Why the 4s Orbital Is Occupied before the 3d

Melvyn P. Melrose
King''s College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK
Eric R. Scerri
Center for the Philosophy of Natural and Social Science, The London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK
J. Chem. Educ., 1996, 73 (6), p 498
DOI: 10.1021/ed073p498
Publication Date (Web): June 1, 1996

Abstract

It is demonstrated that the difference between the total energies of two electronic configurations can be expressed as an orbital energy difference, provided that the configurations differ only in the assignment of one electron and that each of the energies of the differentiating orbitals corresponds to an ionization energy in its own configuration. With orbital energies defined this way, there is nothing paradoxical about 4s being preferred to 3d in the transition series. The vacant 3d orbitals are not available at a lower energy than the occupied 4s.

Keywords (Audience):

Second-Year Undergraduate

Keywords (Domain):

Inorganic Chemistry

Keywords (Subject):

Atomic Properties / Structure

Citing Articles

Citation data is made available by participants in CrossRef's Cited-by Linking service. For a more comprehensive list of citations to this article, users are encouraged to perform a search in SciFinder.

This article has been cited by 14 ACS Journal articles (5 most recent appear below).

Tools

SciFinder Links

SciFinder subscribers:  Click to sign in | Not a SciFinder subscriber? Learn more at www.cas.org

Explore by:


History

  • Received: August 03, 2009

Recommend & Share

  • Share on ACS NetworkACS Network
  • Add to FacebookFacebook
  • Tweet ThisTweet This
  • Add to CiteULikeCiteULike
  • Add to NewsvineNewsvine
  • Digg ThisDigg This
  • Add to DeliciousDelicious

Related Content

See also: