Cart
Letter
SI for Chemists: Another Position
Hi-Res PDFAbstract
This author disagrees with two commentaries made regarding the base units kilogram and mole.
Keywords (Audience):
First-Year Undergraduate / GeneralKeywords (Feature):
LettersKeywords (Pedagogy):
Misconceptions / Discrepant EventsKeywords (Subject):
Nomenclature / Units / SymbolsCiting Articles
Citation data is made available by participants in CrossRef's Cited-by Linking service. For a more comprehensive list of citations to this article, users are encouraged to perform a search in SciFinder.
This article has been cited by 3 ACS Journal articles (3 most recent appear below).
The Atomic Mass Unit, the Avogadro Constant, and the Mole: A Way To Understanding
Andrzej BarańskiJournal of Chemical Education2012 89 (1), 97-102The Atomic Mass Unit, the Avogadro Constant, and the Mole: A Way To Understanding
Andrzej BarańskiJournal of Chemical Education2012 89 (1), 97-102Numerous articles have been published that address problems encountered in teaching basic concepts of chemistry such as the atomic mass unit, Avogadro’s number, and the mole. The origin of these problems is found in the concept definitions. If these ...
The Kilogram and the Mole Redux
Paul J. KarolJournal of Chemical Education2005 82 (2), 212The Kilogram and the Mole Redux
Paul J. KarolJournal of Chemical Education2005 82 (2), 212Freeman’s reply to my letter on the kilogram and the mole misses the point, perhaps because I was not sufficiently clear.
Editor's Note
John W. MooreJournal of Chemical Education2005 82 (2), 212Editor's Note
John W. MooreJournal of Chemical Education2005 82 (2), 212Karol concludes that “it is not for any author to tell this Journal what it may or may not undertake”, which is correct.
Full Text HTMLTools
-
Add to Favorites
-
Download Citation
-
Email a Colleague -
Permalink
Order Reprints
Rights & Permissions
Citation Alerts
History
- Received: August 03, 2009
ACS
Network
Facebook
Tweet This
CiteULike
Newsvine
Digg This
Delicious
