Students' Perspectives of the Influence of Web-Enhanced Coursework on Incidences of Cheating

Chelley Vician
School of Business and Economics, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931
Debra D. Charlesworth
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931
Paul Charlesworth
Department of Chemistry, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931
J. Chem. Educ., 2006, 83 (9), p 1368
DOI: 10.1021/ed083p1368
Publication Date (Web): September 1, 2006

Abstract

Online course management systems, such as WebCT and Blackboard, provide instructors and students with new opportunities for academic freedom. With this freedom comes the potential for abuse, which many instructors believe will manifest itself as increased levels of cheating. This paper investigates what students define as cheating, why students cheat, and their perceptions of a course management system's effect on the level of cheating in a first-year chemistry program. Our results suggest that students define cheating primarily as copying or receiving answers from another student. The primary reasons for cheating include lack of motivation, desperation, and the pressure to obtain good grades. Statistical analyses show that although students with a grade-point average in the range of 2.4–3.0 were more likely to cheat on assignments, students do not believe a course management system will have any significant impact on the level of cheating that occurs in a Web-enhanced course.

Keywords:

First-Year Undergraduate / General

Keywords:

Chemical Education Research

Keywords:

Chemical Education Research

Keywords:

Computer-Based Learning

Keywords:

Ethics

Tools

SciFinder Links

SciFinder subscribers:  Click to sign in | Not a SciFinder subscriber? Learn more at www.cas.org

Explore by:


History

  • Received: August 03, 2009

Recommend & Share

Related Content