
Web Release Date: June 6,
A Highly Efficient Chemoenzymatic Approach toward Glycoprotein Synthesis
Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland 21201
Received May 1, 2006
| Abstract: |
![]() |
Asparagine-linked glycosylation is a predominant form of
posttranslational modifications of eukaryotic proteins. The
covalently attached oligosaccharides of glycoproteins can
profoundly affect a protein's structure and in vivo activity,
and are directly involved in a number of important biological
recognition processes such as cell adhesion and immune
response.1 Since natural and recombinant glycoproteins are
typically produced as a mixture of heterogeneous glycoforms,
synthesis of homogeneous glycoproteins carrying structurally
defined oligosaccharides has become essential both for
detailed structure-function relationship studies and for
developing glycoprotein-based therapeutics.2 To address the
need, a variety of synthetic strategies have been explored
for constructing large glycopeptides and glycoproteins.3,4
The chemoenzymatic approach involving the endo-
-N-acetylglucosaminidase (ENGase)-catalyzed trans-glycosylation is particularly appealing, as it has the unique advantage
to attach an intact oligosaccharide to a preassembled
GlcNAc-containing peptide or protein in a single step without
the need of any protecting groups.4-6
Our preliminary studies have shown that Endo-A can
tolerate certain modifications on the mannose moiety of the
Man
1,4GlcNAc-oxazoline, the minimal substrate structure
recognized by Endo-A.9 This prompted us to examine
whether the endoglycosidase could also tolerate selective
modifications on the outer mannose moieties of the Man
1,3(Man
1,6)Man
1,4GlcNAc core of N-glycans. Thus, a nonnatural hexasaccharide (Gal2Man3GlcNAc) oxazoline was
designed and synthesized, which has two galactose residues
-1,4-linked to the terminal mannose residues in the Man3GlcNAc core (Scheme 1). This hexasaccharide derivative
can be regarded as a mimic of a bi-antennary complex type
N-glycan without the interlinked GlcNAc moieties. Glycosidation of the disaccharide acceptor 2 with two units of the
disaccharide donor 1 under the catalysis of NIS and AgOTf
gave the hexasaccharide intermediate 3 in excellent yield.
NMR analysis confirmed that the newly formed glycosidic
bonds were in the desired
-glycosidic linkage. Compound
3 was then converted to the per-O-acetylated hexasaccharide
4 through a series of protecting group manipulations. The
formation of the oxazoline ring was achieved by the treatment
of compound 4 with Lewis acid (TMSBr, BF3, Et2O) and
collidine to provide compound 5 in 60% yield. Finally, de-O-acetylation of 5 with a catalytic amount of MeONa in dry
MeOH afforded the free hexasaccharide oxazoline 6 in
quantitative yield.
| Scheme 1. Synthesis of an Unnatural Hexasaccharide Oxazoline |
To examine whether the endoglycosidase Endo-A is able
to recognize the synthetic nonnatural sugar oxazoline for
trans-glycosylation, a model reaction was carried out with a
small GlcNAc-peptide, Ac-Asn(GlcNAc)-Ile-Thr (7),9 as the
acceptor. The enzymatic reaction was monitored by reverse-phase HPLC. It was observed that the reaction between 6
and 7 (molar ratio 2:1) occurred quickly in the presence of
Endo-A, while no ligation would occur in the absence of
the enzyme. The glycosylation of the acceptor 7 with
oxazoline 6 under the catalysis of Endo-A was essentially
complete within 30 min to form the glycopeptide 8 (Scheme
2), which was isolated in 98% yield. The identity of the
glycopeptide was characterized by ESI-MS and NMR (see
the Supporting Information). The observed MS (1604.1 Da)
as revealed by ESI-MS matched well with the calculated MS
(exact mass, 1603.63 Da) of glycopeptide 8, indicating that
it is the adduct of the hexasaccharide oxazoline and the
acceptor Ac-Asn(GlcNAc)-Ile-Thr. On the other hand, a
doublet at
4.56 with a relatively large coupling constant
(J = 7.5 Hz) assigned for the H-1 of the second GlcNAc
suggested that the hexasaccharide was attached to the
GlcNAc in the peptide moiety via the expected
1,4-glycosidic linkage. The results clearly indicate that the
synthetic hexasaccharide oxazoline can serve as an excellent
substrate for the Endo-A catalyzed trans-glycosylation,
making it possible to incorporate nonnatural sugar chains
into peptides.
