Cart
Letter
Philosophical Confusion in Chemical Education Research: Does Any of This Matter? (the author replies)
Hi-Res PDFDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1569
J. Chem. Educ., 2004, 81 (2), p 195
DOI: 10.1021/ed081p195
Publication Date (Web): February 1, 2004
Abstract
Questions differences in the meaning of constructivism among learners and philosophers.
Keywords (Audience):
High School / Introductory ChemistryKeywords (Domain):
Chemical Education ResearchKeywords (Feature):
LettersKeywords (Pedagogy):
ConstructivismKeywords (Subject):
Learning TheoriesView: Hi-Res PDF | PDF w/ Links
Citing Articles
Citation data is made available by participants in CrossRef's Cited-by Linking service. For a more comprehensive list of citations to this article, users are encouraged to perform a search in SciFinder.
This article has been cited by 1 ACS Journal articles (1 most recent appear below).
Advice to My Intellectual Grandchildren
J. Dudley HerronJournal of Chemical Education2008 85 (1), 24Advice to My Intellectual Grandchildren
J. Dudley HerronJournal of Chemical Education2008 85 (1), 24In his address at the ACS Award for Achievement in Research for the Teaching and Learning of Chemistry Symposium, Herron advised young researchers in chemistry education to a) be true to their own sense of purpose, b) be flexible enough to take advantage ...
Tools
-
Add to Favorites
-
Download Citation
-
Email a Colleague -
Permalink
Order Reprints
Rights & Permissions
Citation Alerts
SciFinder Links
Explore by:
History
- Received: August 03, 2009
ACS
Network
Facebook
Tweet This
CiteULike
Newsvine
Digg This
Delicious
C−(fc)n−C
