Commentary
Comments on Kinetic, Potential, and Ionization Energies
Abstract
Despite the importance of kinetic energy changes in ionization processes, it is not necessary to explicitly include them when modeling ionization energies: the virial theorem allows one to use potential-energy-only models. A simple potential-energy-only model calculation of the ionization energies of sulfur illustrates the shell structure of this atom.
Keywords (Audience):
Second-Year UndergraduateKeywords (Domain):
Physical ChemistryKeywords (Feature):
CommentaryKeywords (Subject):
Atomic Properties / StructureCiting Articles
Citation data is made available by participants in CrossRef's Cited-by Linking service. For a more comprehensive list of citations to this article, users are encouraged to perform a search in SciFinder.
This article has been cited by 6 ACS Journal articles (5 most recent appear below).

Probing the Orbital Energy of an Electron in an Atom
James L. BillsJournal of Chemical Education2006 83 (3), 473Probing the Orbital Energy of an Electron in an Atom
James L. BillsJournal of Chemical Education2006 83 (3), 473This article answers an appeal for simple theoretical interpretations of atomic properties. A theoretical snapshot of an atom, showing the screened nuclear charge and the electron to be ionized at its radius of zero kinetic energy, enables anyone to ...

The Old Quantum Theory for H2+: Some Chemical Implications
Stephen K. KnudsonJournal of Chemical Education2006 83 (3), 464The Old Quantum Theory for H2+: Some Chemical Implications
Stephen K. KnudsonJournal of Chemical Education2006 83 (3), 464The "old quantum theory" generates eigenvalues dependent entirely on the properties of classical orbits. Application of these old quantum theory ideas to diatomic molecules with one electron, such as H2+, is less successful than the corresponding ...

Response to Lowe's Potential-Energy-Only Models
John P. LoweJournal of Chemical Education2002 79 (4), 430Response to Lowe's Potential-Energy-Only Models
John P. LoweJournal of Chemical Education2002 79 (4), 430Discussion of the suitability of a potential-only model for the successive ionization energies of sulfur for an introductory chemistry course.

Response to Lowe's Potential-Energy-Only Models
Frank Rioux , Roger L. DeKockJournal of Chemical Education2002 79 (4), 429Response to Lowe's Potential-Energy-Only Models
Frank Rioux , Roger L. DeKockJournal of Chemical Education2002 79 (4), 429Discussion of the suitability of a potential-only model for the successive ionization energies of sulfur for an introductory chemistry course.

Response to Potential-Energy-Only Models
Frank Rioux , Roger L. DeKockJournal of Chemical Education2002 79 (1), 29Response to Potential-Energy-Only Models
Frank Rioux , Roger L. DeKockJournal of Chemical Education2002 79 (1), 29Commentary on the suitability of the potential-energy-only (POE) model for explaining successive ionization energies.
Tools
-
Add to Favorites
-
Download Citation
-
Email a Colleague -
Permalink
Order Reprints
Rights & Permissions
Citation Alerts
History
- Received: August 03, 2009
Cart

ACS
Network






