Using Particulate Drawings to Determine and Improve Students' Conceptions of Pure Substances and Mixtures

Michael J. Sanger
Department of Chemistry, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA 50614-0423
J. Chem. Educ., 2000, 77 (6), p 762
DOI: 10.1021/ed077p762
Publication Date (Web): June 1, 2000

Abstract

Students were interviewed to identify the ways in which they classify particulate drawings as pure substances or heterogeneous or homogeneous mixtures. Those who successfully classified the heterogeneous and homogeneous mixtures used a "randomly mixed" definition. Unsuccessful students were more likely to use a "visual" or "sampling" definition. Some students' difficulties in classifying these drawings can be attributed to their applying macroscopic definitions (such as the visual or sampling definitions) to microscopic drawings. An instructional lesson was developed that incorporated the randomly mixed definition, computer-generated visuals at the microscopic level, and physical samples of these substances at the macroscopic level. It was administered to another set of students. Those who received this instruction were more likely to correctly identify particulate drawings of liquids, pure compounds, heterogeneous mixtures, homogeneous mixtures, elements, and compounds than students who received traditional instruction. As a result of the new lesson, students' interpretations of particulate drawings of pure compounds and heterogeneous and homogeneous mixtures appeared to evolve from the assumption that all mixtures are heterogeneous and that pure compounds are homogeneous mixtures to the correct classifications.

Keywords (Audience):

High School / Introductory Chemistry

Keywords (Domain):

Chemical Education Research

Keywords (Feature):

Chemical Education Research

Keywords (Pedagogy):

Misconceptions / Discrepant Events

Keywords (Subject):

Kinetic-Molecular Theory

Citing Articles

View all 17 citing articles

Citation data is made available by participants in CrossRef's Cited-by Linking service. For a more comprehensive list of citations to this article, users are encouraged to perform a search in SciFinder.

This article has been cited by 17 ACS Journal articles (5 most recent appear below).

Tools

SciFinder Links

SciFinder subscribers:  Click to sign in | Not a SciFinder subscriber? Learn more at www.cas.org

Explore by:


History

  • Received: August 03, 2009

Recommend & Share

  • Share on ACS NetworkACS Network
  • Add to FacebookFacebook
  • Tweet ThisTweet This
  • Add to CiteULikeCiteULike
  • Add to NewsvineNewsvine
  • Digg ThisDigg This
  • Add to DeliciousDelicious

Related Content