Analysis of Hydrazine in Drinking Water by Isotope Dilution Gas Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry with Derivatization and Liquid−Liquid Extraction

William E. Davis, II and Yongtao Li*
Underwriters Laboratories Inc., 110 South Hill Street, South Bend, Indiana 46617
Anal. Chem., 2008, 80 (14), pp 5449–5453
DOI: 10.1021/ac702536d
Publication Date (Web): June 20, 2008
Copyright © 2008 American Chemical Society
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Yongtao.Li@us.ul.com. Fax: 574-233-8207.

Abstract

A new isotope dilution gas chromatography/chemical ionization/tandem mass spectrometric method was developed for the analysis of carcinogenic hydrazine in drinking water. The sample preparation was performed by using the optimized derivatization and multiple liquid−liquid extraction techniques. Using the direct aqueous-phase derivatization with acetone, hydrazine and isotopically labeled hydrazine-15N2 used as the surrogate standard formed acetone azine and acetone azine-15N2, respectively. These derivatives were then extracted with dichloromethane. Prior to analysis using methanol as the chemical ionization reagent gas, the extract was dried with anhydrous sodium sulfate, concentrated through evaporation, and then fortified with isotopically labeled N-nitrosodimethylamine-d6 used as the internal standard to quantify the extracted acetone azine-15N2. The extracted acetone azine was quantified against the extracted acetone azine-15N2. The isotope dilution standard calibration curve resulted in a linear regression correlation coefficient (R) of 0.999. The obtained method detection limit was 0.70 ng/L for hydrazine in reagent water samples, fortified at a concentration of 1.0 ng/L. For reagent water samples fortified at a concentration of 20.0 ng/L, the mean recoveries were 102% with a relative standard deviation of 13.7% for hydrazine and 106% with a relative standard deviation of 12.5% for hydrazine-15N2. Hydrazine at 0.5−2.6 ng/L was detected in 7 out of 13 chloraminated drinking water samples but was not detected in the rest of the chloraminated drinking water samples and the studied chlorinated drinking water sample.

Tools

History

  • Published In Issue July 15, 2008
  • Article ASAPJune 20, 2008
  • Received: December 14, 2007
    Accepted: May 13, 2008

Recommend & Share

Related Content

Other ACS content by these authors: