Response to "The Flyleaf Periodic Table"

Laurence Lavelle
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095
J. Chem. Educ., 2008, 85 (11), p 1491
DOI: 10.1021/ed085p1491.1
Publication Date (Web): November 1, 2008

Abstract

Clark and White wonder why the chemistry education community has not uniformly adopted just one form of the periodic table. Part of the answer is that the majority who are silent on this issue do not want to be attacked by the vocal proponents who insist that lanthanum and actinium must be in the f-block and lutetium and lawrencium must be in the d-block.

Keywords (Audience):

High School / Introductory Chemistry

Keywords (Domain):

Inorganic Chemistry

Keywords (Feature):

Letters

Keywords (Pedagogy):

Communication / Writing

Keywords (Subject):

Periodicity / Periodic Table

Citing Articles

Citation data is made available by participants in CrossRef's Cited-by Linking service. For a more comprehensive list of citations to this article, users are encouraged to perform a search in SciFinder.

This article has been cited by 3 ACS Journal articles (3 most recent appear below).

  • Cover Image

    Response to “Misapplying the Periodic Law”

    Laurence Lavelle
    Journal of Chemical Education2009 86 (10), 1187
    • Response to “Misapplying the Periodic Law”

      Laurence Lavelle
      Journal of Chemical Education2009 86 (10), 1187

      Placing lanthanum and actinium in the f-block is not widely accepted or without problems.

  • Cover Image

    Misapplying the Periodic Law

    William B. Jensen
    Journal of Chemical Education2009 86 (10), 1186
    • Misapplying the Periodic Law

      William B. Jensen
      Journal of Chemical Education2009 86 (10), 1186

      The author comments on a recent recommendation for modifying the placement of La and Ac in the periodic table, feeling that it is based on inconsistent reasoning and contains a serious distortion of the contents of an earlier article dealing with this ...

  • Cover Image

    Lanthanum (La) and Actinium (Ac) Should Remain in the d-block

    Laurence Lavelle
    Journal of Chemical Education2008 85 (11), 1482
    • Lanthanum (La) and Actinium (Ac) Should Remain in the d-block

      Laurence Lavelle
      Journal of Chemical Education2008 85 (11), 1482

      This paper discusses the reasons and implications of placing lanthanum (La) and actinium (Ac) in the f-block and lutetium (Lu) and lawrencium (Lr) in the d-block. The author's conclusion is that placing lanthanum (La) and actinium (Ac) in the f-block ...

Tools

SciFinder Links

SciFinder subscribers:  Click to sign in | Not a SciFinder subscriber? Learn more at www.cas.org

Explore by:


History

  • Received: August 03, 2009

Recommend & Share

  • Share on ACS NetworkACS Network
  • Add to FacebookFacebook
  • Tweet ThisTweet This
  • Add to CiteULikeCiteULike
  • Add to NewsvineNewsvine
  • Digg ThisDigg This
  • Add to DeliciousDelicious

Related Content

See also: