Numerical Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy for the Analysis of Molecular Dynamics under Nonstandard Conditions

Michael J. Culbertson, Joshua T. B. Williams, Wayland W. L. Cheng, Dee Ann Stults, Emily R. Wiebracht, John J. Kasianowicz, and Daniel L. Burden*
Chemistry Department, Wheaton College, Wheaton, Illinois 60187, and EEEL Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
Anal. Chem., 2007, 79 (11), pp 4031–4039
DOI: 10.1021/ac062013m
Publication Date (Web): April 21, 2007
Copyright © 2007 American Chemical Society

Abstract

The suitability of mathematical models used to extract kinetic information from correlated data constitutes a significant issue in fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS). Standard FCS equations are derived from a simple Gaussian approximation of the optical detection volume, but some investigations have suggested this traditional practice can lead to inaccurate and misleading conclusions under many experimental circumstances, particularly those encountered in one-photon confocal measurements. Furthermore, analytical models cannot be derived for all measurement scenarios. We describe a novel numerical approach to FCS that circumvents conventional analytical models, enabling meaningful analyses even under extraordinarily unusual measurement conditions. Numerical fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (NFCS) involves quantitatively matching experimental correlation curves with synthetic curves generated via diffusion simulation or direct calculation based on an experimentally determined 3D map of the detection volume. Model parameters are adjusted iteratively to minimize the residual differences between synthetic and experimental correlation curves. In order to reduce analysis time, we distribute calculations across a network of processors. As an example of this new approach, we demonstrate that synthetic autocorrelation curves correspond well with experimental data and that NFCS diffusion measurements of Rhodamine B remain constant, regardless of the distortion present in a confocal detection volume.

Citing Articles

View all 6 citing articles

Citation data is made available by participants in CrossRef's Cited-by Linking service. For a more comprehensive list of citations to this article, users are encouraged to perform a search in SciFinder.

This article has been cited by 5 ACS Journal articles (5 most recent appear below).

Tools

SciFinder Links

SciFinder subscribers:  Click to sign in | Not a SciFinder subscriber? Learn more at www.cas.org

Explore by:


History

  • Published In Issue June 01, 2007
  • Received for review October 27, 2006. Accepted March 18, 2007.

Recommend & Share

  • Share on ACS NetworkACS Network
  • Add to FacebookFacebook
  • Tweet ThisTweet This
  • Add to CiteULikeCiteULike
  • Add to NewsvineNewsvine
  • Digg ThisDigg This
  • Add to DeliciousDelicious

Related Content

Other ACS content by these authors: