College Chemistry and Piaget: An Analysis of Gender Difference, Cognitive Abilities, and Achievement Measures Seventeen Years Apart

Ivan A. Shibley Jr. and Louis M. Milakofsky
Department of Chemistry, Penn State Berks-Lehigh Valley College, Reading, PA 19610
David S. Bender
Department of Educational Psychology, Penn State Berks-Lehigh Valley College, Reading, PA 19610
Henry O. Patterson
Department of Psychology, Penn State Berks-Lehigh Valley College, Reading, PA 19610
J. Chem. Educ., 2003, 80 (5), p 569
DOI: 10.1021/ed080p569
Publication Date (Web): May 1, 2003

Abstract

This study revisits an analysis of gender difference in the cognitive abilities of college chemistry students using scores from "Inventory of Piaget's Developmental Tasks" (IPDT), the Scholastic Assessment Test (SAT), and final grades from an introductory college chemistry course. Comparison of 1998 scores with those from 1981 showed an overall decline on most of the measures and a changing pattern among males and females. Gender differences were found in the IPDT subtests measuring imagery, classification, and proportional reasoning, but not conservation, a pattern that differs from the findings reported 17 years earlier. The generational and gender differences revealed in this study suggest that instructors should be cognizant of, and should periodically assess, the diversity of students' cognitive abilities.

Keywords (Audience):

First-Year Undergraduate / General

Keywords (Domain):

Chemical Education Research

Keywords (Feature):

Chemical Education Research

Keywords (Subject):

Combinatorial Chemistry

Citing Articles

View all 3 citing articles

Citation data is made available by participants in CrossRef's Cited-by Linking service. For a more comprehensive list of citations to this article, users are encouraged to perform a search in SciFinder.

This article has been cited by 3 ACS Journal articles (3 most recent appear below).

  • Cover Image

    Comparing Two Tests of Formal Reasoning in a College Chemistry Context

    Bo Jiang, Xiaoying Xu, Alicia Garcia, and Jennifer E. Lewis
    Journal of Chemical Education2010 87 (12), 1430-1437
    • Comparing Two Tests of Formal Reasoning in a College Chemistry Context

      Bo Jiang, Xiaoying Xu, Alicia Garcia, and Jennifer E. Lewis
      Journal of Chemical Education2010 87 (12), 1430-1437

      The Test of Logical Thinking (TOLT) and the Group Assessment of Logical Thinking (GALT) are two of the instruments most widely used by science educators and researchers to measure students’ formal reasoning abilities. Based on Piaget’s cognitive ...

  • Cover Image

    Logical Reasoning Ability and Student Performance in General Chemistry

    Lillian Bird
    Journal of Chemical Education2010 87 (5), 541-546
    • Logical Reasoning Ability and Student Performance in General Chemistry

      Lillian Bird
      Journal of Chemical Education2010 87 (5), 541-546

      Logical reasoning skills of students enrolled in a general chemistry course at the University of Puerto Rico in Río Piedras were measured using the Group Assessment of Logical Thinking (GALT) test. The results were used to determine the students’ ...

  • Cover Image

    Interdisciplinary, Application-Oriented Tutorials: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation

    Carolyn Herman , Rachel E. Casiday , Roberta K. Deppe , Michelle Gilbertson , William M. Spees , Dewey Holten and Regina F. Frey
    Journal of Chemical Education2005 82 (12), 1871
    • Interdisciplinary, Application-Oriented Tutorials: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation

      Carolyn Herman , Rachel E. Casiday , Roberta K. Deppe , Michelle Gilbertson , William M. Spees , Dewey Holten and Regina F. Frey
      Journal of Chemical Education2005 82 (12), 1871

      At Washington University, fifteen Web-based tutorials were developed for our general chemistry laboratory curriculum. Each tutorial accompanies an experiment, wherein the key concepts of each tutorial complement the key concepts in the corresponding ...

Tools

SciFinder Links

SciFinder subscribers:  Click to sign in | Not a SciFinder subscriber? Learn more at www.cas.org

Explore by:


History

  • Received: August 03, 2009

Recommend & Share

  • Share on ACS NetworkACS Network
  • Add to FacebookFacebook
  • Tweet ThisTweet This
  • Add to CiteULikeCiteULike
  • Add to NewsvineNewsvine
  • Digg ThisDigg This
  • Add to DeliciousDelicious

Related Content