Who Is Responsible for a Fraud: An Exercise Examining Research Misconduct and the Obligations of Authorship through Case Studies

Brian K. Niece
Department of Natural Sciences, Assumption College, Worcester, MA 01609-1296
J. Chem. Educ., 2005, 82 (10), p 1521
DOI: 10.1021/ed082p1521
Publication Date (Web): October 1, 2005

Abstract

This exercise uses two recent incidents of research misconduct to introduce students to the issue of ethics in scientific publication. The incidents involve alleged data falsification by individual researchers and the accompanying debate over responsibility among their collaborators. Before class, the students read summaries and answer focus questions about the facts of the two cases. With the guidance of the instructor, the technical details are clarified and the ethics of the cases are debated in a three-hour laboratory session. Finally, the students are asked to evaluate a publication dispute in which no fraud has been alleged, but which nonetheless raises similar questions of authorship. They then submit a written report recommending a resolution.

Keywords:

First-Year Undergraduate / General

Keywords:

History / Philosophy

Keywords:

Teaching with Problems and Case Studies

Keywords:

Collaborative / Cooperative Learning

Keywords:

Ethics

Citing Articles

View all 3 citing articles

Citation data is made available by participants in CrossRef's Cited-by Linking service. For a more comprehensive list of citations to this article, users are encouraged to perform a search in SciFinder.

This article has been cited by 3 ACS Journal articles (3 most recent appear below).

Tools

SciFinder Links

SciFinder subscribers:  Click to sign in | Not a SciFinder subscriber? Learn more at www.cas.org

Explore by:


History

  • Received: August 03, 2009

Recommend & Share

Related Content