Testing, Testing: Good Teaching Is Difficult; So Is Meaningful Testing

Richard J. Plano
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854
Sidney Toby
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854
J. Chem. Educ., 2004, 81 (2), p 180
DOI: 10.1021/ed081p180
Publication Date (Web): February 1, 2004

Abstract

Multiple-choice questions are usually employed in testing in large science courses for speed, accuracy, and fairness in grading. A significant disadvantage is that students are often presented with an unrealistic choice of answers that may make it possible to work backwards from the answer, rather than forwards from fundamentals. In the real world, answers to numerical problems are rarely displayed in a list, waiting for the correct value to be chosen. We have developed optical scanning forms and software that allow the choice of numerical values, which are then scanned optically and graded with the possibility of partial credit for near-misses or missing factors.

Keywords (Audience):

First-Year Undergraduate / General

Keywords (Feature):

Commentary

Keywords (Pedagogy):

Testing / Assessment

Keywords (Subject):

Learning Theories

Tools

SciFinder Links

SciFinder subscribers:  Click to sign in | Not a SciFinder subscriber? Learn more at www.cas.org

Explore by:


History

  • Received: August 03, 2009

Recommend & Share

  • Share on ACS NetworkACS Network
  • Add to FacebookFacebook
  • Tweet ThisTweet This
  • Add to CiteULikeCiteULike
  • Add to NewsvineNewsvine
  • Digg ThisDigg This
  • Add to DeliciousDelicious

Related Content

See also: