fragmentation
into subunits with uneven silicon-oxygen composition? An
investigation of this possibility requires ground states for
oxygen-rich and silicon-rich clusters. To this end, we
determined the ground-state geometries of SinOn+1 and
SinOn-1 clusters. The key issue is then to identify clusters
where the energy gained in combining the two units is
sufficient to break it into an oxygen-rich and a oxygen-poor
fragment. We thus analyzed the energetics of the reaction


E is the gain in energy. We also found that
Si6O6 can generate oxygen-rich clusters through the processes











The last mystery is the absence of SiO2 in Figure 1. The mass spectra shown in Figure 1 are obtained by ionizing the neutral species formed in the beam via a laser whose wavelength is around 800 nm (or 1.55 eV). To examine the feasibility of such a process, one must consider the energy required for ionizing the various species. To this end, we calculated the vertical ionization potential of all the SinOn, SinOn+1, and SinOn-1 species. These are shown in Figure 3b. Note that SiO2 has the highest ionization potential of 12.19 eV. It would take seven photons to ionize the clusters. Further, the HOMO-LUMO gap in SiO2 is 3.8 eV, making the absorption cross section really small. The lack of SiO2 in Figure 1 is then simply related to the inability to ionize the species. On the other hand, SiO2 has an electron affinity of 1.87 eV, and therefore it should be possible to detect them in experiments on anions. Indeed, the mass spectra of anionic clusters28 generated by vaporizing silicon in a helium atmosphere containing O2 show the formation of SiO2- whereas our experiments detecting cations generated by photoionizing neutral species do not show any significant SiO2+ species!
The final issue relates to the occurrence of extended red emission3,10,29 and the recently observed blue luminescence.14 The extended red emission manifests itself through a broad, featureless emission band with peaks occurring in the range 610-820 nm. The blue luminescence corresponds to wavelength in region 357-486 nm. In the past, these have been associated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) notably molecules containing three to four aromatic rings. Our electronic structure calculations indicated that many of the SinOm species have HOMO-LUMO gaps that could lead to emissions in these regions. This is seen in Figure 3c, which shows the HOMO-LUMO gap in SinOn, SinOn+1, and SinOn-1 clusters containing up to 16 Si atoms. Note that the gaps vary from 0.84 to 3.84 eV. It is then interesting to explore if these clusters could also contribute to these emissions. To examine this possibility we performed time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) calculations as implemented in the Gaussian 03 code.30 The B3LYP exchange correlation functional was used because it is known to provide better optical absorption energies. A 6-31+G* basis set using the same generalized gradient as in the previous calculations was employed for structure optimization and TD-DFT calculations. This method has been previously shown to yield accurate results in other silicon systems. Figure 4 shows the results for SinOn, SinOn+1, and SinOn-1 clusters. For the SinOn and SinOn+1 clusters, the wavelengths range from 225 to 850 nm. The inclusion of SinOn-1 clusters extends the range to 1150 nm. These frequencies include the observed ERE and BL. Note that the above calculations examine the absorption spectra. A calculation of the emission spectra requires further relaxations and will form the basis of a future publication.
| Figure 4 Optical gaps for the SinOm clusters. |
To summarize, the present work answers two main questions that have remained unanswered for a long time. It provides a microscopic mechanism that leads to the formation of oxygen rich with SiO2 as the terminal member via the clustering of SiO molecules and their collisions. It shows that the clustering of the SiO molecules results in structures marked by pure Sin cores and that the extended red emission observed in interstellar space could be originating in these cores. Apart from its applications in understanding the interstellar extinction and blue luminescence, the present work provides a workable approach to generate silicon nanostructures by assembling SiO molecules.
We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of S. E. Kooi and B. D. Leskiw, in performing the measurements presented in Figure 1, and helpful discussions with them and J. A. Nuth and B. Donn during the course of the study. A.W.C. gratefully acknowledges support from U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research Grant F49620-01-1-0328 for the experiments on SiO clusters. A.C.R., P.A.C., J.U.R., and S.N.K. acknowledge financial support from the U.S. Department of Energy Grant DE-FG02-02ER46009 for the theoretical studies. A.A. acknowledges support from NASA's Cosmochemistry and Origins of the Solar System Program.
* Corresponding author. E-mail: snkhanna@vcu.edu.
Virginia Commonwealth University.
Pennsylvania State University.
NASA, Goddard Space Flight Center.
1. Henning, Th. In Solid Interstellar Matter: The ISO Revolution; d'Hendecourt, L., Joblin, C., Jones, A., Eds.; Springer, Berlin, 1999; pp 247-262.
