Success on Algorithmic and LOCS vs. Conceptual Chemistry Exam Questions

Uri Zoller and Aviva Lubezky
Department of Science Education-Chemistry, Haifa University Oranim, Kiryat Tivon 36006, Israel
Mary B. Nakhleh and Barbara Tessier
Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47906
Yehudit J. Dori
Department of Education in Technology and Science, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Technion City, Haifa 32000, Israel
J. Chem. Educ., 1995, 72 (11), p 987
DOI: 10.1021/ed072p987
Publication Date: November 1995

Abstract

The performance of freshman science, engineering, and in-service teacher students in three Israeli and American universities on algorithmic, lower-order cognitive skills (LOCS), and conceptual chemistry exam questions was investigated. The driving force for the study was an interest in moving chemistry instruction from an algorithm-oriented factual recall approach dominated by LOCS to a decision-making, problem-solving, and critical thinking approach dominated by higher-order cognitive skills (HOCS). Students' responses to the specially designed algorithmic, LOCS, and conceptual exam questions were scored and analyzed for correlations and for differences between the means within and across universities by the question's category. The main findings were: (1) students in all three universities performed consistently on each of the three categories in the order of algorithmic > LOCS > conceptual questions, (2) success on algorithmic does not imply success on conceptual, or even on LOCS questions, and (3) students taught in small classes outperformed by far those in large lecture sessions in all three categories. The implied paradigm shift from an algorithmic/LOCS to a conceptual/HOCS orientation should be moved from a research-based theoretical domain to actual implementation in order for a meaningful improvement of chemistry teaching to occur.

Keywords (Audience):

High School / Introductory Chemistry

Keywords (Domain):

Chemical Education Research

Keywords (Pedagogy):

Testing / Assessment

Citing Articles

View all 15 citing articles

Citation data is made available by participants in CrossRef's Cited-by Linking service. For a more comprehensive list of citations to this article, users are encouraged to perform a search in SciFinder.

This article has been cited by 15 ACS Journal articles (5 most recent appear below).

Tools

SciFinder Links

SciFinder subscribers:  Click to sign in | Not a SciFinder subscriber? Learn more at www.cas.org

Explore by:


History

  • Received: August 03, 2009

Recommend & Share

  • Share on ACS NetworkACS Network
  • Add to FacebookFacebook
  • Tweet ThisTweet This
  • Add to CiteULikeCiteULike
  • Add to NewsvineNewsvine
  • Digg ThisDigg This
  • Add to DeliciousDelicious

Related Content