| Scheme 2. Synthesis of the Glycopeptide 8 |
To examine the feasibility of the chemoenzymatic method
for glycoprotein synthesis and remodeling, bovine ribonuclease B was chosen as a model system, which has been
used previously as a system for demonstrating glycoprotein
remodeling.5,10 Ribonuclease B is a small glycoprotein that
consists of 124 amino acids and contains a single glycosylation site at Asn-34. Natural ribonuclease B is a mixture of
several glycoforms carrying a range of high-mannose type
N-glycans (Man5-9GlcNAc2) at Asn-34. Treatment of ribonuclease B with Endo-H (an endoglycosidase that cleaves
high-mannose type N-glycans at the chitobiose core) removed
the N-glycans, which leaves only the innermost N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) at the Asn-34 site, giving the
homogeneous GlcNAc-RB (9). It was found that when the
hexasaccharide oxazoline 6 and GlcNAc-RB (molar ratio,
2:1) were incubated in a phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) at 23
C
in the presence of Endo-A, the GlcNAc-RB was smoothly
glycosylated to give the trans-glycosylation product 10,
which was eluted earlier than GlcNAc-RB under reverse-phase HPLC. The transformation was essentially quantitative
after 2 h reaction and the glycoprotein product was isolated
in 96% yield (Scheme 3). Deconvolution of the ESI-MS of
10 gave a molecular mass of 14901 Da, which is in good
agreement with the calculated MS (14900 Da) of the
glycoprotein 10. These results clearly indicated that the
chemoenzymatic approach was equally efficient for the
synthesis of homogeneous glycoproteins carrying structurally
defined oligosaccharides.
| Scheme 3. Synthesis of the Glycoproteins 10 and 12 |
Interestingly, the glycoprotein 10, once formed, was found to be resistant to Endo-A catalyzed hydrolysis. This is understandable because glycoprotein 10 carries a nonnatural N-glycan and Endo-A is known to hydrolyze only high-mannose type natural N-glycans. Since the corresponding hexasaccharide oxazoline 6 could serve as an excellent donor substrate for the trans-glycosylation, these results suggest that the sugar oxazolines as transition state mimics are kinetically much more active for the enzymatic reaction than the "ground state" glycoprotein products thus formed. We also found that the Endo-A catalyzed trans-glycosylation of the sugar oxazoline 6 was much faster in the presence of the acceptor (GlcNAc-containing peptide or protein) than its enzymatic hydrolysis (data not shown). All these factors contribute to the formation of the trans-glycosylation product. Similarly, Endo-A catalyzed reaction of GlcNAc-RB with the tetrasaccharide oxazoline 117 gave the glycoprotein 12 carrying the core N-linked pentasaccharide Man3GlcNAc2 in 82% yield (Scheme 3). Again, the observed MS (14574.5 Da, from the deconvolution of the ESI-MS data) of the isolated product matches well with the calculated MS (14575.6 Da) of glycoprotein 12. It should be noted that the efficient attachment of the core N-linked pentasaccharide (Man3GlcNAc2) to a protein would provide a key starting structure for a quick assembly of a variety of glycoforms via sequential glycosylations of the core with various glycosyltransferases.11 The identity and homogeneity of the synthetic glycoproteins 10 (Gal2Man3GlcNAc2-RB) and 12 (Man3GlcNAc2-RB) were clearly demonstrated by their ESI-MS (Figure 1).
| Figure 1 The ESI-MS spectra of the synthetic glycoproteins. |
The high-yield enzymatic trans-glycosylation with the use
of synthetic sugar oxazoline as the donor substrate opens a
new avenue toward glycoprotein synthesis and remodeling.
The endoglycosidase-catalyzed ligation with GlcNAc-containing proteins proceeds in a regio- and stereospecific
manner and in an excellent yield under mild conditions,
without the need of any protection groups. The chemoenzymatic approach is highly convergent and allows totally
independent preparation of the oligosaccharide and protein
portions, thus avoiding the long-standing problem of "incompatibility" of protecting group manipulations in glycopeptide synthesis. In addition, this study has demonstrated
that nonnatural oligosaccharide could also serve as efficient
donor substrate, making it possible to construct both natural
and tailor-made glycoproteins. Since a given GlcNAc-protein
could be efficiently prepared by several established approaches, including (a) overproduction of the protein in a
high-yield yeast expression system with subsequent removal
of the high-mannose type N-glycan by Endo-H or Endo-A,
(b) total protein synthesis via native chemical ligation or
expressed protein ligation with the incorporation of a
GlcNAc-tag at a predetermined site during the synthesis,12
We thank Prof. K. Takegawa (Kagawa University) for kindly providing the pGEX-2T/Endo-A plasmid that was used for overproducing the enzyme Endo-A.
Detailed experimental procedures; the 1H and 13C NMR spectra of key compounds. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
* In papers with more than one author, the asterisk indicates the name of the author to whom inquiries about the paper should be addressed.
1. Dwek, R. A. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 683-720.![]()
2. (a) Davis, B. G. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 579-601.
(b) Grogan, M.
J.; Pratt, M. R.; Marcaurelle, L. A.; Bertozzi, C. R. Annu. Rev. Biochem.
2002, 71, 593-634.
(c) Wong, C. H. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 4219-4225.![]()
3. (a) Macmillan, D.; Bertozzi, C. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43,
1355-1359.
(b) Warren, J. D.; Miller, J. S.; Keding, S. J.; Danishefsky, S.
J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 6576-6578.
(c) Tolbert, T. J.; Franke, D.;
Wong, C. H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005, 13, 909-915.
