Modeling Unfolded States of Proteins and Peptides. II. Backbone Solvent Accessibility

Trevor P. Creamer, Rajgopal Srinivasan, and George D. Rose*
Department of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 725 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, Maryland 21205
Biochemistry, 1997, 36 (10), pp 2832–2835
DOI: 10.1021/bi962819o
Publication Date (Web): March 11, 1997
Copyright © 1997 American Chemical Society

 Current address:  Center for Structural Biology, Department of Biochemistry, University of Kentucky, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536.

,
*

 Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Phone:  (410) 614-3970. Facsimile:  (410) 614-3971. Email:  rose@ grserv.med.jhmi.edu.

Abstract

Buried surface area is often used as a measure of the contribution to protein folding from the hydrophobic effect. Quantitatively, the surface buried upon folding is reckoned as the difference in area between the native and unfolded states. This calculation is well defined for a known structure but model-dependent for the unfolded state. In a previous paper [Creamer, T. P., Srinivasan, R., & Rose, G. D. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 16245−16250], we developed two models that bracket the surface area of the unfolded state between limiting extremes. Using these extrema, it was shown that earlier models, such as an extended tripeptide, overestimate the surface area of side chains in the unfolded state. In this sequel to our previous paper, we focus on backbone surface in the unfolded state, again adopting the strategy of trapping the area between limiting extrema. A principal conclusion of this present study is that most backbone surface in proteins is buried within local structure.

Tools

SciFinder Links

SciFinder subscribers:  Click to sign in | Not a SciFinder subscriber? Learn more at www.cas.org

History

  • Published In Issue March 11, 1997
  • Received November 14, 1996
    Revised Manuscript Received January 2, 197

Recommend & Share

Related Content

Other ACS content by these authors: