External Standards or Standard Addition? Selecting and Validating a Method of Standardization

David T. Harvey
Department of Chemistry, DePauw University, Greencastle, IN 46135
J. Chem. Educ., 2002, 79 (5), p 613
DOI: 10.1021/ed079p613
Publication Date (Web): May 1, 2002

Abstract

A common feature of many problem-based laboratories in analytical chemistry is a lengthy independent project involving the analysis of "real-world" samples. Students research the literature, adapting and developing a method suitable for their analyte, sample matrix, and problem scenario. Because these projects encompass the complete analytical process, students must consider issues such as obtaining a representative sample, selecting a method of analysis, developing a suitable standardization, validating results, and implementing appropriate quality assessment/quality control practices. Most textbooks and monographs suitable for an undergraduate course in analytical chemistry, however, provide only limited coverage of these important topics. The need for short laboratory experiments emphasizing important facets of method development, such as selecting a method of standardization, is evident. The experiment reported here, which is suitable for an introductory course in analytical chemistry, illustrates the importance of matrix effects when selecting a method of standardization. Students also learn how a spike recovery is used to validate an analytical method, and obtain a practical experience in the difference between performing an external standardization and a standard addition.

Citing Articles

Citation data is made available by participants in CrossRef's Cited-by Linking service. For a more comprehensive list of citations to this article, users are encouraged to perform a search in SciFinder.

This article has been cited by 3 ACS Journal articles (3 most recent appear below).

  • Cover Image

    Quantitative Analysis of Nail Polish Remover Using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Revisited

    Markus M. Hoffmann , Joshua T. Caccamis , Mark P. Heitz and Kenneth D. Schlecht
    Journal of Chemical Education2008 85 (10), 1421
    • Quantitative Analysis of Nail Polish Remover Using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Revisited

      Markus M. Hoffmann , Joshua T. Caccamis , Mark P. Heitz and Kenneth D. Schlecht
      Journal of Chemical Education2008 85 (10), 1421

      Substantial modifications are presented for a previously described experiment using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to quantitatively determine analytes in commercial nail polish remover. The revised experiment is intended for a second- or ...

  • Cover Image

    Quantitative Comparison of Three Standardization Methods Using a One-Way ANOVA for Multiple Mean Comparisons

    Russell D. Barrows
    Journal of Chemical Education2007 84 (5), 839
    • Quantitative Comparison of Three Standardization Methods Using a One-Way ANOVA for Multiple Mean Comparisons

      Russell D. Barrows
      Journal of Chemical Education2007 84 (5), 839

      The use of an external standard calibration curve, standard addition, and internal standard methods for quantitatively determining the concentration of analytes is important to the study of analytical chemistry, especially in the area of instrumental ...

  • Cover Image

    The Quantitative Determination of Butylated Hydroxytoluene in Chewing Gum Using GC–MS

    A. E. Witter
    Journal of Chemical Education2005 82 (10), 1538
    • The Quantitative Determination of Butylated Hydroxytoluene in Chewing Gum Using GC–MS

      A. E. Witter
      Journal of Chemical Education2005 82 (10), 1538

      An undergraduate experiment for the quantitative determination of the synthetic antioxidant butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) in chewing gum is described. A simple extraction procedure was used that did not require sample derivatization for analysis. Gum ...

Tools

SciFinder Links

SciFinder subscribers:  Click to sign in | Not a SciFinder subscriber? Learn more at www.cas.org

Explore by:


History

  • Received: August 03, 2009

Recommend & Share

  • Share on ACS NetworkACS Network
  • Add to FacebookFacebook
  • Tweet ThisTweet This
  • Add to CiteULikeCiteULike
  • Add to NewsvineNewsvine
  • Digg ThisDigg This
  • Add to DeliciousDelicious

Related Content