Use of Automatic Relevance Determination in QSAR Studies Using Bayesian Neural Networks

Frank R. Burden*
School of Chemistry, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia
Martyn G. Ford and David C. Whitley
Centre for Molecular Design, Institute of Biomedical and Biomolecular Sciences, Portsmouth University, Portsmouth PO1 2DY, U.K.
David A. Winkler
CSIRO Division of Molecular Science, Private Bag 10, Clayton South MDC, Clayton, Victoria 3169, Australia
J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 2000, 40 (6), pp 1423–1430
DOI: 10.1021/ci000450a
Publication Date (Web): October 28, 2000
Copyright © 2000 American Chemical Society
*

 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Telephone:  +613 9905 4559. Fax:  +613 9905 4597. E-mail:  frank.burden@sci.monash.edu.au.

Abstract

We describe the use of Bayesian regularized artificial neural networks (BRANNs) coupled with automatic relevance determination (ARD) in the development of quantitative structure−activity relationship (QSAR) models. These BRANN-ARD networks have the potential to solve a number of problems which arise in QSAR modeling such as the following:  choice of model; robustness of model; choice of validation set; size of validation effort; and optimization of network architecture. The ARD method ensures that irrelevant or highly correlated indices used in the modeling are neglected as well as showing which are the most important variables in modeling the activity data. The application of the methods to QSAR of compounds active at the benzodiazepine and muscarinic receptors as well as some toxicological data of the effect of substituted benzenes on Tetetrahymena pyriformis is illustrated.

Tools

SciFinder Links

SciFinder subscribers:  Click to sign in | Not a SciFinder subscriber? Learn more at www.cas.org

History

  • Published In Issue November 27, 2000
  • Received March 21, 2000

Recommend & Share

Related Content

Other ACS content by these authors: