Cart
Letter
Response to Potential-Energy-Only Models
Hi-Res PDFDepartment of Chemistry, St. John''s University / College of St. Benedict, St. Joseph, MN 56374-2099
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Calvin College, Grand Rapids, MI 49546
J. Chem. Educ., 2002, 79 (1), p 29
DOI: 10.1021/ed079p29.2
Publication Date (Web): January 1, 2002
Abstract
Commentary on the suitability of the potential-energy-only (POE) model for explaining successive ionization energies.
Keywords (Audience):
High School / Introductory ChemistryKeywords (Domain):
Physical ChemistryKeywords (Feature):
LettersKeywords (Subject):
Atomic Properties / StructureView: Hi-Res PDF | PDF w/ Links
Citing Articles
Citation data is made available by participants in CrossRef's Cited-by Linking service. For a more comprehensive list of citations to this article, users are encouraged to perform a search in SciFinder.
This article has been cited by 2 ACS Journal articles (2 most recent appear below).
Response to Potential-Energy-Only Models
John P. LoweJournal of Chemical Education2002 79 (1), 30Response to Potential-Energy-Only Models
John P. LoweJournal of Chemical Education2002 79 (1), 30Commentary on the suitability of the potential-energy-only (POE) model for explaining successive ionization energies.
Response to Potential-Energy-Only Models
Frank Rioux , Roger L. DeKockJournal of Chemical Education2002 79 (1), 29Response to Potential-Energy-Only Models
Frank Rioux , Roger L. DeKockJournal of Chemical Education2002 79 (1), 29Commentary on the suitability of the potential-energy-only (POE) model for explaining successive ionization energies.
Tools
-
Add to Favorites
-
Download Citation
-
Email a Colleague -
Permalink
Order Reprints
Rights & Permissions
Citation Alerts
SciFinder Links
Explore by:
History
- Received: August 03, 2009
ACS
Network
Facebook
Tweet This
CiteULike
Newsvine
Digg This
Delicious
