Cooperative DNA Binding by the B-Isoform of Human Progesterone Receptor:  Thermodynamic Analysis Reveals Strongly Favorable and Unfavorable Contributions to Assembly

Aaron F. Heneghan, Keith D. Connaghan-Jones, Michael T. Miura, and David L. Bain*
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 4200 East 9th Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80262
Biochemistry, 2006, 45 (10), pp 3285–3296
DOI: 10.1021/bi052046g
Publication Date (Web): February 16, 2006
Copyright © 2006 American Chemical Society

 This work was supported by NIH Grants R01-DK061933 to D.L.B. and F32-DK070519 to A.F.H., and the Tissue Culture Core Laboratory of the UCHSC Cancer Center.

,
*

 To whom correspondence should be addressed:  Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, C-238, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 4200 E. 9th Ave, Denver, CO 80262. Phone:  303-315-1416. Fax:  303-315-0274. E-mail:  David.Bain@UCHSC.edu.

Abstract

Abstract Image

Progesterone receptors (PR) play critical roles in eukaryotic gene regulation, yet the mechanisms by which they assemble at multisite promoters are poorly understood. Here we present a thermodynamic analysis of the interactions of the PR B-isoform (PR-B) with promoters containing either one or two progesterone response elements (PREs). Utilizing quantitative footprinting, we have resolved the microscopic energetics of PR-B binding, including cooperativity terms. The results of this analysis challenge a number of assumptions found in traditional models of receptor function. First, PR-B interactions at a single PRE can be equally well described by mechanisms invoking either the receptor monomer or the dimer as the active DNA binding species. If, as is commonly accepted, PR-B interacts with response elements only as a preformed dimer, then its intrinsic binding affinity is not the typically observed nanomolar but is rather picomolar. This high affinity binding is opposed, however, by a large energetic penalty. The penalty presumably pays for costly structural rearrangements of the receptor dimer and/or response element that are needed to form the protein−DNA complex. If PR-B assembles at a single response element via successive monomer binding reactions, then this penalty minimizes cooperative interactions between adjacent monomers. When binding to two response elements, the receptor exhibits strong intersite cooperativity. Although this phenomenon has been observed before, the present work demonstrates that the energetics reach levels seen in highly cooperative systems such as λ cI repressor. This first quantitative dissection of cooperative receptor−promoter interactions suggests that PR-B function is more complex than traditionally envisioned.

Tools

SciFinder Links

SciFinder subscribers:  Click to sign in | Not a SciFinder subscriber? Learn more at www.cas.org

History

  • Published In Issue March 14, 2006
  • Received October 7, 2005
    Revised Manuscript Received January 10, 2006

Recommend & Share

Related Content

Other ACS content by these authors: