Prediction of Glass Transition Temperature (Tg) of Some Compounds in Organic Electroluminescent Devices with Their Molecular Properties

Yeong Suk Kim, Jae Hyun Kim,* Jung Sup Kim,# and Kyoung Tai No#§
Department of Chemistry and Department of Chemical Education, Kongju National University, Kongju 314-700, Korea, and Computer Aided Molecular Design Research Center and Department of Bioinformatics and Department of Chemistry, Soong Sil University, Seoul 156-743, Korea
J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 2002, 42 (1), pp 75–81
DOI: 10.1021/ci0103018
Publication Date (Web): January 28, 2002
Copyright © 2002 American Chemical Society

 Department of Chemistry, Kongju National University.

,
*

 Corresponding author phone:  82-41-850-8281; fax:  82-41-850-8347; e-mail:  kjaehyun@kongju.ac.kr.

,

 Department of Chemical Education, Kongju National University.

,
#

 Computer Aided Molecular Design Research Center, Soong Sil University.

,

 Department of Bioinformatics and Department of Chemistry, Soong Sil University.

,
§

 Member of Hyperstructural Organic Material Research Center, Korea.

Abstract

We have studied the quantitative structure−property relationship between descriptors representing the molecular structure and glass transition temperature (Tg) for 103 molecules including organic electroluminescent (EL) devices materials. Eighty-six descriptors were introduced and among them seven descriptors (one topological descriptor, one thermodynamic descriptor, one spatial descriptor, one structural descriptor, and three electrostatic descriptors) were selected by Genetic Algorithm (GA). The 81 molecules chosen randomly among 103 compounds were used as a training set, and the remaining 22 molecules were used as a prediction set. The quantitative relationship between these seven descriptors and Tg was tested by multiple linear regression (MLR) and artificial neural network (ANN). ANN analysis showed no significant advantage over MLR for this study. As the results of the MLR, the square of the correlation coefficient (R2) for the Tg of the 81 training set was 0.989, and the average error was 8.8 K. In prediction for Tg using the 22 prediction compounds set with MLR, R2 was 0.976, and the average error was 13.9 K.

Tools

SciFinder Links

SciFinder subscribers:  Click to sign in | Not a SciFinder subscriber? Learn more at www.cas.org

History

  • Published In Issue January 28, 2002
  • Received June 12, 2001

Recommend & Share

Related Content

Other ACS content by these authors: