Abstract

Fast and accurate identification of active compounds is essential for effective use of virtual screening workflows. Here, we have compared the ligand-ranking efficiency of the linear interaction energy (LIE) method against standard docking approaches. Using a trypsin set of 1549 compounds, we performed 12,250 molecular dynamics simulations. The LIE method proved effective but did not yield results significantly better than those obtained with docking codes. The entire database of simulations is released.
Supporting Information
Details of library design, simulation and docking protocols, erratic compounds, comparison with other LIE parameters, and further analysis of the simulations. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.