2. Witt, A. N.; Gordon, K. D.; Friedman, D. G. Astrophys. J. 1998,
498, 522.
3. Witt, A. N.; Gordon, K. D.; Furton, D. G. Astrophys. J. 1998, 501,
L111.
4. Nuth, J. A.; Donn, B. J. Chem. Phys. 1983, 78, 1618.
5. Donn, B.; Nuth, J. A. Astrophys. J. 1985, 288, 187.
6. Gail, H.-P.; Sedlmayr, E. Astron. Astrophys. 1986, 166, 225.
7. Speck, A. K.; Barlow, M. J.; Sylvester, R. J.; Hofmeister, A. M.
Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 2000, 146, 437.
8. Witt, A. N. In Astrochemistry: From Molecular Clouds to Planetary Systems; Proceedings of the IAU Symposium; Minh, Y. C., van Dishoeck, E. F., Eds.; Astronomical Society of the Pacific: San Francisco, CA, 2000; Vol. 197, pp 317-330.
9. Bromley, S. T. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 1427.
10. Zubko, V. G.; Smith, T. L.; Witt, A. N. Astrophys. J. 1999, 511,
L57.
11. Nayak, S. K.; Rao, B. K.; Khanna, S. N.; Jena, P. J. Chem. Phys.
1998, 109, 1245.
12. Chu, T. S.; Zhang, R. Q.; Cheung H. F. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105,
1705.
13. Zhang, R. Q.; Zhao, M. W.; Lee, S. T. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93,
095503.
14. Vijh, U. P.; et al. Blue luminescence and the presence of small
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the interstellar medium. Astrophys. J. 2005, 633, 262.
15. Castleman, A. W., Jr.; Wei, S. Annual Rev. Phys. Chem. 1994, 45,
685.
16. Kooi, S. E.; Leskiw, B. D.; Castleman, A. W., Jr. Nano Lett. 2001,
1, 113.
17. Bergeron, D. E.; Roach, P. J.; Castleman, A. W., Jr.; Jones, N. O.;
Khanna, S. N. Science 2005, 307, 231.
18. Kohn, R. W.; Sham, L. J. Phys. Rev. 1965, 140, A1133.
19. Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77,
3865.
20. Godbout, N.; Salahub, D. R.; Andzelm, J.; Wimmer, E. Can. J. Chem.
1992, 70, 560.
21. Köster, A. M.; Calaminici, P.; Flores, R.; Geudtner, G.; Goursot, A.; Heine, T.; Janetzko, F.; Patchkovskii, S.; Reveles, J. U.; Vela, A.; Salahub, D. R. deMon, NRC, Canada, 2004. Available from: http://www.deMon-software.com.
22. Köster, A. M.; Reveles, J. U.; del Campo J. M. J. Chem. Phys. 2004,
121, 3417.
23. Köster, A. M.; Flores-Moreno, R.; Reveles, J. U. J. Chem. Phys.
2004, 121, 681.
24. Reveles, J. U.; Köster, A. M. Geometry optimization in density
functional methods. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1109.
25. Schmidt, G. D.; Cohen, M.; Margon, B. Astrophys. J. 1980, 239,
L133.
26. Wang, N.; Tang, Y. H.; Zhang, Y. F.; Lee, C. S.; Lee, S. T. Phys.
Rev B 1998, 58, R16024.
27. Ho, K. M.; Shvartsburg, A. A.; Pan, B.; Lu, Z. Y.; Wang, C. Z.;
Wacker, J. G.; Fye, J. G.; Jarrold, M. F. Nature 1998, 392, 582.
28. Wang, L. S.; Wu, H.; Desai, S. R.; Fan, J.; Colson, S. D. J. Phys.
Chem. 1996, 100, 8697.
29. Ledoux, G.; Ehbrecht, M.; Guillois, O.; Huisken, F.; Kohn, B.;
Laguna, M. A.; Nenner, I.; Paillard, V.; Papoular, R.; Porterat, D.;
Reynaud, C. Astron. Astrophys. 1998, 333, L39.
30. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb,
M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Vreven, T.; Kudin,
K. N.; Burant, J. C.; Millam, J. M.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Barone,
V.; Mennucci, B.; Cossi, M.; Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.; Petersson, G.
A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.;
Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai,
H.; Klene, M.; Li, X.; Knox, J. E.; Hratchian, H. P.; Cross, J. B.;
Bakken, V.; Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R.
E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J.
W.; Ayala, P. Y.; Morokuma, K.; Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.;
Dannenberg, J. J.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.;
Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cui, Q.; Baboul, A. G.;
Clifford, S.; Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.;
Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill,
P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople,
J. A. Gaussian 03; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2004.