A Multidimensional Electrospray MS-Based Approach to Phosphopeptide Mapping

Roland S. Annan,* Michael J. Huddleston, Rati Verma, Raymond J. Deshaies, and Steven A. Carr*
Department of Physical and Structural Chemistry, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406, and Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
Anal. Chem., 2001, 73 (3), pp 393–404
DOI: 10.1021/ac001130t
Publication Date (Web): December 29, 2000
Copyright © 2001 American Chemical Society
*

 Corresponding authors:  (e-mail) Roland_S_Annan@sbphrd.com; Steven_A_Carr@sbphrd.com.

,

 SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals.

,

 California Institute of Technology.

Abstract

A new, multidimensional electrospray MS-based strategy for phosphopeptide mapping is described which eliminates the need to radiolabel protein with 32P or 33P. The approach utilizes two orthogonal MS scanning techniques, both of which are based on the production of phosphopeptide-specific marker ions at m/z 63 and/or 79 in the negative ion mode. These scan methods are combined with liquid chromatography−electrospray mass spectrometry and nanoelectrospray MS/MS to selectively detect and identify phosphopeptides in complex proteolytic digests. Low-abundance, low-stoichiometry phosphorylation sites can be selectively determined in the presence of an excess of nonphosphorylated peptides, even in cases where the signal from the phosphopeptide is indistinguishable from background in the conventional MS scan. The strategy, which has been developed and refined in our laboratory over the past few years, is particularly well suited to phosphoproteins that are phosphorylated to varying degrees of stoichiometry on multiple sites. Sensitivity and selectivity of the method are demonstrated here using model peptides and a commercially available phosphoprotein standard. In addition, the strategy is illustrated by the complete in vitro and in vivo phosphopeptide mapping of Sic1p, a regulator of the G1/S transition in budding yeast.

Tools

History

  • Published In Issue February 01, 2001
  • Received for review September 20, 2000. Accepted December 7, 2000.

Recommend & Share

Related Content

Other ACS content by these authors: