N-Terminal Isotope Tagging Strategy for Quantitative Proteomics:  Results-Driven Analysis of Protein Abundance Changes

Francesca Zappacosta and Roland S. Annan*
Proteomics and Biological Mass Spectrometry, Department of Computational, Analytical and Structural Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406
Anal. Chem., 2004, 76 (22), pp 6618–6627
DOI: 10.1021/ac049169b
Publication Date (Web): October 9, 2004
Copyright © 2004 American Chemical Society
*

 Corresponding author:  (e-mail) Roland_S_Annan@gsk.com.

Abstract

Comparing the relative abundance of each protein present in two or more complex samples can be accomplished using isotope-coded tags incorporated at the peptide level. Here we describe a chemical labeling strategy for the incorporation of a single isotope label per peptide, which is completely sequence-independent so that it potentially labels every peptide from a protein including those containing posttranslational modifications. It is based on a gentle chemical labeling strategy that specifically labels the N-terminus of all peptides in a digested sample with either a d5- or d0-propionyl group. Lysine side chains are blocked by guanidination prior to N-terminal labeling to prevent the incorporation of multiple labels. In this paper, we describe the optimization of this N-terminal isotopic tagging strategy and validate its use for peptide-based protein abundance measurements with a 10-protein standard mixture. Using a results-driven strategy, which targets proteins for identification based on MALDI TOF-MS analysis of isotopically labeled peptide pairs, we also show that this labeling strategy can detect a small number of differentially expressed proteins in a mixture as complex as a yeast cell lysate. Only peptides that show a difference in relative abundance are targeted for identification by tandem MS. Despite the fact that many peptides are quantitated, only those few showing a difference in abundance are targeted for protein identification. Proteins are identified by either targeted LC−ES MS/MS or MALDI TOF/TOF. Identifications can be accomplished equally well by either technique on the basis of multiple peptides. This increases the confidence level for both identification and quantitation. The merits of ES MS/MS or MALDI MS/MS for protein identification in a results-driven strategy are discussed.

Tools

History

  • Published In Issue November 15, 2004
  • Received for review June 7, 2004. Accepted August 23, 2004.

Recommend & Share

Related Content

Other ACS content by these authors: