Composite Organization of the Cobalamin Binding and Cubilin Recognition Sites of Intrinsic Factor

Sergey N. Fedosov,* Natalya U. Fedosova,§ Lars Berglund, Søren K. Moestrup, Ebba Nexø,@ and Torben E. Petersen
Protein Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Molecular and Structural Biology, University of Aarhus, Science Park, Gustav Wieds Vej 10, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark, Department of Biophysics, University of Aarhus, Ole Worms Alle 185, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark, Cobento Biotech A/S, Science Park, Gustav Wieds Vej 10, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark, Department of Medical Biochemistry, University of Aarhus, Ole Worms Alle 170, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark, and Department of Clinical Biochemistry, AS Aarhus University Hospital, Nrrebrogade 44, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
Biochemistry, 2005, 44 (9), pp 3604–3614
DOI: 10.1021/bi047936v
Publication Date (Web): February 10, 2005
Copyright © 2005 American Chemical Society

 This work was supported by the Eureka program (CT-T2006), Cobento Biotech A/S, and the Lundbeck Foundation.

,
*

 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Telephone:  (+45) 89 42 50 92. Fax:  (+45) 86 13 65 97. E-mail:  snf@imsb.au.dk.

,

 Department of Molecular and Structural Biology, University of Aarhus.

,
§

 Department of Biophysics, University of Aarhus.

,

 Cobento Biotech A/S.

,

 Department of Medical Biochemistry, University of Aarhus.

,
@

 AS Aarhus University Hospital.

Abstract

Abstract Image

Intrinsic factor (IF50) is a cobalamin (Cbl)-transporting protein of 50 kDa, which can be cleaved into two fragments:  the 30 kDa N-terminal peptide IF30 and the 20 kDa C-terminal glycopeptide IF20. Experiments on binding of Cbl to IF30, IF20, and IF50 revealed comparable association rate constants (k+Cbl = 4 × 106, 14 × 106, and 26 × 106 M-1 s-1, respectively), but the equilibrium dissociation constants were essentially different (KCbl = 200 μM, 0.2 μM, and ≤1 pM, respectively). The smaller fragment, IF20, had unexpectedly high affinity for Cbl; however, efficient retention of the ligand required the presence of both fragments. Detailed schemes of the interaction of Cbl with IF50 and with IF30 and IF20 are presented, where the sequential attachment of Cbl to the IF20 and IF30 domains plays the key role in recognition and retention of the ligand. Each isolated fragment of IF was tested for the binding to the specific receptor cubilin in the presence or absence of Cbl. Neither apo nor holo forms of IF20 and IF30 were recognized by the receptor. When two fragments were mixed and incubated with Cbl, they associated into a stable complex, IF30+20·Cbl, which bound to cubilin as well as the noncleaved IF50·Cbl complex. We suggest that formation of the cubilin recognition site on IF is caused by assembly of two distant domains, which allows the saturated protein to be recognized by the receptor. The obtained parameters for ligand and receptor binding indicate that both full-length IF50 and the fragments may be involved in Cbl assimilation.

Tools

SciFinder Links

SciFinder subscribers:  Click to sign in | Not a SciFinder subscriber? Learn more at www.cas.org

History

  • Published In Issue March 08, 2005
  • Received September 23, 2004
    Revised Manuscript Received December 9, 2004

Recommend & Share