Calculating Interaction Energies Using First Principle Theories: Consideration of Basis Set Superposition Error and Fragment Relaxation

Karl N. Kirschner
Department of Chemistry, Center for Molecular Design, Hamilton College, Clinton, NY 13323
Jennifer B. Sorensen
Department of Chemistry, Seattle University, Seattle WA 98122
J. Phillip Bowen
Center for Drug Discovery, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC 27402
J. Chem. Educ., 2007, 84 (7), p 1225
DOI: 10.1021/ed084p1225
Publication Date (Web): July 1, 2007

Abstract

The use of computational chemistry tools has become prevalent in a wide variety of research areas. Many researchers are using computational chemistry as an additional tool to explore and gain insight into the problems they are researching. As such it is important to educate future scientists in the capabilities and proper implementation of theoretical tools. In this article we explain a difficult aspect of computational chemistry: calculating accurate interaction energy by correcting for basis set superposition error and fragment relaxation. There are four fundamental methods to calculate an interaction energy using ab initio theory, two of which take into account basis set superposition error. Using the methanol–water complex as a model, we demonstrate how to calculate an interaction energy using these four different methods. Additionally, we perform a comparison of the interaction energies and examine the magnitude of basis set superposition error as a function of basis set size. Fragment relaxation will be discussed in relation to these methods and is an indication of the magnitude of the inductive forces for each monomer.

Keywords (Audience):

Graduate Education / Research

Keywords (Domain):

Physical Chemistry

Keywords (Feature):

Advanced Chemistry Classroom and Laboratory

Keywords (Pedagogy):

Computer-Based Learning

Keywords (Subject):

Computational Chemistry

Citing Articles

View all 4 citing articles

Citation data is made available by participants in CrossRef's Cited-by Linking service. For a more comprehensive list of citations to this article, users are encouraged to perform a search in SciFinder.

This article has been cited by 4 ACS Journal articles (4 most recent appear below).

Tools

SciFinder Links

SciFinder subscribers:  Click to sign in | Not a SciFinder subscriber? Learn more at www.cas.org

Explore by:


History

  • Received: August 03, 2009

Recommend & Share

  • Share on ACS NetworkACS Network
  • Add to FacebookFacebook
  • Tweet ThisTweet This
  • Add to CiteULikeCiteULike
  • Add to NewsvineNewsvine
  • Digg ThisDigg This
  • Add to DeliciousDelicious

Related Content