(d) Mezzato, S.;
Schaffrath, M.; Unverzagt, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1650-1654.
(e) Fumoto, M.; Hinou, H.; Matsushita, T.; Kurogochi, M.; Ohta, T.;
Ito, T.; Yamada, K.; Takimoto, A.; Kondo, H.; Inazu, T.; Nishimura, S.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2534-2537.
(f) Matsushita, T.; Hinou,
H.; Kurogochi, M.; Shimizu, H.; Nishimura, S. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 877-880.
(g) Kajihara, Y.; Yamamoto, N.; Miyazaki, T.; Sato, H. Curr. Med.
Chem. 2005, 12, 527-550.
(h) Wang, L. X.; Song, H.; Liu, S.; Lu, H.;
Jiang, S.; Ni, J.; Li, H. ChemBioChem 2005, 6, 1068-1074.
(i) Kaneshiro,
C. M.; Michael, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1077-1081.![]()
4. (a) Li, H.; Singh, S.; Zeng, Y.; Song, H.; Wang, L. X. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 895-898.
(b) Haneda, K.; Takeuchi, M.; Tagashira,
M.; Inazu, T.; Toma, K.; Isogai, Y.; Hori, M.; Kobayashi, K.; Takegawa,
K.; Yamamoto, K. Carbohydr. Res. 2006, 341, 181-190.![]()
5. Takegawa, K.; Tabuchi, M.; Yamaguchi, S.; Kondo, A.; Kato, I.;
Iwahara, S. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 3094-3099.![]()
6. (a) Haneda, K.; Inazu, T.; Yamamoto, K.; Kumagai, H.; Nakahara,
Y.; Kobata, A. Carbohydr. Res. 1996, 292, 61-70.
(b) Wang, L. X.; Tang,
M.; Suzuki, T.; Kitajima, K.; Inoue, Y.; Inoue, S.; Fan, J. Q.; Lee, Y. C. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 11137-11146.
(c) Mizuno, M.; Haneda, K.;
Iguchi, R.; Muramoto, I.; Kawakami, T.; Aimoto, S.; Yamamoto, K.; Inazu,
T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 284-290.
(d) Haneda, K.; Tagashira, M.;
Yoshino, E.; Takeuchi, M.; Inazu, T.; Toma, K.; Iijima, H.; Isogai, Y.;
Hori, M.; Takamatsu, S.; Fujibayashi, Y.; Kobayashi, K.; Yamamoto, K.
Glycoconj. J. 2004, 21, 377-386.
(e) Fujita, K.; Takegawa, K. Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Commun. 2001, 282, 678-682.
(f) Singh, S.; Ni, J.; Wang,
L. X. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 327-330.
(g) Yamamoto, K. J.
Biosci. Bioeng. 2001, 92, 493-501.
(h) Wang, L. X.; Singh, S.; Ni, J. In
Synthesis of Carbohydrates through Biotechnology; Wang, P. G., Ichikawa,
Y., Eds.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2004, pp 73-92.
7. Li, B.; Zeng, Y.; Hauser, S.; Song, H.; Wang, L. X. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 9692-9693.![]()
8. Fujita, M.; Shoda, S.; Haneda, K.; Inazu, T.; Takegawa, K.;
Yamamoto, K. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2001, 1528, 9-14.![]()
9. (a) Li, H.; Li, B.; Song, H.; Breydo, L.; Baskakov, I. V.; Wang, L.
X. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 9990-9996.
(b) Zeng, Y.; Wang, J.; Li, B.;
Hauser, S.; Li, H.; Wang, L. X. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 3355-3364.![]()
10. Witte, K.; Sears, P.; Martin, R.; Wong, C. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 2114-2118
11. (a) Fujiyama, K.; Ido, Y.; Misaki, R.; Moran, D.; Yanagihara, I.;
Honda, T.; Nishimura, S.; Yoshida, T.; Seki, T. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2001,
92, 569-574.
(b) D'Agostaro, G.; Zingoni, A.; Moritz, R.; Simpson, R.;
Schachter, H.; Bendiak, B. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 15211-15221.
(c)
Nishikawa, A.; Ihara, Y.; Hatakeyama, M.; Kangawa, K.; Taniguchi, N. J.
Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 18199-18204.
(d) Raju, T. S.; Briggs, J. B.;
Chamow, S. M.; Winkler, M. E.; Jones, A. J. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 8868-8876.![]()
12. (a) Dawson, P. E.; Muir, T. W.; Clark-Lewis, I.; Kent, S. B. Science
1994, 266, 776-779.
(b) Schwarzer, D.; Cole, P. A. Curr. Opin. Chem.
Biol. 2005, 9, 561-569.![]()
13. (a) Zhang, Z.; Gildersleeve, J.; Yang, Y. Y.; Xu, R.; Loo, J. A.;
Uryu, S.; Wong, C. H.; Schultz, P. G. Science 2004, 303, 371-373.
(b)
Xu, R.; Hanson, S. R.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, Y. Y.; Schultz, P. G.; Wong, C.
H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15654-15655.![]()