Evaluating Behavior of Oxygen, Nitrate, and Sulfate during Recharge and Quantifying Reduction Rates in a Contaminated Aquifer

Jennifer T. McGuire,* David T. Long, Michael J. Klug, Sheridan K. Haack, and David W. Hyndman
Department of Geological Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
Environ. Sci. Technol., 2002, 36 (12), pp 2693–2700
DOI: 10.1021/es015615q
Publication Date (Web): April 23, 2002
Copyright © 2002 American Chemical Society
*

 Corresponding author phone:  (517) 355-4626; fax:  (517) 355-8787; e-mail:  mcguir20@msu.edu.

,

 Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI 49060.

,

 U.S. Geological Survey, Lansing, MI 49811.

Abstract

This study evaluates the biogeochemical changes that occur when recharge water comes in contact with a reduced aquifer. It specifically addresses (1) which reactions occur in situ, (2) the order in which these reactions will occur if terminal electron acceptors (TEAs) are introduced simultaneously, (3) the rates of these reactions, and (4) the roles of the aqueous and solid-phase portions of the aquifer. Recharge events of waters containing various combinations of O2, NO3, and SO4 were simulated at a shallow sandy aquifer contaminated with waste fuels and chlorinated solvents using modified push−pull tests to quantify rates. In situ rate constants for aerobic respiration (14.4 day -1), denitrification (5.04−7.44 day-1), and sulfate reduction (4.32−6.48 day-1) were estimated. Results show that when introduced together, NO3 and SO4 can be consumed simultaneously at similar rates. To distinguish the role of aqueous phase from that of the solid phase of the aquifer, groundwater was extracted, amended with NO3 and SO4, and monitored over time. Results indicate that neither NO3 nor SO4 was reduced during the course of the aqueous-phase study, suggesting that NO3 and SO4 can behave conservatively in highly reduced water. It is clear that sediments and their associated microbial communities are important in driving redox reactions.

Tools

History

  • Published In Issue June 15, 2002
  • Received for review July 18, 2001
    Revised manuscript received March 21, 2002
    Accepted March 21, 2002

Recommend & Share