Three-Dimensional Quantitative Structure-Permeability Relationship Analysis for a Series of Inhibitors of Rhinovirus Replication

Sean Ekins,*§ Gregory L. Durst,§ Robert E. Stratford,§ David A. Thorner, Richard Lewis, Richard J. Loncharich, and James H. Wikel§
Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Co., Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285, Lilly Research Centre, Sunninghill Road, Windlesham, GU20 6PH, U.K., and Chemical Research Technologies, Eli Lilly and Co., Lilly, 2001 West Main Street, Greenfield, Indiana 46140
J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 2001, 41 (6), pp 1578–1586
DOI: 10.1021/ci010330i
Publication Date (Web): September 19, 2001
Copyright © 2001 American Chemical Society
*

 Corresponding author phone:  (317)433-5387; fax: (317)433-0311; e-mail:  ekins_sean@lilly.com.

,
§

 Lilly Research Laboratories.

,

 Lilly Research Centre.

,

 Chemical Research Technologies.

Abstract

Multiple three-dimensional quantitative structure−activity relationship (3D-QSAR) approaches were applied to predicting passive Caco-2 permeability for a series of 28 inhibitors of rhinovirus replication. Catalyst, genetic function approximation (GFA) with MS-WHIM descriptors, CoMFA, and VolSurf were all used for generating 3D-quantitative structure permeability relationships utilizing a training set of 19 molecules. Each of these approaches was then compared using a test set of nine molecules not present in the training set. Statistical parameters for the test set predictions (r2 and leave-one-out q2) were used to compare the models. It was found that the Catalyst pharmacophore model was the most predictive (test set of predicted versus observed permeability, r2 = 0.94). This model consisted of a hydrogen bond acceptor, hydrogen bond donor, and ring aromatic feature with a training set correlation of r2 = 0.83. The CoMFA model consisted of three components with an r2 value of 0.96 and produced good predictions for the test set (r2 = 0.84). VolSurf resulted in an r2 value of 0.76 and good predictions for the test set (r2 = 0.83). Test set predictions with GFA/WHIM descriptors (r2 = 0.46) were inferior when compared with the Catalyst, CoMFA, and VolSurf model predictions in this evaluation. In summary it would appear that the 3D techniques have considerable value in predicting passive permeability for a congeneric series of molecules, representing a valuable asset for drug discovery.

Tools

History

  • Published In Issue November 26, 2001
  • Received July 20, 2001

Recommend & Share

Related Content

Other ACS content by these authors: